SP raises UP schools pairing issue at PDA mahapanchayats
2
Lucknow: The
Samajwadi Party
has planned a multi-pronged strategy to counter pairing or closure of govt schools in UP.
After setting up PDA pathshalas, the SP workers are now keeping the focus on the issue at PDA mahapanchayats being organised by the party cadres across UP in the run-up to 2027 assembly polls.
Akhilesh on Saturday reiterated not to allow govt to shut any school. He had accused the UP govt of "shutting 26,012 schools and opening over 27,000 liquor shops in the state".
The SP chief reiterated that the schools being shut have been meticulously chosen and happen to be the ones that served as polling stations and booths during election and where the BJP has lost polls repeatedly. "The BJP wants to leave the Pichde (Backward classes), Dalits and Alpsankhyak (Minorities) uneducated and hence unable to see through its designs and vote against the party," Akhilesh repeated his charge and urged party functionaries to continue to take up the issue at PDA mahapanchayats.
'The SP will not to allow closure of schools by the BJP govt' was the theme of the PDA mahapanchayat at Bhaju village in Shamli.
"We have organised half a dozen PDA mahapanchayats in the region in the last fortnight and focus of all these meetings was the manner in which the BJP govt was destroying the education system," said Prof Sudhir Panwar, a key speaker at these panchayats.
The issue of closure/pairing of schools was discussed at length at the mega PDA mahapanchayat held in Ayodhya recently. Similar events were organised by SP MLC Rajpal Kashyap.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Friendship Day wishes
,
messages
and
quotes
!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Political Tensions Escalate As Suvendu Adhikari's Convoy Faces Attack In West Bengal's Coochbehar
A significant political confrontation unfolded in West Bengal's Coochbehar district when BJP leader and Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari's convoy was allegedly attacked and vandalized by Trinamool Congress workers during his official visit on Tuesday. The incident has sparked intense blame games between the two major political parties, with each side presenting contrasting narratives about the events. The attack occurred while Adhikari was traveling to the Coochbehar Superintendent of Police's office to submit a formal deputation regarding alleged harassment of BJP workers in the district. This visit was part of his ongoing efforts to address what his party claims are systematic attacks on their supporters and local leaders in the region. Video footage from the scene revealed Adhikari's convoy attempting to navigate through a massive Trinamool Congress protest, where party workers were prominently displaying black flags and chanting aggressive slogans. The confrontation resulted in visible damage to at least two vehicles in the convoy, including a police vehicle and the pilot car, both of which suffered shattered windshields during the altercation. According to BJP leaders present at the scene, a large mob carrying Trinamool party flags and black flags assembled at Khagrabari crossing around 12:35 PM, strategically positioning themselves as Adhikari's convoy approached the area. The protesters reportedly engaged in hostile behavior, shouting "go back Suvendu" slogans and even resorting to throwing shoes at the BJP leader's vehicle, escalating the confrontation beyond mere verbal protests. The BJP has directly linked this incident to a recent attack in Ghoksadanga, where a local BJP MLA's car was vandalized, suggesting a pattern of targeted violence against their party members. In response to these alleged attacks, Adhikari had previously called for a meeting with 65 BJP MLAs and had planned to directly confront the district police chief about the deteriorating law and order situation. The Trinamool Congress, however, has vehemently denied orchestrating any attack, dismissing the entire incident as a "well-scripted drama" by the BJP. The Mamata Banerjee-led party maintains that the confrontation was politically motivated and designed to create controversy rather than being a genuine security threat. Anticipating Adhikari's visit, the Coochbehar District Trinamool Congress had strategically announced a series of counter-programs aimed at challenging the BJP leader's presence in the area. TMC district president Abhijit De Bhowmik had declared that the party would conduct anti-NRC protests across 19 different locations throughout the district on the same day as Adhikari's visit. These planned protests were scheduled to take place in various strategic areas including Baburhat, Ghughumari, Mathabhanga, Sitai, Changrabandha, Tufanganj, and Bhetaguri. The Trinamool Congress had mobilized thousands of supporters and positioned them at all entry points into Coochbehar until 2 PM, creating a tense atmosphere that required significant security deployment. The widespread nature of the TMC protests and their strategic positioning at entry points suggests a coordinated effort to challenge Adhikari's movement within the district. This level of organization indicates the high political stakes involved and the intensity of the rivalry between the two parties in the region. The incident has heightened political tensions in West Bengal, where the BJP and Trinamool Congress have been engaged in an ongoing battle for political supremacy. The attack on Adhikari's convoy represents another escalation in what both parties describe as systematic targeting by their opponents. Local authorities deployed heavy security throughout the district in response to the planned protests and anticipated confrontations. Despite the significant police presence and the severity of the alleged attack, West Bengal Police has not yet issued any official statement regarding the incident or announced any arrests in connection with the convoy attack. The absence of an official police response has raised questions about the handling of the situation and may contribute to further political controversy. Both parties are likely to use this incident to strengthen their respective narratives about political violence and victimization in the state. This confrontation reflects the broader political climate in West Bengal, where tensions between the ruling Trinamool Congress and the opposition BJP continue to manifest in various forms of political conflict and street-level confrontations.
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
Amit Shah Breaks LK Advani's Record To Become Longest-Serving Home Minister
New Delhi: Amit Shah has become the longest-serving Union Minister of Home Affairs of India on Tuesday. With 2,258 days in office since assuming the role on May 30, 2019, Mr Shah has now surpassed the previous record held by senior BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani. Mr Shah's tenure has also overtaken that of Congress stalwart Govind Ballabh Pant, cementing his position as a key pillar in the current National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. Coincidentally, Mr Shah achieved this milestone on August 5, the date he announced the abrogation of Article 370 in Parliament in 2019, ending the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. Before Amit Shah, the leaders who served the longest tenures as Home Minister include Congress leader Govind Ballabh Pant and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Lal Krishna Advani. Previously, BJP stalwart Lal Krishna Advani had held the position for 2,256 days (from March 19, 1998, to May 22, 2004). In comparison, Amit Shah has been serving as Home Minister since May 30, 2019, and by August 4, 2025, he will have completed 2,258 days in office. Govind Ballabh Pant served from January 10, 1955, to March 7, 1961, a total of 6 years and 56 days. Mr Shah became the country's Home Minister on May 30 2019, and remained in the post till June 9 2024. He again became Home Minister on June 10 2024, and is serving. Apart from the Home Ministry, he is also the country's first Cooperation Minister. Apart from this, Amit Shah had also served as Gujarat Home Minister and held the position of BJP National President. The tenure of Amit Shah as Union Home Minister, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has been marked by several transformative developments in India's internal security landscape. The historic abrogation of Article 370 and the withdrawal of Jammu and Kashmir's special status stand out as landmark decisions. The region has since witnessed a dramatic improvement in law and order, with stone pelting incidents virtually eliminated. Across the country, there has been a sharp decline in areas affected by Left-Wing Extremism, Naxalism, and Maoist activities. The peaceful progress in the construction of the Ram Janmabhoomi temple, the introduction of new criminal justice laws, and the successful enactment and rollout of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) further highlight this period. Multiple peace agreements in the North East have brought resolution to several long-standing insurgencies, making this a period of significant consolidation in the country's internal security framework.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What Satya Pal Malik said in his last interview: On Pahalgam, security, and Kashmiri people
Former J&K governor Satya Pal Malik, who passed away on Tuesday after a prolonged spell of hospitalisation, had spoken of alleged security lapses that led to the Pahalgam terror attack in April, in what was purportedly his last interview. Satya Pal Malik spoke in favour of the farmers' protest in 2020-21 when he was governor of Meghalaya, and gave many more interviews against the Modi government after his term ended in 2022.(PTI File) He had called the BJP-led NDA government 'shameless' and 'cowardly', and attacked PM Narendra Modi directly, as he spoke to The Wire. Malik was governor of Jammu and Kashmir when the Pulwama terrorist attack took place in 2019. He was the last to hold that post before the state was turned into union territory, and Ladakh was carved out as a separate UT. He served as governor in Bihar, Meghalaya, Goa and Odisha, too, and later said 'serious intelligence failure and security lapses' led to the Pahalgam attack in which more than 40 paramilitary personnel were killed. Malik had later said his demands for more security had been ignored. The central government repeatedly dismissed his claims. His friction with the government first came to light as he sided with farmers in their 2020-21 protest against three laws that were later withdrawn. He had underlined his Jat identity — the community primarily engaged in farming in northern India — and said he was ready to quit as governor for supporting the protesting farmers. He gave many more interviews against the Modi government after his term as governor of Meghalaya ended in 2022. In an interview earlier this year, he said no lessons had been learnt from Pulwama, 'and that's why Pahalgam took place'. He also called for the resignation of Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha who, under central rule, was responsible for security. Sinha later said at a function that he took 'full responsibility' for the lapses. After the Pahalgam attack in the interview that went online on May 6, Satya Pal Malik spoke against detentions and arrests of local people. He accused the central government of acting along communal lines and stoking a Hindu-Muslim divide. He also spoke about the response of the compassionate Kashmiri people who condemned the attack with candle marches across the UT. PM Modi did not praise the Kashmiri response because of their religious identity, Mailk had alleged. The interview was done before the Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor against terror bases in Pakistan in response to the Pahalgam massacre.
