Jaipur man stabbed to death over old rivalry, accused flaunts knife on Instagram
Officials said Anas, accompanied by Shadab and Aman, arrived in the Paldi Meena area on a motorcycle and attacked Vipin before fleeing the scene under the cover of darkness.After the attack, Anas posted a photo on Instagram flaunting a knife believed to have been used in the crime.However, he deleted the post after some time. Anas's social media profile goes by the name 'Anas Shooter' and he has reportedly been jailed multiple times in the past for assault-related cases.Further investigation into the matter is underway.- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru court orders deletion of 8.8k links on Dharmasthala allegations
Bengaluru: In a sweeping ex-parte order, a city civil court has ordered the immediate takedown of 8,842 online links, including YouTube videos and Instagram posts, allegedly containing serious allegations made by a sanitary worker about burial of bodies in Dharmasthala. The court also issued an ex-parte temporary injunction prohibiting media outlets from publishing or sharing content related to petitioner Harshendra Kumar D, brother of the Dharmadhikari of the Dharmasthala Sri Manjunathaswamy temple. The links to be deleted and deindexed included 4,149 YouTube videos and 3,584 Instagram posts apart from reports published by newspapers and posts made on Reddit. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Monday's order, passed by additional city civil & sessions judge Vijaya Kumar Rai stated: "Defendants, their… representatives or any persons claiming on behalf of them are restrained from publishing, circulating, forwarding, uploading, transmitting, and telecasting any defamatory contents and information against the plaintiff, his family members, institutions run by the family of the plaintiff, and Sri Manjunathaswamy temple, Dharmasthala, either in the digital media including YouTube channels, all social media, or print media of any kind until the next date of hearing. " "The defendants must delete all defamatory content against the plaintiff, family members, associated institutions, and Sri Manjunathaswamy temple, Dharmasthala, across digital and print media until further orders," the order added. The next hearing is scheduled for Aug 5. The plaintiff had requested restraining orders against the defendants from sharing false information during the suit's pendency. Additionally, he sought a mandatory injunction for the removal of specified defamatory content from digital platforms. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo The court acknowledged the need to balance constitutional rights of speech and defamation claims. A new FIR regarding the burial of bodies in Dharmasthala contains no direct allegations against the plaintiff or his family members. However, defendants continue making unsubstantiated claims affecting the reputation of institutions employing 75,000 people and educating 45,000 students, the suit stated. The court determined that false allegations could significantly impact the institutional functioning. While acknowledging the defendants' right to legal recourse, the court emphasised protecting reputations from baseless claims. The interim order also referenced Supreme Court cases of Hammad Ahmed v Abdul Majeed (2019) and Dorab Cawasji Warden v Coomi Sorab Warden (1990), noting that defamatory content had already reached one million people. The court concluded this was an exceptional case warranting ex-parte orders, finding strong prima facie grounds and that the balance of convenience favoured the plaintiff. |
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
6 Indian badminton players out of World University Games over administrative lapse
The Indian badminton squad that won the mixed team bronze medal at the ongoing World University Games in Rhine-Ruhr, Germany has been hit by a controversy over selection after six of the 12 chosen players were barred from participating due to an alleged administrative players were selected and sent to represent India, but only six were allowed to compete as officials failed to submit all names correctly during the managers' meeting on July 16."This is not just mismanagement – it's career sabotage. We demand answers, accountability, and that our voices be heard. We didn't lose a match – we lost our right to even participate," wrote Alisha Khan, one of the players left out, on Instagram."This isn't just a mistake. It's career sabotage by AIU and our team officials. We demand justice."According to sources, BV Rao and Ajit Mohan were the Association of Indian Universities (AIU) officials who attended the meeting. The AIU, which is the nodal body for university-level sports in the country, acknowledged the incident."We have been informed about this and the matter is being investigated," AIU Secretary Dr Pankaj Mittal told PTI while refusing to comment any to a source, the issue was not just an error but stemmed from "systematic irregularities" starting from the selection trials held at Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Bhubaneswar."During the managers' meeting, officials were given a letter listing all 12 players from India. It was their responsibility to read it carefully, check for missing or injured players, and confirm or adjust the names accordingly. However, they took it lightly," the source said."The names of players who hadn't attended trials were there. They came here only to enjoy. In the meeting, they also made a basic mistake. They were supposed to declare which player would play singles, doubles, and mixed, but didn't process it properly."Saneeth Dayanand, Sathish Kumar Karunakaran, Devika Sihag, Tasnim Mir, Varshini Viswanath Sri, and Vaishnavi Khadkekar were the six who competed in the mixed team defeated Macau but lost to Hong Kong in the group stage, then beat the USA in the round of 16 and Malaysia in the quarterfinals before losing to Chinese Taipei in the Kumar, Darshan Pujari, Aditi Bhatt, Abhinash Mohanty, Viraj Kuvale, and Alisha Khan were part of the 12-member squad but did not get to has written to the Badminton Association of India (BAI), demanding a thorough investigation.'This level of mismanagement has caused significant emotional distress to the affected athletes. The players who were left out of the nomination list have been unfairly denied the chance to contribute on the field and be acknowledged as part of this achievement,' he wrote in his email.'To date, there has been no accountability or concrete explanation provided by the managers. A mere apology cannot suffice at this level of international representation, where the careers, dreams, and morale of athletes are at stake.'Through this email, I respectfully urge the concerned authorities to take this matter seriously, conduct a thorough review, and ensure that such avoidable and damaging incidents are never repeated in the future.'Expressing frustration over the incident and apathy of the Indian officials, a player said, "It's a historic achievement that our team won a bronze with just six players, but that certificate and medal will change their lives, not ours, when we were supposed to be there as a team.'The frustrating thing is the officials don't even admit their mistakes or show any remorse," he said on condition of anonymity.'The AIU can at least issue certificates acknowledging all 12 as team members to protect our career prospects and rights.'The selection trials were held in April at KIIT, Bhubaneswar, with over 210 players, including top-tier national and international university athletes, the source alleged that the players who actually topped the trials were left out of the mixed team event despite being part of the squad.'The team manager made the blunder. The officials didn't focus during the meeting, and after the trials they didn't follow the proper process. They just submitted six names, so the other six were not allowed by FISU,' the source said.'...the team travelled all the way, and yet in the manager's meeting they missed out names. I don't know how it is possible to overlook such a basic responsibility.'Players have been misled throughout... officials are giving them false hopes about participation and medals in individual events. If the players are robbed of their chance like this, it is unacceptable.'A player also alleged that officials goofed up on the team jerseys which "didn't carry the country's name properly", leading to fine.- EndsMust Watch advertisement
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Man threatens ex-client with morphed photos
Kolkata: A sacked social media manager was accused of cybercrime, extortion and blackmail after allegedly hacking a 37-year-old female client's Instagram account and demanding a Rs 1 lakh ransom, police said on Monday. The incident occurred in Parnashree when the accused, who was managing the complainant's social media accounts for a year, allegedly began harassing her after his services were terminated on May 8. The accused, along with an associate, called her from multiple unknown phone numbers. On July 17, she discovered that she was locked out of her Instagram account, and the mobile number, password changed without authorisation. "The accused threatened to use AI tools to morph photos of the woman and upload them on porn sites," said an officer. tnn
