Impotent Effusions: The Joint Statement On Gaza

Scoop

6 days ago

Impotence takes various forms. Before the daily massacres, incidents of starvation and dispossession of Palestinians taking place in the Gaza Strip with primeval cruelty, international impotence in the face of actions by the Israeli state has become a mockery of itself. The calls to end the war in Gaza grow in number, even among Israel's allies, but little in substance is being done about it. What matters are statements that speak to a wounded conscience that do little to alter anything on the ground.
One such statement, released on July 21, proved to be yet another one of those flossy effusions made by, as Macbeth might have said, idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The idiots numbered many: 28 international partners, including the foreign ministers of 27 states and, obviously not wanting to miss out, the EU Commissioner for Equality, Preparedness and Crisis Management. All, bar Australia, were from Europe. 'We, the signatories listed below, come together with a simple, urgent message: the war in Gaza must end now.'
The statement goes on to mention the drearily obvious. 'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity.' The 'drip feeding of aid and inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of food and water' deserved condemnation. The deaths of over 800 Palestinians (the numbers are most certainly higher) while seeking aid was 'horrifying'. Even here, the language lacked rage. Israel's 'denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.' The government 'must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law.'
To that end, Israel was called upon to restore the flow of aid and enable the work of the United Nations and humanitarian NGOs to resume in the Strip. This is obviously something that the Netanyahu government is conscious of avoiding, given the systematic program of controlled starvation and deprivation being inflicted.
To add balance, the statement also notes the plight of the Israeli hostages still held by Hamas, their continued detention also something to be condemned. They were to be immediately and unconditionally released with a negotiated ceasefire being the best way of doing so.
The signatories do go so far as to acknowledge the dangers and intentions of Israel's administrative measures that seek 'territorial or demographic change in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The E1 settlement plan announced by Israel's Civil Administration, if implemented, would divide a Palestinian state in two, marking a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution.' The West Bank is also recognised in similar light, with the signatories urging a cessation to the violence taking place against Palestinians and a halt to the building of settlements across the territory 'including East Jerusalem'.
These statements are always interesting for what they omit. No toothy measures to address the maltreatment of Palestinian civilians are stipulated, other than an encouragement of 'a common effort to bring this terrible conflict to an end'. A benign, most unthreatening promise is made: the prospect of taking 'further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political pathway to security and peace for Israelis, Palestinians and the entire region.' This may be code for recognition of a Palestinian state, fanciful given the systematic pulverisation of the people who would inhabit it. The signatory list also omits Germany and, most importantly of all, the United States, Israel's arch guardian and evangelical sponsor.
The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, gave us a flavour of feelings in Washington about the signatories in a post on X. 'How embarrassing for a nation to side [with] a terror group like Hamas & blame a nation whose civilians were massacred for fighting to get hostages released.' In another post that made a vague shot at justifying the unjustifiable, the ambassador absolved Israel in its conduct; only the militant group Hamas deserved exclusive blame. The nations in question had 'put pressure on @Israel instead of savages of Hamas! Gaza suffers for 1 reason: Hamas rejects EVERY proposal. Blaming Israel is irrational.'
The Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar, ever lurking in the twilight of alternative reality, reasoned the statement away, much as relatives would the views of a demented, unloved aunt. 'If Hamas embraces you – you are in the wrong place.' Praise from the group was itself 'proof of the mistake they [the signatory countries] made – part of them out of good intentions and part of them out of an obsession against Israel.'
While the various foreign ministers were flashing their plumage of principles and international humanitarian law, the Israeli Defense Forces had busily commenced an operation on a part of Gaza they have yet to level: Deir al-Balah. Given its importance as a humanitarian hub that still houses UN staff and guesthouses, more slaughter is imminent.
Till Israel assumes the status of a pariah state it seemingly craves to become, its rogue army confined and depleted, its economy humbled and isolated, the industrial appetite for slaughter and dispossession will only continue. The Palestinians will be left to be relics of moral anguish, banished to the footnotes of bloodied history along with many more statements of concern and sheer impotence.