US Ally Responds to Chinese Activity in Disputed Waters
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
South Korea dispatched a coast guard vessel last week to monitor Chinese survey ships operating in a contested part of the Yellow Sea, according to Stanford-affiliated maritime analysis group SeaLight.
Newsweek reached out to the Korean coast guard and Chinese Foreign Ministry by email with requests for comment outside office hours.
Why It Matters
The Provisional Measures Zone (PMZ) was established by a 2001 agreement between China and South Korea to allow joint fishing in the area where their exclusive economic zones overlap. Other activities, including scientific surveys, are not explicitly permitted and generally require consent from the other party.
Analysts have accused Chinese civilian research vessels of suspicious behavior and raised concerns that they gather intelligence—such as on natural resources, undersea cables and local military activities—that could be used by the People's Liberation Army to strengthen China's position in disputed areas.
What To Know
Vessel-tracking data shared by SeaLight showed that four Chinese research vessels entered the PMZ on June 15, reportedly for a "water quality investigation," according to Beijing.
In a ship-tracking illustration shared to X (formerly Twitter) by SeaLight director Ray Powell, a South Korean Coast Guard cutter was seen moving in to monitor the Chinese survey ships. China responded by dispatching one of its own coast guard vessels on June 24 to provide escort.
The research vessels were still in the area as of Saturday, Powell said.
Sailors stand onboard South Korean coast guard ship BADARO as it arrives at port in the Indian city of Chennai on April 2, 2018.
Sailors stand onboard South Korean coast guard ship BADARO as it arrives at port in the Indian city of Chennai on April 2, 2018.
Arun Sankar/AFP via Getty Images
The PMZ has already been a source of tension over the presence of two Chinese aquaculture cages and a former oil rig, roughly the size of a football field, which Beijing installed without consulting Seoul. China has refused to remove the structure from the area.
South Korean officials worry these moves may be part of broader efforts to expand China's presence in the Yellow Sea—mirroring concerns voiced by other neighbors over Beijing's activities in the South China Sea.
Last month, China's decision to declare a "no-sail zone" within the PMZ for its advanced aircraft carrier, the Fujian, also drew a protest from Seoul over restrictions to freedom of navigation.
What People Are Saying
Powell wrote on X: "China's increased unilateral activities in the PMZ carries all the marks of gray zone expansionism, and has clearly drawn the attention of the South Korean government as indicated by Korea Coast Guard deployment."
What's Next
Neither country had issued an official statement regarding the research ships as of the time of publication.
In April, Chinese and South Korean officials held a third dialogue on maritime cooperation, which included discussions about the contentious structures in the PMZ.
They agreed to hold another round of talks and to prevent the issue from impacting the development of bilateral ties, according to the South Korean press release that followed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
18 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Daniel DePetris: South Korea's new president tries to shake up the Korean Peninsula
As the world rightly remains focused on the bloody battlefields of Ukraine and the humanitarian abomination that is Gaza, South Korea's new president is trying to shake up the status quo on the Korean Peninsula, one of the most militarized regions on the planet. Whether he succeeds will depend on North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's willingness to cooperate and the Donald Trump administration's support of the endeavor. Lee Jae Myung, a former factory worker and opposition politician elected in June, came into office promising big things. His campaign, which came at a time when recently impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol was facing charges of instigating a coup, focused on getting South Korea back in order. The country, one of Asia's leading democracies, is still recuperating from months of political turmoil and constitutional crisis after a short-lived usurpation of power by Yoon fizzled courtesy of South Korean troops who held their fire and civilians who came out to protest. Lee ran a campaign centered primarily on competence with a simple but compelling message: He'll fix what his predecessor broke. This included changes to South Korea's foreign policy as well, which Lee argued was far too hawkish and ideological under Yoon. He wasn't wrong; Yoon's presidency, for instance, was a disaster for inter-Korean relations. The disgraced president's North Korea policy leaned on the stick to the total exclusion of the carrot, with communication channels between South and North Korean officials falling apart and the one big security agreement the two adversaries signed in 2018 dying on the table. North Korea's Kim shares the blame too, but there's no question that Yoon's hard-line policies pushed Pyongyang into a corner. Bringing stability back to the Korean Peninsula is a tall order for any South Korean president sitting in the Blue House. Yet for Lee, it's a necessity if the goal is to prevent a further degradation of the situation. It didn't take long for Lee to start putting out feelers to the Kim regime. In contrast to Yoon, who was a fan of preconditions and wouldn't dream of handing the North Koreans anything that could be seen as a concession, the new administration in Seoul is doing what it can unilaterally to improve the odds of detente. On June 12, for example, Lee ordered a stoppage to the propaganda broadcasts that South Korea beams into the North from loudspeakers close to the Demilitarized Zone. The anti-Kim leaflets that defectors and activists often send into the North, which drives the Kim regime crazy, are now viewed by the authorities in Seoul as akin to a hostile act whose rewards aren't worth the trouble. The radio broadcasts that provide the North Korean population with access to legitimate news outside the Kim regime's control have declined by roughly 80%, a decision purportedly executed by South Korea's spy agency. The South Koreans are talking about resuming individual tours to the North as well, which haven't occurred since 2008. And the man in charge of Seoul's inter-Korean file is scheduled to make a stop at the Panmunjom peace village in the inter-Korean border region. Lee's signal to North Korea is easy to grasp: The two nations need a relationship that's on a more solid footing, and he is doing what he can to move it in that direction. Of course, there's only so much the South Korean president can do on his own. After all, it takes two to tango. If the North Koreans don't reciprocate, then Lee's initiative will likely cause him a world of hurt politically as conservative politicians lambaste his administration for being weak on a key foreign policy issue. Unfortunately, at this stage, the Kim regime isn't buying what Lee is selling. Kim Yo Jong, Kim Jong Un's powerful sister who often serves as Pyongyang's spokesperson on critical matters, all but laughed at what the South Koreans are doing. Despite Seoul's 'sincere efforts,' she said, Lee is in reality no different than the other people who came before him. 'We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed,' Kim Yo Jong remarked. What to make of North Korea's refusal to play ball? Some of this can be chalked up to the typical bluster we often hear from North Korean officials, where threats to envelop the South Korean capital in a sea of fire are never far away. Another explanation is that Kim Jong Un doesn't need to do much of anything right now to elicit concessions from the South Koreans — so why give up something when you can get it for free? But I suspect the bigger factor driving Pyongyang's intransigence is strategic. North Korea is far less interested in reconciling with Seoul, let alone Washington, this year than it was during Trump's first term. The global landscape between then and now is light years apart. Back then, the Kim regime was dealing with a stringent United Nations Security Council sanctions regime that limited the North's ability to import and export key goods. Now, while the sanctions regime is still in effect, enforcement is a joke thanks to Russian and Chinese violations. Back then, Pyongyang was relatively isolated; today, it's enjoying a strategic relationship with Moscow that has paid off handsomely for the Kim family. The hard thing about international relations is all the puzzle pieces have to fit for dramatic change to happen. On the Korean Peninsula, however, the puzzle pieces are still all over the table. Daniel DePetris is a fellow at Defense Priorities and a foreign affairs columnist for the Chicago Tribune.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says he's not ‘seeking' summit with Xi
President Trump said that he is not looking for a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, pushing back on reporting that the tariff talks this week could set the groundwork for a meeting with his counterpart. 'The Fake News is reporting that I am SEEKING a 'Summit' with President Xi of China. This is not correct, I am not SEEKING anything!' Trump said on Truth Social. 'I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Talks between the U.S. and China are going on in Stockholm this week with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and his counterparts, which marks the third round of talks between the two nations. The meeting could set up an extended tariff truce, which could lead to a meeting with Trump and Xi later this year, NBC News reported. China and the U.S. are facing an Aug. 12 deadline following agreements announced in May and June that brought down mutually imposed triple-digit tariffs. For other trading partners, Trump has set an Aug. 1 deadline for the resumption of tariffs. 'We have a good relationship with China,' Trump said Monday. 'China's tough.' The president last month said Xi was 'extremely hard to make a deal' with and the two leaders have had a fraught relationship in recent years.
Time Magazine
19 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
How China Could Take Taiwan, Without Firing a Shot
In the past few years, a series of high ranking officials have said that China will invade Taiwan by 2027. U.S. Secretary of State Pete Hegseth offered that view in May, as did the then Taiwanese Foreign Minister Joseph Wu two years ago and the then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley another two years earlier. In the face of such pronouncements, it would be tempting to see that date as a near certainty. But there are many reasons why it may not come to pass, including the worrying reality that China could achieve its designs on Taiwan without firing a shot. Read More: Why China-Taiwan Relations Are Getting So Tense Invasion is a simple word but it refers to complex things. China could try to launch an amphibious invasion, with one of the vast new ships with specialist landing barges spotted in Guangdong earlier this year. But the move would be foolhardy for a largely untested navy. A more likely scenario is a blockade, like the smaller-scale one Beijing imposed after the then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taipei in 2022. China might also set off a vast cyberattack. But even with all of the above Taiwan would not lay down and accept violence. And if China eventually prevailed—and that is a big if—winning the peace would be a far more time consuming and treacherous venture. On top of this, the odds are still that the U.S. would intervene, despite President Donald Trump's capriciousness. The risk of this becoming not just a China-Taiwan fight, but a direct confrontation between the world's two superpowers is real. And frightening, even to the leaders around Xi Jinping in Beijing. The speculation about 2027 has to be viewed from the perspective of who is saying it, and what their motives are. Taiwanese need to feel supported and protected, and so it is understandable that they want the world to take the threat seriously. And the U.S. is embroiled in an epoch-defining struggle against China. Talk of a looming Taiwan invasion is a good rallying point for the rest of the world to line up behind America and face down China before it tries anything. Read More: Why Protecting Taiwan Really Matters to the U.S. The one group of people who have largely remained silent are, unsurprisingly, the Chinese. Xi himself has talked plenty about reunification. But he has publicly avoided any hint of a timeline. For all the scary qualities attributed to China's current leaders, one thing that does characterize them is caution. Their domestic situation is economically challenging, and the Party fears they are one uprising away from being ousted. A major military move that went wrong would be precisely the thing that might precipitate chaos. They will therefore not engage in conflict unless they are certain it will succeed. And that is where the waiting game comes in. From Beijing, rightly or wrongly, they see daily evidence that the West is in decline. There is deep political polarization on almost every issue (except, ironically, on the threat from China). And a similar polarization can be seen in the politics of Taiwan itself, where President William Lai's administration is engaged in recalls against opposition lawmakers, in a move widely seen as trying to gain more power. For China, the hope is that Taiwanese will see the West growing less capable and potent with each passing year. The old adage of blood being thicker than water will mean that China's principal appeal for unity with Taiwanese—cultural commonality—will finally have traction. There is already some evidence that views on the island are moving in this direction. A recent poll by The Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation found while 49% felt America more dependable than China, a significant 43% thought the reverse. The scenario of a slow reunification would have been pure fantasy even a decade ago. Today, it is a little more believable. And in the coming years, who knows, it might become a reality as the Western-led world order gives even more signs of systemic decline. On Taiwan, China just has to win the psychological war. And for that, it needs no landing barges or hi-tech ballistics. It just needs the West to carry on ripping itself apart.
