Israel attacks Houthi ports, Galaxy leader vessel
July 6 (UPI) -- Israeli fighter jets overnight attacked three Yemeni ports under the Houthis' control, hitting infrastructure it accused the Iran-proxy militia of using to receive weapons from Iran.
The Israel Defense Forces announced a few hours after the attack that it detected two missiles launched toward Israel from Yemen and that "interception attempts" were made, the results of which were pending.
The IDF said it struck Houthi targets at the ports of Hudaydah, Ras Issa and As-Salif.
Among the targets was the seized Galaxy Leader vessel, which the Houthis captured, along with its crew, in November 2023 when the Iran-backed group entered the Israel-Hamas war.
The Houthis, Israel alleges, had installed a radar system on the Japanese ship that was used to monitor vessels in international waters.
A power station in Ras Kantib was also targeted, which Israel said was a major electricity supply facility for the Houthis' military.
"The strike was carried out in response to repeated attacks by the Houthi terror regime against the State of Israel, its citizens and civilian infrastructure in the country, including the launching of unmanned aerial vehicles and surface-to-surface missiles toward Israeli territory," the IDF said.
While Israel claimed its attack "destroyed" the Houthi infrastructure, Ameen Hayyan, a spokesman for the militant group, said in a statement that their air defenses "effectively repelled the Israeli aggression and forced a significant portion of its formations to retreat."
Israel and Iran have long been in a proxy war that exploded into the open on Oct. 7, 2023, when Iran-backed Hamas in Gaza launched a surprise bloody assault on Israel.
Israel has responded by devastating the Palestinian enclave, killing tens of thousands of Palestinians.
The overnight Israeli attack, however, comes amid a fragile cease-fire between Israel and Iran and during cease-fire talks between Israel and Hamas.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
U.S. to send more weapons to Ukraine after Trump's remarks
U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Pete Hegseth, U.S. secretary of defense, seen during a dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, not pictured, in the Blue Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, July 7, 2025. During the meeting, Trump said they have to send Ukraine weapons to defend itself against Russia. After the dinner, the Pentagon announced additional U.S. weapons would be sent to Ukraine. Photo by Al Drago/UPI | License Photo July 7 (UPI) -- The United States will send additional weaponry to Ukraine, the Pentagon announced late Monday, hours after President Donald Trump said they "have to" provide Ukraine with more defensive capabilities. Though the specifics of the package were not revealed, the move by the Department of Defense and Trump's comments appear to be an abrupt about-face by the administration, which had announced on Wednesday that it was pausing delivery of some weapons, including air defense systems, to its war-torn ally. "We're going to send more weapons. We have to," Trump told reporters during a dinner at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons, your defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess. Trump, who campaigned heavily on being able to end the Ukraine-Russia war within 24 hours of returning to the White House, has been seeking to secure a cease-fire deal, while his pause of weapons deliveries to Ukraine occurred as the Kremlin was hammering its neighbor with air barrages. The future of U.S. support was uncertain under the Trump administration, as Trump has been critical of sending weaponry to the country and is known for praising Putin. On returning to office on Jan. 20, the administration proclaimed that an end to the war would not see Ukraine return to its old borders, an announcement that was criticized as a capitulation to Russia. Last week when asked about the decision to halt some weaponry to Ukraine, Trump responded by blaming his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, for having "emptied out our whole country" of weapons. "We have to have enough for ourselves," he said. Trump spoke with Russian leader Vladimir Putin over the phone on Thursday, after which the American president remarked he "didn't make any progress" toward securing a potential cease-fire. The next day, Russia bombarded Ukraine with a record number of airstrikes. The statement late Monday from the Pentagon said that at Trump's direction, the Department of Defense is sending "additional defensive weapons to Ukraine so it can defend itself "while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops." "Our framework for POTUS to evaluate military shipments across the globe remains in effect and is integral to our America First defense priorities," it said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Experts Break Down Israel-Hamas Cease-Fire Roadblocks
Demonstrators gather in Tel Aviv calling on the government to end the war in Gaza and for the release Israeli hostages, July 5. Credit - Mostafa Alkharouf - Getty Images Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to the White House Monday comes amid renewed efforts for a cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war. The first round of indirect talks ended without any progress on Sunday night, but it is understood that Qatari and Egyptian mediators will regroup to try again. Netanyahu's in-person meeting with President Donald Trump will be the third this year. Trump said last week that Israel had agreed to conditions for a 60-day cease-fire. He urged Hamas to take the deal for 'the good of the Middle East', warning that 'things will only get worse' if they do not. Before boarding his flight to Washington, D.C., Netanyahu, who recently achieved a cease-fire between Israel and Iran, said he had a 'clear commitment' in mind for his U.S. visit. 'To bring back all the hostages, to eliminate Hamas' rule and capabilities, and to ensure that Gaza no longer poses a threat to the State of Israel,' he said, repeating the stance he's shared many times before. TIME asked experts about the difficulty in procuring a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. Here are the main roadblocks they identified: The war was triggered after the Hamas terror attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing more than 1,200 people and taking around 250 hostages. Since then, Israel has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Israel has been clear in its objective to bring the hostages home and prevent further attacks by 'eliminating Hamas.' There have been some successful hostage-prisoner swaps, but as of June 22, it is understood that 50 hostages are still in captivity. Israel believes 27 of those are dead. Hamas, meanwhile, has vowed not to disband and is demanding a full withdrawal of the Israel Defense Force (IDF) from Gaza. Peter Krause, associate professor of political science at Boston College, says that the opposing desired outcomes from Israel and Hamas make a successful, lasting cease-fire incredibly difficult to achieve. 'From Hamas' perspective, their only remaining bargaining chips are these hostages, and so if they give some or all of them back, they'll want to have assurances that the conflict is going to end,' Krause said. 'From the Netanyahu Administration's perspective, they're very happy to have a pause [in combat] if it gets some of the hostages back, so long as they can then return to trying to degrade or destroy Hamas.' 'An end to the conflict at the moment is not very likely because of those antithetical objectives and the lack of trust between the two sides,' Krause argues. Netanyahu continues to battle with approval ratings amid an ongoing corruption trial back home. He is facing charges of bribery centered around donations worth up to $300,000 from 2006 to 2017. Netanyahu is also accused of fraud and breach of trust. He has denied the allegations. In a recent poll by the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, 49% of Israelis surveyed said they believe Netanyahu is continuing the war in Gaza for his own political considerations. Former Israeli Prime Minister and current Leader of the Opposition Yair Lapid has been consistently critical of Netanyahu since his re-election in 2022. 'From 2015 onward, there has been a decline. I see a man desperately clinging to the position out of fear of his trial and mostly out of fear that the only thing people will remember him for is October 7,' Lapid said. Netanyahu has even faced criticism from within his own cabinet, with far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich scorning his handling of the Israel-Hamas war. '[Netanyahu] has failed to implement the decisions of the political echelon and enforce them on the senior IDF command regarding this critical issue for victory—destroying Hamas and returning the hostages,' Smotrich said on Sunday. 'Netanyahu personally has significant incentive to prolong this conflict to avoid prosecution,' Krause argues, adding that leading up to Oct. 7th, 'the Israeli leader was seen by many as being partially responsible for propping up Hamas.' TIME spoke to Israel's Prime Minister in August 2024, when he said that Israel is 'not merely fighting Hamas,' but is instead 'facing a full-fledged Iranian axis, and we understand that we have to organize ourselves for broader defense.'Krause says that far-right members of Netanyahu's government coalition have also threatened to leave, should he sign certain cease-fire deals. Itamar Ben Gvir, threatened to resign from his position as Security Minister in January as Netanyahu considered cease-fire plans. Dana Stroul, director of research at the Washington Institute, says that Netanyahu has 'boxed himself in' by setting the IDF objective in Gaza as absolute victory, without 'identifying achievable political outcomes on the other side.' Netanyahu's cabinet has failed to articulate its exact intentions post-combat, Stroul says, arguing that matters are complicated further by the fact Netanyahu's government has 'the most extremist right-wing' coalition in Israel's recent history 'The political structure inside Israel, and that coalition, has limited his maneuverability to start the process for what happens on the other side of military operations,' Stroul says, highlighting a lack of a clear vision for a prosperous Gaza. Notably, it was Netanyahu and his administration that pulled away from the second phase of the plan last year, which aimed to establish a permanent cease-fire, secure further Israeli hostage and Palestinian prisoner exchanges, and enact the withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza. 'We are committed to continuing the war after a pause, in order to complete the goal of eliminating Hamas. I'm not willing to give up on that,' Netanyahu said in a television interview. Experts agree that Hamas has played a significant role in restricting the progress of negotiations. Stroul says that the framework of the current cease-fire proposal is very similar to that seen in January during the last cease-fire. But when it comes to mapping out long-term security for Israel, Hamas appears uncooperative. 'Paving the way for a non-Hamas future in Gaza, meaning the leaders of Hamas [would] have to leave Gaza and turn in their weapons, is not something that Hamas appears willing to do right now,' Stroul says. Another key issue that keeps Hamas and Israel divided is how the IDF will operate in the future within Gaza, as well as its relationship with aid distribution. There has been concern from international organizations about hundreds of Palestinians killed while collecting aid from distribution sites set up by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The United Nations has reported that over 600 Palestinians have been killed at these centers since GHF began operations at the end of May. Read More: What to Know About the Deaths at Controversial Gaza Aid Distribution Sites 'I think they [the IDF] would want the same sort of deployment that they had on Jan. 19, when they had the last cease-fire, where Israel [only] gets out of [certain] key areas,' says David Makovsky, a Ziegler distinguished fellow at the Washington Institute. He adds that Israel is focused on the 'Morag Corridor,' a line that runs through southern Gaza. 'Israel's strategy is basically to create a Hamas-free zone in southern Gaza,' he says, noting that this is important to continue Israel's strategy for aid distribution under the U.S. organization, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is backed by Israel. Cutting off Hamas' access to southern Gaza, where three of GHF's four distribution centers are located, would disable the group from accessing and hijacking aid meant for civilians, Makovsky says. Meanwhile, Hamas is now calling for a revert in aid distribution, requesting it be handed over to a U.N.-led initiative. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former Pink Floyd member Roger Waters faces possible prosecution after supporting banned Palestine Action
Former Pink Floyd songwriter Roger Waters could face prosecution after declaring his support for Palestine Action, a terrorist organization that has been banned by Parliament in the U.K. Waters posted a video to X on Saturday, in which the Rock 'N Roll Hall of Fame inductee praised Palestine Action as a "great organization," while also giving kudos to Bob Vylan, who led the Glastonbury Festival crowd in a chant, shouting, "Death, death to the IDF." Waters said in his video that he was in his studio and was working on a piece of brown cardboard with a Sharpie. He then switched the camera from his face to the cardboard. Gop Bill Seeks To Ban And Deport Visa Holders Who Support Hamas Amid Wave Of Antisemitic Violence In America "This says, 'Roger Waters supports Palestine Action, 5th of July 2025. Parliament has been corrupted by agents of a genocidal foreign power. Stand up and be counted. It's Now,'" Waters read. "This is the moment. I am Spartacus." Read On The Fox News App "This is Independence Day, July 5th, 2025," he continued. "I declare my independence from the government of the U.K., who've just designated Palestine Action a terrorist, proscribed terrorist organization." Waters said he supports Palestine Action, calling it a "great organization," and noting that they are "nonviolent" and "absolutely not terrorists in any way." "They're a nonviolent protest organization protesting the presence in the U.K. of Elbit Systems, who are an Israeli arms manufacturing organization," he said. "All right. So, that's that. I support Palestine Action, and I always will because that is the right thing to do." Israel Objects To Foreign Nations Sanctioning Its Officials He then turned his attention to others who support Palestine, like Bob Vylan, a punk-rap duo who led anti-Israel chants at the Glastonbury Festival late last month. "We must support our brothers and sisters in Palestine and support them no matter what," Waters said. "So good on you, what was your name? Vylan. Good on you, Vylan, and the rest of you who are standing up to be counted. I love you." Reuters reported that last week, the U.K. government moved to ban Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws after its activists broke into a Royal Air Force base and damaged two planes in protest of what the organization called Britain's support for Israel. EX-MUMFORD & SONS GUITARIST CRITICIZES MUSIC INDUSTRY FOR SILENCE AFTER BOULDER ANTISEMITIC ATTACK After a parliamentary vote, the government proscribed the group as a terrorist organization, and the ban went into effect at midnight. Under U.K. law, offenses include things like inviting support, expressing approval or displaying symbols of a banned group, and violations are punishable by up to 14 years behind bars and/or a fine. There are currently 81 groups listed under anti-terrorism laws in Britain, including al-Qaeda, ISIS and Hamas. Parliament's Minister of State, Sir David Hanson, said after the amendment's approval that Palestine Action released an "undercover manual" that encourages its members to create small groups and provides guidance about how to conduct activity against private companies and government buildings. Hanson also said the manual explains how to operate covertly and evade arrest. David Marcus: Time To Ban Pro-palestine (Hamas) Groups On Campus, Just Like Kkk "The Government have assessed that Palestine Action promotes and encourages terrorism. This includes glorification of its attacks involving serious property damage on social media," Hanson said. "I have to say that we would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideologies, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action." "By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support and degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name," he added. The Campaign Against Antisemitism, which, according to the group's site, is a "volunteer-led charity dedicated to exposing and countering antisemitism through education and zero-tolerance enforcement of law," shared Waters' video on X shortly after it was posted by the former Pink Floyd member. The group said it reviewed the post, adding that anyone who expresses support for it, contrary to the Terrorism Act 2000, is committing a criminal offense. They also said they stand ready to privately prosecute offenders when authorities fail to act. A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism told Fox News Digital, "The suggestion that the Jewish state wields excessive political influence is a breach of the International Definition of Antisemitism." "Roger Waters has a long history of promoting dangerous conspiratorial tropes," the spokesperson said. "His declaration of support for Palestine Action, now a banned organisation, is his most legally provocative move yet. We expect the police to take action, and if they do not then we will." Reuters contributed to this article source: Former Pink Floyd member Roger Waters faces possible prosecution after supporting banned Palestine Action
