‘Scary' job interview moment caught on video
Then, you log into the virtual meeting room only to be met with a robotic voice instead of the typical friendly manager.
This is the disturbing new reality of job interviews in 2025.
In clips posted to social media, job applicants have shared their experiences with the new technology.
'This was so scary guys,' one post was captioned.
Gathering over 2.5 million views, many were quick to brand the new practice as 'disrespectful' and 'dystopian'.
A woman who appears to be interviewing for a job at international gym chain Club Pilates can be seen dressed in a blazer with her hair and makeup done.
She is then met with the voice of an AI assistant who says, 'Hello, I'm Alex the recruiter at Club Pilates.'
Before she can even reply, the bot continues to speak saying, 'Thank you for taking the time to interview today,' before going on to explain the role.
'I just wanted to interview in real life,' the woman told her viewers.
'AI interviews are so disrespectful and dehumanising. You don't want anything to do with this company if this is how they are treating their candidates,' said one viewer.
'If a company doesn't have the decency to use a real human to interview you that shows exactly who the company is,' agreed another.
'Oh wow. This is so unacceptable,' said a third.
AI software is becoming increasingly popular with employers who are using it as an efficient, cheaper and quicker way to sift through large volumes of applicants.
Sometimes, the technology is used to filter likely-candidates through to a second human-led interview.
Other times, the AI tool may decide whether a candidate moves forward in the hiring process without any human review.
AI interview bots are digital systems powered by artificial intelligence that can ask questions, listen to your answers, analyse your tone, and even your facial expressions.
Big-name companies such as L'Oreal are already implementing this technology to screen thousands of candidates.
Why AI?
Unlike human recruiters, AI bots have the ability to interview 500 people before lunch. It serves as a time and cost-effective way of getting through the interview process.
In theory, AI's supposed bias reduction is meant to provide applicants with a more level playing field where their looks, outfits or even voice are not considered.
Their data-driven decisions take all the hard work out of crunching the numbers, patterns and keywords to determine who's ready for the job.
However, the human touch and personal connection is missing.
What's the big problem with AI?
Recruitment expert and workplace consultant Tammie Ballis told news.com.au that the use of AI in interviews can be 'irresponsible and dangerous'.
'When it comes to human factor you still need instinct, you still need to hear the motivation of the candidate and assess their body language. All the things AI can't do,' she said.
Ms Ballis has been in the industry for 10 years and believes Australians aren't willing to put up with AI interviewing.
She believes that candidates who have their first interview in-person are 'more likely to stay for the duration of the recruitment process'.
Applicants are not only missing out on human connection, they are also being met with a lack of transparency.
Having no idea what criteria the AI bot is using to interview you can mean that key points and creativity are easily lost in translation.
'Because you're not speaking to a real person you can't ask questions. You can't ask for feedback or for them to rephrase the question,' Ms Ballis said.
Not only this, using AI presents the obvious issue of malfunctions.
In clips shared to social media, people have captured the moment their AI interviews took a turn for the worst.
In one video captioned 'I was expecting a real human. They didn't tell me ahead of time they'd use AI,' a man in a shirt and tie can be seen on a video call with an AI bot.
The bot can be heard repeatedly saying 'lets touch base' as it appears to malfunction over and over before becoming incoherent.
Ms Ballis believes recruitment is a strictly 'human job' but that agencies can benefit from the implementation of AI in other ways such as writing job ads, completing tedious manual tasks or screening resumes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
15 hours ago
- News.com.au
Break it Down: AnteoTech targets US with battery joint venture
Stockhead's Break it Down brings you today's leading market news in under 90 seconds. In this episode, host Tylah Tully unpacks AnteoTech (ASX:ADO), which has signed a binding term sheet with US-based Black Diamond Structures to co-develop and commercialise an advanced battery product. The collaboration will combine AnteoTech's cross-linker technology, AnteoX, with BDS's carbon nanotube dispersion technology, known as MOLECULAR REBAR, into an advanced battery product that enables a step change in high silicon lithium-ion battery performance. Watch the video to learn more. While AnteoTech is a Stockhead advertiser, it did not sponsor this content. Originally published as Break it Down: AnteoTech targets US with battery joint venture

News.com.au
16 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Pay us what you owe us': America divided by WNBA T-shirt stunt
WNBA stars have sparked widespread divide by wearing T-shirts with 'pay us what you owe us' emblazed on the front. The blunt message was delivered during warm ups ahead of the WNBA All Star Game on Sunday amid ongoing collective bargaining agreement negotiations between the players and the league. With a late October deadline looming, the players' stance is clear … they want a bigger piece of the pie. It's not the first time WNBA players have demanded more pay, with the talking point rearing its head every year. The latest act however comes off the back of the league agreeing to an 11-year, $AUD3.38 billion TV rights deal with Disney, Amazon Prime Video and NBCUniversal that will come into play from 2026. The WNBA is booming with TV ratings (up 23%), ticket sales (up 26%) and attendance (13%) all surging halfway through the season, according to NPR. But the simple act of wearing a T-shirts demanding to be paid more sparked widespread divide with many believing the players are deserving of greater pay, while countless others pointed to the league's struggling finances which have seen the WNBA never make a profit. What is the WNBA's revenue? That's the big talking point behind all of the ongoing CBA negotiations, the WNBA players are chasing a large share of the league's revenue. Under the current CBA, the players split 9.3 per cent of league revenue. A figure far lesser than the NBA which sees players split between 49 and 51 per cent. The league currently operates off a revenue of $200m, but as is often pointed out when these discussions come to the table … the WNBA has yet to turn a profit since its inception in 1996. The NBA owns nearly 60 per cent of the league with team owners investing millions every year to the WNBA. Despite the recent uptick, the 2024 WNBA season saw the league lose $40 million. The new TV rights deal will inject $200m annually into the league, compared to the current deal which injects roughly $45m per season. With that deal set to come into play from 2026 onwards, WNBA players could soon see their salaries rise and the league turn a profit for the first time. What is the difference in WNBA and NBA salaries? According to Sports Illustrated, WNBA salaries roughly range from a minimum of $USD66,000 to a super maximum contract of around $USD250,000. Despite being the face of the league, Caitlin Clark remains on a rookie contract which will see her earn $78,000 in 2025. Compare those figures to the NBA and the difference is eye-watering. The average NBA salary for the 2024-25 season was projected to be $11,910,649, according to SI. The minimum salary came in at $1,157,153 while the highest-paid player, Stephen Curry, earned a staggering $55.7 million. America divided by players calling for more pay You can almost guarantee that anytime a WNBA player speaks out about wanting to be paid more, social media will be flooded with vitriol It kicked into overdrive on Sunday as images of the players wearing the shirts began to spread across the internet. End Wokeness wrote on X: 'The WNBA loses $50 million every year and has NEVER generated a profit. You deserve $0.00.' Jake Crain added: 'There is no league as tone deaf as the WNBA. 'Pay us what you owe us' shirts when you have to be subsidised is wild.' Fox Sports Radio host Aaron Torres wrote: 'There is no group of more delusional people on planet Earth, than WNBA players.' Of course not everyone was on the side of the corporation with a plethora of fans backing the players in chasing what they're worth. WTH News wrote: 'They're not asking for NBA bags, just their damn slice of the pie. Talent's on the court, money's on the table — time to match the energy. You don't build a league on players and leave them crumbs.' NBA and WNBA beat reporter Andrew Dukowitz wrote: 'The league is built on players, they deserve to get a bigger slice of the pie for the work they all have put in, and as the revenue grows, they should as well. The WNBA players are not asking to be paid dollar for dollar what the NBA players make, from what I understand they just want a fair share of the revenue.' Barstool Sports' Dave Portnoy took his outrage even further, savaging people who don't believe the WNBA players don't deserve a bigger slice. 'I don't know how anybody in the world with a brain, and maybe my brain is just bigger than most, can rationally say women don't deserve more money at this point,' Portnoy said in a video posted to social media. 'Franchise values are exploding. Ticket sales, merch, TV rights all exploding. The players have an opt out in their CBA. Of course they took it. It's all about leverage in re-negotiations and for the 1st time in history of the league players have power. 'The players make virtually nothing while the entire league explodes. Of course they deserve more money.' What will it mean if no agreement is reached? With the first round of talks going almost nowhere, the threat of a potential player lockout remains real. The players union has said it's preparing for a work stoppage when the current CBA expires Oct. 31. WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert said she has 'confidence' a deal can be struck before the Halloween deadline, but also said she's 'not going to put an exact date on it. 'We're in a good place and we're going back and forth,' she said. If no agreement is reached, the players will effectively not turn up to work until a deal is struck which could then have an impact on the upcoming expansion drafts in December. Free agency, which usually starts in late January, and potentially the April draft would also be on hold as long as a deal remains unfinalised.

ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Planning for the robotic future that's already here
While city streets teeming with robots might feel like a scene from a sci-fi movie, service robots are already commonplace in the public spaces of cities like Tokyo and Singapore. But while the technology forges ahead, the regulators that plan the public policies for our cities are being left behind, leaving a potential for a gulf between what populations needs from service robots and what is delivered. Professor Michael Mintrom shares the findings from his study into what policymakers need to consider when preparing for the robots of the future. Guest: Michael Mintrom, Professor of Public Policy at Monash University