
Our border is with Tibet, not China: Arunachal CM Pema Khandu takes swipe at Beijing
Arunachal Pradesh shares a 1,200km border with Tibet, not China, chief minister Pema Khandu declared Wednesday in a surgical swipe at Beijing for repeatedly laying claim to the northeastern state, and also creating what he called a ticking "water bomb" in the form of the world's largest dam project on the Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra in India) river.
"Officially, yes, Tibet is under China now. That can't be ruled out... but originally we shared a border with Tibet," he told PTI in Delhi on his way back from the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday celebration in Dharamshala.
"In Arunachal Pradesh, we share three international boundaries - with Bhutan approximately 150km, with Tibet... and on the eastern side, with Myanmar approximately 550km."
Khandu, in his third consecutive term as CM and credited with strengthening BJP's hold on the state, made the remarks while seeking to "correct" the interviewer the moment he referred to Arunachal Pradesh bordering China.
Pointing to China's "forcible" occupation of Tibet in 1950, Khandu said that if one looked at India's map, "none of the Indian states directly shares borders with China".
The CM's statement comes amid China's intensified bid to stamp its authority on the Dalai Lama's succession. Union minister and fellow Arunachal Pradesh native Kiren Rijiju, said recently that the decision on who should be the Dalai Lama's successor should be solely his and in accordance with established Tibetan Buddhist convention.
No government, including China's communist regime, should have a say, he said.
On the dam China is building on the Yarlung Tsangpo, the Tibetan name for the Brahmaputra, Khandu warned that the project poses an 'existential threat' to Arunachal and its neighbouring northeastern states. He termed it 'a bigger issue' than anything else other than the Chinese 'military threat' hanging over the region.
Khandu said Beijing not being a signatory to any international water treaty meant it 'cannot be trusted'. 'No one knows what they might do... Suppose the dam is built and they suddenly release water, our entire Siang belt would be destroyed. The Adi tribe and similar groups would suffer devastating effects,' he said. The CM said that after discussions with the Union government, Arunachal Pradesh conceived the Siang Upper Multipurpose Project as a bulwark against China's intentions.
'Since we cannot make China see reason, it is better that we focus on our own defence mechanisms and preparations,' he told PTI.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Janaki film row: CBFC limits cuts to 2 in Suresh Gopi's film, producers agree
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on Wednesday said it was willing to revise its earlier demand for 96 cuts in the Malayalam film 'JSK: Janaki v/s State of Kerala' to just two cuts, which the producers of the film agreed to, marking the end of a three-week legal tussle. Suresh Gopi The film, starring Union minister of state and Bharatiya Janata Party leader Suresh Gopi and Anupama Parameshwaran in the lead roles, tells the story of a rape survivor fighting for justice. CBFC had objected to the name 'Janaki' in the title as well as the protagonist's name, claiming it refers to the Hindu goddess and that its usage in a film about sexual violence would offend religious sentiments. During the hearing of the case in the Kerala high court, CBFC counsel said that it was ready to grant the producers a censor certificate if they made two changes — one, the film's title be changed to 'Janaki V v/s state of Kerala' indicating the character's initials and two, the name Janaki be muted in two scenes in the film. The producers agreed to the changes during the hearing. Advocate Haris Beeran, appearing for the producers, told reporters that his client agreed to the changes suggested by CBFC as they were facing mounting financial losses due to the delay in the release of the film. 'This is a case that we can win 100% on appeal. But, the producers have taken a commercial call. They are facing financial losses due to the delay in the film's release. They also have an OTT deal that they have to adhere to. That's why, they have agreed to make the changes. The high court has ordered CBFC to grant the censor certificate within three days of re-submission of the application. So hopefully, the film can release by next Friday,' Beeran told reporters. The Censor Board had earlier refused to grant certification unless the title was changed, citing potential religious sensitivity, as 'Janaki' is also an alternative name for the Hindu goddess Sita. Pravin Narayanan, the film's director, said that they would attempt to make the changes and re-submit the application for censor certificate within the next two days. 'We have reached an amicable solution. As an artiste, it's difficult to make such changes, but somewhere, we will have to compromise,' he said.


Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Ratna Bhandar inventory in Aug
Bhubaneswar: A day after the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) completed repair and conservation work of the sacred Ratna Bhandar (treasury) of Shree Jagannath Temple in Puri, Odisha Law Minister Prithiviraj Harichandan on Tuesday said the long-awaited inventory of valuables stored in the treasury may begin in August with the assistance of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Responding to a question on the next step after ASI's conservation efforts, the minister said, 'The inventory of the valuables in the Ratna Bhandar could be undertaken any time in August. The State government will soon write to the RBI, requesting it to deploy experts who have experience in auditing temple ornaments and treasures, such as at the Somnath Temple.' The minister informed that the inner chamber of the Ratna Bhandar was last opened in 1978 — 46 years ago — when the inventory of gold ornaments and other valuables was conducted. Since then, there has been a long-standing demand from the people of Odisha for a fresh inventory. Fulfilling a major poll promise, the BJP-led State government recently constituted a high-level committee headed by retired Orissa High Court judge Justice Biswanath Rath to oversee the inventorisation of jewellery and other treasures stored in the Ratna Bhandar. Harichandan said the State already possesses a record of the items listed in 1978 and that the upcoming stock-taking exercise will involve a thorough verification. 'We will match the current stock with the 1978 inventory to ensure accuracy. Experienced goldsmiths will be involved, and the process will include digital photography and cataloguing with details such as weight and make,' he said. According to the 1978 inventory report, the Ratna Bhandar contains around 128 kg of gold and over 200 kg of silver, along with several ornaments that have gold coatings. The minister also revealed that the State government plans to prepare a new set of gold and silver ornaments for the Trinity — Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra, and Devi Subhadra — for the Suna Besha ritual.


Scroll.in
20 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
2020 Delhi riots: Accused should be in jail till they are acquitted or convicted, police tell HC
The Delhi Police on Wednesday urged the High Court to deny bail to those accused of being part of a 'larger conspiracy' linked to the 2020 Delhi riots, claiming that they tried to defame the country in an orchestrated manner, PTI reported. 'If you are doing something against your nation then you better be in jail till you are acquitted or convicted,' Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the police, told a bench of Justices Naveen Chawla and Shalinder Kaur, according to the agency. Mehta told the court that this was not an ordinary case, where those accused of a crime could argue that they should be released on bail since they had been incarcerated for a long time. 'In cases involving anti-national activities, long incarceration is not a factor,' the solicitor general was quoted as saying by The Indian Express. 'This is an attack on the sovereignty of the country. By attacking the National Capital, it would have an effect on the entire country. Mehta alleged that the accused persons tried to promote communal narratives by forming a WhatsApp group named 'Muslim students of JNU" [Jawaharlal Nehru University'. He claimed that former JNU students Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid, by doing so, 'broke the secular fabric' of the university, PTI reported. The solicitor general referred to an allegedly inflammatory speech that Imam made during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. 'The intention was to cause national embarrassment at a global level,' Mehta alleged, according to PTI. 'February 24, 2020 was the date when the US President was to visit. Sharjeel Imam delivers a speech four weeks before this clearly indicating the timeline for execution of conspiracy. He says we have four weeks.' In his speeches, Imam had purportedly asked the protestors to 'cut off Assam from India' by occupying the 'Muslim-dominated Chicken's Neck'. The comment was widely perceived as secessionist, but Imam had later claimed that he had called for peaceful protests to 'block roads going to Assam' – 'basically a call for chakka jam'. The High Court bench of Justices Naveen Chawla and Shalinder Kaur on Wednesday reserved its judgement on the bail petitions of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, Mohd Saleem Khan, Shifa ur Rehman, Athar Khan and Khalid Saifi. Another bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar reserved the bail petition of Tasleem Ahmed. The bench of Justices Chawla and Kaur will hear the petition of a ninth accused person, Shadab Ahmed, on Thursday. Clashes had broken out in North East Delhi in February 2020 between supporters of the Citizenship Amendment Act and those opposing it. The violence left 53 dead and hundreds injured. The Delhi Police has claimed that the violence was part of a larger conspiracy to defame the Narendra Modi government and was plotted by those who organised the protests against the contentious citizenship law. Imam, however, told the court in December that he did not call for violence in any of the speeches he gave during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act.