Future of local bus routes in Dumfries and Galloway revealed
Stagecoach announced last week it would withdraw almost all its services in the region because they were "no longer commericially viable". Councils have a duty to provide public transport services to meet needs that cannot be provided on a commercial basis.
A spokesperson for the council said the 45 routes will be operated byTelford's Coaches Limited; Brownriggs (Thornhill) LLP; J McCulloch & Son; McCalls Coaches Ltd; and Houston's Mini Coaches. DGC Buses - the council's in-house bus service provider - will operate services that did not receive any "compliant bids" through the tender process. However it has not revealed which routes the operators will take on, which routes have been scrapped and which routes have changed. BBC Scotland News has approached Dumfries and Galloway Council (DGC) for clarification. Colin Smyth, the Scottish Labour MSP for the South of Scotland, said the council's statement raised more questions than it answered. "Thousands of passengers still have no idea who, if anyone, will be running their bus come August - and over 130 local workers are being kept in the dark about their futures," he added. The MSP called for the council to explore the creation of a municipal bus company, similar to Lothian Buses, to secure long-term resilience.
The current contracts with Stagecoch will end on August 6 - when the operator will drop to running two services in the region - the X74 Dumfries to Glasgow route and the 79 service from Dumfries to Carlisle.DGC said most of the locally subsidised bus services operated under contract with regional transport partnership SWestrans will continue with the same frequency and timetable.
The 12 commercial routes that are still to find operators are: 74 Dumfries to Moffat81 Dumfries to Lockerbie (some services only)236 Dumfries to Thornhill (Sunday only)246 Dumfries to Cumnock501 Dumfries to Castle Douglas (some services only)D1 Locharbriggs to Dumfries Town CentreD10 Dumfries Burns Statue to Dumfries Great King StD10B Lochside to Dumfries via Lincluden/Newbridge (evening and Sunday services only)D12 Lincluden to Dumfries Town CentreD2 Heathhall to Dumfries Town CentreD3 Georgetown to Dumfries Town CentreD4 Lochvale to Dumfries Town Centre"Although SWestrans is responsible for the delivery of the local subsidised bus network, neither it nor Dumfries and Galloway Council is responsible for the operation or allocation of commercial routes," the council said.The majority of these services were run by Stagecoach.
Council leader Stephen Thomson said: "We've been able to award long-term contracts that will ensure services can continue and with greater efficiency and reliability, providing communities in Dumfries and Galloway with a well-connected local bus network."The leader added that the new contract agreements will ensure operators invest in their fleets of vehicles "to offer the highest standard possible of service to passengers".Work is underway to promote the updated passenger information across the region in preparation for the launch of the new network in early August.Updated timetable information will be available on the Dumfries and Galloway Council website from mid July or by contacting Traveline Scotland on 0141 465 1878.
School transport
Dumfries and Galloway Council said it has also approved recommendations to award contracts to run home-to-school transport services for the region.The authority has a statutory responsibility to provide the service, but current contracts are due to expire at the end of this academic year.The council said details would be confirmed at the end of that process, in early July. "The council is committed to ensuring all school transport routes are operational for the start of the school year in August," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
Telling colleague to ‘shut up' could break the law, tribunal rules
Telling a colleague to 'shut up' in front of others at work could break employment laws, an employment tribunal has ruled. Despite a claim that the phrase is 'common parlance', a judge ruled that using it would 'undermine' whoever it is directed at. The conclusion came in the case of a company director who successfully sued after his boss tried to silence him during an online meeting. David Ashe won almost £15,000 in compensation after complaining about the 'unacceptable' behaviour of his managing director, Roger Topping, in telling him to shut up. Supporting his claim of constructive unfair dismissal, Judge Lucy Wiseman said: 'The tribunal was satisfied that Mr Topping did not have reasonable and proper cause to tell a fellow director to shut up during a staff meeting and in front of other, more junior, staff. 'We say that because such conduct would undermine [Mr Ashe] in front of those staff.' The tribunal in Glasgow was told that Ashe worked as a director of operations at Claims Equilibrium Club, an insurance claims assistance service for insurance brokers and their clients, from April 2022. Topping had headhunted him as a partner and successor to run the business, the hearing was told. He had employed Ashe on the basis that he would 'sell 50 per cent of the equity in the business to [Ashe] within five years for a set sum', the tribunal was told. However, cracks in the relationship between the two developed over Ashe's first year as a director. One of the problems was that he felt he wasn't being given enough work, while Topping thought he wasn't finding enough work. In June last year the two had a meeting in which Topping said he 'could not see the current relationship improving and therefore there was no prospect of the originally planned partnership of 50/50 working'. He offered to sell Ashe the entire company but Ashe did not want to do this. The day after this meeting, Ashe emailed Topping telling him that he disagreed that he was the cause of the unresolved issues between the two of them. The tribunal was told: '[Ashe] also made reference to the fortnightly staff meetings, held on Teams, where Mr Topping had shouted at him to shut up which was unacceptable.' He added that he 'felt that it had [not been] appropriate for Mr Topping to shout at him during team meetings'. • WhatsApp work 'banter' not private, tribunal rules Ashe raised a grievance with Topping, who consulted an HR specialist. In a meeting with this specialist the same month, the tribunal was told: 'Mr Topping did not deny telling [Mr Ashe] to shut up during a staff meeting on Teams, but this had arisen because [Mr Ashe] was continually interrupting others and not allowing them to speak.' The HR specialist partially upheld Ashe's grievance, finding that Topping had displayed 'general hostility' in telling him to shut up. Ashe went on sick leave after this, and resigned in September. He said Topping had 'taken no proactive steps to resolve matters with him' despite parts of his grievance being upheld, and he had been left with 'no option but to resign in response to the breach of contract'. Topping told the tribunal that it was Ashe who had broken the contract by not being a good employee. 'Mr Topping considered the allegations of bullying were unproven and false,' the tribunal was told. 'He acknowledged that perhaps he had said shut up but there had been no malice in this and it was simply common parlance.' • Boss who said he could not live on £250,000 loses tribunal claim The judge disagreed. Ruling in Ashe's favour, she said of the managing director's behaviour: '[We] considered whether the employer's conduct as a whole was such that its effect, judged reasonably and sensibly, was such that the employee cannot be expected to put up with it. 'The tribunal was satisfied that Mr Topping's conduct was such that, judged reasonably and sensibly, [Mr Ashe] could not be expected to put up with it. 'The tribunal reached that conclusion because of the cumulative effect of … the withdrawal of the share purchase opportunity; the breakdown in the relationship … and Mr Topping undermining the claimant in front of other staff by telling him to shut up during a staff meeting.' This incident was considered, alongside Topping's other actions, to be a 'breach of the implied term of trust and confidence' and therefore a 'fundamental breach of contract entitling the claimant to resign'. The tribunal found that both men were responsible for the breakdown in their relationship, and therefore awarded Ashe half of the award it would have otherwise given him. Claims Equilibrium Club was ordered to pay him £14,568 in compensation.
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Martindale 'happy' but targets striker for Livi
Livingston manager David Martindale is pleased with his transfer business but still wants to add another striker before the close of the window. (Daily Record), externalRead Saturday's Scottish Gossip in full.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How OnlyFans killed off the strip club: Number of venues falls to lowest level in over a decade
Strip clubs are dying out – and experts blame OnlyFans. Only 103 premises still exist in England, Scotland and Wales, figures suggest. This is down from around 155 in 2022. Nick Ede, one of the UK's most esteemed experts on popular culture, told MailOnline: 'OnlyFans has totally killed the strip club. 'People are now tipping sex workers and strippers using their phones, rather than slipping a 10 pound note in a thong. 'It's also a clear generational thing, too. Strip clubs were seen as sleazy venues, now they are seen as old and out of touch with today's lifestyles.' The statistics, obtained by MailOnline under Freedom of Information laws, also show how standalone sex shops are vanishing. Just 42 now exist, compared to 104 in 2010. Mr Ede added: 'Sex shops will soon die a death because people purchase them from online shops which package and post them discreetly.' MailOnline sent FOI requests to all 350 local authorities responsible for issuing sexual establishment licences in England, Scotland and Wales. Under current laws, all sex premises – including pole dancing venues and standalone shops selling sex toys and paraphernalia – have to apply for new operating licences (SEV) each year. Applications can cost businesses up to £10,000, although fees vary wildly across the country. Campaigners fighting to keep the sex worker industry alive say the rules have given council bosses 'much greater powers over whether to keep them open'. In total, 184 councils have taken no SEV applications at all since 2010 – when the new rules came into play. The amendment was proposed and passed after a series of objections from local councils to the formation of new or operation of existing strip clubs on the grounds of the impact on the community. Edinburgh, Swansea and Exeter councils have even introduced 'nil cap' orders, which effectively ban new sex venues from opening. Only 50 strip clubs that were licensed in 2010 remain open today. Birmingham is the strip club capital of the country, with 21 active establishments. Liverpool (10), Newcastle Upon Tyne (10) and Manchester (8) follow behind. Meanwhile, Cardiff, Birmingham and Wolverhampton all lay claim to having the most sex shops, with four apiece. Experts believe the erosion of strip clubs and sex shops reflects the overall trend of British nightlife. Around a quarter of UK adults are thought to be teetotal, jumping to over a third of Gen Z, meaning less punters are likely to cross the strip club thresholds after a night out on the town. A 2021 YouGov poll suggests that only a quarter of men would support banning strip clubs outright, with the figure reaching over 40 per cent for women. And earlier research from the pollster shows that the majority of people in Britain think it is acceptable for a person in a relationship to go to a strip club on a stag or hen do. But the advent of OnlyFans has reshaped how some young people engage with sexual content, some experts believe. Data from Ipsos Iris show that in January, 4.4 per cent of the British population – or 2.2m people – visited the site. This was up 64 per cent in a year. Audrey Jones, a campaigner for DecrimNow – the unofficial union for sex workers, disagreed with Mr Ede. She said: 'I don't think OnlyFans has made an impact at all. 'This trend (the decline of strip clubs) was happening way before OnlyFans was a thing. 'They work in different markets and big groups of lads on stag dos... don't go on OnlyFans.' Proliferation of free online porn and cheap subscriptions to creators on OnlyFans does present a cheaper alternative to real life encounters in strip clubs. Ms Jones told MailOnline: 'Strippers are some of the first to talk about when a recession is coming because their customer base is the first thing to go.' Venues don't require SEV licenses if sexual entertainment takes place less than once a month. Sixteen councils didn't respond to our FOI request. Others refused to supply figures. High Street stores such as Anne Summers and Agent Provocateur weren't included in the analysis because they don't need licences to operate.
