logo
France is ditching bank holidays and so should we

France is ditching bank holidays and so should we

Telegraph2 days ago
Our Gallic neighbours have instructed us in the ways of many things. I'm thinking particularly of white Burgundy, champagne, béchamel sauce, mistresses and surrendering.
More recently the UK's political leadership has taken on President Macron's habit of hugging everyone. Thus Sir Keir Starmer can't see the likes of President Zelensky across a crowded room without clambering over a sea of suits to give the guy a hug. And last week Sir Keir was with Europe's great hugger-in-chief and thus enveloping 47-year-old Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric in his arms.
But here's another thing: as bold as Dijon mustard, as sensible as the line judges at Roland-Garros and as perky as garlic, it has just been announced by the French Prime Minister François Bayrou. He's ditching two bank holidays.
'The entire nation has to work more,' he said this week, adding, 'so that the activity of the country as a whole increases and so that France's situation improves.'
Bayrou's plan comes as he attempts to lower the country's spiralling public deficit and debt and, in next year's budget, save €43.8 billion. His plan is, he says, the 'last stop before the cliff edge'.
And sounding more like Idi Amin, the Ugandan president of the 1970s, than a centrist European politician of the 2020s, he is insistent that, 'everyone will have to contribute to the effort'.
The immediate practical problem, aside from the cacophony that is the sound of 68 million grumbling frogs, is which days to scrap. France has 11 national holidays and Bayrou has suggested scrapping Easter Monday (fair enough in a nation of croissant-munching atheists – only 5 per cent attend Mass on Sundays) and May 8, which is Victory Day. The latter should logically be renamed Surrender Day, occurs on June 22 (the date in 1940 of the Armistice) and on which the nation should definitely be put to work.
The plan may sound harsh, particularly for a people famed for their love of leisure – most people take a month off in summer, they must work a maximum of 35 hours a week, lunch for a minimum of an hour and can dwell over a coffee long after it has gone cold. And indeed politicians, left and right, were spitting out their vins de table in rages this week.
'[It's] a direct attack on our history, our roots and on working France,' said Jordan Bardella of the far-Right National Rally. Fabien Roussel of the French Communist party described it as 'an organised hold-up'.
But hang on, it's actually a fabulous idea. And one that we should embrace as firmly as a Starmer/Macron hug.
The UK has eight bank holidays. There's Christmas Day, Boxing Day, New Year's Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday and then a load of early summer ones that charge at you out of the blue normally when a heatwave has come and gone and it starts to rain and a random one at the end of August that enables people at the tail end of the Notting Hill Carnival to smoke cannabis in the street without impunity before a few stabbings at dusk.
And they are now – in concept and practice – out of date and a contributor to national decline. And, before you squeal about the idea of my tearing apart a cornerstone of Britain's cultural history, they are relatively new. It was 1871 that an Act of Parliament was passed officially designating a number of days that workers should have off and on which banks would be closed. The man behind the Bank Holidays Act was the liberal reforming MP Sir John Lubbock who believed that religious holidays should be formalised. There was otherwise no way to ensure that a factory worker wasn't forced to toil, in gruelling conditions, for six days a week.
The 'St Lubbock's Days', as they were called for a while, reflected the shift in Victorian England to more formalised leisure. But that was then. More than 150 years later and Britain dwells in a state of lugubrious idleness at which Lubbock himself would raise an eyebrow.
Indeed post-Covid, most of the UK enjoys a four-day jolly every weekend. Offices are lucky if workers deign to join them Tuesday to Thursday and they can only tempt them in by offering free cereal, table tennis, comfy sofas in so many break-out areas, a drinks trolley on a Thursday afternoon (non-alcs catered for so as not to offend the Gen Zs) and a promise not to send the poor lambs too many emails on a Monday or Friday. Because the end of the week is firmly the beginning of the weekend and Monday is a recovery day and who wants to get on a horrid train when you can Zoom from home in your jim-jams.
Our work patterns are also considerably less Victorian. Almost 7.5 million people now freelance – full- or part-time – and bank holidays lurk around the corner for them as pestilent days of childcare and lost revenue.
Each bank holiday costs the nation some £2.4 billion in economic output so while politicians publicly support occasional additions such as that for King Charles's coronation in 2023, privately they shudder at the damage it does to the nation's books.
And they are patently not 'bank' holidays of course, because nowadays you can bank online 24 hours a day. Furthermore, most high street banks are now upscale bars and people only wander into the remaining banks by mistake when they're drunk.
Bank holidays are no longer precious, quiet days, and they are conspicuously not religious. The only notable religion featuring being that of unabashed consumerism.
That France is enacting this policy while, according to the Office for National Statistics, actually being more productive than us should shame us into working more. So let's scrap two of them, the random May one and the August one, the extra days worked can merit a proportionate pay rise and hospitality need not grumble because, with more money in one's pocket, we can all afford to nip to the pub after work.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour says Reform UK ‘trying to divide communities' ahead of Farage speech on crime
Labour says Reform UK ‘trying to divide communities' ahead of Farage speech on crime

The Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Labour says Reform UK ‘trying to divide communities' ahead of Farage speech on crime

Update: Date: 2025-07-21T08:19:51.000Z Title: Farage's plans to reform criminal justice system criticised ahead of speech Content: Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of UK politics. Nigel Farage is to lay out plans that he claims would end all early release schemes for sex offenders and serious violent offenders if he were to become prime minister. In a speech in London later today, the Reform UK leader will also reportedly promise to build 30,000 new prison places to tackle the overcrowding crisis, appoint 30,000 more police officers within five years and deport 10,400 foreign offenders currently in British jails. He has not said how these policies will be funded and will likely face questions on how he would negotiate return agreements for foreign offenders. Some of his promises – like sending some of the most serious criminals to overseas jails, including in El Salavdor – will also likely face serious legal obstacles if they were ever realised. Farage, whose Reform party is leading many polls, was quoted by the Daily Telegraph as having said: Reform UK will be the toughest party on law and order this country has ever seen. We will cut crime in half. We will take back control of our streets, we will take back control of our courts and prisons. We are expecting more details on Reform's plans at around 11am. Reform's attempt to woo voters with a tough on crime message stands in contrast to the proposals recently suggested by Sir Brian Leveson, a former senior judge who was asked by the Lord Chancellor to come up with ways to reduce the backlog of cases in the criminal courts. Recommendations in the report included increased use of out-of-court resolutions, greater use of rehabilitation programmes and health intervention programmes and increasing the maximum reduction for entering a guilty plea at the first opportunity from 33% to 40%. Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said that Reform is not serious about implementing real changes to the criminal justice system as the party 'voted to try to block measures to crack down on knife crime, antisocial behaviour, shop theft and child sexual abuse'. 'They should focus more on practical solutions to support our police, combat crime, deliver justice for victims of crime, rather than chasing headlines, spouting slogans and trying to divide communities,' she added. Here is the agenda for the day. 09.45am: Sir Jon Cunliffe, Independent Water Commission chair, to give speech. 11am: Nigel Farage to make a speech in London on the criminal justice system. 13:00pm: Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign press conference in Sheffield. 14.30pm: Keir Starmer to appear at the Liaison Committee.

Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with
Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with

The shock value of the Lionesses' decision against taking the knee was that they still laboured, five years on, under a misapprehension it was some vital instrument in the fight against racism. Watching them stage this ritual before their games in Switzerland has brought echoes of that overwrought summer of 2020, when the Black Lives Matter movement unleashed such chaos that genuine action took a back seat to superficial slogans and designer hashtags. Kneeling felt tokenistic even then, a tick-box exercise for football to show how much it cared, an easy PR win while avoiding any commitment to deeper change. In 2025, it has become so perfunctory that the England women's team are forced to admit it serves no useful purpose. 'Is the message as strong as it used to be?' asked Lucy Bronze. 'Is the message really hitting hard?' To those questions, Alex Greenwood provided some form of answer. 'There's maybe a feeling,' she said, 'that it has lost its power.' The reality that these players dared not acknowledge was that it had never had any power in the first place. This was not some 21st-century equivalent of the Black Power salute, when Tommie Smith and John Carlos stood atop a podium at the Mexico City Olympics and raised black-gloved fists to the sky at grave personal cost to themselves. This was an empty, performative piece of gesture politics. The wonder, truly, is that it has gone on so long. Even when Gareth Southgate's England included it in their pre-match repertoire in 2021, many fans loudly booed in protest, rejecting both the symbolism of a fad that had originated in the United States and the blurring of political agitation with the escapism of sport. The pro-knee brigade's argument, of course, was that this crusade had less to do with politics than an assertion of universal human rights. But this seemed naive at best when you examined the other principles of BLM leaders who portrayed themselves as 'trained Marxists': defunding the police, for example, or dismantling the nuclear family. Perhaps the most compelling case against kneeling was made by black players who hated it. Wilfried Zaha described it as 'degrading', explaining that his parents had taught him to be proud to be black, that they had urged him to stand tall. 'I think the meaning behind the whole thing is becoming something that we just do now,' he said. 'That's not enough. I'm not going to take the knee.' It was four-and-a-half years ago that he delivered this impassioned statement, so it seems peculiar that the Lionesses are only now reaching the same conclusion. The original rationale was that taking the knee would assume unstoppable force purely through repetition. And yet the reverse has taken place, with the spectacle so denuded of impact that the Premier League has long since chosen to reserve it only for a few carefully-chosen fixtures. For an institution so wedded to the idea that it compelled players in 2020 to replace the names on their shirts with the words 'Black Lives Matter', it is a means of saving face. Now we find ourselves at the logical end point, where the practice is phased out altogether. You might expect this to happen if its stated objectives had been fulfilled, but the bitter truth is that it has done nothing to eradicate the scourge of racism. Just as Marcus Rashford, Bukayo Saka and Jadon Sancho received unspeakable bigotry after missing penalties in England's European Championship final defeat to Italy, so Jess Carter has spoken of 'vile' and 'abhorrent' comments directed towards her online during the latest tournament. For all that she deserves sympathy over her ordeal, it is revealing that she and her team-mates are abandoning their anti-racism campaign on the pitch at the precise moment that they confront evidence of racism off it. There could scarcely be a more damning illustration of the gesture's hollowness. In sport as in society, we are past the point of being impressed by those who drape themselves in the cloak of righteousness. In 2020, amid the collision of pandemic and culture wars, conspicuous projection of virtue was all the rage, with Jake Humphrey adorning his fleece in the TV studio with one pin badge for the NHS and another for BLM. But in 2025, it is a turn-off, with the sight of footballers dropping to their knees for a couple of seconds inducing nothing more than ennui, a sense that they are acting out of obligation rather than any sincere concern for the cause of anti-racism itself. So, never mind Greenwood's notion that it has 'lost its power' now. Ultimately, you cannot lose what you never had.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store