The great Paris tourist rip-off exposed by a fake American
After detecting online complaints from tourists about being overcharged, Le Parisien sent out one bona fide Parisian to a cafe on the Champ-de-Mars near the Eiffel Tower.
It then dressed up one of its reporters as a typical tourist, sporting a T-shirt emblazoned with the iconic tower, trainers, dark glasses and a baseball cap, along with a passable American accent − albeit with a French twang.
They both sat down at the unnamed restaurant and ordered the same dish − lasagne − and drinks, a Coke and water, and discreetly filmed themselves.
The clearly 'French' customer was served a can of Coke for €6.50 and offered a carafe of water along with his dish. Meanwhile, the 'American' was not offered a small can, only a 'medium or large Coke'. When it arrived, it was half a litre and cost €9.50.
As for the water, the 'American' received no offer of a carafe, which is free. Instead, he was made to fork out a further €6 for a small bottle of Vittel.
The pair then walked to another nearby cafe-restaurant to test its policy on tipping.
When it was time to pay, the French customer received the bill, which includes an obligatory 10pc service charge. However, the 'American' client was asked if he wished to tip because 'service isn't included'.
Worse, when he agreed to add a 10pc tip via the card machine, he realised afterwards the waiter had shielded the amount and discreetly upped this to 15pc.
Last month, Paris cafes were caught cheating unsuspecting tourists out of good-quality wine.
An undercover sommelier ordered a glass of Chablis, costing around €9, but the wine being served was actually the cheapest on the menu − a €5 sauvignon.
Wine merchant Marina Giuberti said: 'It's a pity for the customer and for the image of the wine appellation, for the winemaker and for the restaurant owners who do a good job.'
The Telegraph spoke to Joseph, a 21-year-old waiter who confirmed some of the techniques were widespread.
'In one restaurant I worked [in] I was instructed to bring spring water at €7 a bottle unless foreign customers specifically asked for a carafe.
'I confess I sometimes don't tell them that service [is] included if they mention the word tip.'
'It's daylight robbery,' said the French customer,Marc Maziere, an economist who runs a blog called Radin Malin (shrewd miser), which helps people make savings in their everyday spending.
'It's almost abuse of weakness. They know you're a tourist, you're probably tired and don't understand much etc.'
Several American tourists quizzed by Le Parisien on restaurant rules thought that you always had to pay for water, as that was their experience. 'Usually they bring a bottle of water, you have to pay for even when we say still,' said one woman sitting on a bench in the Tuileries gardens.
Franck Trouet of the hotel and restaurant umbrella group GHR said: 'It's a disgrace to the profession. You can't even call these people waiters. You should know that in France, water and bread are free. One can refuse a bottle of water.'
He said waiters' eagerness to increase the tip had been supercharged when Emmanuel Macron, the French president, decided three years ago to waive taxes on 'le pourboire'. Now, tips made in French restaurants and cafes using a bank card are no longer taxable.
The rise of new pay machines that automatically suggest a tip of at least 5pc has accelerated the trend to try to squeeze more out of diners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
38 minutes ago
- The Journal
Tánaiste welcomes trade deal between EU and US but says ‘a lot of detail needed' for pharma sector
LAST UPDATE | 9 mins ago THE TÁNAISTE HAS welcomed a deal between the European Union and the United States but added that 'a lot of detail on the agreement' in relation to the pharma sector needs to be brought forward. The deal was reached yesterday during a meeting between Donald Trump and the president of the European Commission, which will see a 15% tariff on most EU imports to the US. The US president met European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen to hammer out the final details on the trading relationship between Europe and the US. Tánaiste Simon Harris welcomed the fact that the deal avoids tariffs of 30% which had been due to be imposed by the US on 1 August. It will also avoid the EU imposing its own countermeasures at this time. He added that it provides 'a measure of much needed certainty for Irish, European and American businesses'. While Harris said he 'regrets that the baseline tariff of 15% is included' in the deal, he acknowledged that the US has 'made clear that a baseline tariff was always going to be part of the outcome'. Von der Leyen described the 15% tariffs as 'across the board, all-inclusive', but Harris said 'there is still a lot of detail on the agreement which will need to be brought forward including in relation to pharma, aviation and other sectors'. 'Over the coming days, we will be examining what has been agreed and the full implications for Irish business and the economy, including any implications for the all-island economy,' said Harris. In a letter to the Trade Forum yesterday, Harris said it is his understanding that the 15% is a 'ceiling on any potential tariffs that may be imposed, including those relating to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors'. 'The EU will continue to work with the US to underline the closely integrated nature of the EU and US pharmaceutical sector,' he added. And while the baseline tariff is 15%, Harris said there are 'important exclusions, including a zero for zero arrangement on aviation'. Harris said Ireland made the case for 'zero for zero arrangements in as many sectors as possible'. 'As the framework negotiations continue the EU will keep working to add more products,' added Harris. Meanwhile, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the agreement was very welcome and that it 'brings clarity and predictability'. 'That is good for businesses, investors and consumers. It will help protect many jobs in Ireland. Advertisement 'We will now study the detail of what has been agreed, including its implications for businesses exporting from Ireland to the US, and for different sectors operating here. 'The agreement is a framework and there will be more detail to be fleshed out in the weeks and months ahead.' Martin said the higher tariffs will have an impact on trade between the EU and the US, which will make it more expensive and more challenging. 'However, it also creates a new era of stability that can hopefully contribute to a growing and deepening relationship between the EU and the US, which is important not just for the EU and the US, but for the global economy,' he added. 'Given the very real risk that existed for escalation and for the imposition of punitively high tariffs, this news will be welcomed by many.' Elsewhere, Ibec CEO Danny McCoy said that while the deal 'brings an end to a significant amount of uncertainty', a 15% tariff 'still represents a substantial burden for many industries'. 'Sectors which rely heavily on the US market and operate within small margins, will once again be significantly impacted by an additional 5% tariff, on top of what they have already had to absorb over the past several months and well in excess of the 1% effective tariff which existing before April,' said McCoy. He noted that 'details are still emerging' and that 'these details will be critically important for Ireland'. 'Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors which equate to 75% of Ireland-US trade are, we understand, included in the 15% deal.' Speaking yesterday, EU commissioner Michael McGrath said the meeting was a 'significant and decisive moment'. McGrath, EU Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection, said it would involve substantive negotiations between both sides. 'It's a significant moment, we hope a decisive moment, and it builds on an enormous amount of work that has been done over quite a period of time,' Mr McGrath said ahead of the meeting. 'President Trump invited President von der Leyen to Scotland for a meeting. 'This follows on the back of intensive negotiations over a number of months. He added: 'It is not a case of turning up and signing on the dotted line. There will be a real discussion that will happen, and it will take on a dynamic of its own, and let's see what happens over the course of the afternoon. 'But from the EU's point of view, we are determined to do all that we can to get a deal for European businesses, because we recognise the cost of uncertainty. 'It manifests in trade and in investment decisions and ultimately in employment and of course tariffs can cost consumers at the end of the day. 'We want a good deal. We have negotiated hard, and we're at a point now where hopefully the two leaders can today bring it to a concluding phase.'
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Indeed deletes millions of listings every month to reduce number of 'ghost jobs'
JOBS WEBSITE INDEED removes millions of listings every month, globally, to reduce the number of so-called 'ghost jobs' advertised on its platform. Ghost jobs refer to open adverts for applications to positions that do not immediately exist or that have already been filled. A survey of 1,000 American employers by US-group Clarify Capital found that a third of job listings are for opportunities at companies that are not actively hiring. Compared to the results of the survey in 2022, the number of ghost jobs has halved in recent years . It is still a scourge for job sites like Indeed, however. The firm was not able to provide exact data on the number of listings removed in Ireland, but did confirm that it removes 'millions of job posts that don't meet our strict quality standards' every month. Employers who responded to the American survey said that although they are not actively recruiting, they will keep positions online for a variety of reasons. Most, 57%, said they do so to collect an active pool of candidates for future positions. Notably, 6% of US employers claimed that job listings are kept online to 'give the impression that the company is growing'. Indeed told The Journal that the website has a dedicated team which assesses the legitimacy of listings to ensure they meet the website's criteria. That includes the need for a job description, location, title and application methods. Advertisement It added: 'Our policies do not allow ghost jobs – job postings on Indeed should be connected to a real employer that is actively hiring for a particular role.' 'Advertising or window-shopping?' Founder of Clearview Career Coaching Jane Downes told The Journal that jobseekers can find ghost jobs particularly frustrating. 'This is what is complicated with job websites,' she said. 'Is it an advertising space or a chance for companies to window-shop?' Downes added: 'From a job hunter's point of view, it's a real issue. [The applications] wastes people's time, particularly when there is no live role there.' A quick scroll of posts uploaded to the Reddit thread RecruitingHell will show that many users have often not received interview or job offers, despite filing dozens of applications. In some circumstances, recruiters are waiting for the ideal candidate to apply for a job, Downes said. In 'less than ideal' scenarios, however, managers await an application from a good candidate in order to expand their team's budget, she added. Asked about companies that list positions to give the impression of growth, Downes said that it is a 'very unfair practice'. She recommended that all jobseekers frequently track the status of every application they send. A blog post from Indeed earlier this year acknowledged that ghost jobs can be 'frustrating' for jobseekers, particularly as application processes can be stressful and time-consuming. It warned jobseekers to make sure that listings have detailed job descriptions, application deadlines and to cross-reference the adverts with the company's social media posts or own website. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Ian Bailey's ex to open up on who she thinks murdered Sophie Toscan du Plantier
Ian Bailey's former lover believes she knows who murdered Sophie Toscan du Plantier in a new book. Jules Thomas, whose ex was long considered a suspect in the brutal killing in December 1996, is writing her autobiography as she battles a life-threatening blood disease. While she and Mr Bailey were no longer a couple when he died last year, she told how the crime ruined their lives and she will never forgive the gardai for how they treated them. Although Ms Thomas, who is a painter, didn't name names, she said the killer is someone well connected with the forces of law and order. She also believes the culprit was involved in a relationship with the tragic French film producer who was battered to death, just 100 yards from her holiday home in Schull, Co Cork. Ms Thomas said: "I will tell my side of the story in this book. I want to get the truth out there while I am alive. "Ian Bailey may have been a lot of things but he did not kill Sophie. "He didn't have it in him to kill anyone – he couldn't kill a turkey for God's sake." Ian Bailey arrives at the Criminal Courts of Justice in Dublin with his partner Jules Thomas (Image: Collins Courts) The artist was Mr Bailey's alibi on the night Sophie was killed and detectives were hoping she would change her story after they split up three years ago. But she was having none of it. She recalled: "When gardai brought me in for questioning all those years ago they kept telling me my life was in danger and Ian would eventually kill me. Well here we are all these years later and guess what? Ian didn't kill me. "He has passed on and I am still here. He was never a danger to me or anyone else. Gardai, as far as I am concerned, tried to frame Ian for the murder and in doing so ruined our lives. "They never seriously looked at any other suspects. "In this book I will tell what actually went on and put the record straight. "Gardai did everything to get me to change my story but the truth is the truth. I kept telling them Ian did not kill Sophie but they wouldn't listen." Sophie Toscan du Plantier (Image: PATRICK ZIMMERMANN/AFP via Getty Images) Mr Bailey was arrested twice over the murder but never charged. He was then convicted in absentia by a French court of murder and sentenced to 25 years jail. But Irish authorities refused to extradite him because much of the evidence was based on hearsay and would never have been admissible in an Irish court. Ms Thomas' comments come as US forensic experts are using new technology to try and identify DNA from a blood sample found on the block used to kill Sophie. Her family in Paris are hoping for a breakthrough and are adamant the biological material will be that of Mr Bailey, who died of a heart attack. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
