logo
No ‘disliking' on Instagram

No ‘disliking' on Instagram

The Star17 hours ago
EVER wonder why Instagram has no 'dislike' button?
You're not alone. Maybe you've asked yourself why it's all hearts, thumbs-up and smiley faces – but never a simple 'your-post-is-no-fun-at-all.' It's not a glitch. It's a design. Welcome to the dark side of digital addiction.
In an age where smartphones practically live in our hands, digital addiction is far from hyperbole. It covers everything from endless scrolling on Instagram and compulsively watching YouTube Shorts to binge gaming and obsessively checking notifications.
Addictive behaviour isn't new – we've battled gambling, smoking and even coffee dependence – but our flickering digital world makes it worse. Why? Because digital space is always on, always connected and hard to escape.
It hijacks our psychology; our brains crave quick dopamine hits, triggered by every buzz, swipe and glowing heart.
This constant stimulation is especially harmful for teenagers. Teens are wired to seek novelty and approval, and Big Tech knows exactly how to exploit that.
Picture this: You're a 15-year-old faced with algebra homework – tedious, stressful and hardly satisfying. Meanwhile, your phone offers instant relief. Just one more video. Just one more like. That tiny dopamine hit feels irresistible.
And here lies the sinister brilliance of digital addiction: It offers a fast escape from discomfort while dulling the brain's ability to regulate impulses. The result? A vicious cycle of compulsive escape. This isn't just a personal failing – it's a structural problem, engineered into the very platforms we use.
Which brings us back to the original question: Why no dislike button on Instagram?
Facebook (now Meta), Instagram's parent company, uses behavioural psychology to maximise engagement. Negative feedback causes discomfort. Discomfort drives people away. And that's bad for business. So, no public 'dislike' button.
Instagram has reportedly tested a private 'downvote' for comments – but let's be honest, that does little to address the deeper problem of addiction by design.
Research by Kaitlin Woolley and Marissa Sharif in Harvard Business Review explains why these designs are so effective. Watching several short videos in a row increases the urge to keep watching.
Labelling content as 'similar' drives up engagement. And uninterrupted viewing? Even more addictive. These patterns increase what psychologists call 'cognitive accessibility' – our brains find the content easier to process, making it feel more rewarding.
Platforms exploit this by feeding us seamless flows of content designed to keep us watching.
It's clear that these features aren't about authentic feedback or real connection. They're 'dark patterns' that trap users – especially teens – in loops of envy, anxiety, validation-seeking and disengagement from reality. But here's the good news: Digital addiction is something we can overcome – if we take it seriously.
A study led by Noah Castelo at the University of Alberta found that blocking smartphone internet access for just two weeks significantly improved mental health, well-being and attention span.
Why? Because without constant mobile internet, people spent more time socialising in person, exercising and going outdoors.
What this means is that reducing constant connectivity can lead to real, measurable psychological benefits.
Simple strategies can help: stop watching more than two videos without a break, intentionally choose unrelated content and use timers or reminders to break the binge.
Small actions can go a long way.
Historically, we've regulated addictive substances and behaviours – tobacco, gambling, narcotics – because willpower alone wasn't enough.
The same goes for digital addiction. We need institutional action.When we let tools like ChatGPT do the thinking, we risk turning off the very parts of our brain that make us human. But digital addiction – precisely because it's manageable – is the fight we can take on now, especially for teenagers, whose minds are still under construction.
So, dear tech billionaires: You've made your billions, changed the world and redefined connection. Isn't that enough?
Maybe it's time to curb the greed and rethink the design choices that keep us hooked. Do it for humanity. Do it for the future. Or at the very least – do it for your own kids.
A note to myself: Let's stop blindly clicking (and counting) hearts and start confronting the reality behind the glowing screen.
Look out the window – the sun, the clouds, the trees, even the people on the street. They're just as fleeting as a TikTok video, but far more real.
And the best part? You'll never get addicted to them. — The Korea Herald/ANN
Lim Woong is a professor at the Graduate School of Education at Yonsei University in Seoul.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No ‘disliking' on Instagram
No ‘disliking' on Instagram

The Star

time17 hours ago

  • The Star

No ‘disliking' on Instagram

EVER wonder why Instagram has no 'dislike' button? You're not alone. Maybe you've asked yourself why it's all hearts, thumbs-up and smiley faces – but never a simple 'your-post-is-no-fun-at-all.' It's not a glitch. It's a design. Welcome to the dark side of digital addiction. In an age where smartphones practically live in our hands, digital addiction is far from hyperbole. It covers everything from endless scrolling on Instagram and compulsively watching YouTube Shorts to binge gaming and obsessively checking notifications. Addictive behaviour isn't new – we've battled gambling, smoking and even coffee dependence – but our flickering digital world makes it worse. Why? Because digital space is always on, always connected and hard to escape. It hijacks our psychology; our brains crave quick dopamine hits, triggered by every buzz, swipe and glowing heart. This constant stimulation is especially harmful for teenagers. Teens are wired to seek novelty and approval, and Big Tech knows exactly how to exploit that. Picture this: You're a 15-year-old faced with algebra homework – tedious, stressful and hardly satisfying. Meanwhile, your phone offers instant relief. Just one more video. Just one more like. That tiny dopamine hit feels irresistible. And here lies the sinister brilliance of digital addiction: It offers a fast escape from discomfort while dulling the brain's ability to regulate impulses. The result? A vicious cycle of compulsive escape. This isn't just a personal failing – it's a structural problem, engineered into the very platforms we use. Which brings us back to the original question: Why no dislike button on Instagram? Facebook (now Meta), Instagram's parent company, uses behavioural psychology to maximise engagement. Negative feedback causes discomfort. Discomfort drives people away. And that's bad for business. So, no public 'dislike' button. Instagram has reportedly tested a private 'downvote' for comments – but let's be honest, that does little to address the deeper problem of addiction by design. Research by Kaitlin Woolley and Marissa Sharif in Harvard Business Review explains why these designs are so effective. Watching several short videos in a row increases the urge to keep watching. Labelling content as 'similar' drives up engagement. And uninterrupted viewing? Even more addictive. These patterns increase what psychologists call 'cognitive accessibility' – our brains find the content easier to process, making it feel more rewarding. Platforms exploit this by feeding us seamless flows of content designed to keep us watching. It's clear that these features aren't about authentic feedback or real connection. They're 'dark patterns' that trap users – especially teens – in loops of envy, anxiety, validation-seeking and disengagement from reality. But here's the good news: Digital addiction is something we can overcome – if we take it seriously. A study led by Noah Castelo at the University of Alberta found that blocking smartphone internet access for just two weeks significantly improved mental health, well-being and attention span. Why? Because without constant mobile internet, people spent more time socialising in person, exercising and going outdoors. What this means is that reducing constant connectivity can lead to real, measurable psychological benefits. Simple strategies can help: stop watching more than two videos without a break, intentionally choose unrelated content and use timers or reminders to break the binge. Small actions can go a long way. Historically, we've regulated addictive substances and behaviours – tobacco, gambling, narcotics – because willpower alone wasn't enough. The same goes for digital addiction. We need institutional we let tools like ChatGPT do the thinking, we risk turning off the very parts of our brain that make us human. But digital addiction – precisely because it's manageable – is the fight we can take on now, especially for teenagers, whose minds are still under construction. So, dear tech billionaires: You've made your billions, changed the world and redefined connection. Isn't that enough? Maybe it's time to curb the greed and rethink the design choices that keep us hooked. Do it for humanity. Do it for the future. Or at the very least – do it for your own kids. A note to myself: Let's stop blindly clicking (and counting) hearts and start confronting the reality behind the glowing screen. Look out the window – the sun, the clouds, the trees, even the people on the street. They're just as fleeting as a TikTok video, but far more real. And the best part? You'll never get addicted to them. — The Korea Herald/ANN Lim Woong is a professor at the Graduate School of Education at Yonsei University in Seoul.

AI mastery essential for progressive society says DPM Fadillah
AI mastery essential for progressive society says DPM Fadillah

The Sun

timea day ago

  • The Sun

AI mastery essential for progressive society says DPM Fadillah

KUCHING: Mastering artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer optional but essential for building a progressive, inclusive, and competitive society, said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. Fadillah, who is also the Member of Parliament for Petra Jaya, said in today's fast-evolving digital landscape, enhancing digital skills is a shared responsibility that benefits individuals, families, and the wider community. 'Learning has no age limit. As long as we are able, seeking knowledge is a noble pursuit that benefits not just ourselves, but also those around us. 'In a world that is constantly changing, it is our responsibility to keep improving our skills and adapting to digital transformation,' he said in a Facebook post today. Earlier, Fadillah visited the 'AI for MY Future' training programme held in the Petra Jaya parliamentary constituency at the Centre for Technology Excellence Sarawak (CENTEXS) in Kuching. The programme brought together 150 participants, including 51 community leaders, 33 teachers, and 24 entrepreneurs, and focused on the application of AI in areas such as data analytics, document creation, and digital management and reporting. Fadillah highlighted the value of tools like Microsoft Co-Pilot, especially for community leaders who often work without sufficient administrative support. 'With tools like Microsoft Co-Pilot, they can now carry out their duties more efficiently and professionally – from preparing reports and communication materials to managing data,' he said. He also thanked the organisers and encouraged similar initiatives to be extended to other areas. 'My message to all participants - with the knowledge and understanding of AI and digital transformation, we not only enhance our individual capabilities but also drive meaningful change in our communities,' he added. - Bernama

Exclusive-Meta won't tweak pay-or-consent model further despite risk of EU fines, sources say
Exclusive-Meta won't tweak pay-or-consent model further despite risk of EU fines, sources say

The Star

time2 days ago

  • The Star

Exclusive-Meta won't tweak pay-or-consent model further despite risk of EU fines, sources say

BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Meta Platforms is very unlikely to offer more changes to its pay-or-consent model, meaning it is almost certain to be hit by fresh EU antitrust charges and hefty daily fines, people with direct knowledge of the matter said on Friday. The European Commission last month warned Meta of possible daily fines after being told that the U.S. social media giant would only make limited changes to its model to comply with the European Union's Digital Markets Act. The Facebook owner was hit with a 200-million-euro ($234 million) fine in April after the EU antitrust enforcer said its pay-or-consent model breached the DMA from when it was introduced in November 2023 to November 2024. Meta had tweaked the model in November 2024 to use less personal data for targeted advertising, which prompted additional EU scrutiny and the subsequent Commission comments in June. The DMA seeks to curb the power of Big Tech via a list of dos and don'ts. Meta will not propose additional changes unless circumstances change, the people with direct knowledge of the matter said on Friday. That in turn will likely result in fresh EU antitrust charges in the coming weeks and daily fines following shortly, of as much as 5% of Meta's average daily worldwide turnover starting from June 27, one of the sources said, although a final decision has yet to be made. Meta declined to comment and pointed to previous statements where it said it is confident that it complies with the DMA, that its range of choices to Europeans go beyond the DMA's requirements and that the Commission is discriminating against its business model. The Commission declined to comment. ($1 = 0.8553 euros) (Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Susan Fenton)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store