Troops at the Border: How the military's role in immigration enforcement has exploded under Trump
One 250-mile stretch, located in Texas' Cameron and Hidalgo counties, is being transferred to Air Force control and will fall under the jurisdiction of Joint Base San Antonio and be managed as part of a newly established National Defense Area (NDA).
The land is being transferred from the International Boundary and Water Commission, an agency traditionally responsible for handling water and boundary disputes between the U.S. and Mexico, marking a significant shift in the use and oversight of federal land at the border.
Another 140-mile stretch of land along the border near Yuma, Arizona, will be transferred to Navy jurisdiction.
These mark the third NDAs created under the Trump administration, following similar moves in New Mexico and near El Paso, Texas. The areas are designated as military zones to bolster border security operations amid a surge in illegal crossings under the Biden administration.
Presidents since Richard Nixon have deployed active-duty troops and reservists to the border. But until Trump, they've largely been restricted to logistical support: surveillance, building roads, etc. U.S. troops stationed in the NDAs will now be authorized to apprehend, search and detain migrants until Customs and Border Protection agents arrive. Migrants entering these zones may also face trespassing charges for entering military property.
The move is part of a broader mission managed by the Joint Task Force – Southern Border (JTF-SB), a joint effort between the Air Force and U.S. Northern Command to consolidate and strengthen military presence along the border.
To support these efforts, the military has deployed Stryker vehicles, ground-based radar systems, and even begun 3D-printing drones to enhance surveillance capacity and reduce costs.
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said the coordinated efforts between DoD and Customs and Border Patrol led to zero "gotaways," or migrants that escape authorities, across the entire southern border from June 28-30.
Civil liberties groups have sounded the alarm, warning the policy blurs the lines between military and law enforcement roles and may violate the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the use of federal troops in domestic policing without congressional approval.
"Using the military purpose doctrine to justify direct military involvement in immigration enforcement is a transparent ruse to evade the Posse Comitatus Act," the Brennan Center for Justice said in a statement. "The nominal justification is protecting the installation, but the installation itself was created to apprehend and detain migrants."
Critics also warn the policy could set a dangerous precedent. "If soldiers are allowed to take on domestic policing roles at the border, it may become easier to justify military deployments within the U.S. interior," the Center added.
Andy Gould, former Arizona supreme court justice, said he thought the move was "extremely effective against the cartels and completely legal."
"He's created No Trespassing zones on the border, and by taking federal land and declaring a national emergency and transferring it to the military, and then also using the military as an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act where he says, 'This is a military purpose to deal with the emergency on the border.'"
"The idea that the President United States can use a military presence to defend an American border, I think that's going to be tough to challenge."
Since President Donald Trump took office, the number of active-duty troops at the southern border has surged from under 2,000 to more than 8,000, with Hegseth authorizing up to 10,000 earlier this year.
This militarized approach has also prompted drug traffickers to shift tactics, turning to maritime smuggling routes in response to intensified land enforcement. The Pentagon has responded by deploying naval vessels with Coast Guard teams to interdict sea-based drug operations.
"We know terrorists are trying to get in through our border," said Brig Barker, former FBI advisor to U.S. Special Operations Command and counterterrorism expert. "Swarming this with different inter-agencies is a good thing. … The military has a lot of refined skills and capabilities that civilian law enforcement doesn't have.
He predicted that military counternarcotics missions would push further into Latin America, "bringing that out to that fight farther out from our border, really kind of preempt before they can get closer to our border."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
FBI Issues US Social Media And Messaging Warning — What To Know
Beware of ramp and dump attacks, the FBI warns. It has been, without any shadow of a doubt, a busy few days regarding Federal Bureau of Investigation warnings concerning cybercrime. On June 30, the FBI issued an alert for the aviation industry that attackers from the Scattered Spider ransomware group were shifting their attention to this industry sector. By July 2, that FBI warning had become a stark reality as Qantas confirmed it had fallen victim to a 'cyber incident.' Now, the FBI has issued a public service advisory, as cybercriminals are using social media platforms and messaging apps to target U.S. stock investors with a ramp-and-dump fraud. Here's what you need to know. FBI Warns Of Ramp-And-Dump Frauds Using Social Media And Messaging Apps FBI Public Service Advisory I-070325-PSA, dated July 3, has warned the general public that cyber criminals are targeting anyone in the U.S. who is investing in stocks with a ramp-and-dump fraud that is initiated through the use of social media platforms promoting investment clubs. Many of the members of these so-called clubs have, upon investigation, turned out to be fake accounts, and active members are likely to be mostly bot-operated accounts. The social media posts, the FBI said, 'typically direct victims to secure messaging apps where the group operates.' And if you are already to dismiss victims as the easily fooled, the FBI goes on to warn that the attackers are impersonating 'legitimate brokerage firms or well-known stock analysts,' to create an air of respectability and, more importantly, trust. 'So far in 2025, the FBI has seen at least a 300 percent increase in victim complaints referencing ramp-and-dump stock fraud from 2024,' the FBI warned, revealing just how much of a problem this has become, hence the urgent need for the advisory. The criminals will have control over a relatively large volume of relatively low-priced stocks, and the aim of the fraud is to get investment club members to purchase shares over weeks or months in order to inflate the price. This is the ramp bit of the fraud involved. The dump comes into play once a suitably over-inflated price has been achieved and the fraudsters sell all their stock at a profit, with the investment club members left holding a fair bit of nothing at all as the price crashes. FBI Advice On How To Identify Ranp-And-Dump Stock Fraud The FBI advisory recommended that investors look to recognise the following indicators of ramp-and-dump schemes: Readers are urged to report any such incidents to the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center at as soon as possible.
CNN
34 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump wants more skilled tradespeople. His Labor Department is trying to cut off a pipeline of workers
Eighteen months ago, at around 7 p.m. practically every night, Chloe Lawson would start a four-mile walk to Subway, where she'd work the overnight shift, earning a buck above the $7.25 federal minimum wage. Eight hours later, the then 19-year-old would clock out and head back to find somewhere to hopefully get some sleep. She had no family, no friends she could stay with in Splendora, Texas, a small town outside Houston. She often found herself at 'some shady hotel' or other unsafe places. 'I honestly didn't have a future,' she said. That's changed in the year and a half since: Lawson, now 21, has interviews lined up to be a train conductor, a job that starts out with an $80,000 annual salary and could open the door for other higher-earning positions in the years to come. But the vocational training program that got her and many others into better jobs is suddenly in jeopardy. Lawson is one of at least 21,000 current students whose coursework and hands-on training were upended by the Department of Labor's announcement in late May to pause operations at Job Corps, a residential career training program for low-income and at-risk youth that was started 60 years ago under President Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty. The Labor Department, citing budget deficits and claiming poor results, said that it was halting contracts on the 99 private-contractor-operated sites under its purview by the end of June and that it would initiate an orderly transition of students from the residential program into their respective communities. The move is part of a broader push within the Trump administration to slash federal programs. 'Job Corps was created to help young adults build a pathway to a better life through education, training, and community,' Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement at the time. She noted that an analysis of the program raised concerns about safety and its fiscal health. 'We remain committed to ensuring all participants are supported through this transition and connected with the resources they need to succeed as we evaluate the program's possibilities.' The National Job Corps Association, a trade organization of center operators and other community and business organizations that support the centers, have pushed back on the Labor Department's claims, arguing that the analysis cherry-picked data distorted by the pandemic and sensationalized the safety aspect (which the organization stated were the result of strict reporting requirements and included incidents such as injuries, power outages and adult students leaving campus without approval). However, the abrupt suspension and potential long-term closure of Job Corps carries far-reaching implications, economists, employers, attorneys general and members of Congress caution: If Job Corps goes dark, the Labor Department is cutting off a long-forged pipeline of young, skilled trades workers not only when there's a shortage but also when President Donald Trump is seeking to revitalize the US manufacturing industry. 'We have a very strong need for those with less than a bachelor's degree,' Rachel Sederberg, senior economist at Lightcast, a labor market data and analytics firm, told CNN in an interview. Those include maintenance workers, truck drivers and healthcare roles such medical assistants, she said, adding: 'These are very critical jobs for our economy and for our day-to-day as consumers.' 'We're going to start feeling it quite acutely if we aren't able to get things in our homes fixed or it takes longer to get things manufactured and transported and into our stores.' The abrupt May 29 announcement sent staff scrambling at Job Corps centers nationwide, and, in some cases, resulted in students heading back to the streets. The operators of several centers filed a lawsuit in federal district court challenging the government's move. Late last month, a judge in the case gave Job Corps a reprieve, granting a preliminary injunction on the suspension of operations. However, that lifeline is likely temporary: A recent Supreme Court ruling that limited nationwide injunctions could affect the outcome of the Job Corps case and, in turn, the program's operations. And, ultimately, Job Corps' ongoing operations come down to whether Congress continues to fund it. A Department of Labor spokesperson told CNN that the agency is not conducting interviews at this time but provided a statement following the injunction ruling: 'The Department of Labor is working closely with the Department of Justice to evaluate and comply with the temporary restraining order. We remain confident that our actions are consistent with the law.' The Department of Labor pointed CNN to an online FAQ about the Job Corps pause. 'The Department of Labor is collaborating with state and local workforce partners to assist current students in advancing their training and connecting them with education and employment opportunities,' the FAQ reads in part. Trump, like presidents Obama and Biden, has long stated a desire to revive US manufacturing. Trump has sought to wield tariffs as a solution. However, economists and supply chain analysts have questioned the effectiveness of that approach. The White House did not respond to CNN's request for comment. In the meantime, industry members long involved with the program fear they're losing opportunities to educate, train and place new workers to meet growing demand and help fill the void left by retiring tradespeople. A report last year from McKinsey & Company estimated that from 2022 to 2032, the annual hiring for 'critical skilled trades' roles (such as carpenters, electricians, plumbers, welders and laborers) is projected to be 20 times that of all other jobs. A shutdown of Job Corps threatens to negatively ripple through the economy, said Arthur Maratea, national president of the Transportation Communications Union/IAM. The union has taught, trained, counseled and helped place more than 16,000 Job Corps Advanced Training students in railroad industry jobs since 1971. 'It will definitely hurt the labor market, that I can tell you,' Maratea told CNN, 'because going into the trades, there are not that many apprenticeships. We're short electricians, we're short on our carmen, we're short everything.' Job Corps has provided a consistent stream of trained workers to railroad operators, helping them find employees while saving on costs, Maratea said. Without those added workers, supply chains could be disrupted. 'If we're not there, the freights are not going to have enough people to do the job, which mean there's hold-ups at the ports on goods coming in,' he said. 'It's going to affect commuters, and it's going to affect our food chain lines. There's a bigger picture to this.' In June, the labor force participation rate for 16- to 24-year-olds fell for the third consecutive month and landed at 54.9%, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. That rate is 13 percentage points below where it was in March 1990, when youth employment participation peaked at 67.9%. For comparison, the overall labor force participation fell 4.4 percentage points to 62.3% between March 1990 and June 2025, BLS data shows. 'We know that those from less-advantaged backgrounds can benefit from additional mentorship, can benefit from stability that a job might provide and from understanding various parts of the labor market that they might not have been exposed to otherwise,' said Lightcast's Sederberg, who has researched the outcomes of employment programs for teens and young adults. 'Anything that's increasing youth involvement within the labor force, increasing opportunities, is something that we should be trying to do more of.' In 2019, Jasmine Geib said she was on a fast track to a low-paying job and getting even further in debt with student loans. 'I was taking a break from college. I didn't feel ready to go back there; I also was in a really bad place in my life, went through a bad breakup, and I just had nowhere else to go,' said Geib, 29, in an interview last week with CNN. 'I was basically homeless, living couch to couch, and my friend went to Job Corps before me and told me about it.' Geib had a dream of becoming a flight attendant and sought advanced education at Job Corps; however, opportunities shifted, and she ended up going through the union-run railroad training program in Excelsior Springs, Missouri. Geib now is four years into a job at Union Pacific, where she is a licensed conductor and engineer and currently helping to move locomotives at the North Platte, Nebraska, hub as a hostler. She's making $90,000 to $100,000 a year with the potential of having that double in a matter of years. In recent weeks, both Geib and Lawson have jumped into advocacy roles, writing letters to congresspeople and sharing their experiences on social media about Job Corps. 'I feel like, if they need to do something, they can reform it; but I don't think they should full-blown shut it down,' Geib said. Lawson, who grew up in a small town outside of Houston, Texas, made good grades in high school, but college just wasn't the right fit. She moved back home but was kicked out and ended up unhoused. 'I won't say I had it the worst, definitely not compared to some kids here; I've never had trouble with the law,' she said. 'But before Job Corps, I honestly had nothing. I had maybe 20 bucks to my name.' Her former boss at Subway mentioned Job Corps as a possibility for career development, but the Texas center was full up, and Lawson scraped together what she had to make her way to the Job Corps in Collbran, Colorado, a tiny town nestled in the Plateau Valley. There she learned about iron working, welding and fabrication and eventually had her interests piqued by opportunities within the railroad sector. With the TCU/IAM heading up a hands-on program in Excelsior Springs, she ventured east to where she is today. 'We need trades, we need CNAs (certified nursing assistants), we need corrections officers, we need carmen, we need conductors, we need welders, we need these things, and they're helping kids who, in reality, would probably be in jail or dead,' Lawson said. 'They're helping kids that had no future make something of themselves instead of working at McDonald's, instead of working at a low-paying job.'
Fox News
38 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump White House calls out Smithsonian for pushing 'one-sided, divisive political narratives'
EXCLUSIVE: The Trump administration is turning its attention to the Smithsonian Institution, accusing the taxpayer-funded museum complex of using federal dollars to promote what it calls "one-sided, divisive political narratives" that fail to honor the greatness of the American story. White House official Lindsey Halligan blasted content currently on display at the National Museum of American History's Entertainment Nation exhibit in an exclusive email to Fox News exhibit, which explores American pop culture, has drawn internal and external criticism for what some see as a politically loaded interpretation of cultural milestones. "American taxpayers should not be funding institutions that undermine our country or promote one-sided, divisive political narratives," Halligan said. "The Smithsonian Institution should present history in a way that is accurate, balanced, and consistent with the values that make the United States of America exceptional."DONALD TRUMP FIRES NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY DIRECTOR FOR BEING 'STRONG SUPPORTER' OF DEI The White House statement comes on the heels of several striking examples from the exhibit. One placard, featured alongside a 1923 circus poster, reads: "Under the big top, circuses expressed the colonial impulse to claim dominion over the world." Another, describing early American entertainment, declares: "One of the earliest defining traits of entertainment in the United States was extraordinary violence." The exhibit reframes iconic American characters through a critical, politically-charged lens. On The Lone Ranger, the display states: "The White title character's relationship with Tonto resembled how the U.S. government imagined itself the world's Lone Ranger." Mickey Mouse, a beloved American cultural icon, is not spared either. A display for the 1928 cartoon Steamboat Willie states, "Mickey challenged authority, but not everyone was in on the joke." It continues: "Mickey Mouse debuted as the deckhand 'Steamboat Willie' in 1928, amidst a rising anxiety felt by many that modern living and city life were eroding family and community ties and loosening moral codes… But the new character's outsized facial features, white gloves, and trickster temperament were vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackface minstrelsy." In reference to the Indiana Jones film series, another panel reads: "His character embodied a confident righteousness that, in many ways, captured the essence of the 1980s" above another subhead referencing President Ronald Reagan's famous speech, asking, "Are you better off?"KENT STATE STUDENT'S VIOLENT ANTI-TRUMP ART DISPLAY SPURS OUTRAGE One panel calls Magnum, P.I. a challenge to the "popular perceptions of Vietnam veterans as damaged misfits." A section on Jon Stewart's Daily Show refers to it as "the go-to for viewers who mistrusted politicians and the reporting process." Another panel highlights the late pop star Selena Quintanilla-Pérez and frames her cultural impact through identity politics. "Selena got us talking about identity," with a quote from the late singer reading, "I feel very proud to be Mexican." The text goes on to say her work "cast a light on the longstanding cultural and growing political influence of Mexican American and Latinx communities within the United States." "The examples [Fox News Digital] highlighted from the National Museum of American History are part of the problem the Trump Administration aims to fix," Halligan said. "Framing American culture as inherently violent, imperialist, or racist does not reflect the greatness of our nation or the millions of Americans who have contributed to its progress." Halligan confirmed that a top-to-bottom content review is already underway, with input from senior Smithsonian leaders and the Board of Regents. "We are working with leadership at the Smithsonian to audit and review all content at the museums," she said, "and we are committed to ensuring that such content honors our country's founding principles, tells the stories of American heroes, and does not promote fringe or activist ideologies masquerading as history." She added, "We will provide updates on this audit as our progress unfolds." The Smithsonian Institution responded to Fox News Digital with the following brief written statement: "The museum is committed to continuous and rigorous scholarship and research and unbiased presentation of facts and history. As such, and as previously announced, we are assessing content in Smithsonian museums and will make any necessary changes to ensure our content meets our standards." The Institution did not answer specific questions regarding who authored the Entertainment Nation exhibit, whether outside academic consultants or activist organizations were involved, or who made the decision to present all exhibit text bilingually in English and Spanish. The controversy comes amid a broader push by President Donald Trump to reshape cultural institutions he says have veered too far left. In March, Trump issued an executive order directing the Board of Regents to eliminate "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" from Smithsonian museums. He accused the institution of embracing what he called "a revisionist movement" aimed at "undermining the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." The Board of Regents includes the vice president, the chief justice of the United States, six members of Congress, and nine citizen regents. Vice President J.D. Vance and Congressman Carlos Giménez, both recent appointees, have advocated for an expedited review of Smithsonian content. Giménez, in a prior interview with The Wall Street Journal, confirmed tensions at the board's June meeting over how quickly to proceed, though ultimately a compromise was reached. The Smithsonian receives approximately two-thirds of its $1 billion annual budget from federal appropriations. The Entertainment Nation exhibit opened in December 2022 and was billed as a permanent exhibition to "celebrate the power of popular culture to shape and reflect history." It is housed in a prime space on the museum's west wing and features artifacts and media from movies, television, sports, and music. While the museum's stated goal is to explore how entertainment intersects with American identity, the Trump administration argues that it instead uses culture to smuggle in ideology often at odds with the values most Americans hold. "Americans deserve a Smithsonian that inspires national pride, tells the truth, and reflects the greatness of this country," Halligan said. "Not one that serves as an agent for social change and cultural subversion."
