logo
Gen Zers Convinced They Can Predict a Recession—It's Not Going Well

Gen Zers Convinced They Can Predict a Recession—It's Not Going Well

Newsweek7 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
We have been long advised not to believe everything that we see online, but when creators start citing Gwyneth Paltrow's carb cravings or the rise of Pilates chic as signs of a looming financial crash, the question becomes unavoidable: do any of these so-called "recession indicators" hold real validity?
Across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, Gen Zers and younger millennials have been spotlighting the curious return of several late 2000s' and early 2010s' cultural motifs—some subtle, others screamingly obvious.
Platinum blonde hair with visible dark roots; the reemergence of "recession pop" music; the rising popularity of "skinny chic," not long ago dubbed problematic: the list goes on, including, unmanicured nails, mustache-embossed crockery and even the rerelease of Coca-Cola's "Share a Coke" campaign.
The implication? A return to recession-era culture suggests a return to recession itself.
Some of these social media-driven indicators are grounded in economic behaviors we have seen before—people cutting spending and dressing to appeal to those in positions of power. But others are, at best, psychological signposts and, at worst, internet inside-jokes.
"Pop culture 'recession indicators' are entertaining—but they are not economic science," Louis Carter, founder and CEO of Best Practice Institute, told Newsweek. "These trends are reflections of mood, and lack of human logic—not causes of market movement."
In conversations with Newsweek, content creators, analysts, and economists unpacked the cultural, financial, and political narratives behind several trending indicators—and whether anything can actually be predicted from them.
'Recession Blonde'
Leah Holm, a marketing manager and influencer known as @ladyleahmarie, recently gained viral attention for her breakdown of "recession blonde"—a style featuring platinum blonde hair with grown-out roots, seen in the late 2000s and very early 2010s and making a comeback today.
"This trend was the direct result of the economical state of the world at the time," Holm said in a TikTok video. "Prices went up, people had less money … The girls who would previously get their roots touched up every 4 to 6 weeks didn't have money to do so, so they let them grow out, and this became a trend."
Holm told Newsweek that fashion reflects cultural and economic conditions—and, right now, we are in what she calls a "recession-core" moment.
"Fashion has always mirrored the times we are living in—economically, politically, and emotionally," Holm said. "We are seeing a shift toward timeless, minimalist styles in response to inflation, job insecurity, and global uncertainty.
"Think muted colors, clean silhouettes, and an emphasis on quality over quantity."
Holm has spotted a marked rise in aesthetics labeled "old money" or "quiet luxury," alongside emerging consumer trends such as "capsule wardrobes," and creators engaging in "low-buy years" or "underconsumption"—all of which are geared toward people spending less.
'Recession Pop'
For Texas-based content creator Xavier Wilson (@xavier.clb), 27, the rise of "recession" talk online is less about market indicators and more about cultural anxiety playing out on loop. His videos focus on class divides and the social-mobility traps that Gen Z face.
"I think the idea of a recession online has become an anxious long-running joke and trend," Wilson told Newsweek. "TikTok rose to popularity during the pandemic, when recession fears were high and they never really went away.
"That created an ongoing wave of trends that anyone could participate in, everyone can relate to, and that sparks enough conversation to stay active in the algorithm."
Wilson, who was featured in a Gen Z report presented at the 2023 World Economic Forum, said that, for younger generations, the recession is more cultural than fiscal. It is gamified, meme-ified and shared endlessly—but also rooted in real anxiety.
"While our parents have experienced recessions, it is not 'real' for Gen Z in the same way," Wilson said. "It is a bit of a game—'Is this indicator a real one?' Will this finally bring the recession we've been talking about for years?"
Online, "recession pop" has become a nostalgic shorthand for the glossy, synth-heavy hits of the late 2000s and early 2010s—think Kesha, early Katy Perry, and The Black Eyed Peas—resurfacing across playlists and TikTok montages.
The sound evokes a time when escapism ruled the charts, and its return feels eerily timely to some.
Ozempic, Pilates, and Conservative Lifestyles
On Instagram, MaryBeth Monaco-Vavrik (@mb.mv) ignited discussion with her viral video exploring the connections between fitness aesthetics, cultural shifts and what that can suggest about the economy.
"There is a strong pattern of fitness ideals shifting based on political and cultural values," Monaco-Vavrik, a certified barre instructor based in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek. "Pilates aligns with the 'clean girl' aesthetic and broader conservative shift we are seeing."
From left: A screenshot of Nicole Richie sporting "recession blonde" hair from a TikTok video by @ladyleahmarie; and a stock image of a road sign reading "recession ahead."
From left: A screenshot of Nicole Richie sporting "recession blonde" hair from a TikTok video by @ladyleahmarie; and a stock image of a road sign reading "recession ahead."
@ladyleahmarie / Getty Images
The Ozempic craze and resurgence of ultra-thinness are part of that same ideological fabric.
"The sanitized, exclusionary aesthetic of Pilates reflects certain values: control, conformity, proximity to whiteness and wealth," the 24-year-old added.
The Hemline Index
Coca-Cola's revival of its "Share a Coke" campaign and the popularity of late 2000s and early 2010s fashion staples—large handbags, indie sleaze styling, heels and peplum detailing—have all been flagged online as evidence of a looming economic downturn.
One creator, @style.analytics, shared in a TikTok video that they had used data to dissect which trends are actually indicative of a looming recession.
They concluded that mini skirts were the "most confident predictor of consumer confidence in the economy," later elaborating that the garments becoming trendier suggests that consumer confidence in the economy has dropped.
The idea that skirt length can be representative of economic change is called the hemline index.
The creator added that indie sleaze styling, big bags, maxi skirts and blazers becoming trendier is also indicative of a looming recession, among other talked-about nods to the economy like lipstick theory.
@style.analytics
These are just the recession indicators that I have been hearing about a lot — but please let me know if you have any other indicators that you would like to test. A bit more on the analysis: I didn't want to just report on some growth metrics (I saw a financial advice account report that maxi skirts were trending in the google data this past month which means we are going into a recession. Like, it's spring, so ofc they are?), or run a bunch of regressions between consumer confidence in the economy (CCI) and a single search term for each recession indicator. So! I used structural equation modelling, which allows me to combine multiple items and search terms into a single variable. For example, I have included the volume of people looking for hobo bags, oversized bags, tote bags, balenciaga city bags, louis vuitton neverful, etc., within my 'big bag theory' variable. And for indie sleaze, I have a bunch of trends associated with it within its latent variable, such as: cheetah, leopard, fur, skinny jeans, disco pants, etc. When you are building this model, you have to ensure that al of these variables are trending together and not just making a big mess. Here, you have to take time to evaluate the the model fit and factor loadings for each item before it could be included in the latent variable and therefore in the regression. Hope that makes sense! Might do a post or another video explaining all of this in-depth! Might include the R code if someone is interested… ? In the end, mini skirts and blazers had a strong negative relationship with CCI — suggesting that interest in these items can be signals that the economy is doing poorly. Big bags, lipstick, maxi skirts, and indie sleaze had a moderate negative relationship, and then peplums and high heels had no relationship. I know someone in the comments will say that my R2 values are way too low — and I totally thought the same thing. However, after looking at expected R2 values for cultural data and real world signals versus experimental data — these values are pretty good. (Feel free to argue with me tho, I'm not an expert.) (Oh and this is just US data btw.) ♬ original sound - Style Analytics
Destiny Chatman, a consumer expert at TopCashback.com, is not certain things are quite so simple.
"Things that were popular in the 2010s coming back in 2025 do signal that we are headed toward a recession because 2007 to 2009 was the last Great Recession in America," she said. "However, everything old does become new again, and people should take these 'recession indicators' with a grain of salt."
Kristen Smirnov, a professor at Whittier College, emphasized the cyclical nature of aesthetics.
"Pop culture and fashion trends are naturally cyclical," Smirnov told Newsweek. "Part of how we signal social capital is by showing we are in tune with what is current, and 'what is current' often swings away from whatever came just before."
Possibly the most-mocked "indicator" of all has been actress and wellness mogul Gwyneth Paltrow announcing she will start eating carbs again—an abrupt dietary change for someone long associated with extreme wellness trends.
Online, it was quickly labeled a "recession-coded" move, but Hila Harary, a trend forecaster at Tectonic Shift, sees it differently.
"Gwyneth Paltrow's diet is not being revived—it is being rejected," Harary told Newsweek. "People are choosing joy over control … To enjoy the pasta, not obsess over celery juice."
Harary noted that this cultural nostalgia for a rose-tinted past is often mistaken for economic nostalgia.
"Nostalgia shows up elsewhere—in the resurgence of the early 2010s trends, for example," she added. "But that is about emotional security.
"When the present feels unstable, people gravitate toward eras that felt simpler, it is comfort, not forecasting."
Harary pointed to broader movements such as "Back to the Roots," encompassing gardening, sustainability, and natural beauty.
"Yes, economic pressure can amplify these shifts, but the root cause is values, not just cost," she said. "The 'trad wife' trend fits here, too—a return to traditional, more conservative ways of living.
"It is not caused by a recession, but it can have recession-like effects on household economics."
Financial experts agreed that the meme economy and actual economy have little overlap.
"Cultural clues are fun to watch, but real financial strategy relies on indicators like the inverted yield curve, jobless claims and earnings data," Steven Rogé, chief investment officer of R.W. Rogé & Company, Inc., told Newsweek. "These meme-worthy signals reflect consumer concerns, not economic truth, and even amplify anxiety, potentially influencing real spending."
Certified financial planner Prudence Zhu agreed that trends like diet shifts and aesthetic preferences offer us an insight into consumer psychology—but not economics.
"They are more of a lighthearted way for people to engage with economic discussions rather than reliable recession indicators," Zhu told Newsweek. "It is important to focus on economic data such as GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation."
While the indicators may be satirical, the anxiety behind them appears to be real.
The latest Bank of Montreal (BMO) Real Financial Progress Index revealed that 67 percent of Americans say their concerns about a recession have increased, with Gen Z concern jumping 18 points in one month; 65 percent of millennials also reported an increased economic concern.
But experts say that what we are seeing online is less an indication of recession and more a cultural mood board drawn from collective uncertainty.
"These trends aren't forecasting a recession," Harary said. "They reflect how we are processing instability."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Looks Like We Both Winning:' Lyft Customer Gets Charged $80 for Ride. Then She Asks Her Driver This Question That Saves Her $40
‘Looks Like We Both Winning:' Lyft Customer Gets Charged $80 for Ride. Then She Asks Her Driver This Question That Saves Her $40

Motor 1

timean hour ago

  • Motor 1

‘Looks Like We Both Winning:' Lyft Customer Gets Charged $80 for Ride. Then She Asks Her Driver This Question That Saves Her $40

Taking a rideshare like Lyft or Uber is easy and convenient, but it can also be expensive for some rides. A content creator says she has a simple trick to cut the costs of your next rideshare. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . TikToker Valuable V ( @vistheway ) posted a video about how she lowered the cost of a Lyft ride in a way that benefited both her and the driver. The post went viral with 8.4 million views as of this writing. It prompted a thoughtful discussion among viewers. Many shared how this tactic can save money and even land you a private driver. How Did She Save $40 On a Lyft? In her post, Valuable V says she saved $40 by asking the driver a simple question: 'How much is Lyft paying you for this ride?' The ride was locked in at $80, she says. The driver informed her they were only getting paid $20, however. 'Cancel the ride and here is $40 cash,' she says she offered the Lyft driver. They accepted, she says. 'All these charges for these rideshare people… Let me make a deal for you!' she captions the post. Others claim they have done the same. 'I did this and found an everyday driver,' one commenter shared. 'This happened to me. They were giving the driver $50 and charged me almost $300. Canceled and gave him $150,' another rider said. 'I offered this one time and the rider hired me as his private driver. I work no other jobs and can afford my entire life,' a purportedly former rideshare driver said. How Does Lyft Pricing Work? Lyft operates using dynamic pricing. Dynamic pricing bases products or services' prices on evolving market trends, Harvard Business School reports. Trending Now 'I Listed It For a Fair Price:' Man Lists Jeep on Facebook. Then a Prospective Buyer Brings a Friend Named 'Tommy Roughknuckles' 'Do Not Leave Your Car Out in the Heat:' Woman Says It's So Hot Her Grandmother's Buick's Tires Exploded. Is That Possible? As Lyft Engineering explains, 'Dynamic pricing aims for optimizing the entire rideshare network by looking at both riders and drivers to improve the throughput of rides. The algorithm starts counting and gathering input signals, and then trying to find a reasonable balance between demand and supply.' On Lyft's website , the company explains that fares are determined by estimated time and distance to complete the ride and distance to the pickup. The fare also depends on what's going on in your area, such as the number of ride requests, how many drivers are on the road, and how busy it is at the destination. It basically means that a ride costs more when there's higher demand, such as during rush hour or after a large sporting event, or fewer drivers, like in the middle of the night. The former is referred to as surge pricing. How Much Do Lyft Drivers Get Paid? According to Glassdoor , the average pay for a Lyft driver ranges from $17-23 an hour. Business Insider reports the hourly rate can be as low as $9-12 and up to $23-28. The wide variance between hourly rates is because pay is based on a variety of factors, such as tips, expenses, and how Lyft calculates the fare and fees. The rideshare industry has faced criticism for purportedly underpaying drivers. Last year, over a hundred people commented on a Reddit thread asking about Lyft drivers' pay. 'I recently had a driver who told me that out of a $120 fare he was only paid $20,' a redditor asked. 'Surely that must be a lie? I can't see Lyft charging the customer $120 and only paying the driver $20, so I've come here to ask if this could be true?' A Redditor who says they drive for the company commented, 'I had a ride last week that paid $92 and I got $12. Lyft is straight thieves.' 'Not a lie. This Saturday they were charging about $100 for an airport ride and paying like $25' another purported driver added. Lyft told Motor1 , "Drivers are essential to our purpose. That's why we've released a series of new features aimed at increasing driver pay. This includes an earnings commitment that ensures drivers always make at least 70% of the weekly rider fares after external fees.' This means that if a driver's earnings fall below that threshold in a given week, Lyft will pay them the difference, minus the external fees. According to Lyft, these are all the external fees that can take away from the driver's pay: Commercial auto insurance & other risk-related costs, Airport fees, Data processing fees, Payment processing fees, Sales tax, Government fees, and Ancillary insurance fees. Lyft told Motor1 that there's yet another fee that impacts driver pay but is largely outside its control: Car insurance. "It's also important to remember that runaway insurance costs are taking up an increasing percentage of the total rider fares,' the company said. 'That's bad for both riders and drivers, and it's why we are working with state lawmakers across the country to pass common-sense insurance reform that will help get these costs under control." People concerned about Lyft and other rideshare drivers' pay can always opt to take Valuable V's advice. 'This lowkey is something everybody should start doing,' one person commented. Motor1 has contacted @vistheway via TikTok direct message. This story will be updated should she respond. More From Motor1 Lyft Sends $1K Card To A Family Named Uber Uber's New Autonomous Vehicle Is the VW ID. Buzz Uber Cars Will Be Only Electric From 2030 Uber loses London licence, again Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

Kevin O'Leary Says TikTok Deal Is Dead — And U.S. Law Must Finally Decide Who Owns Your Data
Kevin O'Leary Says TikTok Deal Is Dead — And U.S. Law Must Finally Decide Who Owns Your Data

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Kevin O'Leary Says TikTok Deal Is Dead — And U.S. Law Must Finally Decide Who Owns Your Data

Celebrity investor Kevin O'Leary says the window to buy TikTok with its current Chinese-owned algorithm has officially closed. As a new 90-day deadline ticks down, O'Leary is sounding the alarm: TikTok's future in the U.S. hangs in the balance, and at the heart of it is a much bigger issue — who truly owns your personal data? TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, is under pressure from a U.S. law enacted last year that requires it to sell its TikTok assets in the U.S. or face a nationwide ban. The law was upheld by the Supreme Court, but enforcement has been repeatedly delayed. Most recently, President Donald Trump granted a 90-day extension until September, marking the third postponement. Don't Miss: Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can invest with $1,000 at just $0.30/share. Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Back a bold new approach to cancer treatment with high-growth potential. While TikTok has continued to operate, critics say these delays are avoiding a key national security concern: the possibility that the Chinese government could access American user data. Beijing denies this, but many U.S. lawmakers remain skeptical. According to O'Leary, a new sale involving TikTok's existing algorithm is no longer on the table. "We know that we can't buy the algorithm," he said in a video he posted to X. "So we're gonna have to rewrite this whole thing." O'Leary is part of a group led by billionaire Frank McCourt and Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian proposing a new version of TikTok — one without Chinese-owned code. Their goal? Create a U.S.-based platform that puts data ownership in the hands of users, not corporations. The alternative, O'Leary warns, is a legal minefield. "Every mothers' group and state attorney general is suing social media," he said. "All stemming from the fact that the platform owns the data and the customer doesn't." Trending: Tired of Grid Failures and Charging Deserts? This Startup Has a Solar Fix and $25M+ in Sales — Now Raising at $3/Share O'Leary also tied the TikTok debate to the broader issue of U.S. technology exports, especially AI chips made by companies like Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD). He used a bee analogy to explain: The chip is the queen bee, and software developers are the honeybees building AI — or "honey" — on that chip. O'Leary argued there will soon be only two types of AI: "American honey" and "Chinese honey." "If you want the world running on Chinese honey, stop shipping American queen bee chips," he said. His point: limiting chip exports could backfire by encouraging foreign adversaries to build their own alternatives — like Congress acts or a new buyer is found, TikTok could be pulled from U.S. app stores after the September deadline. O'Leary believes this is likely the "last extension." As lawmakers debate national security, global trade, and personal privacy, the clock keeps ticking. One thing is clear: TikTok's fate is tied not just to politics, but to a fundamental question about the future of the internet — who controls the data, and who gets to decide? Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES (AMD): Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA (NVDA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Kevin O'Leary Says TikTok Deal Is Dead — And U.S. Law Must Finally Decide Who Owns Your Data originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

16 Ways To Stop Wasting Your Money and Build Wealth, According to Rachel Cruze
16 Ways To Stop Wasting Your Money and Build Wealth, According to Rachel Cruze

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

16 Ways To Stop Wasting Your Money and Build Wealth, According to Rachel Cruze

One of the biggest obstacles to building wealth is overspending. Luckily, there are plenty of tips and tricks that can help you stop throwing money away on unnecessary purchases and save and invest in your financial future. See More: Read Next: Money expert Rachel Cruze recently shared on YouTube her best practices to manage your spending. Here's what you need to do if you're working to grow your wealth. Who are you when it comes to spending money? Cruze uses the example that some people are natural spenders while others are savers. Ask yourself whether you prioritize buying quality items or quantity to better understand how and why you spend money. Be Aware: View More: One of the biggest misconceptions about having a budget is that it means you can't spend money. On the contrary, a budget helps you keep from overspending. Cruze said your monthly budget should have your income at the top along with a list of all your expenses and the amounts you're giving and putting into savings. Place dollar amounts next to each one. 'The goal is your income minus all of those expenses and giving and saving should equal zero,' Cruze said, adding that if you're spending within what you budgeted, you're not going to overspend. Explore Next: Are you in student loan debt? Plan to pay it off in full. Do you need to buy a used car? Start saving money now to buy it in cash. How much do you really spend every day? You can track these purchases and their amounts by writing them down or using an app. Commit to a month where you're spending money only on necessities like shelter, groceries, utilities and transportation. Cancel any monthly subscriptions to streaming services and avoid scrolling through Amazon for items you don't need. By retooling your mindset to buy only what you need, Cruze said, you might be able to reset the way you spend money. Try This: It will always cost more money to eat out than to cook at home. If you want to start a no-spend challenge, Cruze recommends trying a 'don't go out to eat challenge.' Spend a full season cooking at home and track how much you save. (Spoiler: You're going to save a lot of money.) If you don't know what you're having for dinner, you'll be all the more likely to go out to eat rather than cook. (This is especially true if it has been a long day.) Become intentional with your meals and meal prep them out for a full week. You spend a lot less money if you stick to using cash only: yes, really. Put your credit or debit card away and use cash to get better control on your spending habits. Discover More: Make necessary moves that actively put money back into your pocket, like getting rid of credit cards. It's not uncommon to 'fix' a bad day by going on a shopping spree or celebrate a win by 'treating yourself' to expensive things. If you're scrolling online and worry you may start shopping for things you don't need, Cruze recommends putting down the smartphone or iPad and going for a walk, listening to your favorite podcast or completing some tasks you've been putting off. Even if something on sale seems like a good deal, that doesn't mean it's a good deal for you. That's Interesting: Whether you're shopping for groceries or back-to-school supplies, sticking to a list keeps you on budget and keeps from buying things you don't need. Now more than ever, curated ads and influencers on social media platforms are showing us all sorts of things we never knew existed that we should spend money on. If you take a break from social media, you'll be able to save more money since it's now out of sight and out of mind. Instead of hitting 'place order' or 'buy now,' wait a few hours. Better yet, wait 24 hours. Then come back to your online shopping cart and ask yourself whether you really needed what's in it. Trending Now: Go through your closet. Dig through your pantry. Comb through the junk drawer. Chances are pretty good you might already have some of the things you were planning to go out and buy new already at home, like an extra bottle of shampoo or pasta sauce. You don't have to curb your spending habits alone. Share your plans with a close friend, partner or trusted mentor who is good with money. Run your ideas past them or get their feedback on what you're doing to better hold yourself accountable for your actions. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on 16 Ways To Stop Wasting Your Money and Build Wealth, According to Rachel Cruze

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store