I Smoked for 30 Years. AI Helped Save My Life (Exclusive)
Her doctor entered Riffle's age, how many years she had smoked and her CT scan imaging into artificial intelligence software, which gives a predictive score between 1 and 10 as to the likelihood of cancer. The number 1 means the risk is 2%, while a 10 means the risk is 93%.
Riffle's result was an 8, meaning there was a 64% chance the lesion was cancer. 'It really surprised me,' says Dr. Daniel Miller, 66, Director of the Lung Cancer Screening Program at the Georgia Cancer Center.
Because of the AI software, he ordered a PET scan. That's when Dr. Miller told Riffle it was probably lung cancer. On January 11, 2024, Riffle had surgery. A biopsy was done, and a pathologist confirmed the AI's diagnosis: She had stage 1B lung cancer. Miller performed a lobectomy, removing the lower lobe of her lung and all the lymph nodes.
'Lung cancer is still the No. 1 cause of cancer deaths in the United States since 1986 for both men and women," Miller says. "In Georgia, every two hours, someone dies of lung cancer.'
Without the AI software, Miller says he would have suggested a repeat scan in three to six months, but the software helped 'expedite diagnosis and treatment.' Riffle was diagnosed at stage 1, whereas 75% of lung cancers are diagnosed at stage 3 or 4, according to Miller.
Riffle shares her story with PEOPLE's Wendy Grossman Kantor.
I was a smoker off and on almost 30 years. I started as a teenager. I stopped when I was pregnant with my children and then I would start again.
I hid it from my children always. I never smoked a cigarette in front of my children. I always stepped outside. I'm sure they knew I smoked. You can smell it. If I'm standing out in the garage and quickly put out a cigarette or hide it behind my back, they're not stupid.
A few years ago, I decided I was ready to quit. I was tired of breathing heavily and I wasn't as active as I wanted to be, running on the beach or hiking in the woods.
I would take trips with my girlfriends who were nonsmokers, and I'd be the one outside while everyone else was inside playing games and having fun. I wasn't a pack-a-day smoker, but after we'd go out to dinner, I'd be the one to step outside to have a cigarette before we headed back for the evening.
I also felt like I had to plan the trip around cigarettes, make sure I have enough to go for a four-day trip, which is terrible. I was realizing these things and how smoking was occupying my time and my health. I was done. I just needed to stop and take better care of myself.
Breathing was also an issue. I wasn't able to breathe well. I could never take a deep breath. I was using an inhaler daily, and that's not good. I knew I could breathe well on my own by quitting smoking. I had become very aware of my lack of breathing capacity.
I quit smoking in October 2020.
After I quit, one of my girlfriends said, "Susan, you don't wheeze anymore. You sound great." And I was finally able to keep up with her quick pace when we went walking.
I had been smoke-free for three years when my family physician suggested that it was time to do a CT scan for proactive health care. And of course I agreed.
Related: A Billboard Saved Me from Dying from Lung Cancer — Before I Even Had Symptoms (Exclusive)
I had a CT scan December 11, 2023. My lung doctor, Dr. MIller, ran my test through the AI software.
I took notes every meeting that Dr. Miller and I had together. He said the nodule was the size of a green grape. I felt very well-informed. He said: These are your options. This is what it is. Let's make a decision together.
Learning the AI said 'cancer' was scary. But I'm a proactive person. I'm the type of person who says, "Well, let's just get in there, get it out, and be done with it. Let's treat it so we can move forward." I do not dwell and cry, "Oh, poor me." Tell me what we need to do, and I will do it. And that's what we did. Dr. Miller explained the surgery. We would do a biopsy once we got in there, which would determine how much would be removed. And that was all explained to me ahead of time. It was worrisome and concerning, but we had a plan. That, to me, is the most important thing.
My surgery was January 11, 2024.
The decision to do one surgery and biopsy at that time — as opposed to doing a biopsy, closing me up, analyzing that, and then going back for more surgery if necessary — it just made sense to me. Let's just try to do surgery once, as opposed to prolonging the procedure.
When I came out of anesthesia, I had a wonderful nurse who was there to take care of me, and I remember her to this day. I was in a little pain, of course, but Dr. Miller and the many others on his team came to visit me and there was constant communication.
The day after surgery, I was in my hospital bed and the sun was coming in and I just snapped a selfie and sent it to my family, and they were like, "Oh, you had surgery? Where are your wrinkles? How do you look so good?" Now, maybe they were all being nice, but it was uplifting and supportive. I'm fortunate. I just had a great network of friends and family around.
Related: ChatGPT Diagnosed a Woman with Blood Cancer a Year Before Her Doctors Found It
I only spent two days in the hospital.
The biggest thing my husband Randy, 64, and two daughters Kelsey Earnest, 31, and Samantha Riffle, 28, did, was just be there for me. Kelsey, a traveling radiation therapist, was out of state but came home and spent a full week helping me recover. Both daughters did the cooking, cleaning and bandage changes. Samantha, a beverage manager at a restaurant and pet portrait artist, lives just across the river in North Augusta, so she continued to come every day after Kelsey left for another two weeks. Randy took over in the evenings and after that. (He was actually the best at changing bandages.)
Right away I made sure I was moving. Every day I changed my clothes and dressed and came downstairs and walked around the house.
I don't like to be sedentary. I have trouble sitting through a manicure and pedicure. I like to get up and move — I just know that's better for you. If you just sit and watch TV, or read a book for six or eight weeks, you're not going to feel well for a really long time.
I have very minimal scars. As a matter of fact, when I went for a mammogram a few months after the surgery, the technician said, "Well, where are your scars? I expected a huge scar, you had lung surgery." And I have a few three-inch scars.
I was fortunate enough to be back up and out at seven or eight weeks post-op, and I was back to work, being a productive person and walking and exercising and breathing air without any other treatments.
The fact that I haven't had to have any radiation or chemotherapy is fantastic. It is amazing that we caught it and were able to remove enough to determine that I didn't have to have those treatments.
Today I feel very well. I have no complaints and I have no limitations.
Randy and I joined Kelsey and her husband on a trip to the Grand Canyon last summer. That was a real test because of the higher elevations and the thin air. I did have to take a few breaks. But you just stop and take few deep breaths and then keep going. It was wonderful.
The fact that I am able to do that, that I'm still here, is because of Dr. Miller and the team and the hospital and AI. I have a normal life again after a relatively short time.
Randy is still a smoker.
We have all been pressuring him, but you can't make anybody stop smoking. They have to be in the headspace to stop. You can read every book, you can read the literature, you can try cold turkey. You can do all kinds of things, but until you yourself are ready to commit and come up with a plan — or two or three — because it usually doesn't work the first time or first three times, you won't quit.
He's not ready to quit. He's not there.
He did get a prescription for Chantix recently. And he's in the yearly screening program at the Georgia Cancer Center, and his doctor monitors him. I think he's close to retirement. I ask him, "So what are you going to do? Sit around and smoke cigarettes all day?" Hopefully, quitting will be one of his goals. I hope.
My cancer was caught early. It was stage 1B. If we waited another six months, who knows what could have happened?
I feel very fortunate to have had the advantage of the AI to look at my scans. It saved my life. It certainly saved me from what potentially could have been a horrible diagnosis down the road.
I think a lot of people don't get scanned because they're afraid. What if? What if? But like I said, if you find something early and you make a plan, you can take care of it. I think education and trying to tell people it doesn't all have to be so fearful is important. Yes, it is a frightening diagnosis, but caught early, many cancers can be taken care of completely
Get those screenings. If a medical professional suggests a screening, just do it. That would be my advice. Don't be afraid. Just do it and deal with whatever is found out.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lauren Manzo Reveals ‘Insane' Weight Gain After Lap-Band Removal
is getting real about her decades-long battle with weight and how she finally found balance. The "Real Housewives of New Jersey" alum, who first appeared on Bravo alongside her mom, Caroline Manzo, back in 2009, revealed that her body has been under public scrutiny since her early 20s. In fact, when Lauren Manzo was just 21 years old, television viewers would tell her she was "fat" and "disgusting." Lauren Manzo Admits She Ignored Vomiting From Lap-Band Surgery Growing up in a tight-knit Italian family with food always at the center, from her family's catering business to dinners out together, Lauren admitted eating was practically a hobby. 'We love to eat. We don't eat to live,' the now 37-year-old told PEOPLE. But despite always working out and trying diets, she recalled, 'I could be full to the point where I was in pain, but my brain was still, 'It's time to eat.'' By middle school, her weight struggles already kept her from pool parties and Jersey Shore trips with friends. 'I was just a big girl, and I never understood why,' she explained. In her early 20s, Lauren underwent lap-band surgery, desperate for a solution. While it helped her shed pounds, she admitted she ignored worrying side effects, including vomiting, because she was just happy to be 'skinny.' Eventually, she had the band removed, only to gain back 'an insane amount of weight,' peaking at 208 pounds. 'I felt unhealthy, swollen, and depressed,' she recalled. Manzo Fires Back At Weight Loss Critics Everything shifted three years ago when Lauren started seeing a functional medicine doctor. Cutting out gluten and dairy helped her lose 50 pounds and feel less exhausted, but she still struggled to get further results. That's when she turned to the GLP-1 weight-loss drug Mounjaro, a decision she says saved her life. 'I really believed [Mounjaro] saved my life. What they say about food noise. I had never heard that term,' she explained. In total, Lauren dropped another 50 pounds on the medication. But while her physical health improved, critics began to weigh in, accusing her of taking the 'easy way out.' 'It wasn't the easy way out, the surgeries weren't easy,' she fired back. 'Comments like that. I don't think it's fair. What are you teaching your kids? That it's okay to attack someone for their body, especially knowing how much they have struggled?' Lauren Manzo Beams With Confidence After 100-Lb. Weight Loss Today, Lauren is still on Mounjaro but says she's focusing on long-term health by strength training and eating a balanced diet to build muscle. 'Being skinny doesn't mean that you're healthy,' she emphasized. The transformation has given her back her confidence and her life. Last year, she wore a bikini for the first time while vacationing in Florida with her 8-year-old daughter, a milestone she once thought impossible. 'I used to be able to be outside for 10 minutes, tops. I would be sweating, breathing heavily, and so uncomfortable. Now, I'm out with my daughter every day and we're going to the pool,' she said, proudly reflecting on the everyday benefits of living at a healthier weight. Manzo's Divorce From Vito Scalia Finalized After Nearly A Decade Of Marriage Lauren's health transformation comes on the heels of major personal changes in her life. Earlier this year, news broke that the former "Real Housewives of New Jersey" star had quietly finalized her divorce from Vito Scalia months ago. According to Daily Mail, court documents revealed that a judge signed off on their split in November 2024, nearly a decade after their 2015 wedding. As part of the settlement, the exes agreed to share joint legal custody of their daughter, Marchesa, with Lauren's mother, "RHONJ" alum Caroline Manzo, serving as the 'exchange point' for custody transitions. Scalia was ordered to pay $1,000 per month in child support and $4,000 in limited-duration alimony for just over two years. Lauren also retained ownership of the couple's New Jersey home and its contents, while both kept their own vehicles. Lauren Manzo Says Divorce From Vito Scalia Was A Mutual Decision The pair, who first faced split rumors as far back as 2017, officially cited 'irreconcilable differences' in their divorce filing. Lauren later confirmed the breakup in an October 2023 Instagram video, assuring fans that the separation was amicable. 'This has been done for a very long time,' she said at the time. 'The last part of the process was filing. We were on the same page. This is something that we did together.' Scalia has since found new love with wellness coach Dominique Valenti, who began sharing photos with him on her Instagram as early as August 2023. Solve the daily Crossword


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Cannabis and Lung Cancer: A Link Stronger Than It Appears
The toxicity of cannabis, particularly its potential link to lung cancer, has long been underestimated. However, recent studies are challenging this 'false innocence,' identifying a growing population of younger patients with high cannabis consumption who are presenting with aggressive cancers. Pauline Pradère, MD, pulmonologist at Marie Lannelongue Hospital in Paris, France, and a leading researcher on this topic, discussed the effects of cannabis on lung health during this year's ALBATROS International Addictology Congress. Inhaled Cannabis Use 'France holds the unfortunate distinction of being the leading cannabis consumer in Europe,' said Pradère. In 2019, it was estimated that by the time they turned 17, 1 in 5 French individuals had consumed cannabis at least once in the past month. Most of this consumption is through inhalation of cannabis resin joints, often mixed with tobacco. Given the high prevalence, it is crucial to understand the potential impact of cannabis on respiratory health. While many studies focus on the neuropsychological effects of cannabis, Pradère emphasized that its inhalation, which introduces the substance directly into the lungs, may have significant pulmonary effects — effects that remain under-researched, particularly regarding lung cancer risk. Cannabis and Lung Cancer Pradère referenced a well-known study published in Chest in 2018, which suggested that smoking cannabis does not cause emphysema or impair inspiratory function. Although biopsies of cannabis smokers showed precancerous lesions, the study did not strongly connect these findings to lung cancer. Another 2018 meta-analysis, often cited to 'clear' cannabis consumption of lung cancer risk, concluded that there were insufficient data to draw definitive conclusions. Pradère criticized this study for not specifically examining cannabis use and its unique effects. While evidence links cannabis consumption to an increased risk for testicular tumors, the connection to lung cancer remains unclear. A recent review published in The New England Journal of Medicine also examines the chronic effects of cannabis, focusing primarily on its neuropsychiatric impact. However, the review makes no mention of its effects on the lungs, noted the pulmonologist. Additionally, there are other studies that highlight the potential therapeutic properties of cannabis in cancer care, such as managing cancer-related symptoms, treatment-associated pain, and even its possible antitumor effects. One such article, provocatively titled Can Cannabis Cure Cancer? , further fuels the debate surrounding cannabis' medical use. Stronger Evidence for Harmful Effects Despite the conflicting data, several factors suggest a harmful role of chronic cannabis inhalation in lung health. The first is a toxicologic argument. 'Even without considering the resin and tobacco association, significant carcinogens are found in joints,' explained Pradère. The second argument, recognized by those with asthma, is that tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive component of cannabis, has a bronchodilatory effect, likely leading to deeper inhalation of carcinogens than with tobacco smoking. Histologic studies have shown that cannabis smokers develop precancerous lesions similar to those found in tobacco smokers. These findings further suggest a possible link between cannabis use and lung cancer. Epidemiologic Data While research remains limited, Pradère highlighted epidemiologic studies that suggest cannabis use is a risk factor for lung cancer. A Canadian study, for example, showed that cannabis use reported at the age of 20 years significantly affected the later development of lung cancer. Adolescents who smoked more than 50 joints during their teenage years were found to have more than double the risk of developing bronchial carcinoma. Why the Discrepancy? To explain the reassuring findings in some meta-analyses, Pradère pointed to challenges in studying the link between chronic cannabis use and lung cancer. She noted that many cannabis users also smoke tobacco, and in France, the illegal status of cannabis leads to the addition of other substances to cannabis resin, further complicating research. Additionally, a significant underreporting of cannabis use by patients contributes to these gaps in data, especially when clinicians fail to directly ask about cannabis use. This underreporting is one of the reasons Pradère pursued her research in this area. Pradère works at a center specializing in lung cancer surgery, where she has observed a high prevalence of cannabis use among patients. Over 3 years, she studied patients younger than 50 years who had undergone lung cancer surgery at three major hospitals in the Île-de-France region. She then followed up with these patients post-surgery to gather more information about their cannabis consumption. Study on 75 Patients Younger Than 50 Years 'We contacted 75 patients who had undergone surgery for lung cancer over 3 years, and none of them refused to participate,' Pradère explained. 'We found that 43% of our young patients were chronic cannabis users.' On average, these patients smoked 150 joints per month, and for 61% of them, no healthcare provider had ever asked about their cannabis use. 'They had seen general practitioners, anesthesiologists, surgeons, and pulmonologists, but no one had ever asked,' she added. When comparing the three patient groups — those who smoked both cannabis and tobacco, those who smoked only tobacco, and nonsmokers — the results showed that the cannabis-smoking group, which represented a significant proportion, was predominantly men. Their tobacco consumption was similar to those who smoked only tobacco. However, they presented with more emphysema and poor prognosis carcinomas, such as poorly differentiated large cell carcinomas. 'The tumors were more often located in the upper lobes, where the majority of inhaled toxins concentrate. Additionally, their surgery durations and hospital stays were longer, likely due to underlying lung damage,' Pradère pointed out. Prospective Study of 150 Patients Building on her earlier work, Pradère led a multicenter prospective study, supported by the French National Cancer Institute, which included 150 patients younger than 60 years diagnosed with primary lung cancer. 'We collaborated with the Toxicology Department, led by Jean-Claude Alvarez, MD, PhD, at Garches University Hospital, where we conducted toxicological analyses on patients' hair and administered anonymous self-report questionnaires outside the medical office,' Pradère explained. The study aimed to evaluate both the prevalence of cannabis consumption among these patients and whether the lung cancer of cannabis smokers differed from that of tobacco smokers. Though the manuscript is still under review, Pradère shared some preliminary findings. 'We observed a high prevalence of cannabis use in this group of young patients with highly lethal lung cancer. 38% were cannabis smokers, with an average consumption of four joints per day over a median period of 26 years.' Lung conditions among cannabis smokers included more emphysema, including bullous emphysema, which increases the risk for pneumothorax. Pulmonary function tests revealed greater damage in gas diffusion than in tobacco smokers, even though their exposure to tobacco was similar. The study also found that cannabis smokers had a higher incidence of poor prognosis cancers, such as poorly differentiated carcinomas and sarcomatoid carcinomas. New Perspectives and Concerns Pradère emphasized that her research aligns with recent studies in France, such as the KBP study, which has increasingly focused on the potentially harmful effects of cannabis. However, she believes pulmonologists have not fully addressed the issue and that many still struggle to provide clear guidance to patients on cannabis-related health risks, including how to manage cannabis withdrawal — often a more challenging process than quitting tobacco. 'I believe this is an area where we must make progress within the medical community,' she concluded.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study
There are many reasons to avoid ultraprocessed foods, including a link with heart disease, diabetes and obesity, but an increased risk of lung cancer may be yet another, a new study suggests. Ultraprocessed foods contain ingredients 'never or rarely used in kitchens, or classes of additives whose function is to make the final product palatable or more appealing,' according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Those ingredients — found in items such as sodas, chips, packaged soups, chicken nuggets and ice cream — can include preservatives against mold or bacteria, artificial coloring, emulsifiers to stop separation, and added or altered sugar, salt and fats to make food more appealing. People who eat the most ultraprocessed foods are 41% more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer than those who eat the least, even after accounting for other factors such as smoking, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Thorax. For this study, researchers analyzed data from more than 100,000 people who completed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey's Food Frequency Questionnaire on their dietary habits and compared the information with medical records for lung cancer diagnoses. On average, people had nearly three servings a day of ultraprocessed foods, most commonly lunch meat, diet or caffeinated soft drinks, or decaffeinated soft drinks, the study authors wrote. 'Industrial processing alters the food matrix, affecting nutrient availability and absorption, while also generating harmful contaminants,' the researchers added. They specifically highlighted acrolein, which can come from burning tobacco, wood, plastics and gasoline and from cooking fats and oils at high temperatures, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Packaging materials also may be part of the problem, they suggested. The study is observational, meaning that while the methods were clear and strong, the research still can't definitively prove that the foods cause lung cancer –– just that there is a connection between the two, said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine and founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine. He was not involved in the research. 'This study strongly suggests that (ultraprocessed foods) may contribute to lung cancer risk,' he said. Lung cancer isn't just about smoking Lung cancer is a common form of cancer, with an estimated 2.4 million new cases worldwide in 2022, according to the World Health Organization. Smoking is the main contributor to lung cancer risk, but people who don't smoke can still get it, which suggests other factors are at play, Katz said. The authors adjusted for factors, meaning that they accounted for other possible things that could increase lung cancer diagnoses, including whether or not a person smoked, but it's important to note that the measurements were not nuanced, said Dr. Fang Fang Zhang, The Neely Family Professor and chair of the division of nutritional epidemiology and data science in the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University in Boston. She was not involved in the research. 'Because smoking is a very important risk factor for lung cancer, adjusting smoking in a crude way could leave a large room for residual confounding,' she said in an email. 'It will be important to adjust for the intensity (e.g., cigarettes/day) and duration (e.g., years of smoking) or the cumulative exposure of smoking (e.g., pack-years). However, the authors found that the association between ultra-processed food consumption and lung cancer risk was stronger among never-smokers.' Why foods impact lung cancer There hasn't been a lot of research into ultraprocessed foods and lung cancer risk, but a lot of existing evidence shows how important diet quality is for predicting premature death from all causes in the United States, Katz said. Often, ultraprocessed food consumption is associated with a lower diet quality, such as a higher intake of saturated fats, chemicals, salt and sugar, as well as higher calorie consumption, he added. These factors 'can drive inflammation –– a primary pathway in the development and progression of cancer –– and damage the microbiome, impairing immune system function,' he said in an email. 'This combination of excess inflammation and impaired immunity gives rogue cells the upperhand. … This scenario is where cancer begins.' Ultraprocessed foods tend to be low in omega-3s, said Dr. Tom Brenna, professor of pediatrics, human nutrition and chemistry at Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin. Omega-3s are essential, healthy fats that the body can't produce on its own, according to the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. 'Omega-3s limit shelf life, so if you're going to ultraprocess something … then you kind of want to get rid of omega-3s,' said Brenna, who was not part of the research. Additives in ultraprocessed foods, carcinogens formed during processing or chemicals from food packaging might also be at play, Zhang said. 'However, these pathways are not well understood and warrant further investigations,' she said. Ultraprocessed foods vs. whole foods from nature The study adds lung cancer risk to the list of reasons to avoid ultraprocessed foods and increase diet quality, Katz said. Health and diet quality improve when people eat mostly whole, unprocessed foods and largely plants such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, lentils, nuts and seeds, he added. If you want to make a change, Zhang recommends starting by reading food labels. 'Avoid foods with long ingredient lists with unfamiliar names — these are more likely to be additives, preservatives, and artificial flavors,' she said. 'Prioritize whole food and prepare meals using whole or minimally processed ingredients whenever possible.' Instead of focusing on what you won't eat, try prioritizing adding foods directly from nature into your diet, Katz added. 'If you are used to eating a lot of UPFs, transition to less of them, more 'real' foods one better choice at a time,' he said in an email. It may take a minute for your taste buds to adjust to more wholesome foods, but if you give yourself a couple of weeks to get used to it, you can come to prefer the taste of more natural ingredients, he said. 'Once that happens, maintaining a healthier diet becomes much easier,' Katz added. Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.