logo
Peptides: performance-boosting, anti-aging drugs or harmful snake oil?

Peptides: performance-boosting, anti-aging drugs or harmful snake oil?

UPI8 hours ago
Today over 100 peptide medications are approved, including semaglutide – better known as Ozempic and Wegovy. Photo by Haberdoedas Photography/ Pexels
For a growing number of middle-aged men, aging no longer means surrendering to sagging skin, sore joints or slowing metabolism. Instead, it's becoming a science experiment.
The new frontier? Injectable peptides -- experimental compounds that promise rapid recovery, fat loss and muscle gains with the ease of a twice-daily to weekly jab.
Once confined to elite labs and obscure bodybuilding forums, these amino acid chains are now flooding wellness spaces, social media feeds and online marketplaces. Although they are marketed as "next-generation biohacks" and "research chemicals, "many peptides are not approved for human use and lack basic clinical testing.
Still, their popularity is growing -- fueled by testimonials, influencer hype and the seductive promise of turning back time.
But beneath the surface of glossy marketing and fitness fantasies lies a far more sobering truth: many of these substances operate in a medical gray zone, with unknown long-term risks, questionable manufacturing standards and, in some cases, life-threatening side-effects.
Peptides aren't entirely new to medicine. The first peptide drug -- insulin -- was isolated in 1921 and became commercially available in 1923. Today, more than 100 peptide medications are approved, including semaglutide -- better known as Ozempic and Wegovy.
But the compounds now circulating in fitness communities represent a very different category. They're experimental substances that have shown promise in animal studies but have never undergone proper human trials.
The 'Wolverine stack'
One such compound, first discovered in human gastric juice, that is attracting lots of attention is BPC-157. Early animal studies suggest it may help repair damaged tissue throughout the body.
Researchers tested it on mice, rats, rabbits and dogs without finding serious side-effects. The compound appears to support healing of the tendons, teeth and digestive organs, including the stomach, intestines, liver and pancreas.
Scientists don't yet fully understand how BPC-157 works, but animal studies suggest it triggers several biological processes essential for healing. The compound appears to help cells move to damaged areas and encourages the growth of new blood vessels, bringing nutrients and oxygen to tissues in need of repair.
Another compound gaining attention is TB500. It is a synthetic version of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring protein fragment that plays an important role in repairing and regenerating damaged cells and tissues.
It also helps protect cells from further harm by reducing inflammation and defending against microbes. The combination of BPC-157 and TB500 has earned the nickname "the Wolverine stack," named after the Marvel superhero famous for his rapid healing.
Then there's IGF-1 LR3, a modified version of a natural protein (IGF-1) linked to muscle growth. This synthetic compound was shown to increase muscle mass by 2.5 times in animal studies, though it has never been studied in humans.
The limited human research that does exist for these compounds offers inconclusive results. For example, a study showed that over 90% of patients experienced reduced knee pain after BPC-157 injections. However, the study had no control group and several methodological issues, so the results should be viewed with caution.
Hidden dangers
Even though the early results seem exciting, these experimental compounds can be dangerous. Making them involves special chemicals called coupling agents, which can trigger serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis -- a life-threatening condition.
The health consequences extend well beyond allergic reactions. Long-term injection of performance-enhancing substances can lead to heart failure that can occur rapidly with little warning, as documented in recent medical case studies of young bodybuilders.
Injection-related injuries pose another significant threat. "Compartment syndrome" can develop at injection sites in leg muscles, causing numbness, blood clots and muscle spasms that result in permanent loss of function.
In severe cases, skin and underlying tissue can suffer necrosis (tissue death), requiring antibiotics or surgery to treat. More alarming still are reports of users contracting HIV, hepatitis B and C, and serious eye infections from contaminated injections.
These compounds don't just target muscles -- they affect the entire body in ways scientists are only beginning to understand. Some interfere with natural insulin production, while others activate biological pathways that healthy cells use for growth and repair.
The concern is that these same pathways are exploited by cancer cells. The VEGF pathway, which promotes blood vessel growth, is active in about half of all human cancers, including melanoma and ovarian cancer. Laboratory studies suggest that thymosin beta-4 may play a role in helping colorectal and pancreatic cancers spread.
While there's no direct evidence linking compounds like BPC-157 or TB500 to cancer, researchers emphasize that the long-term effects remain unknown because these substances have never undergone proper human trials. The World Anti-Doping Agency has banned these compounds, noting they lack approval from any health regulatory authority and are intended only as research tools.
A growing problem
Yet, their use appears to be spreading rapidly. A 2014 study found that 8.2% of gym members used performance-enhancing drugs. By 2024, a comprehensive review suggested the figure could be as high as 29%. Perhaps most concerning: only 38% of users recognized the health risks involved.
These experimental compounds represent a dangerous gamble with long-term health. Unlike approved drugs, they haven't undergone the rigorous testing required to understand their safety profile in humans. While they may promise enhanced performance and healing, they deliver it at a cost that users may not fully understand until it's too late.
The appeal is understandable -- who wouldn't want faster healing and better muscle tone? But the reality is these substances remain experimental for good reason. Until proper human trials are conducted, users are essentially volunteering as test subjects in an uncontrolled experiment with their own bodies.
Adam Taylor is a professor of anatomy at Lancaster University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peptides: performance-boosting, anti-aging drugs or harmful snake oil?
Peptides: performance-boosting, anti-aging drugs or harmful snake oil?

UPI

time8 hours ago

  • UPI

Peptides: performance-boosting, anti-aging drugs or harmful snake oil?

Today over 100 peptide medications are approved, including semaglutide – better known as Ozempic and Wegovy. Photo by Haberdoedas Photography/ Pexels For a growing number of middle-aged men, aging no longer means surrendering to sagging skin, sore joints or slowing metabolism. Instead, it's becoming a science experiment. The new frontier? Injectable peptides -- experimental compounds that promise rapid recovery, fat loss and muscle gains with the ease of a twice-daily to weekly jab. Once confined to elite labs and obscure bodybuilding forums, these amino acid chains are now flooding wellness spaces, social media feeds and online marketplaces. Although they are marketed as "next-generation biohacks" and "research chemicals, "many peptides are not approved for human use and lack basic clinical testing. Still, their popularity is growing -- fueled by testimonials, influencer hype and the seductive promise of turning back time. But beneath the surface of glossy marketing and fitness fantasies lies a far more sobering truth: many of these substances operate in a medical gray zone, with unknown long-term risks, questionable manufacturing standards and, in some cases, life-threatening side-effects. Peptides aren't entirely new to medicine. The first peptide drug -- insulin -- was isolated in 1921 and became commercially available in 1923. Today, more than 100 peptide medications are approved, including semaglutide -- better known as Ozempic and Wegovy. But the compounds now circulating in fitness communities represent a very different category. They're experimental substances that have shown promise in animal studies but have never undergone proper human trials. The 'Wolverine stack' One such compound, first discovered in human gastric juice, that is attracting lots of attention is BPC-157. Early animal studies suggest it may help repair damaged tissue throughout the body. Researchers tested it on mice, rats, rabbits and dogs without finding serious side-effects. The compound appears to support healing of the tendons, teeth and digestive organs, including the stomach, intestines, liver and pancreas. Scientists don't yet fully understand how BPC-157 works, but animal studies suggest it triggers several biological processes essential for healing. The compound appears to help cells move to damaged areas and encourages the growth of new blood vessels, bringing nutrients and oxygen to tissues in need of repair. Another compound gaining attention is TB500. It is a synthetic version of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring protein fragment that plays an important role in repairing and regenerating damaged cells and tissues. It also helps protect cells from further harm by reducing inflammation and defending against microbes. The combination of BPC-157 and TB500 has earned the nickname "the Wolverine stack," named after the Marvel superhero famous for his rapid healing. Then there's IGF-1 LR3, a modified version of a natural protein (IGF-1) linked to muscle growth. This synthetic compound was shown to increase muscle mass by 2.5 times in animal studies, though it has never been studied in humans. The limited human research that does exist for these compounds offers inconclusive results. For example, a study showed that over 90% of patients experienced reduced knee pain after BPC-157 injections. However, the study had no control group and several methodological issues, so the results should be viewed with caution. Hidden dangers Even though the early results seem exciting, these experimental compounds can be dangerous. Making them involves special chemicals called coupling agents, which can trigger serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis -- a life-threatening condition. The health consequences extend well beyond allergic reactions. Long-term injection of performance-enhancing substances can lead to heart failure that can occur rapidly with little warning, as documented in recent medical case studies of young bodybuilders. Injection-related injuries pose another significant threat. "Compartment syndrome" can develop at injection sites in leg muscles, causing numbness, blood clots and muscle spasms that result in permanent loss of function. In severe cases, skin and underlying tissue can suffer necrosis (tissue death), requiring antibiotics or surgery to treat. More alarming still are reports of users contracting HIV, hepatitis B and C, and serious eye infections from contaminated injections. These compounds don't just target muscles -- they affect the entire body in ways scientists are only beginning to understand. Some interfere with natural insulin production, while others activate biological pathways that healthy cells use for growth and repair. The concern is that these same pathways are exploited by cancer cells. The VEGF pathway, which promotes blood vessel growth, is active in about half of all human cancers, including melanoma and ovarian cancer. Laboratory studies suggest that thymosin beta-4 may play a role in helping colorectal and pancreatic cancers spread. While there's no direct evidence linking compounds like BPC-157 or TB500 to cancer, researchers emphasize that the long-term effects remain unknown because these substances have never undergone proper human trials. The World Anti-Doping Agency has banned these compounds, noting they lack approval from any health regulatory authority and are intended only as research tools. A growing problem Yet, their use appears to be spreading rapidly. A 2014 study found that 8.2% of gym members used performance-enhancing drugs. By 2024, a comprehensive review suggested the figure could be as high as 29%. Perhaps most concerning: only 38% of users recognized the health risks involved. These experimental compounds represent a dangerous gamble with long-term health. Unlike approved drugs, they haven't undergone the rigorous testing required to understand their safety profile in humans. While they may promise enhanced performance and healing, they deliver it at a cost that users may not fully understand until it's too late. The appeal is understandable -- who wouldn't want faster healing and better muscle tone? But the reality is these substances remain experimental for good reason. Until proper human trials are conducted, users are essentially volunteering as test subjects in an uncontrolled experiment with their own bodies. Adam Taylor is a professor of anatomy at Lancaster University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.

Box Office: ‘Fantastic Four' Craters by 66% in Second Weekend, ‘Naked Gun' Debuts to $17 Million
Box Office: ‘Fantastic Four' Craters by 66% in Second Weekend, ‘Naked Gun' Debuts to $17 Million

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Box Office: ‘Fantastic Four' Craters by 66% in Second Weekend, ‘Naked Gun' Debuts to $17 Million

Marvel's First Family might not save the day after all. 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' is quickly losing steam in its second weekend, signaling the comic book adventure isn't connecting at the box office beyond the film's core demographic of superhero fans. After a healthy $117.6 million debut, 'The Fantastic Four' suffered a hefty 66% drop in its sophomore outing with $40 million from 4,125 theaters. Heading into the weekend, box office analysts anticipated a decline of 55% to 60% from its opening. (By comparison, 'Superman' dropped by 53% in its second weekend after launching to $125 million earlier in July.) This painful fall is surprising because the Marvel tentpole has the benefit of positive reviews and word-of-mouth, as well as a clear runway in terms of competition. More from Variety 'Together' Stars Dave Franco and Alison Brie Relive Their Off-Screen Wedding: Weed Pens, Pizzeria Mozza and a Party Crasher Liam Neeson Jokes His Death as Qui-Gon Jinn in 'The Phantom Menace' Was 'A Bit Namby-Pamby': 'Please, Hardly a Master Jedi' 'Bad Guys 2' Director on Spoofing Elon Musk's SpaceX and How the Cold Open Was Influenced by 'Skyfall' and 'Mission: Impossible' Although those ticket sales were enough to rank as No. 1 on North American charts, 'The First Steps' endured one of the steeper second-weekend drops for Disney's Marvel Cinematic Universe, better than 'The Marvels' (down 78%) but in the company of February's 'Captain America: Brave New World' (down 68%), 2023's 'Ant Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' (down 70%) and 2022's 'Thor: Love and Thunder' (down 67%). So far, 'Fantastic Four' has generated $198 million domestically and $368 million globally. Luckily for Marvel, whose output has been wildly inconsistent in post-pandemic times, 'The First Steps' is pacing to outgross this year's prior theatrical disappointments of 'Captain America: Brave New World' ($415 million globally) and 'Thunderbolts' ($382 million globally). The final tally for 'Fantastic Four' won't be disastrous, à la 'The Marvels' ($206 million) or 'Thunderbolts,' but it's not yet a return to box office glory for Marvel. However, the MCU should officially regain its box office stride with its next three films — 2026's 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' and 'Avengers: Doomsday' and 2027's 'Avengers: Secret Wars.' ''Fantastic Four' is not a top-tier Marvel franchise. Never has been,' says analyst Jeff Bock of Exhibitor Relations. 'Remember, this ramps up into 'Avengers.' That's the real payoff.' Three new movies opened nationwide, but none were competing for the same audience as 'Fantastic Four.' Among new releases, Universal and DreamWorks Animation's heist comedy 'The Bad Guys 2' enjoyed the strongest start with $22.8 million from 3,852 venues. That's directly even with the first film, which opened to $23 million in 2022 at a time when cinemas were majorly struggling to recover from COVID and studios were barely releasing any movies. The original film eventually powered to $250 million worldwide. 'The Bad Guys 2,' which cost $80 million and follows a group of reformed criminals who relapse for one final con job, was embraced by audiences with an 'A' grade on CinemaScore exit polls. Overseas, 'The Bad Guys 2' landed with $16.3 million for a global total of $44.5 million. 'This is a good opening for an animation sequel,' says analyst David A. Gross of Franchise Entertainment Research. 'With this kind of business, the movie is doing what it's supposed to do.' At No. 3, Paramount's slapstick comedy 'The Naked Gun' debuted to $17 million from 3,344 theaters, right in line with projections. The film earned another $11.5 million at the international box office, bringing its global tally to $28.5 million. It's a promising start given the dearth of theatrical comedies. Akiva Schaffer of the Lonely Island fame directed the film, which carries a $42 million price tag. Critics and moviegoers dug 'The Naked Gun,' in which Liam Neeson stars as bumbling L.A. detective Frank Drebin Jr. (son of the late Leslie Nielsen's Frank Drebin, his predecessor in the 'Naked Gun' trilogy) alongside Pamela Anderson and Paul Walter Hauser. The movie scored an 'A-' grade on CinemaScore and boasts a 90% average on Rotten Tomatoes, both of which should bode well for the remainder of its theatrical run. 'The Naked Gun' appealed almost squarely to older white men; 62% of initial crowds were male, 50% were above 35 years old and 70% were Caucasian. This weekend's final newcomer, Neon's body-horror nightmare 'Together' landed in sixth place with $6.8 million over the traditional weekend and an encouraging $10.8 million during its first five days of release. Real-life husband and wife Dave Franco and Alison Brie star in 'Together' as a co-dependent couple who become frighteningly close after a mysterious force causes horrific body changes. Audiences gave the film a 'C+' on CinemaScore, though that harsh a grade isn't surprising since they likely left the theater feeling very disturbed. In fact, Neon has been leaning into the on-screen trauma to promote the movie, offering free couples therapy for partners who see 'Together' during opening weekend. Neon shelled out $17 million to buy the movie at Sundance, marking one of the richest deals in the festival's history. 'A lukewarm audience score is typical of these films and generally has little effect on how they play out,' Gross says. 'It's [a] smart horror production that's going to be profitable when it's finished.' Elsewhere at the box office, 'Superman' descended to fourth place with $13.9 million in its fourth weekend of release. The Warner Bros. and DC Studios adaptation has generated $316.2 million domestically and $551.2 million globally to date. Universal's 'Jurassic World Rebirth' rounded out the top five with $8.4 million in its fifth weekend of release. The dinosaur epic, which rebooted the long-running property with Scarlett Johansson, Jonathan Bailey and Mahershala Ali, has grossed $317 million in North America and $766 million globally. Overall, the box office is 9.5% ahead of last year but 23% behind 2019, the last pre-pandemic year, according to Comscore. Summer revenues just hit $3 billion from May through early August, so it's a question of whether this could be the second summer in post-COVID times — the year of 'Barbenheimer' was the first — to cross the $4 billion milestone. 'A solid home stretch of the summer is in the cards,' predicts senior Comscore analyst Paul Dergarabedian. 'The $4 billion benchmark is still about a $1 billion away, which is no cake walk but potentially in play.' Solve the daily Crossword

Nearly 17 Million Young Americans Could Benefit From Ozempic-like Drugs
Nearly 17 Million Young Americans Could Benefit From Ozempic-like Drugs

Newsweek

time9 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Nearly 17 Million Young Americans Could Benefit From Ozempic-like Drugs

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly 17 million young Americans could be eligible for GLP-1RAs—a class of medications used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity—including Ozempic and Wegovy. This is based on estimations from Yale School of Medicine researchers who have assessed how many adolescents and young adults in the US are eligible for the drugs and how many can realistically access them. Despite millions being eligible, one in five young adults who meet the criteria are uninsured and one-third denied having a routine place for healthcare. The researchers describe this as "a barrier to identifying, treating, and preventing cardio-kidney-metabolic diseases". The prevalence of type 2 diabetes and obesity continues to increase in youth across the country, hence the need for improved intervention. "Assuming that all individuals who were appropriate candidates for these medications could receive them after shared-decision making with their clinician, we could see substantial progress made in treating and preventing obesity-related diseases in US youth, such as dyslipidemia and hypertension," paper author Ashwin K. Chetty told Newsweek. This, he explained, "could lead to the prevention of severe complications of obesity into adulthood, such as strokes and heart attacks." Hand holding Ozempic-like injection pens on dark background. Hand holding Ozempic-like injection pens on dark said the GLP-1RA eligibility criteria they used covered indications for semaglutide (Ozempic, Rybelsus and Wegovy), liraglutide (Saxenda and Victoza), Bydureon BCise (exenatide), Trulicity (dulaglutide) and tirzepatide (Zepbound and Mounjaro). While some medications contain the same ingredient under a different brand name, the drugs are licensed in different ways. In the U.S., Ozempic, for example, is approved for use in people with type 2 diabetes, while Wegovy is approved for those with obesity or who are overweight and have related health problems. Wegovy and Ozempic mimic a hormone called glucagon-like peptide-1—hence 'GLP-1'—which targets areas of the brain that regulate appetite. "Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are approved to treat pediatric obesity and T2D, and a small but growing number of adolescents and young adults receive GLP-1RAs, which are largely covered through private insurance or Medicaid," the researchers wrote. "Insurance status, access to care and clinical profile of the broader population of youth eligible for GLP-1RAs are unclear but important for policy development. We characterized demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics of US adolescents and young adults eligible for any GLP-1RA." To inform the estimations, the cross-sectional study pooled publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) January 2017–March 2020 and August 2021–August 2023. They included US adolescents aged 12–17 and young adults aged 18–25 who met U.S. Food and Drug Administration criteria for GLP-1RA treatment. Over-the-shoulder view of a person in bed checking a smartphone. Over-the-shoulder view of a person in bed checking a adolescents, GLP-1RA indications included type 2 diabetes or obesity defined either as BMI in the 95th percentile or higher for age and sex or body weight greater than 60kg and BMI corresponding to 30 for adults by international cutoffs. For young adults, GLP-1RA indications included type 2 diabetes, obesity (a BMI greater than 30) or a BMI of 27 or higher with a weight-related condition (dyslipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or type 2 diabetes). The sample included 572 adolescents and 590 young adults eligible for GLP-1RA treatment, representing an estimated 5.8 million adolescents and 11.1 million young adults. Adolescents eligible for the drugs included 40.3 percent insured by Medicaid, 40.5 percent privately insured and 7.2 percent uninsured. Eligible young adults included 20.8 percent insured by Medicaid, 49 percent privately insured and 19.4 percent uninsured. While 92.2 percent of adolescents reported having a routine place for healthcare, 68.1 percent of young adults reported the same, according to the study. Among both groups, cardio-kidney-metabolic risk factors (dyslipidemia, impaired kidney function, hypertension and prediabetes) were prevalent. "Of note, some indications for young adults were fully encompassed by other indications and were not analyzed separately," said Chetty. For example, the indication of type 2 diabetes may include having also a cardiovascular disease. The analysis also did not include people aged 10–11 years with type 2 diabetes as there were too few participants in their sample in that age group with the condition. "While Medicare is not allowed to cover anti-obesity medications that are indicated only for obesity, Medicaid can cover anti-obesity medications, though only a fraction of state Medicaid programs do," said Chetty. The researchers say their findings indicate broad Medicaid coverage could increase access to GLP-1RAs for a large portion of U.S. youth who may benefit from them. "This could look like state-level formulary changes that include anti-obesity medications or federal policy changes that foster coverage for these therapies," said Chetty. "Beyond expanding insurance coverage, improving access also involves ensuring these individuals have access to general healthcare and clinician appointments, which we show in this study is a particularly significant concern for young adults." Why are we seeing rising rates of metabolic diseases in America's youth? Paper author and pediatric nephrologist Dr. James Nugent told Newsweek: "Changes in lifestyle behaviors and structural factors like increased screen time, decreased physical activity, poor sleep, and consumption of ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages are important contributors to obesity in youth. "The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the rise in obesity due to its effect on these lifestyle behaviors. Chronic stress, food insecurity, poverty, and adverse childhood experiences are also strongly associated with obesity in youth. Additionally, in utero exposure to maternal obesity and diabetes are risk factors for obesity and type 2 diabetes in childhood." The authors said study limitations include self-reported data subject to recall bias and potential misclassification of the type of diabetes. They also flagged GLP-1RAs should be considered alongside intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment (and surgery where applicable). And while expanded insurance coverage may substantially increase access, uninsurance and lack of routine care are barriers to this therapy. How can we ensure young people receive holistic care too? "Improving access to comprehensive obesity treatment will involve ensuring that individuals receive access to healthcare with regular follow-ups and support to engage in health behavior and lifestyle treatment, such as specific programs tailored to providing intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment," said Chetty. "As Dr. Mona Sharifi, a co-author of this paper, has shown, intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment programs can be cost-effective but inadequate funding is the main barrier to implementing and sustaining these programs." What's next? "Given the size and clinical characteristics of the U.S. youth population eligible for GLP-1RAs, there should be greater discussion of how to improve access to GLP-1RAs and other anti-obesity interventions among this population." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about GLP-1 drugs? Let us know via health@ Reference Chetty, A. K., Sharifi, M., & Nugent, J. T. (2025). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist eligibility among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatrics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store