logo
Bangladesh Polls Announcement Likely In August, Yunus Calls For Unity

Bangladesh Polls Announcement Likely In August, Yunus Calls For Unity

NDTVa day ago
National elections in Bangladesh are likely to be announced in the first week of August by the country's interim government, according to media reports, with the announcement expected to coincide with the first anniversary of the protests that led to the fall of the Sheikh Hasina-led government.
Chief Adviser of the interim government, Professor Muhammad Yunus, is expected to make the announcement through a national address. Elections to install a government with a political mandate are likely to be held in February next year.
Several political parties in Bangladesh have been pressing for elections, arguing that the interim government lacks a political mandate. Demands for elections by December, however, appear to have been ignored.
Earlier on June 13, Bangladesh Nationalist Party's acting Chairman Tarique Rahman met with Chief Adviser Yunus in London during his official visit to the United Kingdom. In a joint statement following the meeting, Muhammad Yunus had said, "If necessary preparations are completed, the next national election could be held in the week before the beginning of Ramadan in 2026 (early February)."
Notably, pressure has been mounting on Yunus to announce elections, as the country has been without an elected government since the ouster of Sheikh Hasina in August 2024.
The BNP, which is the main political contender following the ban on the Awami League, remains optimistic about the announcement of an election date and timeline.
Bangladesh daily Prothom Alo quoted BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir saying on Monday, "If the Chief Adviser announces the election date within a couple of days, we will be happy-because that's exactly what we have been demanding."
However, Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, a hardline Islamic outfit that has supported Yunus, is reportedly not in favour of announcing an election date at this stage. Critics argue that Yunus has remained in power with the backing of Jamaat-e-Islami. Following the fall of the Hasina government, the ban on Jamaat was lifted, and its registration with the Election Commission was restored, allowing it to contest future elections.
However, Muhammad Yunus has not indicated anything about an election date announcement despite multiple calls to do so. After holding meetings with the political parties on Saturday, he had called for "unity to thwart attempts to disrupt the election."
"If all the forces of the uprising cannot come together to conduct a fair election, this great opportunity will slip through our hands," the Chief Adviser said during a discussion with top leaders of various political parties.
Expressing hope for the cooperation of all political parties to organise a fair election, Muhammad Yunus said, "Whenever we move forward with election preparations, various conspiracies come to light. But the reality is that no conspiracy can obstruct the democratic journey. Because the unity of all democratic forces on the issue of fascism is clear."
Notably, Sheikh Hasina was toppled in a student-led revolution in August 2024 and was charged with crimes against humanity, including incitement, conspiracy, and issuing orders that led to mass killings.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Erdogan's Islamist agenda undermines India-Turkey ties
How Erdogan's Islamist agenda undermines India-Turkey ties

First Post

time43 minutes ago

  • First Post

How Erdogan's Islamist agenda undermines India-Turkey ties

While India and Turkey have the potential to develop economic and commercial relations, Ankara's political orientations and President Recep Erdogan's Islamic bent of mind and his larger-than-life image of himself prevent the growth of ties read more Turkey, or, to be diplomatically correct, Türkiye (but the country is still popularly known as Turkey), has had close ties with Pakistan since the early 1950s. Their inspiration was Turkey and Pakistan's pro-West orientation during the Cold War. Turkey became a member of NATO in 1952, and both countries joined the US-created Central Treaty Organisation (Cento) in 1955. That led their armed forces, which controlled the destinies of their respective countries, to be drawn to each other. This process was encouraged by the US because it considered them to be bulwarks against the Soviets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Thus, the Cold War cast a shadow on India-Turkey relations because India was a non-aligned country. Thus, also, Turkey's sympathies, through the decades, were with Pakistan on contentious India-Pakistan matters. These included the Jammu and Kashmir issue. Its disposition for Pakistan was not limited to expressions of diplomatic support but covered the defence dimension as well. It was this approach that was decisively demonstrated during Operation Sindoor. Turkish diplomatic statements were biased against India. During the aerial operation, Pakistan extensively used Turkish drones between the nights of May 6-7 and the cessation of hostilities on May 10. It is also believed that Turkey continued its military supplies during the crucial period when Operation Sindoor was actively underway. India was indignant at Turkey openly siding with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. It signalled its unhappiness by withdrawing the security clearance of the Turkish company Celebi Aviation, which, through its Indian entity, handled cargo at nine Indian airports. This action was appropriate. India reinforced its disapproval of Turkish policies during Operation Sindoor when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Turkey's arch-rival Cyprus on June 15-16. During his trip Modi reiterated India's traditional support for Cyprus in its disputes with Turkey. The India-Cyprus Joint Statement issued after Modi's discussions with Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides noted, inter alia, 'India reiterated its unwavering and consistent support for the independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity, and unity of the Republic of Cyprus. In this regard, both sides emphasised the need to avoid unilateral actions as essential for creating a conducive environment for the resumption of meaningful negotiations.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is contrary to the Turkish position on the Cyprus issue. Indeed, Turkey's all-out support for Turkish Cypriots manifested itself fully after its invasion of the island in 1974. Turkish troops since then are present in the entity, which now calls itself the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TNRC). Turkey actually wants TNRC to become a sovereign state with full international recognition. A United Nations Peacekeeping Force ensures the maintenance of peace in Cyprus. Before proceeding further to attempt a prognosis of how the India-Turkey-Pakistan ties will evolve, it would be appropriate to consider Turkey's diplomatic responses to the Pahalgam terrorist attack and the beginning and pause of Operation Sindoor. Turkey's Foreign Ministry condemned the Pahalgam attack, calling it 'heinous'. It also stated, 'We are deeply saddened to learn that many people lost their lives and many others were injured in a terrorist attack that targeted civilians in the Pahalgam region of Jammu and Kashmir today (April 22).' Turkey did call the Pahalgam attack a terrorist one, but what is clearly seen in its carefully crafted statement is that it left the question of where the terrorists came from completely open. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Turkey has a long tradition of refined diplomacy. Hence, its decision not to enter into the question of where the terrorists came from was deliberate. Pakistan's sponsorship of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir has been going on for thirty-five years, and Turkey is not oblivious of this fact. On the day of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was in Ankara on apparently a pre-scheduled visit. However, this was all the more reason for Turkey to signal, even obliquely, that the sponsorship of terrorism was not acceptable. On Operation Sindoor, Turkey's Foreign Ministry stated the 'attack carried out by India last night (night of May 6-7) raises the risk of an all-out war. We condemn such provocative steps as well as attacks targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure. We call on the parties to exercise common sense and refrain from unilateral actions. We expect that measures will be taken to reduce tensions in the region as soon as possible and that the necessary mechanisms, including in the field of counter-terrorism, will be put in place to prevent the recurrence of similar incidents. We also support Pakistan's call for an investigation into the April 22 terrorist attack'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This was clearly a pro-Pakistani statement. It virtually called Operation Sindoor 'provocative' and 'condemned' it. Going further, it supported Pakistan's demand for an 'international' investigation into the Pahalgam attack. Turkey also showed its partisanship by not demanding that a similar international investigation should be carried out on the Jaffar Express attack, which the Pakistani military stated was undertaken by India through the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA). By issuing this statement, Turkey indicated that it fully stood behind Pakistan. This could only cause outrage in the government and people of India, as indeed it did. On the day of the ceasefire—May 10—Turkey again issued a completely pro-Pakistani statement. Its Foreign Ministry noted, 'We welcome the declaration of a ceasefire between Pakistan and India. We call on the parties to make maximum use of the opportunity provided by the ceasefire to establish a direct and healthy dialogue. It is evident that dialogue mechanisms to prevent similar escalations, including in the field of counter-terrorism, need to be established to ensure sustainable stability in South Asia. We extend our appreciation to all countries, in particular the USA, which have contributed to the ceasefire.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In this statement Turkey contradicted or ignored two basic Indian positions. The first was that the cessation of hostilities was because of direct Indian and Pakistani contacts and not caused by the intervention of any third party, including the United States. The second position that Turkey ignored was India's valid stand on talks with Pakistan. These are best summarised in the words 'talks and terrorism cannot go together'. Taken together, Turkey's three statements were so completely against India that they could have no reaction but to bring India-Turkish ties to a new low. They also naturally angered the Indian public, and calls went out that Indian tourists should not visit Turkey; its popularity as a tourist destination for Indians has grown in recent years. Besides, Indian filmmakers have also considered Turkish locales for shooting their films. If India was disappointed by Turkey's partisanship, Pakistan was delighted. Shehbaz Sharif, who was in Turkey on April 22, again went to the country on May 25 to thank President Recep Tayyip Erdogan for his support of Pakistan before and during Operation Sindoor. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A media release from Shehbaz Sharif's office gushed, 'Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who was accompanied by Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, Chief of Army Staff, expressed heartfelt gratitude to the government and people of Türkiye [Turkey] for their unwavering support to Pakistan during the recent developments in South Asia, underscoring the strength of the fraternal bonds between the two nations." He lauded Turkey's principled stance and the outpouring of support of goodwill of the Turkish people for Pakistan and termed it as a source of great comfort and strength for Pakistan. Significantly, the media release also noted, 'Both leaders reaffirmed their principled support for each other's core concerns, including the Jammu and Kashmir dispute.' What the Pakistani media release omitted to mention is Turkey's core concern, which is the Cyprus dispute. Certainly, this omission would not have pleased the Turks, but they would have taken it in their stride. Turkey and Pakistan's evolution has greatly differed over the past two decades in one major respect. President Erdogan, who has been the effective 'ruler' of Turkey in this period, has succeeded in eliminating the Turkish armed forces' role in its political life. The armed forces considered themselves as the guardians of the secular legacy of Kemal Ataturk, the father of modern Turkey. They ensured that Turkey's Islamic forces were kept out of the country's public life. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, Erdogan, who is an Islamic revivalist, cut the armed forces to size with the help of the Turkish hinterland, which was never in full sympathy with Kemalist ideals. This is unlike Pakistan, where the armed forces are still in control of the country despite the veneer of democracy. What now joins the two countries is that they are both coming more and more in the grip of conservative Islam. At the same time, the professional Turkish army continues its technical linkages with its Pakistani counterpart. In view of these factors, it seems unlikely that Turkey is capable of taking an objective view of developments in the Indian subcontinent or pressing Pakistan to abandon the use of terrorism as a military security doctrine. This can only mean that while India and Turkey have the potential to develop economic and commercial ties, Turkey's political orientations and also Erdogan's Islamic bent of mind and his larger-than-life image of himself will prevent their growth. The possibility of positive growth in India-Turkish ties is therefore bleak. The writer is a former Indian diplomat who served as India's Ambassador to Afghanistan and Myanmar, and as secretary, the Ministry of External Affairs. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Has Nimisha Priya been pardoned in Yemen? How Grand Mufti's big claim has been refuted
Has Nimisha Priya been pardoned in Yemen? How Grand Mufti's big claim has been refuted

First Post

time3 hours ago

  • First Post

Has Nimisha Priya been pardoned in Yemen? How Grand Mufti's big claim has been refuted

Uncertainty continues in the case of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya, whose execution in Yemen was deferred earlier this month. The claim by the 'Grand Mufti of India' that the woman's sentencing was overturned has been refuted by sources in the Indian government. The family of the man Priya killed has also said that no pardon has been granted read more Has Nimisha Priya's death sentence been overturned? The 38-year-old nurse from Kerala is on the death row in Yemen for killing her business partner. More than two weeks after Nimisha Priya's execution was deferred, the 'Grand Mufti of India', Kanthapuram AP Abubakar Musliyar, has claimed that the punishment was completely overturned. However, the Indian government and the victim's family have refuted the claim. What's the latest in the case? And is there any truth to the Grand Mufti's claim? We explain. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is Nimisha Priya saved from the gallows? Grand Mufti says… On Monday (July 28), the office of the 'Grand Mufti of India', Kanthapuram AP Abubakar Musliyar, reportedly claimed that Nimisha Priya's death sentence had been officially cancelled. It, however, added that it had yet to receive official written communication from authorities in Yemen. Nimisha Priya was scheduled to be executed on July 16 for killing her business partner, Talal Abdo Mehdi, a Yemeni national, in 2017. However, her sentencing was deferred, and no further date was set. Then came the big claim. 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned. A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence that was temporarily suspended earlier,' according to a statement issued by the Grand Mufti's office and quoted by the news agency ANI. The office of Kanthapuram AP Aboobacker Musliyar, who holds the ceremonial title of 'Grand Mufti of India', reportedly claimed that Nimisha Priya's death sentence was revoked. Image courtesy: Markaz Knowledge City According to reports, the decision to overturn the nurse's death sentence was taken at a meeting in the Yemeni capital. Senior Yemeni scholars, appointed by Sheikh Umar Hafeel Thangal at the request of the Indian Grand Mufti, mediated with the rulers of Northern Yemen and international diplomats, it was earlier reported. The meeting was concluded with the complete cancellation of the death sentence. According to Musliyar's office, while some key decisions regarding the case have been made, further deliberations were expected. The pending matters, which included a resolution with the family of the murdered Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mehdi, will be finalised through continued discussions, media reports claimed. Who is the 'Grand Mufti of India'? A mufti is a Muslim scholar, an Islamic law expert, qualified to give legal opinions on matters of Sharia. Grand Mufti is the highest-ranking cleric in the country. Musliyar, whose official name is Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, is a revered figure in the Sunni Muslim sect and has a following not only in India but also in South Asia. The 94-year-old cleric is based in Kerala, the state Nimisha Priya hails. He is widely known as the 'Grand Mufti of India', though it is not an official title. He is the 10th person to hold the title. A leader in Islamic education, social welfare, and public discourse, he rose to prominence over the years. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad was conferred the 'Grand Mufti of India' title in February 2019 at the Gareeb Nawaz Peace Conference held at New Delhi's Ramlila Maidan, organised by the All India Tanzeem Ulama-e-Islam, a national body of Sunni clerics. He is the general secretary of All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama and the Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama, two of India's most influential Sunni Muslim organisations. He is also chairman of the Markaz Knowledge City project, a private integrated township in his hometown, Kozhikode, which runs educational institutions, charitable organisations, social service centres, and a cultural centre. Musliyar is a regular at global interfaith gatherings and represented Indian Muslim scholars at international forums, including sessions at the United Nations and events organised by Unesco, reports The Hindu. In the past, he has grabbed headlines for his views on the Babri Masjid verdict and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). In 2019, he appealed to the Muslim community to accept the verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi issue. Musliyar met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah in March 2020 and urged them to amend the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is his role in the Nimish Priya case? After Yemeni authorities set July 16 as the date for Nimisha Priya's execution, there was hectic activity going on to delay the sentencing. Politicians in Kerala requested the government to step in, but India does not have a formal diplomatic relationship with the Houthis, the rebel group that controls parts of Yemen, including Sana'a, where Nimisha Priya is lodged in jail. Amid the hectic parlays, Kerala Congress MLA Chandy Oommen reportedly approached the Grand Mufti, requesting him to secure mercy under Islamic law. The cleric reached out to prominent Yemeni Sufi scholar Sheikh Habib Umar bin Hafiz to explore the possibility of obtaining a pardon from the victim's family under the Islamic concept of diyah, also known as blood money, according to a report in The Hindu. The Grand Mufti appealed to religious leaders in Yemen to pardon the nurse in exchange for financial compensation. A coordinated effort involving Yemeni tribal leaders, judicial authorities, and religious scholars led to Nimisha Priya's execution being temporarily deferred, the report says. However, a report by The Indian Express pointed to the role of the Indian government in deferring the execution. According to social worker Samuel Jerome Baskaran, who has been leading the negotiations in the case, the decision to postpone the death sentence was taken by the Yemeni government after Abdul Malik Al Nehaya, ruler of the Al Wasab region, met the President of Yemen on July 11. A day later, he agreed to defer to sentencing. 'The Indian government also got involved in this mission,' he had said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is the Indian government saying about the case now? The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has refuted reports that Nimisha Priya's execution has been revoked. 'Information being shared by certain individuals on the Nimisha Priya case is inaccurate,' MEA sources said today. Nimisha Priya, a nurse from Kerala, was convicted of killing her business partner and Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mehdi in 2017 and was sentenced to death in 2018. What is the victim's family saying? The family of the Yemeni businessman called the Grand Mufti's claim baseless. In a rebuttal to a statement made by the office of Musaliyar, Mehdi's brother, Abdul Fattah Mehdi, denied that a pardon had been granted to Nimisha Priya. 'Certain preachers who claim to speak in the name of religion step forward to create a false sense of heroism for themselves — at our expense,' Abdul Fattah said, according to CNN-News18. 'Talal's blood will not become merchandise in a negotiation bazaar.' Questioning the claims made by the cleric, he said, 'Who authorised them, when, and on what basis?' He emphasised that under Yemeni law, a death sentence can only be reversed if the victim's family accepts blood money — a decision his family has not yet made. 'If any decision is to be made, we are the ones who will make it,' he said. What can we expect next in the Nimisha Priya case? Efforts are ongoing to save the nurse from the gallows. However, when the Houthi Supreme Political Council rejected Nimisha Priya's appeal in November 2023, it left a very small window under the Sharia law – only the victim's family can now forgive her if they were paid blood money. Diplomatic efforts by the Indian government are underway. Indian officials are regularly in touch with jail authorities in Sana'a and the prosecutor's office in Yemen, according to reports. For now, Nimisha Priya's fate hangs in balance. With inputs from agencies

Nimisha Priya: Uncertainty Deepens Over Death Sentence In Yemen As MEA Refutes Overturn Claims
Nimisha Priya: Uncertainty Deepens Over Death Sentence In Yemen As MEA Refutes Overturn Claims

India.com

time4 hours ago

  • India.com

Nimisha Priya: Uncertainty Deepens Over Death Sentence In Yemen As MEA Refutes Overturn Claims

Uncertainty still besets the destiny of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya, who sits on death row in Yemen. Contradictory reports were heard on Monday, about the fate of her death sentence, keeping her family and supporters in limbo. Earlier on Monday, the office of Grand Mufti Abu Bakr Musliyar stated that Nimisha Priya's death penalty had been officially reversed, suggesting she would no longer be executed in Yemen. This news had briefly raised hopes for her release. But minutes after that, India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) quickly denied the Grand Mufti's assertion. MEA sources explained that reports made about Nimisha Priya were "incorrect" and that the Grand Mufti was merely "mediating" in the matter. This MEA announcement threw Nimisha Priya's case back into uncertainty, asking whether her sentence is indeed overturned or if only its execution is suspended. Victim's Family Demands Execution Compounding the complexity, Abdul Fattah Mahdi, the sibling of the late Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mahdi, for whom Nimisha Priya was found guilty of manslaughter, has openly called for Nimisha Priya's instant execution. Expressing himself on a social media page, Abdul Fattah posted a letter to Yemen's Attorney General, asserting that his family demands the instant application of the death sentence without any delay. As per the English portal Onmanorama, in his July 25 letter, he wrote that the order for the death sentence on Nimisha Priya had got the final nod from Yemen's Supreme Political Council. "This decision has now attained the status of a final and binding order. Hence, its implementation is obligatory under the law, and all concerned authorities have to implement it without delay," the letter had allegedly claimed. Abdul Fattah also refuted the Grand Mufti Abu Bakr Musliyar's claim of a meeting between Northern Yemeni authorities, an international delegation, and a group of Islamic clerics appointed by Sheikh Habib Omar bin Hafeez, which was supposedly aimed at overturning the death sentence. Nimisha Priya's execution was originally set for July 16 but was put off indefinitely after mediation by Indian religious leaders. Abdul Fattah had publicly denounced this postponement, declaring that his family "categorically rejected all reconciliation and mediation efforts, as the crime had crossed all boundaries." Grand Mufti's Claim And Family's Arrival Despite the victim's family's position, attempts to spare Nimisha Priya were said to be being made from the side of Grand Mufti Abu Bakr Musliyar. An announcement from the 94-year-old Grand Mufti's office had previously stated Nimisha Priya's death sentence, which was suspended before, had now been "completely cancelled" in a high-ranking meeting in Sanaa. Meanwhile, Michelle, 13-year-old daughter of Nimisha Priya, and her husband have reached Sanaa, Yemen's capital, along with a few mediators in the hopes of winning her release. Nimisha's daughter cried out emotionally, "I miss you Mommy. I love you very much, Mommy. Please help bring my mother home. I really want to meet her." Nimisha Priya, a 38-year-old Indian nurse from Kerala, traveled to Yemen in 2008 in search of improved job prospects. She was an employee at a government hospital. In 2017, she was charged and subsequently convicted of murdering Yemeni citizen Talal Abdo Mahdi.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store