Air India Ahmedabad plane crash: Government constituted high-level panel meets, looks into possible causes
The panel, chaired by Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan, listened to the opinions of various stakeholders about the possible causes of the aircrash and deliberated on steps to be taken to check future occurrence of any such accident, sources said.
In the first meeting of the panel here, the sources said, the focus of the participants was to analyse the possible causes of the aircrash and how to go about in "formulating Standard Operating Procedures for preventing such occurrences in the future".
Air India Ahmedabad plane crash LIVE updates
Since a separate investigation is also being carried out by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is looking into the technical aspects of the crash, the panel discussed about the possible causes and lesson to be taken from it, the sources said.
Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu on Saturday (June 14, 2025) said while the AAIB investigation will handle the technical aspects, the high-level committee will provide a holistic, policy-oriented roadmap for future safeguards.
Those who attended the meeting on Monday include representatives from the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Home Ministry, Indian Air Force, Intelligence Bureau, Gujarat government, Directorate General of Civil Aviation, and Bureau of Civil Aviation Security, among others.
The committee is expected to submit its report within three months.
The black box of Air India's Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner plane that crashed on Thursday (June 12, 2025) in Ahmedabad was recovered from the site on Friday evening while officials have also confirmed that the Cockpit Voice Recorder has been found, a crucial discovery to help ascertain the possible cause of the accident.
The aircraft from Ahmedabad to London crashed soon after takeoff on Thursday afternoon. Out of 242 people on board the plane, only one person survived.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Jitendra calls for paradigm shift in agriculture sector
New Delhi: Technology in agriculture has progressed rapidly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership over the past 11 years, Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh said on Monday, calling for a paradigm shift in the agriculture sector by embracing cutting-edge technology and fostering greater synergy among stakeholders. Addressing the 96th annual general meeting of the ICAR Society at the NASC Complex in the capital, the minister said its full potential remained untapped at the ground level. Speaking at the event, chaired by Agriculture Minister Shri Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Dr Singh underscored that every technology available globally is now accessible within India. 'It is no longer about whether technology is available—it is about how fast we adopt it and integrate it into our agricultural ecosystem to add value to our economy,' he told the gathering. The Minister stressed the importance of breaking mental and institutional silos, noting that many in the agriculture value chain are not just unaware of new technologies, but also unaware that they are unaware. Pointing to success stories like the Lavender Revolution in Jammu and Kashmir, where over 3,500 startups have emerged around lavender cultivation, Dr Singh emphasised how new-age farming — using satellite imaging, remote-controlled tractors, and order-based crop production — is reshaping the agricultural narrative. 'From lavender in Bhaderwah to off-season tulips grown for temple offerings, we have examples where science and strategy have combined to generate both income and innovation,' he noted. He also highlighted that biotech-driven advances, such as pest-resistant cotton developed through Department of Biotechnology initiatives and radiation-based food preservation techniques by the Department of Atomic Energy, are redefining how produce is grown, stored, and exported. 'Our mangoes now fly to the US thanks to these technologies. And yet, many states have not come forward to fully exploit these tools,' he observed. Dr Singh proposed more frequent and informal cross-ministerial interactions to ensure real-time exchange of innovations. 'We should not wait for annual meetings alone. Let's create working groups and reach out when solutions can be shared, spontaneously and practically,' he urged.
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Thupstan Chhewang Out, Sonam Wangchuk in: The Political Churn at Ladakh's Apex Buddhist Body
Srinagar: In a significant political development, environmentalist and innovator Sonam Wangchuk has been inducted into the Apex Body Leh (ABL) a day after Thupstan Chhewang, its chairman and the most prominent Buddhist face of the ongoing agitation in Ladakh stepped down citing 'individual agendas' and 'competing interests'. The development has triggered speculation about the alleged power struggle in the Buddhist body with some political observers noting that the exit of Chhewang at a time when the Union home ministry has refused to concede any of the four demands made by the Ladakh civil society will lead to a 'power vacuum'. Describing Chhewang as a 'towering and respected figure', author and former diplomat Phunchok Stobdan said that his resignation was a 'veiled warning' for the people of Ladakh and that it has left a 'big question mark' on the role and functioning of the apex body. Wangchuk After a day of hectic political activity on July 7, the ABL said in a statement that Wangchuk has been inducted in its subcommittee as its representative for the high-powered committee (HPC) which was set up by the home ministry in 2023 to address the anger in Ladakh after its separation from J&K in 2019. The HPC also comprises members of the home ministry and Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) which represents the Muslim-majority Kargil district. In its four-point agenda, the ABL-KDA alliance has been demanding statehood, Sixth Schedule status, a dedicated public services commission and two parliamentary seats for Ladakh. Activist Wangchuk has gone on hunger strikes twice in the past against the constitutional disempowerment of Ladakh and its demotion into a Union territory (UT) without a legislature in the aftermath of its separation from J&K in 2019. The ABL cited Wangchuk's 'unwavering commitment' and his 'dedicated efforts in voicing the aspirations' of the people of Ladakh as the reasons for his induction. The elevation of Wangchuk, who is widely seen as a moderate face of the agitation in Ladakh, came after a meeting of the apex body on July 5 in Leh following which Chhewang, former member of parliament who resigned from the Bhartiya Janta Party in 2018 over its 'false promises and empty rhetoric' parted ways from the group. 'I prefer not to be entangled in competing interests …. Since stepping away from electoral politics, I have consistently distanced myself from partisan and individual agendas,' Chhewang said in a statement announcing his resignation which sent shockwaves across the political landscape in Ladakh. Another leader leaves After Chhewang's resignation, senior Congress leader Nawang Rigzin Jora had also 'recused' from the HPC and the ABL subcommittee. 'The Congress party shall continue to remain part of the ABL, support all genuine efforts towards achieving our avowed objectives, including the Sixth Schedule and statehood and criticise any moves that undermine them,' Jora said. The ABL said that its members met Chhewang at his residence in Leh on July 7 and 'earnestly appealed to him to withdraw his resignation'. 'The members reaffirmed their unwavering support for his leadership and expressed deep respect for his vision and guidance,' the ABL said, adding that it 'continues to regard (Chhewang) as the sole leader capable of guiding this movement to its rightful destination'. 'In response, Shri Thupstan Chhewang assured the members that he would reflect on the matter and speak about it at an appropriate time,' the statement said. Jora however 'agreed to extend his continued support and participation' in the ABL and the high powered committee, 'He also reaffirmed his continuous support and respect to Shri Thupstan Chhewang's Chairmanship/leadership of Apex Body Leh,' the ABL statement said. Elections and BJP In a lengthy post on Facebook, Stobdan who has warned of factional strife in Ladakh in the past wondered whether the ongoing agitation in Ladakh was being used by the ABL leaders as 'convenient staging grounds for their own political ambitions'. 'Are the youth of Ladakh being emotionally exploited with lofty slogans and alarmist narratives while certain individuals quietly prepare for the coming LAHDC elections? Is the 'movement' truly about the environment and constitutional safeguards-or is it a smokescreen for personal electoral gain? These are not idle questions-they go to the very heart of Ladakh's political integrity and future,' Stobdan said. The elections for the powerful Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council (Leh) are scheduled to be held in September-October with the Bhartiya Janta Party eyeing a comeback after suffering a humiliating defeat in the 2024 Lok Sabha election. Wangchuk who received the 2018 Ramon Magsaysay Award welcomed the 15-year clause in the new domicile policy which was rolled out by the Union government for Ladakh last month, calling it a 'low hanging fruit'. "The hunger strikes, the YouTube campaigns, the emotional appeals for environmental preservation — was it all theatre? Was it meant to manipulate the youth, the media, and the sentiments of an entire region to set the stage for a political entry?' Stobdan, author of The Great Game in the Buddhist Himalayas: India and China's Quest for Strategic Dominance, said. Jammu-based political analyst and editor Zafar Choudhary said that the exit of Chhewang, a two-time MP, carries 'immense political significance' as it comes at a time when the civil society in Ladakh has been negotiating with the Union government over the restoration of its constitutional rights. 'The lack of progress, unclear commitments from the Centre, and internal political differences may be creating pressure on regional leadership. The timing of his resignation has raised serious concerns about the state of unity among Ladakh's leadership which appears to be under strain,' Choudhary said.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Liberals don't want Muslim women to demand rights in Hindutva era
I am not suggesting that Indian women as a whole have attained substantive equality as guaranteed by the Constitution. This appears distant, even eight decades after Independence. But Muslim women additionally bear the brunt of belonging to a religious minority. They have to deal with patriarchal orthodoxy within the community and divisive communal onslaught outside. Unlike Hindu and Christian women, they face legal discrimination in family matters without reformed codified Muslim personal laws. This is an injustice suffered by women alone – even as the whole community lives in poverty, economic and educational backwardness, and political apathy. Rising religious polarisation and hate politics have made matters worse in recent years. Her work also highlights that Muslim women seeking justice are neither a figment of imagination nor a part of some political conspiracy. Rather, they remind us of gaps such as unjust personal laws in our democratic system. Forever, Muslim women seeking justice within family and community have been demonised by conservatives as 'bad women'. Speaking to the media, Banu recalled how she was threatened and attacked for amplifying the voices of women in a conservative society. Banu Mushtaq's Heart Lamp won the 2025 International Booker Prize for poignantly telling stories based on the lived realities of Muslim women in a male-dominated society. The jury lauded her work for its 'astonishing portraits of survival and resilience'. Originally written in Kannada and translated into English by Deepa Bhasthi, the stories are universal. The women portrayed can be found across India. Mushtaq's work brings alive the pathos and ingenuity with which ordinary women negotiate the complexities imposed by patriarchy. Muslim women have come under the spotlight since 2014. The women-led movement against instant triple talaq had been going on since 2012, gaining momentum when Shayara Bano approached the Supreme Court in 2016. The Union government then filed an affidavit supporting the abolition of instant triple talaq. Many women survivors of triple talaq, as well as my organisation, joined the petition. We argued that the 'talaq talaq talaq' method of divorce was both un-Quranic and unconstitutional. A major campaign educating the public about the rights of women in Islam was undertaken. Thousands of women joined the movement. The conservative clergy defended the practice and fought for the preservation of the status quo. To them, Shariat is divine and cannot be touched by anyone. Most Opposition political parties kept silent, except some parliamentarians who spoke out in their individual capacity. In 2017, the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the practice of triple talaq was invalid. In 2019, the Centre brought a law punishing Muslim husbands pronouncing triple talaq with a jail term. The Narendra Modi government has been accused of using Muslim women as tropes to further its politics. On one hand, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders talk about the need for a Uniform Civil Code to help Muslim women. On the other, girls and women in hijab cannot be allowed inside schools and colleges in Karnataka. Also read: Indian Muslims must face the truth—Muslim countries don't care about them Muslim women & majoritarian politics Muslim women cannot be immune to majoritarian policies and rising hate crimes. While reform in family law is overdue, women need to be supported in areas such as education, jobs, health and housing. They need safety, security and a life with dignity and freedoms. Women and children are the worst affected when homes are razed during riots or when bulldozers are deployed. It is ironic that no government could protect the rights of Muslim women since Independence, despite constitutional obligations. Only men with overtly religious identities were perceived as leaders. The Shah Bano episode remains a shameful chapter in our history. It seems Indian Muslim women are obligated to live within predefined boundaries demarcated by conservative clergy – which are occasionally readjusted by the dominant politics of the day. In 1986, the Congress government quashed the maintenance given to Shah Bano by the court in 1985 to ostensibly uphold secularism. They surrendered to the patriarchal forces for fear of losing votes. Between 1986 and now, the opportunity for reforming personal laws has not arisen. This speaks volumes about the stranglehold of patriarchy over our polity. Meanwhile, women continue to suffer from unilateral divorces, and archaic practices such as halala, muta marriages, polygamy, denial of guardianship of children, and denial of a fair share in property. Our petition in the Supreme Court listed verses from the Quran, highlighting how Allah created man and woman as equals. In reality, misogynistic interpretations and misinterpretations abound. The unequal status of Muslim women is one of the key enigmas for our secular democracy. By contrast, the Muslim woman herself shows exemplary behaviour. She knows her rights and duties as a Muslim and as a citizen in a democracy. She demands to be an equal Muslim and an equal citizen at once. I have routinely heard women survivors of the 2002 Gujarat riots saying that they want justice and not charity. Women fighting against triple talaq equipped themselves with Quranic teachings as well as knowledge of constitutional safeguards. They saw no contradiction in demanding justice from both sources. Women fighting against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) invoked constitutional values of equality, secularism, and non-discrimination as they sat on dharnas with the tricolour in their hands. However, it suited the conservatives to support this women-led agitation, unlike the one against triple talaq. Women can be supported as long as they protest against state institutions and do not challenge the patriarchal status quo within the home and family. Some liberals consider Muslim women's demand for equal rights as inappropriate in times of Hindutva politics. But for women seeking justice within their lifetime, there is nothing called the correct time. Shayara Bano, Aafreen Rehman, Ishrat Jahan, Atiya Sabri, and Gulshan Parveen – all petitioners against triple talaq are living feminine beings. As are the women in Heart Lamp. Zakia Soman is a women's rights activist, columnist, and the co-founder of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan. Her X handle is @zakiasomanbmma. Views are personal. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
