Lashkar-e-Taiba prison radicalisation case: NIA arrests central jail psychiatrist, 2 more from Karnataka
According to NIA, searches were conducted at five locations in Bengaluru and Kolar districts of the state which lead to the 'arrest of Dr Nagaraj, Psychiatrist, Central Prison, Parappana Agrahara, Bengaluru, Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) ASI Chan Pasha, and Anees Fathima, mother of an absconding accused.'
The investigation agency also found various digital devices, cash, gold and incriminating documents during the searches at the accused's houses.
'The case RC-28/2023/NIA/DLI relates to the recovery of arms, ammunition, explosives and digital devices, including two walkie-talkies, from habitual offenders who were conspiring to unleash terror activities in Bengaluru city with the aim of furthering the nefarious agenda of the proscribed terrorist organization LeT,' the NIA said.
The Central agency said that the psychiatrist was smuggling mobile phones to inmates including Tadiyandaveed Naseer @ T Naseer, a life-time convict lodged in terror cases in Central Prison, Bengaluru. Also Read | BIG arrest: 2 arrested for harbouring Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists responsible for Pahalgam terror attack, says NIA
Nagaraj was supported by one Pavithra in this activity.
'Besides houses of Nagaraj and Pavithra, NIA also searched the house of Anees Fathima, mother of absconder Junaid Ahmed and involved in passing instructions from Naseer to her son for raising funds and handing over the same to T Naseer in prison,' it said.
'As per NIA investigations, ASI Chan Pasha had, in 2022, been involved in passing information related to T Naseer's escort from prison to various courts in exchange of money.'
In the 2023 LeT prison radicalisation case, the NIA has already chargesheeted nine accused. They include absconder 'Junaid Ahmed, under various sections of IPC and UA(P) Act, Arms Act and Explosive Substances Act in the case. Investigations and efforts to track the absconder are continuing.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Police seize mobile phone from inmate during inspection at central prison
Thiruvananthapuram: Exposing security lapses at Central Prison and Correctional Home, Poojappura, officers seized a mobile phone from an inmate during an inspection. The mobile phone was spotted this time in the inner wear of an inmate, Shafeek U T, 28, of Pachira near Pallipuram. Police registered a case against him under Section 86 (2) of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Act-2010. "The mobile phone is sent for forensic examination to trace the owner using its IMEI number. A detailed probe will be ensured this time to identify how the mobile phones reached inside the prison," said station house officer at Poojappura police. This is the fifth time a mobile phone was seized from the prison. In previous incidents, mobile phones were spotted on the roof of the toilets and also found wrapped in plastic covers in the courtyard. In all cases, police identified the owners of the mobile phones. However, the probe team could not find how the mobile phones reached the inmates inside the central prison, where the security measures are fully capped. A year ago, a mobile phone was spotted inside the prison, and during the investigation, it was found that a prisoner on 'parole' threw it over the boundary wall for another inmate. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo "We will check CCTV visuals inside to know how the phone reached there," said police. In addition to the seizure of mobile phones, ganja was seized from the prison four times and banned tobacco products once in the past two years. In addition to these, two jail breaks were also reported and three inmates tried to commit suicide. The jail authorities blamed a shortage of staff and overcrowded cells for all the mess.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Online shopping scam: Kerala HC directs transfer of provisionally attached amount to interest-bearing treasury deposit
Kochi: High court has directed the competent authority under the BUDS Act to ensure that the provisionally attached amount, exceeding Rs 200 crore and lying in various bank accounts in connection with the scam-hit High Rich Online Shopee case, is transferred to an interest-bearing treasury deposit within two weeks. The bench of Justice P Gopinath issued the order on Monday in a petition filed by High Rich Online Shoppe Pvt Ltd and its directors, K D Dasan and his wife K S Sreena, challenging the actions taken under the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (BUDS Act). The directive was issued after considering the fact that the amounts on deposit admittedly exceed Rs 200 crore, and that it would be in the interest of the depositors for the funds to earn interest rather than remain idle in current accounts across various banks. HC further directed that the details of the treasury deposit, including the applicable rate of interest, be duly intimated to it by the competent authority immediately after the transfer and deposit of the amount. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to Aug 13. Previously, a crime had been registered at the Cherpu police station in Thrissur under the BUDS Act against the petitioners, based on a private complaint in a financial fraud case. The complainant alleged that High Rich was engaged in multi-level marketing, thereby conducting a money chain business. Similar cases were also registered against the petitioners at the Ernakulam, Sulthan Bathery and Kannur police stations. In 2023, the additional chief secretary (home), acting as the competent authority under the Act, provisionally attached the assets.
Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat Congress leader files complaint against news channel editor, anchor for defamation
Former Union Minister and newly appointed Congress Legislature Party (CLP) leader in the Gujarat Assembly, Dr Tushar Chaudhary, has lodged a complaint of defamation and under Atrocity Act against the editor of a news channel and an anchor of another on Friday evening. Chaudhary has alleged that the journalists had defamed him and his father, former Chief Minister of Gujarat, the late Amarsinh Chaudhary. The complaint against Jagdish Mehta, group editor of Rajkot-based Headlines News channel, and Gopi Ghanghar, anchor of Ahmedabad-based Nirbhay News channel, was registered in Tapi district. The complaint was registered under Section 356 (Defamation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and various sections of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. In the FIR, the Congress MLA from Khedbrahma has alleged that in a show aired on July 22 on Nirbhay News, Ghanghar made an objectionable statement against him. He said Mehta consented to the statements, which were 'defamatory for him and the entire tribal community'. He said in the FIR, 'A live news debate video came to my personal assistant's mobile phone on July 22' where the statements were made. Talking to The Indian Express, Chaudhary said, 'My father and I got elected from the ST reserved seat, and we are also leaders of the tribal community. Both the accused had uttered statements defaming me, my father and my entire community, and we will not let this go.' Speaking to The Indian Express, Ghanghar said, 'Chaudhary has lodged a complaint against me and Mehta, and we are also looking into ways to respond to it legally. Till now, I have not received any call from Tapi police.' Deputy Superintendent of Police, SC/ST cell, Tapi district, Nikita Shiroya said, 'We have registered an offence against both the accused. We will first gather the original video footage of the debate so that we can determine the topic of discussion, the statements made, and the context in which they were made. Currently, we are at the stage of collecting evidence, and if necessary, we will again contact the complainant and take his statement. We are also looking for both the accused and will see what they have to say.'
