‘If you beat me…': Maharashtra governor on violence over Marathi language
To make his point, Radhakrishnan shared an incident from when he was an MP in Tamil Nadu where he witnessed something similar - violence over language.
'When I was an MP in Tamil Nadu,' Radhakrishnan narrated, 'one day on a highway, I saw some people beating someone. I immediately asked my driver to stop the car and I got out of the car. After seeing me, those who were beating ran away and people who were getting beaten up stood there. I asked them what the problem was, he was telling in Hindi and I could only understand maar maar (beaten up). I called the hotel owner and I asked him, he explained to me that they don't know Tamil, those people were trying to beat them and asked them to speak only in Tamil.'
Also read: Maharashtra challenges acquittal of Mumbai train blasts accused in Supreme Court
'If you come and beat me, can I speak in Marathi immediately? It's impossible. I said sorry to them…I paid for their food and only left after they sat in a lorry,' he added.
Clarifying why he shared that incident, he said that with such kind of hatred, investors would not come and invest in the state, which would harm Maharashtra in long term.
'Why I am telling this? If we spread this kind of hatred, then which investor will come? No investor will come, no industry will come. In the long run, we're doing harm to Maharashtra,' he said.
He also added that he did not speak and understand Hindi, which is an obstacle for him. 'I'm unable to understand Hindi, and that is an obstacle for me…We must learn the maximum number of languages, and we should be proud of our mother tongue, there's no compromise on that,' he said.
Maharashtra governor's remarks come amid several recent incidents of violence against non-Marathi speakers in the state, particularly by workers of Uddhav Thackera's Shiv Sena faction and his cousin Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena.
'What if someone asks us to speak in Tamil, Bengali?'
Reiterating what governor CP Radhakrishnan said, Maharashtra minister Girish Mahajan said that forcing someone to speak Marathi and beating them over it was not good for the state. He also that even Marathi people go out of state for a lot of reasons, what if they're also asked to speak in a language they don't know.
'Definitely, Marathi is our mother tongue, and it is our priority, but if we force someone else to speak Marathi or beat them, that is also not right for our state. We also go out, and what will we do if someone tells us to speak in Tamil or Bengali,' ANI quoted Mahajan as saying.
'We live in a country where many languages are spoken. We love our own languages, but I also do not like this kind of attitude,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
SC refuses to entertain Baghel's plea against nephew's election petition
New Delhi, Jul 22 (UNI) The Supreme Court today refused to entertain a plea by former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel challenging an election petition filed against him by his nephew and BJP leader Vijay Baghel, which alleged violation of the mandated silence period norms during the 2023 Assembly elections. A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi dismissed the petition as withdrawn while granting Baghel liberty to approach the High Court-cum-Election Tribunal to raise the issue of maintainability as a preliminary issue. 'If such an application is filed, the High Court is requested to decide it after giving an opportunity of being heard to the other side and before proceeding on merits. Observations made in the said order shall have no bearing on the application sought to be moved,' the Bench clarified. Baghel had approached the apex court against the Chhattisgarh High Court's dismissal of his application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of Vijay Baghel's election petition. Appearing for Baghel, Senior Advocate Vivek Tankha, along with Advocate Sumeer Sodhi, argued that breach of silence period norms does not amount to 'corrupt practice' under election law and hence, the election petition was not maintainable. However, the Bench suggested that the issue be raised before the High Court-cum-Election Tribunal. In the 2023 Chhattisgarh Assembly elections, Bhupesh Baghel (Indian National Congress) and Vijay Baghel (Bharatiya Janata Party) contested against each other from the Patan constituency, with Bhupesh Baghel emerging victorious. Subsequently, Vijay Baghel filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices, including violation of the 48-hour silence period mandated under Section 126 of the Representation of the People Act. It was claimed that Bhupesh Baghel organised a rally or roadshow during the silence period, where slogans were raised in his favour. This was allegedly video-graphed and photographed by Vijay Baghel's election agent. In his defence, Bhupesh Baghel contended that the election petition was vague and did not disclose any triable cause of action. Upon dismissal of his application by the High Court, he approached the Supreme Court, which today declined to interfere. UNI SNG SSP
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
The linguistic landscape of Tamil Nadu
Amidst Tamil remaining a strong marker of regional identity, the linguistic profile of Tamil Nadu reveals a vibrant variety of languages, including Telugu, Kannada, Urdu, Malayalam, and English, reflecting the State's rich linguistic diversity. This was vividly captured in the Language Atlas of Tamil Nadu 2011, brought out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, last year. According to the Language Atlas, the State had a total population of 7,21,47,030 that spread across an area of 1,30,060 square kilometres in 32 districts (based on Census 2011). Of this, 7,20,98,315 people (99.93%) reported speaking one of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India, while only 48,715 people (0.07%) spoke other languages. A total of 96 languages were identified within the administrative boundaries of Tamil Nadu during the 2011 Census. In the Language Atlas, the term 'speakers' referred only to individuals who reported a particular language as their mother tongue during the Census enumeration. This count excluded those who may have spoken the language but did not declare it as their mother tongue in the Census. Among the scheduled languages in Tamil Nadu, Tamil had a total of 6,37,53,997 speakers. This included 6,37,43,847 people who reported Tamil as their mother tongue in the Census schedules, along with 10,150 individuals whose mother tongues were classified under the Tamil language group. This was followed by Telugu with 42,34,302 speakers, Kannada with 12,86,175, Urdu with 12,64,537, Malayalam with 7,26,096, Hindi with 3,93,380, Gujarati with 2,75,023 and Marathi with 85,454 speakers. Among the non-scheduled languages, English had the highest number of speakers at 24,495, followed by Tulu with 2,636, Bhili/Bhilodi with 1,405, Arabic/Arbi with 1,119 and Kurukh/Oraon with 817. District-wise distribution of languages Tamil Being the official language, Tamil was the most widely spoken language in the State. Tamil Nadu had a total of 6,37,53,997 speakers, making up 88.37% of the State's population. The Tamil-speaking population was concentrated in Chennai (5.71%), Kancheepuram (5.65%), and Villupuram (5.24%), Vellore (4.96%), Tiruvallur (4.88%), Salem (4.83%), Tirunelveli (4.76%), Madurai (4.41%), and Tiruchirappalli (4.09%). Telugu Telugu was the second most spoken language in Tamil Nadu, with 42,34,302 speakers, comprising 5.87% of the total population. The Telugu-speaking population was concentrated in Coimbatore (13.32%), Chennai (10.21%), Tiruvallur (9.80%), Krishnagiri (9.57%), and Vellore (7.53%). Some of the other district that also had significant shares of Telugu speakers were Tiruppur (6.47%), Erode (5.49%), Salem (5.00%), Kancheepuram (4.77%), Virudhunagar (4.07%), and Theni (3.75%). Kannada Kannada speakers in the State numbered 12,86,175, accounting for 1.78% of the population. Their presence was most prominent in Coimbatore (18.73%), Krishnagiri (18.57%), The Nilgiris (13.98%), Erode (9.75%), Theni (7.62%), Salem (6.73%), and Tiruppur (4.41%). Malayalam Malayalam was spoken by 7,26,096 people, representing 1.01%of Tamil Nadu's population. The Malayalam-speaking community was primarily concentrated in Coimbatore (23.34%), The Nilgiris (18.16%), Kanniyakumari (14.75%), and Chennai (14.46%), Tiruvallur (8.28%) and Kancheepuram (5.99%). Urdu Urdu were 12,64,537 in numbers, making up 1.75% of the population. Vellore district had the highest concentration, accounting for 30.21% of the State's Urdu-speaking population. It was followed by Chennai (15.70%), Krishnagiri (8.73%), Villupuram (5.34%), Tiruvannamalai (5.19%), Kancheepuram (4.91%), and Tiruvallur (4.83%). Hindi Hindi was spoken by 3,93,380 people, forming 0.55% of the State's population. The largest share resided in Chennai (40.54%), followed by Tiruvallur (10.80%), Kancheepuram (10.06%), Coimbatore (7.13%), and Vellore (4.42%). Gujarati Gujarati speakers numbered 2,75,023, comprising 0.38% of the total population. Madurai had the largest share at 35.67%, followed by Chennai (11.63%), Thanjavur (9.35%), Salem (7.81%), and Ramanathapuram (7.51%), Dindigul (5.89%), Kancheepuram (3.71%), and Coimbatore (2.92%) Marathi Marathi was spoken by 85,454 persons, making up 0.12% of Tamil Nadu's population. The community was primarily concentrated in Chennai (20.94%), Vellore (13.51%), Krishnagiri (10.44%), Kancheepuram (9.68%), Tiruvallur (7.90%), Coimbatore (6.31%), and Thanjavur (4.30%). English English was spoken by 24,495 individuals, accounting for 0.03% of the total population. The majority of English speakers were concentrated in Chennai, which accounted for 41.98% of the State's total English-speaking population. Other notable districts included Tiruvallur (11.57%), Kancheepuram (10.96%), Coimbatore (7.56%), Tiruchirappalli (5.72%), and The Nilgiris (3.27%). Tulu Tulu speakers in Tamil Nadu numbered 2,636. Their presence was primarily concentrated in Chennai, which accounted for 39.87% of the total Tulu-speaking population in the State, followed by Coimbatore (11.99%) and Kancheepuram (10.74%). Smaller shares were found in Tiruvallur (8.84%), The Nilgiris (7.17%), and Krishnagiri (4.93%). Bilingualism and Trilingualism Tamil Nadu remained predominantly a monolingual State in terms of linguistic ability. According to the 2011 Census, 5,17,30,760 people (71.70%) spoke only one language. The number of bilingual speakers, excluding those who were trilingual, was 1,79,69,107 (24.90%), while 24,47,163 individuals (3.39%) reported speaking three languages. The Language Atlas also recorded the number of individuals who reported that they could speak various languages, irrespective of whether it was their mother tongue or not. In Tamil Nadu, a total of 6,94,04,292 people reported that they could speak Tamil (96.20%), followed by 1,33,37,789 people who reported that they could speak English (18.49%). A total of 58,04,634 individuals said they could speak Telugu (8.05%), 18,70,602 Kannada (2.59%), 15,24,049 Hindi (2.11%), and 10,08,468 reported that they could speak Malayalam (1.40%).
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Maintain status quo on removal of existing flagpoles: HC full bench
1 2 3 Madurai: A full bench of the Madras high court on Tuesday directed the state to maintain status quo prevailing as of date until further orders concerning the removal of existing flagpoles of political parties and organisations across the state. The full bench was hearing an appeal preferred by state secretary of the CPM, P Shanmugam, challenging the order passed by a single bench that dismissed his plea seeking to prevent officials from removing the party's flagpoles across the state. The appeal was referred to a larger bench by a division bench after considering that the earlier order of another single bench directing the removal of all flagpoles of political parties and organisations across the state was confirmed by a coordinate division bench. Senior counsel N G R Prasad, appearing for the appellant, contended that issues of constitutional importance arise in this case since the rights of political parties, communal parties, or associations have been involved. The single bench issued directions in violation of the principles of natural justice, which were cited by a division bench while issuing a reference for the constitution of a full bench. The state also requested securing necessary instructions from the authorities concerned on the issues raised by the parties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo A full bench of justice S M Subramaniam, justice R Vijayakumar, and justice S Sounthar observed that to provide an opportunity to all political parties and organisations likely to be affected or aggrieved, they must be heard before taking the final decision on the issues raised by the parties. The judges directed the chief secretary to issue a public notification enabling political parties and organisations willing to get impleaded in the appeal as respondents for the purpose of presenting their case or defending the case of the appellant. Hence, the judges directed the chief secretary to issue a public notification in two English and two Tamil dailies with wide circulation across Tamil Nadu, stating that those willing to get themselves impleaded as respondents in the present appeal should file the impleading petitions before the Madurai bench on or before Aug 5. The chief secretary should effect the publication on or before July 25. The judges made it clear that no petition for impleadment or any other purpose from any third party will be entertained after Aug 5. Since the appellant raised an apprehension that the existing flagpoles would be removed by the state govt to implement the order passed by the single bench, the judges directed the state to maintain status quo. The respective parties are at liberty to file their affidavits or counter affidavits before the court on or before Aug 5. The matter was posted for hearing on Aug 6. Meanwhile, CPM state secretary, Shanmugam, in a statement said that the interim order of the full bench is a victory for the legal battle of the party. He congratulated the counsel who appeared for the party in the case.
