&w=3840&q=100)
NAPA seeks stricter checks on travel ads as Punjabis fall to trafficking
Satnam Singh Chahal, executive director of the US-based NAPA, emphasised that every year, hundreds of young Punjabis, driven by the dream of a better future in Western nations, end up being exploited by unregulated agents.
These agents often work through sophisticated networks and use flashy advertisements in newspapers, social media, and local TV channels to lure innocent people.
"They are promised high-paying jobs abroad, but instead, many are abandoned in transit countries or forced into inhumane conditions. These agents charge anywhere between Rs 20 and 50 lakh, pushing families into lifelong debt," he said.
He alleged that unscrupulous agents, operating not only from Punjab but also from metropolitan hubs like New Delhi and even foreign countries like the USA, are running a parallel economy based on deceit and exploitation.
"There must be a system in place to scrutinise whether a travel agent has valid licenses and legal authorisations to offer jobs overseas," Chahal asserted.
He recommended that all job-related advertisements by travel agents should be vetted by authorities such as the Protector of Emigrants and local police departments.
He also stressed the need for digital tracking and reporting mechanisms to monitor these agents' activities across states and international jurisdictions.
Chahal warned that the unchecked flow of irregular migration not only affects individuals but also tarnishes the reputation of the entire Indian diaspora.
"There are countless cases of Punjabi youths being jailed in Mexico, Panama, and other Latin American countries while en route to the USA or Canada. The rampant violation of their basic human rights in these regions is alarming," he said.
He called upon both Indian and international authorities to take coordinated action.
"Transit and destination countries must treat such migrants as victims rather than criminals. Stronger international cooperation is required to dismantle human trafficking syndicates," he said.
Chahal also proposed the creation of a comprehensive national and international database to monitor patterns in illegal migration.
Chahal urged the Indian government to initiate awareness drives in rural and semi-urban areas where such fraudulent practices are most prevalent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
India-China ties changing: 4 signs, 1 challenge
After a five-year hiatus triggered by the 2020 border standoff, India and China are burying the hatchet, driven by mutual interest and global pressures read more Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping meeting in informal setup in 2019 India and China, two of Asia's giants, have been navigating a complex relationship since the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley clash. However, recent developments signal a cautious warming of ties, driven by mutual interest and global pressures, though challenges remain. Here are four indicators of improving relations and one significant hurdle that persists. 1) India resumes tourist visas for Chinese nationals After a five-year hiatus triggered by the 2020 border standoff, India has reinstated tourist visas for Chinese citizens, a move aimed at mending strained ties. The announcement, shared by the Indian embassy in Beijing, was reported by China's state-owned Global Times. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun called it a 'positive move,' expressing China's willingness to enhance 'facilitation of people-to-people exchanges.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The visa suspension, along with restrictions on Chinese investments and apps, followed the 2020 clash that resulted in casualties on both sides. 2) Jaishankar's landmark visit to China External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's visit to China from July 13-15 marked a significant diplomatic milestone, the first such trip since the 2020 standoff. Meeting President Xi Jinping, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, and Vice President Han Zheng before attending the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's Council of Foreign Ministers, Jaishankar noted that both nations have made 'good progress' in normalising relations over the past nine months. He emphasised that maintaining peace along the border is the 'fundamental basis for mutual strategic trust' and called for further de-escalation. 3) China issues 85,000 visas for Indian pilgrims In a reciprocal gesture, China issued over 85,000 visas to Indian citizens in 2025, particularly for those visiting sacred sites like Mansarovar. Chinese Ambassador Xu Feihong announced on X, 'As of April 9, 2025, the Chinese Embassy and Consulates in India have issued more than 85,000 visas to Indian citizens travelling to China this year. Welcome more Indian friends to visit China, experience an open, safe, vibrant, sincere and friendly China.' This surge in visas, following troop disengagement in eastern Ladakh, further signals the strengthening of people-to-people ties. 4) Push for direct flight resumption Both nations have agreed to restore direct flights and mutual travel, suspended since 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent border clash. India's Ministry of External Affairs stated, 'The two sides agreed to take additional practical steps, including travel to each other's country and direct flight connectivity, for facilitating people-to-people exchanges.' While China's foreign ministry statement omitted mention of flights, the agreement reflects a shared interest in easing travel barriers between the world's most populous neighbours. The challenge: Reluctance to share technology Despite these positive steps, a key obstacle remains: Chinese companies' reluctance to share technology and data, the same attitude shown by their Western counterparts. This poses a significant challenge to deeper economic collaboration, testing India's diplomatic finesse. As both nations navigate this issue, India's scepticism about China's intentions, given its history as a hostile, irresponsible and unpredictable neighbour, underscores the need for careful engagement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump factor- a peace initiative he never takes credit for US President Donald Trump is often visibly eager to claim credit for peace initiatives across the globe in a bid to reinforce his nomination for Nobel Peace Prize. However, the ongoing reconciliation between the two Asian neighbours is something Trump never would brag about. It's Trump's unpredictable policies that have forced Beijing and New Delhi to step closer despite their shared concerns. Recently, China's open support to Pakistan in the four-day standoff with India angered many in New Delhi. However, that frustration didn't culminate in a setback for Sino-Indo ties. India is selectively engaging with Chinese firms while diversifying its economic resources, balancing cooperation with strategic caution.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bihar history-sheeter with Rs 50,000 bounty shot dead in encounter in UP's Hapur
The Noida Special Task Force (STF) and the Bihar Police killed Dabloo Yadav, a wanted criminal carrying a reward of Rs 50,000, after a gunfight during a joint operation to nab him in Uttar Pradesh's Hapur district Monday morning. The shootout occurred in the Simbhaoli police station area, where the team intercepted Yadav after the police received a tip-off about his movement. The police said Yadav first opened fire at them, leading to a retaliatory firing in which he was shot dead. Yadav was a native of Sahebpur Kamal in the Begusarai district of Bihar and had been absconding for months in connection with the kidnapping and murder of local Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM) leader Rakesh Kumar. The police said Yadav allegedly abducted Kumar, the party's 20-point block president, from the Sahebpur Kamal police station area by Dabloo in April and later killed him. Kumar's body was later found in a river in the Diara region. 'A reward of Rs 50,000 had been declared for his arrest. He was a key suspect in several other heinous crimes across Bihar,' the Bihar Police said in their statement to the press. 'Yadav was on the run for a long time. Acting on intelligence inputs, our team reached Uttar Pradesh and coordinated with Noida STF. During the operation in Hapur, the accused opened fire and was killed in the retaliatory firing,' the police added.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump strikes 'biggest ever' trade deal with EU: Here's what we know, what we don't
The US and European Union have struck a landmark trade deal imposing a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods, averting Trump's threatened 30 per cent levy. The agreement promises $750 billion in US energy sales and $600 billion in EU investments, but leaves key issues unresolved read more The United States and the European Union have struck one of the most consequential trade agreements in recent years. Announced by US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during Trump's visit to Scotland, the pact establishes a 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports to America, replacing the looming threat of a 30 per cent levy that would have taken effect on August 1. While hailed as a breakthrough, the framework leaves crucial gaps unresolved. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Both sides have presented the deal as a way to prevent a transatlantic trade confrontation, yet analysts are now parsing the details to understand exactly what has been agreed — and where negotiations must continue. The headline numbers: a 15 per cent tariff, billions in investment and major energy commitments. At the centre of the announcement is a 15 per cent tariff applied to 'the vast majority' of European goods shipped to the US — a rate lower than Trump's earlier proposals of 20 per cent and subsequent threats of 50 per cent and then 30 per cent, but still a dramatic jump from the near-zero tariff environment that existed before Trump's return to the White House. The deal is tied to two large European commitments. First, von der Leyen confirmed that the EU would purchase $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of US natural gas, oil, and nuclear fuel, part of its continuing effort to pivot away from Russian energy sources. Second, European entities would invest $600 billion (511 billion euros) into the US economy, though the sources of this investment have not yet been disclosed. Standing alongside von der Leyen in Scotland, Trump celebrated the outcome, saying: 'I think this is the biggest deal ever made,' and praised the agreement as an expansion of US-EU ties. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He argued that the deal would benefit both sides, claiming it would stabilise trade and create new opportunities for American farmers, energy companies and manufacturers. Von der Leyen, who led months of complex negotiations on behalf of the European Commission, described Trump as a 'tough negotiator' and acknowledged the compromise: 'The 15% rate was the best we could do.' She added that the deal would 'bring stability' and 'predictability' for companies on both sides of the Atlantic. Zero tariffs on these 'strategic' goods Although the 15 per cent tariff applies broadly — including on key sectors like cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals — there are notable carve-outs. Both sides agreed to zero tariffs on certain 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts Select chemicals Some generic drugs Semiconductor production equipment A range of agricultural items Critical raw materials and natural resources Von der Leyen stressed that the list is not final: 'We will keep working to add more products to this list.' Even with these exemptions, major questions linger. Tariff treatment for spirits remains unresolved, an issue of particular sensitivity given its impact on producers and consumers in both the US and the EU. Pharmaceuticals — a massive trade category — were intentionally left off the main deal. 'Pharmaceuticals were on a separate sheet of paper,' von der Leyen explained, meaning discussions will continue separately. A major flashpoint is steel. Trump made clear that his administration's 50 per cent tariff on imported steel — introduced earlier as part of his broader trade agenda — would remain in place. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Von der Leyen signalled a willingness to keep talking about potentially replacing that tariff with a quota system, which would cap the amount of steel allowed into the US at lower duty rates. What this means for Americans & Europeans While the 15 per cent tariff avoided the heavier blow of 30 per cent, it still represents a seismic change. Prior to Trump's presidency, average US tariffs on European goods hovered around 1–1.5 per cent; the European Union's own tariffs on American products were similarly low. Trump himself had instituted a 10 per cent 'baseline tariff' while negotiations were ongoing — high enough that the European Commission downgraded its 2025 growth forecast from 1.3 per cent to 0.9 per cent earlier this year. The new tariff effectively cements that higher-cost reality. Import taxes of this scale force two choices for companies selling into the US market: raise prices for American consumers — risking market share — or absorb the cost through lower profit margins. European exporters are bracing for the impact. The Federation of German Industries warned of serious consequences, with senior official Wolfgang Niedermark stating: 'Even a 15 per cent tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump insists that the tariffs are a tool for fairness, pointing to the long-standing trade imbalance between the two economies. Before his return to office, the US-EU trade relationship — worth around €1.7 trillion ($2 trillion) annually — was largely balanced in services but heavily tilted in goods: in 2024, the EU posted a €198 billion trade surplus with the US. How Europe has reacted Reactions in Europe have been cautious but largely positive — driven by relief that a full-scale trade war has been avoided. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the outcome, saying it prevented 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations' and preserved 'our core interests.' He added, however, that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' Markets showed mild optimism. The euro rose about 0.2 per cent against the dollar, sterling, and yen within an hour of the announcement — a sign that investors were reassured by the removal of Trump's August 1 tariff threat. Economists, however, are urging caution. Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macroeconomics at ING, summed up the hesitation, 'The big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet. With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy. This risk seems to have been avoided.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What about the auto industry Among the industries most affected by Trump's tariffs is the European auto sector. Until now, European carmakers had been paying a 27.5 per cent tariff — made up of Trump's 25 per cent tariff on all imported cars plus the preexisting 2.5 per cent duty. The new agreement cuts that total to 15 per cent, a meaningful reduction but still far above historical norms. Von der Leyen pointed out that the new rate is 'much lower' than the current burden, making it easier for carmakers to sell into the US. Yet for major automakers, the damage has already been done. Volkswagen reported a €1.3 billion ($1.5 billion) hit to profits in the first half of 2025 alone due to higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz, while somewhat shielded by its Tuscaloosa, Alabama production plant — which makes 35 per cent of Mercedes vehicles sold in the US — warned of 'significant increases' in car prices in coming years. Dealers have said they are holding prices steady 'until further notice,' but acknowledge hikes are coming. Japan deal with a lot of holes The new EU agreement resembles the framework Trump struck with Japan a week earlier, which carried a $550 billion price tag. Like that deal, the EU pact leaves major details unsettled and is being cast by the White House as a victory in its push to 'rebalance' global trade. Trump has long argued that the EU was formed to disadvantage the US economically. He has claimed that tariffs have generated 'hundreds of billions of dollars' in revenue for the American government and dismissed warnings from economists about inflationary effects. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This latest deal fits into his administration's broader goal of signing '90 deals in 90 days' — a goal officials admit hasn't been met, but which has already yielded agreements with UK, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam. Senior US officials underscored the scale of this latest accord. 'Remember, their economy is $20 trillion … they are five times bigger than Japan,' one official said during a briefing to reporters. 'So the opportunity of opening their market is enormous for our farmers, our fishermen, our ranchers, all our industrial products, all our businesses.' Why the deal is still incomplete Not every issue was resolved in Scotland. Spirits remain a particularly thorny topic, with both US bourbon makers and European wine and liquor producers awaiting clarity on whether they will face tariffs. Steel and aluminium, too, remain at the top of the agenda. Trump is keeping the 50 per cent steel tariff intact, while the EU is pushing for talks to turn it into a quota-based system. There's also the question of pharmaceuticals and non-tariff barriers. US officials claim Europe has agreed to reduce some of these regulatory barriers for automobiles and certain agricultural goods — but EU officials counter that the specifics are still under discussion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has also reserved the right to raise tariffs again if the EU fails to follow through on its investment and energy-buying pledges, according to senior administration figures. The US and EU together represent 44 per cent of global GDP, and their trade flows total nearly €1.7 trillion ($2 trillion) annually. For decades, this partnership thrived on low tariffs and deep economic integration, with US goods tariffs averaging 1.47 per cent and EU tariffs on U.S. products averaging 1.35 per cent, according to the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank. Trump's tariffs — starting with steel, then cars, and now a sweeping 15 per cent rate — have disrupted that status quo. With inputs from agencies
