Mistral AI CEO says AI's biggest threat is people getting lazy
Mistral AI CEO Arthur Mensch says warnings about AI's impact on white-collar workers are overblown.
He says the biggest risk AI poses to humans is "deskilling."
Mensch said humans needed to remain actively involved in reviewing AI output to keep learning.
As tech leaders continue to debate the potential impact of artificial intelligence on the job market, one CEO says the technology's biggest risk may be "deskilling."
In an interview with The Times of London, Arthur Mensch, the CEO of the Paris-based firm Mistral AI, dismissed the idea that AI would lead to huge cuts to white-collar jobs, saying the bigger risk was that people may become progressively lazier as they increasingly rely on the tech to search for information.
Speaking to the outlet at the VivaTech conference in Paris earlier this month, Mensch, who cofounded the open-source large language model developer alongside Guillaume Lample and Timothée Lacroix in April 2023, said that a key way to avoid this would be to ensure humans remained actively involved in reviewing and critiquing AI output.
"It's a risk that you can avoid, if you think of it from a design perspective, if you make sure that you have the right human input, that you keep the human active," he said, adding that he believed it was important humans did not take AI output as the "truth."
"You want people to continue learning," he continued. "Being able to synthesize information and criticize information is a core component to learning."
Mensch, a former Google DeepMind researcher, also responded to recent warnings that AI poses a threat to white-collar jobs, including from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who recently said that AI could replace half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years.
"I think it's very much of an overstatement," Mensch said, adding that he believed Amodei liked to "spread fear" about AI as a marketing tactic.
Instead, Mensch said he thought AI would change white-collar jobs. "I do expect that we'll have more relational tasks because that's not something you can easily replace," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Philippe Laffont Sells Nvidia Stock and Buys an AI Stock Up 300% in 2025
Billionaire hedge fund manager Philippe Laffont sold Nvidia and started a position in CoreWeave during the first quarter. Nvidia is not only the leader in data center GPUs, but the company also has booming artificial intelligence (AI) networking and cloud services businesses. CoreWeave operates data center infrastructure purpose-built for AI workloads, and the stock has advanced 300% since its IPO in March. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the cornerstone of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, and Wall Street has a great deal of conviction in the semiconductor company. Among 65 analysts, the median target price is $175 per share. That implies 13% upside from its current share price of $155. Yet hedge fund manager Philippe Laffont of Coatue Management sold 1.4 million shares of Nvidia in the first quarter, reducing his stake by 15%. Meanwhile, the billionaire purchased 14.4 million shares of CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV), an AI stock that has returned 300% since its IPO on March 28. Here's what investors should know about Nvidia and CoreWeave. Nvidia reported strong first-quarter financial results that beat expectations on the top and bottom lines. Sales rose 69% to $44 billion due to what CEO Jensen Huang called "incredibly strong" demand for AI infrastructure solutions. Meanwhile, non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) earnings increased 33% to $0.81 per diluted share, and would have grown more quickly had it not been for export restrictions. Looking ahead, investors have good reason to think Nvidia can maintain its momentum for several years to come. The company is not only the market leader in data center graphics processing units (GPUs), chips used to accelerate artificial intelligence (AI) applications, but it also has booming networking and cloud services businesses built on growing demand for AI. That sets Nvidia up for strong sales growth through the end of the decade. Grand View Research estimates spending on AI hardware, software, and services will increase at 35% annually through 2030. Meanwhile, Wall Street expects Nvidia's adjusted earnings to grow at 40% annually through the fiscal year ending in January 2027. That makes the current valuation of 49 times adjusted earnings look fair. So, why did Philippe Laffont sell Nvidia? I think profit-taking factored into the decision. When he first bought the stock in Q3 2016, the average split-adjusted price was $1.47 per share. But the average price had risen 8,500% by Q1 2025. Regardless, it would be wrong to assume Laffont has lost confidence. Nvidia was still his eighth-largest holding at 4% of his portfolio as of March 31. I think Laffont has the right idea. Anyone sitting on monster gains can take some profits and reinvest that money elsewhere. At the same time, it makes sense to keep a modest position in Nvidia because the company has a strong presence in so many parts of the AI economy. Indeed, Angelo Zino at CFRA Research thinks Nvidia "will be the most important company to our civilization over the next decade." CoreWeave provides infrastructure and software services purpose-built for AI workloads. The company is quite adept at managing GPU clusters. An internal study shows up to 20% better performance compared to other public clouds, and independent research company SemiAnalysis recently ranked it as the best AI cloud platform on the market. CoreWeave reported tremendous first-quarter financial results. Revenue climbed 420% to $981 million, and adjusted operating income (which eliminates stock-based compensation and interest payments) increased 550% to $162 million. However, the company reported a non-GAAP net loss of $150 million because interest payments cut deeply into profits. Building and maintaining data center infrastructure is costly, especially when the servers are built for AI. But CoreWeave has a responsible borrowing strategy: It only takes on debt when contracts create a need for additional capacity, and only if those contracts more than cover the cost of the debt. Management calls it "naturally deleveraging self-amortizing debt." CoreWeave is well positioned to benefit as demand for AI infrastructure increases. The company said its revenue backlog increased 63% to $26 billion in the first quarter due in large part to a new deal with OpenAI. But its clientele also includes noteworthy technology companies likely to spend more on AI infrastructure in the years ahead, such as IBM, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. Importantly, Philippe Laffont bought CoreWeave for about $40 per share because the company held its IPO on March 28, meaning it was only public for two trading days in the first quarter. Its share price ranged from $37 to $40 during that period. CoreWeave has since quadrupled in value, and the stock now trades at 29 times sales, a very expensive valuation. For context, only three companies in the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) currently have price-to-sales ratios above 29. So, investors should be cautious. I think it's OK to buy a small position today, but I would wait for the stock to get cheaper before building a large position. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends International Business Machines, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Billionaire Philippe Laffont Sells Nvidia Stock and Buys an AI Stock Up 300% in 2025 was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU and US optimistic about trade deal before July 9 tariff deadline
-- The European Union and the United States are expressing confidence about reaching a trade agreement before the July 9 deadline, when significant tariffs are set to take effect on both sides. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told EU leaders during a closed-door summit on Thursday that she believes a deal can be secured before the deadline, according to a report from Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. This would prevent an economically damaging escalation between the two major trading partners. Von der Leyen informed leaders that the Trump administration had presented a new proposal this week. During discussions, EU leaders reportedly showed greater willingness to accept some imbalance in a potential trade agreement to avoid a tariff war. If no agreement is reached by July 9, the US plans to impose a 50% tariff on nearly all EU products, while the European bloc is prepared to implement its own set of countermeasures. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shared similar optimism in a Thursday interview with Bloomberg TV. Lutnick noted that the EU had accelerated negotiations in recent weeks, establishing groundwork that could lead to an accord. Related articles EU and US optimistic about trade deal before July 9 tariff deadline - Bloomberg Deutsche Bank sees limited grounds for Spirit's JetBlue-United objection Jefferies starts Armada Hoffler at Buy, says dividend-cut sell-off is overdone
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Cyril Chapuy Made L'Oréal Worldwide Leader in Prestige Beauty
Cyril Chapuy's title may be president of L'Oréal's Luxe division, but a more apt moniker would be cultural anthropologist. While he has a large and beautiful office in L'Oréal's worldwide headquarters in Paris, filled with art, books and assorted bibelots, it is not here where he's strategized L'Oréal's rise to be the leading seller of prestige beauty products globally. It's out, in the field, in the markets of the world, be it a hot new restaurant in Kuala Lumpur or Roosevelt Field Mall in Long Island, New York, where Chapuy has honed his understanding of what constitutes luxury for consumers today — and how that should translate for the 27 brands that fall under his purview. More from WWD Global Beauty Giants' Early Bets on the Eastern Fragrance Wave Queen Rania Embraces the Unspoken Black Dress Code With Prada Sandals Ahead of Jeff Bezos' and Lauren Sánchez's Wedding in Venice 'F1' Star Damson Idris Is Ready for Takeoff 'In our business, if you don't understand culture, forget it,' said Chapuy, the son of a doctor and an artist who thrives on the operational and emotional aspects of the business. It's an approach that has garnered great success. Over the last five years, L'Oréal has solidified its position as the worldwide leader in fragrance, with five of the top 10 global bestsellers in the women's category in 2024 and four in the men's. Overall, the Luxe division's sales reached 15.59 billion euros in 2024 and it is the leading player in every key geography save travel retail, where, said Chapuy, L'Oréal deliberately pulled back amidst the ongoing challenges in that channel. According to the company, it sold four fragrances every second in 2024. But Chapuy isn't content to rest on such laurels. Instead, he's laser-focused on driving uniqueness and desire across all categories, especially fragrance. That might mean olfactive innovation, for instance, or driving L'Oréal to be the leader in refillable fragrance bottles. 'Luxury is about permanently surprising, permanently disrupting, permanently enchanting consumers,' he said, during a wide-ranging interview in the company's New York headquarters, 'so even for fragrance growing by double digits, if you don't keep bringing exciting stuff, consumers will get bored. We don't want them to ever get bored. We're the worldwide luxury leader in beauty and in fragrance, too, and we always want to keep this category very enchanting, very experiential and very surprising for consumers.' What does it mean for L'Oréal to be the number-one luxury beauty player? C.C.: It's an incredible source of pride for our teams, because L'Oréal as a company is number one in beauty, but we were not number one in luxury, so that is what we were all dreaming of and we have been very strongly working on that for years. It also gives us a great sense of responsibility. As a leader, you have to take a position that helps the market stay very dynamic, inspiring. It's not — OK, we are the leaders and we're happy. It's — we're the leaders and we want to keep developing this market and recruiting new consumers. The potential of the luxury business is still immense. If you look at the penetration rate of categories there's a lot of room to grow. What's your assessment of the global market and the factors that have enabled you to get to this point? C.C.: 2024 was the 14th year in a row where we gained market share. It's been a lot of work by the teams. Why did we become leader? First, we have an incredible portfolio of brands — extremely complementary in terms of price levels between 20 euros and 500 euros, consumer targets we want to address and in geography. I'm a very strong brand believer and my teams are brand builders first. In luxury, the brand comes before anything. Secondly, we have very strong innovations. When you have beautiful brands you need to innovate. If you have a beautiful brand that rests on its laurels, it can fade. Then there is the team. Luxury is about being very creative, about being obsessed by excellence and details, and for this, you need teams. You can have teams that are enhanced by tech and AI, but you need talent, people who create, who design, who formulate incredible juices, who choose incredible materials for the bottle. You need beauty advisers — we have 26,000 around the world — who create this incredible one-to-one relationship with consumers that is the epitome of luxury. On top of that you need a strategy to become the leader and where our strategy paid off is because we are very balanced across categories and regions. We're number-one worldwide in fragrance and number two in makeup and skin care. We are number one in three of the four major regions. We're also balanced by channel — offline and online. We're not ultra-dependent just on offline or purely dependent on online, i.e., a relationship which might be more transactional and less experiential — we're well-balanced between the two. Some of my colleagues and competitors are not as balanced between the channels. Finally, our culture. L'Oréal Luxe is 35,000 people around the world and for the last three years I've been distilling this cultural obsession of what is luxury in beauty. When you have a big company you need a common language, a common currency, common criteria to look at when we discuss a new product, a new store opening, a new retail design. We're not just a conglomerate of brands. We have a philosophy of luxury beauty on culture and creativity which is the way we work and think. What are the emerging markets of the future for luxury? C.C.: All emerging markets are booming in luxury because the upper middle class is growing. When the upper middle class increases, the luxury market increases, because there is a desire to indulge more in products that have a higher level of quality and excitement. So the Southeast Asian countries, Asia, Mexico — Mexico has become one of the top 10 countries in the world in luxury beauty now. Brazil and even Africa are growing very strongly. This desire for more quality, more elevation, more inspiration is very strong across all emerging markets. The market is at plus-10 and we are at plus-14 in emerging for L'Oréal Luxe. I love to go to these markets and figure out how we are going to win there. I spend a lot of time traveling to countries like India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines. I love visiting to decipher and decode what we need to do, what brands have the best appeal for consumers, what specific innovations can we do — for instance, in fragrances, in emerging markets, there are certain olfactions that are preferred, certain ingredients. So you need to understand and decipher that if you want to succeed. It's not just copy and pasting what you do in gigantic markets like China and the U.S. What does a typical visit look like for you? I would imagine that you have an official schedule you have to keep but that you also like to go off sometimes. C.C.: My routine is always the same. I spend the first day and a half in the field — not in the office. We go to stores, malls, home visits. You need to feel the market, understand the consumer in the field, not only through facts and figures. Then I have strategy meetings with my teams where we discuss the quarter, the future, the building of the brands and businesses long term, what we need in terms of talents and investment. In the evening I love going to the places that are hot in the city to understand what is edgy and trendy right now. What's the hottest restaurant in Kuala Lumpur? What's the next rooftop you need to visit in Bangkok. You understand a lot when you go to these places. On top of that — it's great team-building moments. I love to spend the time in the evening getting to know our leaders and teams better, asking them to explain their culture to me. Because in our business, if you don't understand culture, forget it. If you don't understand the kabuki theater culture in Japan then you don't understand makeup in Japan. You don't understand why they want to use eyeliners, which are the most precise on the planet. Or why do young Chinese have 10 fragrances at home when their parents have zero. Why do they? C.C.: Because for years in China everybody had to look the same, because if you stood out it was the opposite of the accepted approach. The young generation today are dying to be different, and fragrance is a way for them to express their personality. Just as makeup has been used as a form of self-expression in the U.S. for years. C.C.: Absolutely. More recently, that's the case with fragrances in the U.S. with the young generation. They love to have a fragrance wardrobe. When I go in the sun I have my Sol de Janeiro, but when I go out at night, I have my Born in Roma. It's all about self-expression. Do you think we'll see a levelling off of fragrance this year? C.C.: I don't think so. The penetration of fragrance in Europe for women is 70 percent. In the U.S. it is 52 percent and in China it's 40 percent. In Europe — fragrance is very cultural — ever since Versailles it has been part of the beauty routine, so fragrance is extremely high in Europe, but it's catching up in other regions. For men, the penetration is 56 percent in Europe, 38 percent in the U.S. and 29 percent in China. If we do a proper job to recruit new consumers, the category has a lot of potential and that's why I challenge the teams to invent new ideas, new olfactions, new gestures. There are many ways to do fragrance and if you want to optimize penetration you need to cover all of these segments. You have everything from accessible luxury to the very high-end. Is growth coming from one segment of the portfolio more than others or are you seeing it equally spread out? C.C.: The segment of accessible fragrances is growing very fast. Some of our competitors are doing great work — Sol de Janeiro has done an amazing job with the fragrance mists. It's accessible, fun, tasty. But all in all — all categories are successful. High-end collection fragrances are the most dynamic, but it starts from a smaller base. Today, the top of the market, collection or artisanal fragrances, are around 22 percent of the market worldwide. The middle section, blockbuster prestige fragrances like La Vie Est Belle, YSL's Libre and Dior's J'Adore — are around 45 percent, and accessible fragrances comprise the rest. So the market is pretty well-spaced across price levels, and as a leader, we want to play in all three segments. When you look at luxury — especially in the U.S. — what's your assessment of the distribution landscape? C.C.: The very top of the pyramid needs the highest levels of quality and service. Take a brand like Aesop. We have around 90 doors in the U.S. and they are the top of the pyramid luxury experience. The design is exquisite. The location is always in the best streets, and the service, the quality of the time the consultant spends with you, is very high. We need experiences like that to keep developing the market. Department stores have understood that. Nordstrom and Macy's have understood they need to elevate to attract the top of the market. They were slower to move in that direction versus what I've seen in other parts of the world, but I see it happening. It's a fantastic opportunity for them — valorizing what they can offer to consumers to differentiate from the very dynamic self-assisted distribution of Sephora and Ulta, which is very buoyant, energetic, incredibly trend-driven and exciting. But the quality of the service there — it's not the number-one element of their strategy. You don't sit down with the consumer for 20 minutes to choose a juice. At the end of the day — when you want to buy a fragrance at $350 like Valentino Sogno in Rosso — you don't do it in two minutes in front of a gondola because it's exciting. You need to have story telling about the way it has been formulated, the ingredients, you need to try it on your skin. Amazon has become a leading prestige beauty retailer in the U.S. What are the implications of that and how do you think about creating a luxury experience on the platform? C.C.: We were first movers with Amazon and we went because we truly believe they understood what luxury online has to be. It took us three years of top-to-top discussion and partnership to discuss what kind of experience and service the consumer should have, so it doesn't feel like a downgraded luxury experience. They did a great job and consumers are happy. It's not yet top-end luxury because that is very much for a physical experience and when you buy a product for 300 euros or 500 euros, the physical experience is fundamental, but for the rest of the luxury market, they did a great job and we are very happy to be their partners. Luxury is not about promotions all the time — it is about service, explaining the superiority and performance of a product, and all of this Amazon does really well. What stores have you visited on this trip to New York? C.C.: I started my day at Roosevelt Field, visiting Sephora, Ulta, Macy's, Nordstrom Aesop, Kiehl's. It's interesting to see the way the U.S. team is expressing the brands and what the competition is doing. You cannot stay blindfolded in this business, you need to always know what your competitors are doing. Looking at competition is fundamental to me. That's why I don't like doing my job in my office. My office is nice to answer emails, but if I spend too much time there, I lose connection with consumers, the culture, the competition. You cannot discover competition in the Circana data. You can't be like — 'Oh my god! I didn't know this brand was working.' You better have spotted it when you were out in the field, especially since we keep being pretty active on acquisitions. Any coming up? C.C.: My job is to make sure we are crafted to win. So I'm always permanently looking at what brands could be interesting additions to our business. We just signed a long-term partnership with Jacquemus. I've been very excited and intrigued by what [designer] Simon [Porte Jacquemus] has created in the world of fashion. He is independent in an incredibly competitive field with powerful groups, he has incredible DNA, he brings a new take on fashion that is very refreshing that young consumers love. He is a very interesting man. Before I acquire a license or brand, I spend a lot of time meeting the people in charge, because for me the human factor in luxury is fundamental. When we acquired Youth to the People we spent almost three years talking to them. Looking at potential new brands is an important job and not something that you do in a hurry. You take your time, you observe, you see if brands have a real potential or if it's just a temporary success. You've spent all of this time getting to know Jacquemus. How will you translate that into commerciality? C.C.: The way we work is based on a permanent dialogue. We take inspiration from them because they know their brands better than anyone, but we know beauty better than anyone. So my team visits Simon, sometimes with me, most of the time without me. Simon explains to them what he dreams of, shows them images, shares scents from his childhood that he likes. Taking inspiration from everything he tells us, we create and come back to him and make propositions. It's a creative process back and forth, made of surprise, made of moments where we have doubts, where we get very excited. You have to take time to create good stuff. So it's going to take us two, two-and-a-half years to create what we want to create together with him, the same way that when we started working with Madame Prada before Paradox was born. We want to make sure that what we do is very creative and different. Luxury takes time. Luxury is not (snaps fingers) something that should be in a hurry. Which is somewhat paradoxical, because today we talk so much about speed and agility. C.C.: You need speed and agility, but you need to launch in luxury when you think you have reached a certain level of creativity, excellence and excitement. Luxury is not a business in which you should launch tons of stuff just to launch stuff. The consumer is very smart and if they look at a product and ask, 'why is it more expensive than what I can buy from mass market brands or dupe brands, why should I buy it?' — well, your launch is useless. What's the most luxurious purchase you've made recently? C.C.: I love fashion and design, so probably the most luxurious is my kitchen made by Boffi. It takes time to design a beautiful Boffi kitchen. Fashion-wise, I love this Saint Laurent bag — it looks like a women's bag because you can put so much stuff in it but it's a men's bag. I love fashion, accessories, design, it is part of my culture, my passion. My mother was an artist, my father was a doctor, so I have the rational facet and the emotional facet. I love visiting the designers I work with, but I love going to the factories, too, spending time on the lines, talking to the workers who are producing the products. I love spending time with the finance guys. In my job I need to have both. Best of WWD Which Celebrity Brands Are Next for a Major Deal? Lady Gaga, Beyonce and More Possible Contenders for the Next Corporate Prize The Best Makeup Looks in Golden Globes History A Look Back at Golden Globes Best Makeup on the Red Carpet, From Megan Fox to Sophia Loren [PHOTOS] Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
