Jennifer Aniston's The Morning Show Gets Season 4 Release Date & Trailer
'With the UBA-NBN merger complete, the newsroom must grapple with newfound responsibility, hidden motives and the elusive nature of truth in a polarized America,' reads the official synopsis for Season 4. 'In a world rife with deepfakes, conspiracy theories and corporate cover-ups — who can you trust? And how can you know what's actually real?'
Check out The Morning Show Season 4 teaser trailer below (watch more trailers):
Set to take place nearly two years after the events of Season 4, the next installment of The Morning Show will officially start streaming on Wednesday, September 17. Joining Aniston and Witherspoon in the new season are returning cast members Jon Hamm, Greta Lee, Mark Duplass, Nestor Carbonell, Karen Pittman, and Nicole Beharie.
The Morning Show is an unapologetic, candid drama that looks at the modern workplace through the lens of the people who help wake America up. Season 4 will also feature the addition of Oscar winners Marion Cotillard as Celine Dumont and Jeremy Irons as Alex's father, Martin Levy, along with Aaron Pierre as Miles, William Jackson Harper as Ben, and Boyd Holbrook as Brodie.
The series is created and executive produced by Michael Ellenberg (The Leftovers), with Kerry Ehrin serving as writer. Executive producers are Witherspoon, Aniston, Ehrin, Mimi Leder, Kristin Hahn, Lauren Levy Neudstadter, Adam Milch, and Erica Lipez. Season 3 was the show's highest-rated installment with a Tomatometer rating of 75% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The post Jennifer Aniston's The Morning Show Gets Season 4 Release Date & Trailer appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Jamie Lee Curtis has thoughts about the harm done to ‘a generation of women by the cosmeceutical industrial complex'
Jamie Lee Curtis understands that using the word 'genocide' to describe plastic surgery and cosmetic procedures might not go over well for some, but she's not backing down. 'I've been very vocal about the genocide of a generation of women by the cosmeceutical industrial complex,' the actress told The Guardian in a recently published interview. 'I've used that word for a long time and I use it specifically because it's a strong word. I believe that we have wiped out a generation or two of natural human (appearance).' The 'Freakier Friday' star caused a stir years ago when she posed for a magazine cover in her underwear and no makeup to show the reality of what she looked like at the time. Now 66, Curtis told The Guardian that 'the concept that you can alter the way you look through chemicals, surgical procedures, fillers – there's a disfigurement of generations of predominantly women who are altering their appearances.' She added that the trend 'is aided and abetted by AI, because now the filter face is what people want.' 'I'm not filtered right now. The minute I lay a filter on and you see the before and after, it's hard not to go: 'Oh, well that looks better.' But what's better?,' the Oscar-winner continued. 'Better is fake. And there are too many examples – I will not name them – but very recently we have had a big onslaught through media, many of those people.' Elsewhere in the interview, Curtis described how she would respond to other public-facing personalities in her business that may have indeed had plastic surgery, saying, 'It doesn't matter.' 'I'm not proselytising to them. I would never say a word,' she said. 'I would never say to someone: what have you done? All I know is that it is a never-ending cycle. That, I know. Once you start, you can't stop. But it's not my job to give my opinion; it's none of my business.' This is far from the first time Curtis has commented on what it means to age in Hollywood. During a 2024 appearance on 'Today,' the star said she was 'very much in acceptance of what I look like and I own what I think and feel. And that, to me, is what maturity is.' 'You own what you think and feel. I say what I mean. I mean what I say. I try not to say it mean. And that's a way then to grow into my old age.'
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Sequel to Julia Roberts and Cameron Diaz's beloved 90s rom-com ‘My Best Friend's Wedding' announced
An Oscar-nominated director has been hired to pen a sequel to classic '90s rom-com 'My Best Friend's Wedding.' The original film, starring Cameron Diaz and Julia Roberts, became a box office success upon its release in 1997. The movie has since gone on to be considered one of the most iconic films within its genre. It featured Roberts and Dermot Mulroney as Julianne and Michael, a pair of best friends who made a pact that if they were still single at age 28, they would get married. When Mulroney's character gets engaged to another women, played by Diaz, Roberts had just four days to stop the wedding. Director Celine Song, best known for her Oscar nominated romantic drama Past Lives, has been hired by Sony to write the script for the sequel. Song had another hit this year with follow-up The Materialists starring Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans and Pedro Pascal. 'My Best Friend's Wedding' premiered in 1997. Official news of a sequel to 'My Best Friend's Wedding' comes shortly after Mulroney revealed that 'there is talk of a sequel' during an interview with the New York Post. When asked about the potential for a follow-up, he said: 'I know nothing about it. Last I heard, quote, lawyers were talking, unquote.' The original was a big hit when it was released, earning $127 million in the US and three Golden Globe nominations in best musical and comedy, as well as acting nods for Roberts and Rupert Everett. Cameron Diaz and Julia Roberts starred in the box office hit. It comes after it was announced that yet another classic movie is getting a sequel after more than two decades. Bend It Like Beckham director Gurinder Chadha has confirmed she is working on a sequel to the hit 2002 film, which starred Keira Knightley and Parminder Nagra. It will be released in 2027 in honour of Bend It Like Beckham's 25th anniversary and also to coincide with the FIFA Women's World Cup in Brazil. Chadha told the BBC she'd received requests for a follow-up 'almost twice a week' since the release of the original, which was made on a $7.2 million budget and became a box office hit, making around $120 million worldwide. 'We've been part of changing the game for women, so it felt like this was a good time for me to go back and investigate the characters,' she explained. It's not yet clear whether the new instalment will be a film or TV series, but Chadha said she hoped to reunite some of the original cast members.
Tom's Guide
7 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
5 reasons ‘Fantastic Four' is better than ‘Superman'
Not since the summer of 2012 have Marvel and DC gone toe to toe like two comic book titans are right now. The battle for the big screen is currently being fought by DC's 'Superman' and Marvel's 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' And, at least for me, the winner is clear. There's no doubt, my more lukewarm reaction to 'Superman' is something of a hot take. And if I didn't already know that based on its 91% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, the myriad of less-than-impressed comments on my recent opinion piece certainly made that point clear. However, having now seen Marvel's tentpole blockbuster for 2025, in my eyes, there's no denying that the MCU's First Family soars higher than the Man of Tomorrow (and for what it's worth, FF's RT viewer score is 93%). The margins are somewhat slim. Both movies have clear faults, falling into many of the predictable superhero tropes that have seen the genre grow stale over the past 15 years, but if you can only see one in theaters this summer, I'd recommend spending your money on Fantastic Four." So, here are the five reasons I believe that 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' beats 'Superman.' 'Fantastic Four's' biggest strength is how it successfully balances its four main players, the eponymous quartet, ensuring that each is given their moment to shine, while also feeling part of a superhero team as well. Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn are all well cast in their roles, and I really enjoyed how each brings something to the comic book collective. Which isn't to say 'Superman' isn't also well cast and stuffed with acting talent, David Corenswet is a promising Clark Kent, and Rachel Brosnahan nearly steals the whole movie as Lois Lane. However, 'Superman's' struggles to balance its roster of heroes, with some upstaging the titular cape-wielder (Edi Gathegi's Mister Terrific is the focus of the flick's best action scene), while others are relegated to barely background extras like Isabela Merced's Hawkgirl. 'Fantastic Four' juggles its heroes significantly better, ensuring that all of them feel developed and play a key part in the overall story, and of course, contributing to saving the universe. Audiences have been treated to (or in recent years forced to endure) a lot of superhero movies since the MCU debuted in 2008 with 'Iron Man.' With dozens upon dozens of big-budget flicks all mining similar source material, it's increasingly hard to stand out in such a crowded field. From a narrative, tone, and character perspective, 'Fantastic Four' is largely more of the same. It sticks to the largely quippy vibe of the MCU without any real deviation. However, where it does stand out is in its 1960s aesthetic and its retro-futurism setting. Inspired by the Golden Era of Comic Books, which birthed many of the heroes we love together, and the 'Fantastic Four's' own debut in 1961, 'The First Steps' has a charming retro look which intentionally feels like a '60s-era idea of the far future. Yes, that does mean that 'Fantastic Four' drive a hovercar at one point, and the Baxter Building TVs remain delightfully chunky. This visual design helps elevate 'Fantastic Four' and ensures that even when the narrative falls into predictable tropes, there's a novel quality about the proceedings that kept me hooked. Plus, the cast's supersuits are just the right amount of dorky for me to love them. I often find that modern-day superhero movies hinge on their villains. After all, a compelling superpowered protagonist needs an equally well-considered antagonist to defeat in the grand finale. 'Superman' offers up the mack daddy of comic book foes in Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor, and while this take on the character has been met with much praise, it did little for me (through no fault of Hoult). His whiny tech bro persona grates, and the attempts to make him seem threatening feel manipulative. The less said about the army of trolling monkeys, the better. In this third 'Fantastic Four' reboot, the First Family faces off against an equally legendary villain: Galactus (Ralph Ineson). And oh boy, does this big purple boi feel intimidating. The first scene where the four encounter Galactus in his hulking ship sent a shiver down my spine, and his cold-blooded approach to consuming whole planets feels befitting of an enemy that is supposed to strike fear into the hearts of even the most powerful heroes. That Julia Garner's Silver Surfer is also thrown into the mix is a very appreciated bonus. I do wish that Galactus wasn't defeated quite so easily in the third act. However, this is a problem with superhero movies in general. The villain is hyped up to be a near undefeatable threat to the whole world, only to be snuffed out and dealt with inside a studio-demanded two-hour runtime. If you didn't already disagree with me on my point above, now I'm really going to put the cat among the pigeons. Or should that be dog, because Krypto was one of my least favorite parts of 'Superman.' As I noted in my previous 'Superman' article, I find the modern blockbuster trend of including some form of 'cute' animal/creature very tiresome. The cynic in me can't see it as anything other than a calculated attempt to create a sidekick ripe for merchandising opportunities. 'Fantastic Four' doesn't escape this trend either, with robot helper H.E.R.B.I.E. on hand to assist the family throughout. And, to the surprise of nobody, you can now buy a Pop Vinyl figure of the adorable android for the low price of just $15. Still, at least director Matt Shakman shows a little restraint with H.E.R.B.I.E., and unlike Krypto the Super Dog, he's not used as a 'get out of jail free' card to save the heroes whenever they're in a sticky situation (Krypto is used for those purposes twice in 'Superman'). Frankly, I could probably do without either sidekick, but if I'm picking between the two, at least H.E.R.B.I.E. fits within the '60s aesthetic and isn't leaned on like a cheap crutch. Both 'Superman' and 'Fantastic Four' aren't shy about winking nods to future comic book movies in the pipeline at their respective studios. But while 'Superman' leans into sequel-baiting and universe setup pretty hard, 'Fantastic Four' mostly saves it for the post-credits stinger. 'Superman' is so busy introducing us to the Justice Gang that it forgets this is the viewer's first chance to get acquainted with a character who is supposed to be the lynchpin of the new-look DC universe going forward. Marvel, who admittedly have the benefit of a well-established universe already humming, focuses first on establishing the 'Fantastic Four.' In the post-credits scene, we get our first glimpse of Robert Downey Jr's return to the MCU as Doctor Doom, and this tease feels well handled. It's a great preview for next year's 'Avengers: Doomdays,' but it also reminds us that the Fantastic Four are part of a larger world. It's enough to get superfans speculating, but it doesn't dominate the actual movie.
