Defence, Joint Debt And Farmers: EU Draws Budget Battle Lines
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen has a mammoth task on her hands: present a budget for 2028-2034 that supports farmers, helps member states ramp up their defence spending, and all while paying back the debts racked up during the covid pandemic.
The European Commission, the bloc's executive arm, will outline the proposals Wednesday, setting the stage for explosive debates with capitals and EU lawmakers over the next two years.
The previous 2021-2027 budget was worth around 1.2 trillion euros ($1.4 trillion) and made up from national contributions -- around one percent of the member states' gross national income -- and money collected by the EU such as customs duties.
The European Parliament has already made it clear it wants more money.
Von der Leyen wants the budget to address the EU's priorities: security, competitiveness and better preparing the 27-country bloc for economic shocks.
But the EU wants to achieve this while reining in ballooning public debts and deficits, and simultaneously bolstering its industries to catch up with rivals in China and the United States.
Security will be top of von der Leyen's mind as she makes the finishing touches to the budget with war still raging in Ukraine and fears among member states of a more aggressive Russia.
It is more important given the NATO military alliance last month pledged to spend significantly more on defence -- some five percent of national economic output.
There are 23 EU members in the Western military alliance.
Also under consideration is a 100-billion-euro fund to keep Ukraine afloat, but one EU official said it could change between now and Wednesday.
Von der Leyen this week vowed to support Ukraine "until 2028 and beyond, when the new European budget kicks in".
Under EU treaties, the bloc cannot spend directly on defence, but it can pour money into dual-use infrastructure like bridges that would be critical during a war.
The EU's common agricultural policy (CAP) -- vast farming subsidies that make up the biggest share of the budget -- will be the subject of fiery debates.
It accounts for nearly a third of the EU's current multi-year budget -- around 387 billion euros, of which 270 billion euros are directly paid to farmers.
The EU is thinking about moving away from subsidies based on farm size -- and putting a cap on how much one farm can get -- which could free up billions of euros.
"There is a growing recognition that its share in the EU budget should decline and I also expect it to decline further," said Zsolt Darvas of Bruegel think tank.
The commission is considering cutting part of the agriculture budget without touching the direct payments, but farmers have made it clear that's a red line.
"I have a tractor and I'm ready," Massimiliano Giansanti, president of Europe's influential Copa farming lobby, raising the spectre of more farmers' protests after months of demonstrations last year by disgruntled European farmers.
Farmers plan to protest Wednesday in front of the commission in Brussels as they seek to pile the pressure on the EU.
Brussels is also looking into whether CAP will keep its dedicated budget or be integrated into wider cohesion funds, with allocations left to member states to decide.
France, whose farmers are the biggest CAP beneficiary, opposes this.
The big question looming over everything: where will the money for all this come from?
France, Italy and others are pushing for more joint borrowing but that's a no-go for Germany, a major net contributor to the budget, as well as frugal EU states Finland, The Netherlands and Sweden.
One idea put forward has been an instrument that would allow the EU to seek grants or loans in the event of a crisis like the pandemic.
Since some states would fiercely oppose such a measure, an EU diplomat said he had seen the idea appear and disappear from draft texts shared with capitals.
Other options to raise money include a possible digital services levy as well as collecting money from taxes on small packages entering from outside the EU.
The last time the EU took on joint debt was during the pandemic, borrowing around 800 billion euros to rescue the European economy.
Except now the bloc must start paying that money back -- potentially up to 30 billion euros annually -- from 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
15 minutes ago
- DW
Club World Cup final: A win for Chelsea, FIFA and Trump – DW – 07/13/2025
A sensational display from Cole Palmer and Chelsea stunned Paris Saint-Germain, with a 3-0 win securing the Club World Cup title. FIFA boss Gianni Infantino and watching US President Donald Trump also made gains. "The golden era of global club football has started," said FIFA President Gianni Infantino at Trump Tower in New York on Saturday. "We can say definitely this FIFA Club World Cup has been a huge, huge, huge success." It's the kind of hyperbole favored by the owner of Trump Tower, where FIFA have recently rented an office. Donald Trump and Infantino have grown ever closer this year, ostensibly because of this revamped and expanded tournament and next year's World Cup, to be hosted in the USA, Canada and Mexico — an event many feel will be used by Trump to further push his message. "He loves the game," Infantino said of the man who sat next to him at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on Sunday. "You cannot organize a competition like this without the full support of the government. Great thanks to President Trump – he has been fantastic." So too was Chelsea's Cole Palmer. The English attacking midfielder scored twice and made a third goal for Brazilian striker Joao Pedro to put European champions Paris Saint-Germain to the sword before halftime. PSG had no answer in the second half, as Chelsea cruised to victory. Infantino's main measure of success for the Club World Cup, though, appears to be financial. He reported revenues of over $2 billion (€1.7 billion) and average earnings of $33 million per match for FIFA. Not bad for an organization whose remit is organization and promotion of the sport, rather than pure profit. FIFA aside, the biggest financial beneficiaries were the two teams that contested the final. Chelsea will get $40 million for the final alone while Paris Saint-Germain gets $30 million for the match, plus both get their share of the overall $1 billion prize pool. It's a sizable chunk, even for a team owned by an American private equity firm who bought it from a sanctioned Russia oligarch and one owned by the oil-rich nation state of Qatar. A $250 million solidarity payment was also promised by FIFA "to club football across the world." The fact that the final contained European teams who won two of three continental competitions in the season just finished is evidence of the primacy of European football. Three of the four semifinalists were European, as were the majority of the quarterfinalists. It remains to be seen how much a solidarity payment split between the rest of the teams in FIFA's 211 member states will impact the inequalities in the global game. Though Infantino has been effusive in his praise, many in the game have found failings with the first edition of a revamped competition pushed through by the FIFA boss. "The Club World Cup is the worst idea ever implemented in football in this regard," German coach Jürgen Klopp, who coached Liverpool and Borussia Dortmund said during the tournament. "People who have never had or do not have anything to do with day-to-day business anymore are coming up with something. There is insane money for participating, but it's also not for every club. "Last year it was the Copa [America] and the European Championship, this year it's the Club World Cup, and next year the World Cup. That means no real recovery for the players involved, neither physically nor mentally." The issue of exhaustion, echoed by many players, coaches and fans throughout the tournament, was exacerbated by the extreme temperatures in some of the matches. "Honestly, the heat is incredible. The other day I had to lie down on the ground because I was really dizzy," said Chelsea midfielder Enzo Fernandez on the eve of the final. "Playing in this temperature is very dangerous, it's very dangerous." Borussia Dortmund coach Niko Kovac, meanwhile, described conditions for his team in Charlotte as being like "a sauna" in the group stage. While there are mandated cooling breaks, Infantino has now said indoor air-conditioned stadiums will be used as much as possible for daytime kickoffs across the 16 venues that will host 2026 World Cup matches. But only Atlanta, Dallas, Houston and Vancouver (which has the coldest average temperatures of any venue at the relevant time of year) have such facilities in place. FIFA also made a surprise player welfare announcement on Saturday. An agreement has been made for a mandatory 72-hour minimum gap between games and a three-week period of rest in the off season, with global players' union, FIFPRO, among those who have been pushing hard for similar measures. The amount of long haul trips taken by players will also be considered in future. All that may well have been some distance from the Chelsea players' minds as, after a brief scuffle on the pitch with PSG players and staff, they celebrated a win that clearly meant something to them. As he headed from the stands to hand medals to those victorious players, a beaming Infantino was likely reflecting favorably on the beginning of his "golden era". The next stage will be the biggest one of all, the World Cup. Infantino seems well disposed to let Trump bask in some of football's light there too.
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Chief Delays Retaliation For US Tariffs In Search Of Deal
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said Sunday that Brussels will continue to hold off on hitting back at US steel and aluminium tariffs, as it seeks a deal to avoid broader 30-percent levies. US President Donald Trump on Saturday threw months of painstaking negotiations into disarray by announcing he would hammer the 27-nation bloc with the sweeping tariffs if no agreement is reached by August 1. "The United States has sent us a letter with measures that would come into effect unless there is a negotiated solution, so we will therefore also extend the suspension of our countermeasures until early August," von der Leyen told journalists. "At the same time, we will continue to prepare for the countermeasures so we're fully prepared," she added. The European Commission president insisted that the European Union has "always been very clear that we prefer a negotiated solution. This remains the case, and we will use the time that we have now till August 1". The move by von der Leyen will spur hope that Trump's latest threat -- in which he also targeted Mexico -- has not killed off the progress made in negotiations so far between Brussels and Washington. The European Union's current suspension of its retaliation over US steel and aluminium tariffs had been set to expire overnight Monday to Tuesday. Brussels has readied duties on US goods worth around 21 billion euros ($24 billion) in response to the levies Trump slapped on metal imports earlier this year. But it announced in April it was holding off on those measures to give space to find a broader trade agreement with the Trump administration. "Since the very beginning, we have worked and now are ready to respond with countermeasures. We've prepared for this, and we can respond with countermeasures if necessary," von der Leyen said. EU trade ministers are set to meet Monday in Brussels to discuss the bloc's response to Trump's latest move -- and crucially how strong a line to take with Washington. Germany's finance minister Lars Klingbeil said on Sunday that "serious and solution-oriented negotiations" with the United States were still necessary, but added that if they fail, the European Union would need "decisive countermeasures to protect jobs and businesses in Europe". "Our hand remains outstretched but we won't accept just anything," Klingbeil told daily newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung. That came after French President Emmanuel Macron on Saturday urged the European Commission -- which negotiates on behalf of all EU countries -- to "resolutely defend European interests". Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has unleashed sweeping stop-start tariffs on allies and competitors alike, roiling financial markets and raising fears of a global economic downturn. But his administration is coming under pressure to secure deals with trading partners after promising a flurry of agreements. So far, US officials have only unveiled two pacts, with Britain and Vietnam, alongside temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China. The European Union, alongside dozens of other economies, had been set to see its US tariff level increase from a baseline of 10 percent on July 9, but Trump pushed back the deadline to August 1. In a letter published on Saturday, Trump cited the United States's trade imbalance with the bloc as justification for the new 30-percent levies. The EU tariff is markedly steeper than the 20-percent levy Trump had unveiled in April -- before hitting pause as markets went into meltdown.
Local Germany
13 hours ago
- Local Germany
Impact of US tariffs varies across European Union
Ireland, with a major pharmaceutical industry, is in the front line along with Germany, for whom the United States is a major outlet for its cars, steel and machine tools. France is less exposed, even if it does have aeronautics, food, wine and luxury goods companies that risk losing markets. The EU as a whole has an annual trade surplus with the United States of $235.6 billion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), which reports to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Only China has a higher amount. Germany, the industrial powerhouse Germany, the EU's largest economy, is under particular pressure due to its dependence on exports: it has a surplus of $84.8 billion with the United States, thanks to its large automobile, chemical, steel and machine industries. The United States accounts for 23 percent of the revenue of Mercedes Benz. While some of that is accounted for by SUVs manufactured in the United States and exported, they risk being hit by any tariff reprisals from the EU. The Federation of German Industries (BDI) reacted promptly to Donald Trump's announcements on Saturday, calling on the EU and the United States to "quickly find solutions and to avoid an escalation". READ ALSO: German chancellor 'cautiously optimistic' on EU-US tariff deal Advertisement Italy, France in the second line Italy and France, with surpluses of $44 billion and $16.4 billion respectively, according to US statistics (French data says the surplus is much smaller), would appear to be less affected. But some sectors are heavily exposed. The food and wine industries would be particularly affected in both countries, as is also the case for Spain. A 30-percent tariff would be a "catastrophe" for the French wine and spirits sector, Jerome Despey, head of the viticulture branch of the FNSEA union, said Saturday. Coldiretti, Italy's main agricultural organisation, said Saturday that tariffs of 30 percent would cost US consumers and Italian food producers some $2.3 billion. Like Germany, Italy is also concerned about its automotive sector. Franco-Italian manufacturer Stellantis (particularly Fiat and Peugeot) has suspended its forecasts for the year due to these uncertainties. Exposed French sectors also include aeronautics and luxury goods. LVMH, the world's largest luxury conglomerate, makes a quarter of its sales in the United States. About a fifth of France's exports to the United States come from the aerospace industry, much of it from Airbus. Austria and Sweden also have surpluses with the United States, $13.1 billion and $9.8 billion respectively. Advertisement Ireland, Europe's lab Ireland has the largest surplus among EU members, at $86.7 billion. That is largely due to the presence of major American pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. They all set up in Ireland to benefit from a 15 percent corporate tax, compared to 21 percent in the United States. These companies can thus host their patents in Ireland and sell on the American market, where drug prices are traditionally higher than in the rest of the world. Ireland also hosts most of the European headquarters of American tech giants, such as Apple, Google and Meta, also attracted by the attractive Irish tax system. Overall, pharmaceuticals account for 22.5 percent of EU exports to the United States, according to Eurostat, with many major players having announced major investments in the United States.
