Europe's defining moment is now
With its democratic values, industrial strength, and commitment to sustainability, Europe can hold its ground and lead the way in a rapidly changing world – if it acts boldly and decisively.
Europe must reinforce its foundations in four key areas: security, sustainability, competitiveness, and innovation.
Denmark, with its strong commitment to European unity, environmental leadership, and pragmatic industrial policy, is well-positioned to lead this effort.
Russia's war against Ukraine and shifting geopolitical realities are reshaping Europe's security architecture. The
EU and its member states – Denmark among the frontrunners – alongside the UK and Norway, continue to provide vital support to Ukraine and have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening Europe's defence posture. This ambition must be backed by sustained political and financial support.
Defence budgets are rising and collaborative initiatives are underway, but processes must accelerate. The capability targets approved by NATO earlier this month must translate into long-term procurement contracts that give industry the visibility and planning certainty it needs.
Aggregating demand and harmonising requirements across European countries will reduce complexity and enable economies of scale, thus increasing efficiency, reducing cost, shortening delivery times, and enhancing interoperability. Europe must accelerate joint procurement and fully utilise instruments like SAFE and EDIP.
Strategic planning for Europe's security must also embrace a wider perspective: protecting Europe's critical infrastructures is fundamental to strengthening our security and resilience against evolving hybrid threats.
The European defence industry is fully committed, capable, and ready to continue developing critical capabilities and to further ramp up production, deliver at pace, and meet Europe's and its NATO allies' defence needs with state-of-the-art equipment and solutions.
A strong and innovative European defence industry is indispensable for Europe's security – it is a defence capability in itself. Therefore, we must drastically reduce critical non-European dependencies. "Buy European" is a strategic imperative.
Sustainability through strength
Europe is a global pioneer in climate policy and environmental standards. But this leadership is under pressure.
To succeed in the green transition, we must align our environmental goals with industrial competitiveness.
Deindustrialisation is not the path to decarbonisation. The goal must be to reduce environmental impact through a globally competitive European industry – preserving economies, jobs, and social welfare.
Building on the strength of its world-class aircraft, engine, equipment and Air Traffic Management (ATM) manufacturers, the European civil aeronautics industry remains one of the few high-tech sectors where Europe leads globally. That leadership must be protected as we transition to climate-neutral flight.
The European aviation industry has committed to net zero by 2050 and is driving innovation including advanced propulsion systems and next-generation, more fuel-efficient aircraft. But this transformation depends on a supportive policy and investment environment.
In particular, there is an urgent need to establish a functioning market for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF), which will play a critical role in the sector's decarbonisation.
One immediate and critical step: ensure that civil aviation is fully included in the upcoming Sustainable Transport Investment Plan (STIP). Without targeted EU funding, even breakthrough technologies may struggle to scale.
As a powerhouse of innovation, the European aeronautics industry has the potential to drive the decarbonisation of a global sector and strengthen Europe's industrial leadership.
Securing Europe's technological future
Europe's future competitiveness will be shaped by its ability to innovate and responsibly industrialise next-generation technologies.
From space and AI to quantum, autonomous systems, cybersecurity, and environmentally advanced solutions, Europe's aerospace, security and defence industries – with a supply chain of thousands of companies – are at the forefront of the next wave of technological innovation.
Yet Europe lags in innovation investment compared to global competitors, and internal fragmentation slows progress.
Unlocking our full potential requires fewer barriers, faster R&D cycles, and funding mechanisms that span civil and defence domains.
Europe has shown what's possible. Flagship space programmes like the world's leading navigation satellite system Galileo and Earth observation programme Copernicus prove our ability to deliver when vision, partnership, and political support align.
We must build on those successes, with an industrial strategy that places aerospace, security, and defence at the heart of Europe's technological sovereignty. The next multi-annual EU budget must reflect this priority.
The world is changing fast. As Denmark takes the helm of the EU Council, it has a real opportunity to prioritise Europe's security, resilience, competitiveness and technological leadership.
With the right policies, investments, and coordination, Europe can rise to this moment. The European aerospace, security, and defence industry stands ready to deliver.
Micael Johansson is Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) President and CEO of Saab, and Jan Pie is ASD Secretary General.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Merz faces Pride flag fallout after saying Bundestag 'not a circus'
German Chancellor and CDU party leader Friedrich Merz is facing significant backlash from his political opponents after rejecting calls to fly a Pride flag at the Bundestag, which he said was "not a circus tent where any flag could be hoisted". In an appearance on public broadcaster ARD on Tuesday, Merz defended his party's lawmakers and Bundestag President Julia Klöckner — who previously declined to display the rainbow flag for Christopher Street Day on 26 July — saying the banner should only be flown on 17 May, the International Day Against Homophobia. "On all other days, the German flag and the European flag are flown at the German Bundestag and no other. And this decision is the right one," he said. In Germany, Christopher Street Day is observed in memory of the 1969 Stonewall riots in New York — the first major LGBTQ+ community uprising against persecution — and is typically marked by Pride events across the country. In previous years, the rainbow flag was displayed at the Bundestag building during Pride events, and prior chancellors have participated in Christopher Street Day celebrations. Merz's words have sparked considerable criticism from the opposition. Sophie Koch, the government's queer commissioner and centre-left SPD lawmaker questioned whether the statement implied LGBTQ+ community were "circus animals". Green Party leader in the Bundestag, Katharina Dröge, stated that the rainbow flag represents "a group that is increasingly affected by hostility, violence and hatred" and thus has its place in parliament. Green-led lawmakers also staged a protest in the Bundestag chamber, wearing clothes that collectively formed the rainbow flag.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU pharma chief calls for European Nasdaq to boost biotech innovation
Stefan Oelrich, president of Bayer's pharmaceutical division and newly appointed head of the EU's pharmaceutical lobby EFPIA, pointed out the urgent need for capital market reform to support biotech development in Europe. 'We need the equivalent of a Nasdaq in Europe where we can raise capital for biotech. Because biotech is not just about government finance,' Oelrich said during a press conference last week. Launched in 1971, the Nasdaq (originally the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations) was the world's first electronic stock market. Known for its fully electronic trading model, the exchange has historically been attractive to fast-growing sectors, including life science, listing some of the world's largest tech companies, including Apple, Microsoft, and Google. Oelrich argued that Europe must urgently develop a similar equity-driven financing ecosystem. 'Today, there is very limited venture capital available, which is largely due to the way we manage equities. We invest our equities not in venture, but elsewhere,' he said. According to him, the lack of early-stage capital means European biotech innovations often migrate elsewhere — especially to the US, where funding and commercialisation opportunities are more robust. 'The transition from basic research to patented applications tends to follow where the capital is. We must ensure that innovation generated in European universities and research institutions stays in Europe,' he warned. 'Why don't we do it?' His remarks came just ahead of the unveiling of the EU's long-awaited Life Sciences Strategy, which aims to revive Europe's position as a hub for biotech research and development. The strategy acknowledges that the gap in venture capital investment is widening in Europe. It points to the continent's fragmented capital markets and heavy reliance on bank loans, which are often limited in volume and duration, as major structural issues. The strategy also recommends strengthening innovation hubs and integrating them into value chains to better attract private investment. However, it does not place significant emphasis on completing the EU's Capital Markets Union (CMU), a key demand from Oelrich. 'This may sound ambitious, but it's absolutely doable. Interestingly, everyone I talk to recognises the need: So why aren't we acting on it?' Oelrich asked. He also suggested that part of Europe's pension and life insurance capital could be redirected toward venture investment if appropriate political frameworks were put in place. 'Inventions can find a market here as it's not only about a lack of capital in Europe: It's about how we allocate it. We need to do a better job,' he concluded. The broader context The EU's Capital Markets Union remains incomplete, with progress hindered by regulatory divergence, inconsistent enforcement, and political resistance to deeper integration. While the CMU does not directly aim to create new stock exchanges, it does support efforts to expand access to capital, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This improved access could encourage the development of specialised or regional exchanges, though the broader goal remains integration rather than fragmentation. Currently, Europe lacks sector-specific stock exchanges. Major platforms like Euronext, the London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Nasdaq Nordic, and SIX Swiss Exchange list companies across a wide range of industries. Instead of dedicated exchanges, sector-focused investment is facilitated through indices such as the STOXX Europe 600 family, which tracks sectors like banking, automotive, and leisure. Still, for many in the biotech sector, the absence of a specialised capital-raising platform remains a barrier. Whether the EU will — and can — move to address this remains to be seen.
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
EU unveils long-delayed 2040 climate target with contested flexibilities
The European Union on Wednesday, July 2 unveiled its long-delayed target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, but with contested new flexibilities built in to win over the most skeptical member states. After months of tough negotiations with EU member states, Brussels announced it would stick to the objective announced last year of cutting emissions by 90% by 2040, compared to 1990 levels. The proposal comes as much of Europe roasts in an early summer heatwave, which scientists say are becoming more intense, frequent and widespread due to human-induced climate change. The 2040 target – which needs the sign off from the EU's member states and parliament – is a key milestone toward the bloc's goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050. Brussels says the EU has cut climate-warming emissions by 37% relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces mounting pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate skepticism in many European countries. EU climate chief Wopke Hoekstra acknowledged the "sensitive" debate, saying Brussels was keeping an "ambitious" goal while being "pragmatic and flexible on how to achieve it." To sway resistant capitals, the European Commission proposes that from 2036, the bloc's 27 countries can count carbon credits purchased to finance projects outside Europe, for up to 3% of their emission cuts. Climate groups are fiercely opposed to such a measure. Backed by scientific studies and the commission's own science advisers, they say factoring in international credits – for things like tree-planting or renewable-energy projects – risks undermining the EU's own efforts to shift away from fossil fuels. 'Don't strain ourselves' EU environment ministers will discuss the objective at a meeting in mid-July, ahead of an expected vote to approve the measures on September 18. It will only become law after EU lawmakers also sign off on the target. The commission's hope is that the 2040 objective will be approved before the UN climate conference (COP30) in November in the northern Brazilian city of Belem. But that gives little time for negotiations with skeptical nations, with whom Hoekstra has already spent months trying to build a compromise. For some countries, including the Czech Republic, the 90% target is unrealistic. Meanwhile, others including Italy and Hungary worry about the burden of decarbonizing heavy industry at a time when Europe is working to strengthen its industry in the face of fierce competition from the United States and China. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has suggested a target of 80 or 85%, while France has expressed doubts over how the EU will reach its objective. French President Emmanuel Macron wants guarantees for the decarbonization of industry and support for nuclear energy, the largest source of power in France. But the commission can count on the support of other countries including Spain and Denmark, which took over the rotating EU presidency this week. And the three-percent "flexibility" – which mirrors demands made in the new German government's coalition agreement – should help keep the economic powerhouse on board. When it comes to Europe's international commitments, Macron has also stressed that the bloc is only bound to present a midway target for 2035 at COP30 in Belem, and not the 2040 objective. "Let's not strain ourselves," Macron told reporters last week. "If we have [a 2040 target] for Belem, great, but if it takes longer, let's take the time," he said.
