Political parties in Taiwan recall dozens of MPs just one year after election
Supporters say it's about breaking political deadlock.
Opponents say it's a dangerous power grab by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Tens of thousands of protesters gathered in central Taipei on April 26, just outside the Presidential Office building, to "stand up and fight the dictator".
The "dictator" in question was President Lai Ching-te of the DPP, who was democratically elected just over a year ago.
The rally marked the most high-profile response yet to a nationwide campaign targeting opposition MPs known as a recall.
"Disagreement is normal in a democracy," said Stacey Chen, a supporter of the opposition Taiwan People's Party.
So, exactly who is being targeted by the recall? What do voters think?
And where does it leave Taiwan in the face of threats from Beijing?
Taiwan is a self-governing island of 23 million people with a vibrant, if often polarised, democracy.
Its political system allows voters to remove their elected representatives before the end of their term through a legal process known as a recall.
"He absolutely does not qualify as [a dictator]," said Tang Ching-ping from National Chengchi University about Mr Lai.
But recalls are rare — and they've never been used on this scale before.
The current wave of recall motions began after the DPP lost its majority in parliament during the 2024 elections.
Although it held on to the presidency, it won just 51 out of 113 seats in the legislature — one seat short of its main rival, the Kuomintang, a party often accused by the DPP as being pro-Beijing.
The Taiwan People's Party won eight seats, and two independents hold the balance of power.
The Kuomintang and Taiwan People's Party have since formed a coalition, giving them control of parliament.
The DPP has accused them of blocking legislation, cutting budgets, and paralysing the government.
In January, the opposition coalition pushed through major funding cuts — slashing about 7 per cent of the annual budget and freezing billions more.
"Hostile China will be very pleased," Taiwan's Premier Cho Jung-tai warned at the time, suggesting the cuts could weaken the island's defences.
The stand-off triggered the launch of the Great Recall campaign.
Supporters say it's about protecting national security and democracy from an obstructionist opposition.
Critics say it's a dangerous attempt to silence dissent and tilt the political playing field.
To win back control of parliament, the DPP needs to remove at least six district-level opposition politicians and replace them with its own candidates.
But not all are vulnerable.
Taiwan's parliament includes two types of legislators: district representatives, who are elected by local voters, and "at-large" members, who are chosen based on party vote share. Only district MPs can be recalled.
It means that 13 Kuomintang legislators and all eight Taiwan People's Party legislators — who hold at-large seats — are safe.
So far, pro-DPP groups have filed recall motions against 34 Kuomintang politicians and one independent aligned with the Kuomintang.
The Kuomintang has denounced the effort as a "witch hunt" and an attempt by the DPP to establish one-party rule.
It has launched a counter-campaign targeting 15 DPP legislators.
Kuomintang chair Eric Chu has accused Mr Lai of launching "a cultural revolution in Taiwan", referencing the bloody purges in China under Mao Zedong.
He also threatened to initiate a recall motion against Mr Lai himself as soon as it becomes legally possible, on May 20 — one year after Mr Lai took office.
For his part, Mr Lai has rejected characterisations as a dictator.
"You can't only oppose the DPP but stay silent on the Chinese Communist Party," he said.
The Great Recall campaign has struck a nerve in Taiwanese society — not just in parliament, but on the streets, within families and online.
Pop-up booths where volunteers gather recall signatures have become flashpoints for political confrontation. Videos of heated arguments between strangers have gone viral on social media.
Some DPP supporters see the campaign as necessary for Taiwan's survival in the face of growing pressure from Beijing.
"We are facing an existential threat from China," said a DPP volunteer gathering signatures in Taipei.
But public opinion appears to be shifting.
A recent poll by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation found 59.3 per cent of respondents oppose the DPP's recall campaign, with 33.8 per cent in support.
Now, figures within the DPP are urging caution.
Former president Chen Shui-bian — the first DPP leader known for his strong advocacy of Taiwanese sovereignty and a clear break from China — warned against using recalls to punish political opponents.
"Respecting different opinions and listening to minority voices is the true essence of democracy," Mr Chen said.
"You can't label someone an agent of some entity just because they hold a different view."
Ms Chen, a supporter of the opposition Taiwan People's Party who attended the April 26 rally, said: "I'm 43 years old, born and raised here, and I've never seen the country this divided in my entire life.
"There was never this idea that 'If you don't support the DPP, you are a CCP collaborator.'"
That fear of being labelled pro-Beijing — even for holding moderate or dissenting views — is a recurring theme.
Deer Lee, in his 20s, said he avoids political discussions with friends, many of whom support the DPP.
"If your views are even slightly different, you get sidelined," he said.
Others believe the DPP is using the recall campaign as a political weapon, not a democratic safeguard.
"If it's about recalling a single unfit legislator, I think that's something we can discuss rationally," said university student Eric Hsu.
Professor Tang said the mass recall campaign was eating away at something deeper than party politics.
"Taiwanese society has always been grounded in trust and strong social bonds," he said.
"But this campaign is being driven by resentment, not accountability — and that's not good for democracy."
In the first stage, the campaign must gather signatures from at least 1 per cent of the voters in a politician's district.
If successful, a second stage requires support from 10 per cent of eligible voters.
A recall voting process is then facilitated.
For it to pass, the number of votes in favour must both exceed those against and make up more than 25 per cent of the total electorate.
This makes recalls difficult to pull off — but not impossible, especially with strong party machinery behind them.
Taiwan's growing domestic divide is unfolding at a time of deepening geopolitical tension.
China, which claims Taiwan as one of its provinces and has not ruled out using force to take it, has ramped up its military pressure.
Live-fire drills and other military exercises by the People's Liberation Army around Taiwan are now routine.
In early April, Beijing staged another round of drills, simulating attacks on Taiwan's ports and energy facilities.
Around the same time, Chinese state media released propaganda cartoons portraying Mr Lai as a parasite being grilled over flames.
The drills drew condemnation from both the ruling DPP and the opposition Kuomintang.
But the Kuomintang also used the moment to urge the Lai administration to tone down its rhetoric.
Adding to the unease was a surprise move from Taiwan's closest ally, the United States.
The Trump administration in April announced a 32 per cent tariff on some Taiwanese goods — a decision that stunned the island.
The tariff was suspended shortly afterwards, pending trade talks, but it left many questioning how reliable Taiwan's partners really are.
The opposition seized on the moment, accusing the DPP of jeopardising Taiwan's "silicon shield" — a term referring to Taiwan's dominance in semiconductor manufacturing, which many believe acts as a strategic buffer against Chinese aggression.
That argument was sharpened after Taiwan's chip giant, TSMC, announced a $US100 billion investment in American factories.
At the April 26 rally, senior Kuomintang figure Han Kuo-yu summed up the sense of pressure from all sides.
"Three swords are hanging over the people of Taiwan," he said — referring to the US tariff threat, China's military drills, and the domestic turmoil caused by the recall campaign.
So far, Mr Lai has not publicly commented on the recall drives launched by either camp and has instead called for national unity in the face of rising external threats.
Recall votes could begin as soon as late August.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
5 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Four Aussie residents, including two citizens, now facing Hong Kong arrest warrants, bounties
Four Australian residents are now facing overseas arrest warrants issued by Hong Kong's national security police, after a fresh announcement concerning support for a pro-democracy party in the state's parliament. Australian citizen Chongyi Feng and resident Wong Sau-Wo are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial "Hong Kong Parliament" group. They are among 19 activists who are are accused of organising or participating in the group that authorities in the Asian financial hub say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a "Hong Kong constitution". Authorities say the group aims to subvert state power, under the law Beijing imposed in 2020 following months of pro-democracy protests in 2019. There is a bounty of at least HK$200,000 ($38,807) for each of the activists. Yam, who is a legal scholar, and Hui, a former Hong Kong Democracy party MP, were among eight overseas-based activists who authorities accused of national security offences, including foreign collusion and incitement to secession. At the time, the police also offered rewards of HK$1 million ($194,000) for information leading to each possible arrest. Foreign Minister Penny Wong has reacted to the announcement, saying "Australia strongly objects to Hong Kong authorities issuing arrest warrants for pro-democracy advocates in Australia." "Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy," she wrote on social media platform X on Saturday "We have consistently expressed our strong objections to China and Hong Kong on the broad and extraterritorial application of Hong Kong's national security legislation, and we will continue to do so." SBS News has reached out to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for comment. Hong Kong's national security law Feng has told SBS News that, while he feels safe being in Australia, the federal government must remain cautious in its interactions with China. "So we need to be fully aware of the nature of (China's) authoritarian regime when dealing with Xi Jinping or the People's Republic of China." He says many of his friends in Hong Kong have been jailed due to the state's national security law, which makes perceived political subversion a serious offence. Critics of the national security law say authorities are using it to stifle dissent. Chinese and Hong Kong officials have repeatedly said the law was vital to restore stability after the city was rocked for months by sometimes violent anti-government and anti-China protests in 2019. "I feel quite sad that the autonomy of Hong Kong, of basic human rights in Hong Kong, and democracy in Hong Kong have all been destroyed by the implementation of the national security law," Feng said. Police reiterated that national security offences were serious crimes with extraterritorial reach and urged the wanted individuals to return to Hong Kong and turn themselves in. "If offenders voluntarily give up continuing to violate the crime, turn themselves in, truthfully confess their crimes, or provide key information that helps solve other cases, they may be eligible for reduced punishment," they said in a statement. Police also warned that aiding, abetting, or funding others to participate in the "Hong Kong Parliament" could be a criminal offence. Additional reporting by Wing Kuang and the Reuters News Agency.

ABC News
11 hours ago
- ABC News
US drops sanctions on Myanmar junta's allies after military chief praises Donald Trump
The United States has lifted sanctions on several allies of Myanmar's ruling generals and their military-linked companies in a move that has prompted concern from politicians and rights groups. Junta chief Min Aung Hlaing seized power in a 2021 coup, deposing the civilian government and sparking a civil war that has killed thousands, displaced 3.5 million left and half the nation in poverty. The US Treasury announcement it would lift the sanctions came two weeks after Min Aung Hlaing sent a glowing letter of praise to US President Donald Trump, in response to his threat of tariffs, and commended him for shutting down US-funded media outlets covering the conflict. Rights groups say the decision risks undermining efforts to hold the country's military regime accountable. The US Treasury said it had dropped sanctions against KT Services & Logistics and its founder, Jonathan Myo Kyaw Thaung, who were sanctioned in 2022 for leasing Yangon's port from a military-owned firm. Others delisted include the Myanmar Chemical and Machinery Company and Suntac Technologies, which were previously sanctioned for producing arms, including tanks and mortars. A US Treasury spokesperson said the removals were conducted "in the ordinary course of business" and declined to explain why the individuals were removed from the list. A senior Trump administration official said the decision was unrelated to the general's letter. John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, described the decision as "extremely worrying" and said it suggested a weakening of the US sanctions regime. "The individuals involved are not marginal players; they have facilitated the junta's arms imports from countries such as China and Russia," analyst Sean Turnell told the ABC. "These are people who are closely tied to Myanmar's war economy. "Lifting sanctions on them sends the wrong message." The sanctions decision comes as Myanmar's military continues deadly air strikes against civilians. In May, a junta air strike on a school in Sagaing region killed 20 students and two teachers, according to local witnesses. The strike was carried out despite a purported humanitarian ceasefire called to help the nation recover from a devastating earthquake. In July, more than 20 civilians, including children, were reportedly killed in another air strike on a monastery sheltering displaced people. Amnesty International data has shown that the military has continued importing aviation fuel despite sanctions, enabling lethal air strikes across the country. This year, the junta's China and Russia-backed forces have clawed back ground on the northern front. State media also said its soldiers managed "to fully retake" the gold mining town of Thabeikkyin this week. Early this month, as part of a slate of import tariffs Mr Trump ordered, Myanmar was notified of a 40 per cent tariff to take effect on August 1. On July 11, Min Aung Hlaing responded by proposing a reduced rate of 10 per cent to 20 per cent. US Democratic Representative Ami Bera, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia, said the decision to lift the sanctions "goes against our values of freedom and democracy". However, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said that sanctions delistings "were collected over the last year in accordance with standard Treasury course of business". The US maintains sanctions against Min Aung Hlaing and two state-owned banks, the Myanma Foreign Trade Bank (MFTB) and Myanma Investment and Commercial Bank (MICB). Mr Turnell said it was important to keep individuals and banks involved in the military's procurement network on the sanctions list as it could complicate efforts to restrict the regime's access to foreign currency, which remains critical for weapons purchases. "Even Myanmar's allies, such as Russia and China, insist on payment in dollars or euros," Mr Turnell said. "That makes financial sanctions one of the most effective levers the US still holds." ABC/wires


SBS Australia
16 hours ago
- SBS Australia
SBS News in Filipino, Saturday 26 July 2025
There are growing calls for Australia's childcare subsidy to include more care options. Australia and the United Kingdom are set to sign a 50-year defence treaty today Supreme Court dismisses impeachment complaint against VP Sara Duterte, citing constitutional violation of one-year ban. LISTEN TO THE PODCAST SBS Filipino 26/07/2025 06:25 Filipino 📢 Where to Catch SBS Filipino