logo
'Why not an Islamic bomb?': How Israel planned and failed to stop Pakistan going nuclear

'Why not an Islamic bomb?': How Israel planned and failed to stop Pakistan going nuclear

Middle East Eye25-06-2025
Former CIA Director George Tenet thought him 'at least as dangerous as Osama bin Laden' and former Mossad Chief Shabtai Shavit regretted not killing him.
But to almost 250 million Pakistanis, Abdul Qadeer Khan - the godfather of Pakistan's nuclear programme - is a legend and national hero.
The nuclear scientist, who was born in 1936 and died in 2021 aged 85, was more responsible than anyone else for the South Asian nation developing a nuclear bomb.
He ran a sophisticated and clandestine international network assisting Iran, Libya and North Korea with their nuclear programmes.
One of those nations, North Korea, ended up getting the coveted military status symbol.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Israel - itself a nuclear power, although it has never admitted it - allegedly used assassination attempts and threats to try and stop Pakistan from going nuclear.
In the 1980s Israel even formulated a plan to bomb Pakistan's nuclear site with Indian assistance - a scheme that the Indian government eventually backed out of.
AQ Khan, as he is commonly remembered by Pakistanis, believed that by building a nuclear bomb he had saved his country from foreign threats, especially its nuclear-armed neighbour India.
Today many of his fellow citizens agree.
'Why not an Islamic bomb?'
Pakistan first decided to build a bomb after its larger neighbour had done so. On 18 May 1974 India tested its first nuclear weapon, which it codenamed Smiling Buddha.
Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto immediately vowed to develop nuclear weapons for his own country.
"We will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own," he said.
There was, he declared, 'a Christian bomb, a Jewish bomb and now a Hindu bomb.
'Why not an Islamic bomb?'
'We will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own'
- Pakistani PM Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (from 1973 to 1977)
Born during British rule of the Indian subcontinent, AQ Khan completed a science degree at Karachi University in 1960 before studying metallurgical engineering in Berlin. He also went on to study in the Netherlands and Belgium.
By 1974 Khan was working for a subcontractor of a major nuclear fuel company, Urenco, in Amsterdam.
The company supplied enriched uranium nuclear fuel for European nuclear reactors.
Khan had access to top secret areas of the Urenco facility and blueprints of the world's best centrifuges, which enriched natural uranium and turned it into bomb fuel.
In January 1976 he made a sudden and mysterious departure from the Netherlands, saying he had been made 'an offer I can't refuse in Pakistan'.
Khan was later accused of having stolen a blueprint for uranium centrifuges, which can turn uranium into weapons-grade fuel, from the Netherlands.
That July he set up a research laboratory in Rawalpindi which produced enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.
For a few years the operation proceeded in secret. Dummy companies imported the components Khan needed to build an enrichment programme, the official story being that they were going towards a new textile mill.
While there is significant evidence indicating that Pakistan's military establishment was supporting Khan's work, civilian governments were generally kept in the dark, with the exception of Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (who had proposed the initiative).
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (R) and his wife Begum Nusrat Isphahani Bhutto at a dinner gala at the Georges V Hotel in France, on 26 July 1973 (AFP)
Even the late prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's daughter, was not told a word about the programme by her generals.
She only found out about it in 1989 by accident - in Tehran.
Iranian President Rafsanjani asked her whether they could reaffirm the two countries' agreement on 'special defence matters'.
'What exactly are you talking about, Mr President?' asked Bhutto, confused.
'Nuclear technology, Madam Prime Minister, nuclear technology,' replied the Iranian president. Bhutto was stunned.
Assassination attempts and threats
In June 1979, the operation was exposed by the magazine 8 Days. There was an international uproar. Israel protested to the Dutch, who ordered an inquiry.
A Dutch court convicted Khan in 1983 for attempted espionage (the conviction was later overturned on a technicality). But work on the nuclear programme continued.
By 1986, Khan was confident Pakistan had the capability to produce nuclear weapons.
'Imperial whore': Top Pakistani official goes after son of overthrown shah of Iran Read More »
His motivation was in large part ideological: 'I want to question the holier-than-thou attitude of the Americans and British,' he said.
'Are these bastards God-appointed guardians of the world?'
There were serious efforts to sabotage the programme, including a series of assassination attempts widely understood to have been the work of Israel's intelligence agency, Mossad.
Executives at European companies doing business with Khan found themselves targeted. A letter bomb was sent to one in West Germany - he escaped but his dog was killed.
Another bombing targeted a senior executive of Swiss company Cora Engineering, which worked on Pakistan's nuclear programme.
Historians, including Adrian Levy, Catherine Scott-Clark and Adrian Hanni, have argued that the Mossad used threats and assassination attempts in a failed campaign to prevent Pakistan from building the bomb.
Siegfried Schertler, the owner of one company, told Swiss Federal Police that Mossad agents phoned him and his salesmen repeatedly.
He said he was approached by an employee of the Israeli embassy in Germany, a man named David, who told him to stop 'these businesses' regarding nuclear weapons.
The Israelis 'didn't want a Muslim country to have the bomb', according to Feroz Khan, a former official in Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme.
'Are these bastards God-appointed guardians of the world?'
- AQ Khan, Pakistani nuclear scientist
In the early 1980s Israel proposed to India that the two collaborate to bomb and destroy Pakistan's nuclear facility at Kahuta in Pakistan's Rawalpindi district.
Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi approved the strike.
A plan developed for Israeli F-16s and F-15s to take off from the Jamnagar airbase in India's Gujarat and launch strikes on the facility.
But Gandhi later backed out and the plan was shelved.
In 1987, when her son Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister, the Indian army chief Lieutenant General Krishnaswami Sundarji tried to start a war with Pakistan so India could bomb the nuclear facility at Kahuta.
He sent half a million troops to the Pakistani border for military drills, along with hundreds of tanks and armoured vehicles - an extraordinary provocation.
But this attempt at triggering hostilities failed after the Indian prime minister, who had not been properly briefed on Sundarji's plan, instigated a deescalation with Pakistan.
Imran Khan (L) walks with AQ Khan after a meeting at his residence in Islamabad on 7 February 2009 (AFP)
Despite Indian and Israeli opposition, both the US and China covertly helped Pakistan. China provided the Pakistanis with enriched uranium, tritium and even scientists.
Meanwhile, American support came because Pakistan was an important Cold War ally.
US President Jimmy Carter cut aid to Pakistan in April 1979 in response to Pakistan's programme being exposed, but then reversed the decision months later when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan: America would need the help of neighbouring Pakistan.
In the 1980s, the US covertly gave Pakistani nuclear scientists technical training and turned a blind eye to its programme.
But everything changed with the end of the Cold War.
In October 1990 the US halted economic and military aid to Pakistan in protest against the nuclear programme. Pakistan then said it would stop developing nuclear weapons.
AQ Khan later revealed, though, that the production of highly enriched uranium secretly continued.
The seventh nuclear power
On 11 May 1998 India tested its nuclear warheads. Pakistan then successfully tested its own in the Balochistan desert later that month. The US responded by sanctioning both India and Pakistan.
Pakistan had become the world's seventh nuclear power.
And Khan was a national hero. He was driven around in motorcades as large as the prime minister's and was guarded by army commandos.
What the Israel-Iran-US conflict taught Pakistan Read More »
Streets, schools and multiple cricket teams were named after him. He wasn't known for playing down his achievements.
'Who made the atom bomb? I made it,' Khan declared on national television. 'Who made the missiles? I made them for you.'
But Khan had also organised another, particularly daring, operation.
From the mid-1980s onwards, he ran an international nuclear network which sent technology and designs to Iran, North Korea and Libya.
He would order double the number of parts the Pakistani nuclear programme required and then secretly sell the excess on.
In the 1980s the Iranian government - despite Ayatollah Khomeini's opposition to the bomb on the grounds that it was Islamically prohibited - approached Pakistan's military dictator, General Zia-ul-Haq, for help.
Between 1986 and 2001, Pakistan gave Iran key components needed to make a bomb, although these tended to be secondhand - Khan kept the most advanced technology for Pakistan.
The Mossad had Khan under surveillance as he travelled around the Middle East in the 1980s and 1990s, but failed to work out what the scientist was doing.
Then-Mossad chief Shavit later said that if he had realised Khan's intentions, he would have considered ordering Khan to be assassinated to 'change the course of history'.
Gaddafi exposes the operation
In the end, Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi blew Khan's operation in 2003 while attempting to win support from the US.
Gaddafi disclosed to the CIA and MI6 that Khan was building nuclear sites for his government - some of which were disguised as chicken farms.
The CIA siezed machinery bound for Libya as it was being smuggled through the Suez Canal. Investigators found weapons blueprints in bags from an Islamabad dry cleaner.
When the operation was exposed, the Americans were horrified.
'It was an astounding transformation when you think about it, something we've never seen before," a senior American official told the New York Times.
"First, [Khan] exploits a fragmented market and develops a quite advanced nuclear arsenal.
'Then he throws the switch, reverses the flow and figures out how to sell the whole kit, right down to the bomb designs, to some of the world's worst governments."
In 2004 Khan confessed to running the nuclear proliferation network, saying he had provided Iran, Libya and North Korea with nuclear technology.
In February, he appeared on television and insisted he had acted alone, with no support from the Pakistani government, which then swiftly pardoned him.
President Musharraf called him 'my hero'. However, reportedly under US pressure, he placed Khan under effective house arrest in Islamabad until 2009.
Later AQ Khan said that he 'saved the country for the first time when I made Pakistan a nuclear nation and saved it again when I confessed and took the whole blame on myself'.
Soldiers carry the flag-draped coffin of AQ Khan during his funeral outside the Faisal Mosque following his death in Islamabad on 10 October 2021 (AFP)
He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2006 but recovered after surgery.
Enormously wealthy, in his later years, Khan funded a community centre in Islamabad and spent his time feeding monkeys.
Those who knew him said Khan firmly believed what he had done was right.
He wanted to stand up to the west and give nuclear technology to non-western, particularly Muslim, nations.
'He also said that giving technology to a Muslim country was not a crime,' one anonymous acquaintance recalled.
When Khan died of Covid in 2021, he was hailed as a 'national icon' by then-Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan.
And that is how he is still widely remembered today in Pakistan.
'[The] nation should be rest assured Pakistan is a safe atomic power,' the nuclear scientist had declared in 2019.
'No one can cast an evil eye on it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Jurisprudence of Coexistence
The Jurisprudence of Coexistence

Al Etihad

time2 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

The Jurisprudence of Coexistence

28 July 2025 04:37 Imam Mohammad Tawhidi*The modern world is shaped by a complex interplay of faith traditions, doctrinal schools, and ideological frameworks; as such, the jurisprudence of coexistence between peoples emerges as a foundational pillar in achieving societal stability and contributes meaningfully to the flourishing of civilisations. Diversity and human difference are not incidental outcomes but are among the enduring divine laws governing creation. The need for a jurisprudential framework that reorganises the relationship between human beings on the basis of justice, dignity, and mutual respect becomes increasingly urgent. This is the very essence of the jurisprudence of coexistence, which stands as one of the highest expressions of Islamic Sharīʿa in its engagement with human plurality. It does not call for compromising principles or abandoning identity; rather, it is a field of knowledge unto itself; one that governs relations with others on religious, cultural, and civilisational grounds according to the higher objectives of Islamic law (maqasid al- Sharīʿa) and its authoritative rulings. Its purpose is to cultivate societal peace, prevent conflict, and contribute to the building of a shared human civilisation. God Almighty created people different in tongues, colours, and beliefs, and did not make them one religious community. This diversity is a permanent cosmic law. As the Qur'an states: 'Had your Lord willed, He could have made all mankind one community. But they will not cease to differ' (Surah Hud, 11:118).Coexistence is the civilisational response to this diversity, and extends beyond religious pluralism to encompass ethnic, cultural, doctrinal, and intellectual differences. Islam laid the groundwork for this inclusive vision from its inception, insisting that there is no compulsion in religion, legislating humane interaction with non-Muslims, and encouraging kindness and excellence toward them. Coexistence, in this sense, is not a passive condition of endurance or tolerance; it is an active behaviour and ethical orientation that produces an atmosphere of cooperation, solidarity, and shared pursuit of the common good. Islam's call for coexistence was not born out of weakness or temporary convenience but stems from its intrinsic principles that prioritise the preservation of life, intellect, religion, and human the most dangerous causes of conflict in some countries today is the lack of awareness about this jurisprudence and the deviation of religious or political discourse toward exclusion and arrogance. Such deviations generate environments saturated with hatred and hostility. By contrast, grounding societies in the jurisprudence of coexistence contributes to building stable communities that respect diversity and invest in it as a resource for development and Principles of the Jurisprudence of Coexistence:1. Religious and Intellectual FreedomFreedom of belief lies at the heart of the jurisprudence of coexistence. It is the cornerstone upon which all other elements of coexistence rest. God Almighty granted human beings the freedom of choice and affirmed this in His Book: 'There is no compulsion in religion' (Surah al-Baqarah, 2:256). This verse stands as a fundamental basis for respecting religious and intellectual convictions so long as these convictions do not become tools of aggression or corruption. Sharīʿa safeguards the invitation to guidance through explanation, not coercion or humiliation. It upholds the principle that belief must arise from conviction, not imposition.2. Justice for AllJustice in Islam is an absolute value, not conditional upon one's religion, colour, or nationality. It is a divine command that transcends communal boundaries. The Holy Qurʾān states: 'Let not the hatred of a people cause you to act unjustly. Be just; that is nearer to piety' (Surah al-Ma'idah, 5:8). Justice, in the framework of coexistence, requires that every person be treated according to their inherent dignity and rights; not based on allegiance or personal preference. In the Sharīʿa, justice is the balance that sustains the world, and it is due to all without exception.3. Respect for Human DignityRespect for human dignity is a foundational tenet of Islamic law and is not limited to Muslims alone. God states: 'Indeed, We have honoured the children of Adam' (Surah al-Isra', 17:70), a declaration that affirms the inviolable dignity of every human being regardless of faith. This universal honour imposes on society a duty to protect human life, belief systems, property, and to prohibit any violation or degradation under the guise of religion, ethnicity, or ideology. The protection of human dignity is an obligation that extends across all of society's institutions.4. Human ToleranceTolerance does not imply erasing identities or remaining silent in the face of falsehood. Rather, it entails bearing the existence of the other, accepting their right to be, and interacting with them in a manner characterised by civility and moral integrity. Disagreement, under this principle, must never become a pretext for hostility. True tolerance generates cohesive communities, built upon mutual respect, where collaboration toward the common good is possible without eroding distinctive cultural or doctrinal identities. This form of human tolerance is deeply rooted in the Prophetic tradition and the ethics of Islamic principles are not merely theoretical aspirations. They are historically lived realities that have been actualised by various peoples under Islamic governance grounded in the jurisprudence of coexistence. A prominent contemporary example is the United Arab Emirates, whose visionary leadership has established an atmosphere of peace and allowed adherents of various religions to practice their rituals and live in safety and reassurance; emulating the legacy of the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh), the Prophet of mercy. Observers frequently praise the policies of the UAE as a vibrant model of coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims, built on mutual respect and legal protections that prioritise citizenship without dissolving religious or cultural the broader civilisational context, coexistence is a prerequisite for the emergence of cities, the development of the sciences, and the exchange of knowledge. Civilisations do not thrive in isolation or closed environments but grow when they interact with others and exchange ideas and experiences. History bears witness that Islamic civilisation reached its peak when it welcomed scholars from diverse backgrounds and produced intellectual schools that advanced both religious and worldly sciences. Coexistence, in this comprehensive sense, is more than a moral value; it is a necessary condition for social peace and a driver of civilisational progress. In its absence, hatred arises, societies fragment, and the machinery of construction and advancement grinds to a jurisprudence of coexistence, therefore, is a realistic appeal for the establishment of stable societies based on respect, pluralism, and justice. It is the jurisprudence of the future, because the future cannot be built on exclusion, but on recognition; not on hegemony, but on partnership; not on violence, but on peace. In the enduring words of the late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, May Allah bless his soul: 'To treat every person, no matter what his creed or race, as a special soul, is a mark of Islam.' *The writer is a Parliamentary Advisor and Research Partner with the think-tank TRENDS Research and Advisory

Negotiations with Israel pointless while Gaza faces famine and genocide, says Hamas
Negotiations with Israel pointless while Gaza faces famine and genocide, says Hamas

Middle East Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Negotiations with Israel pointless while Gaza faces famine and genocide, says Hamas

Hamas's top official in Gaza said on Sunday there is no longer any justification to continue negotiations with Israel while the genocide against Gaza continues and civilians are deprived of basic needs, accusing Israel of withdrawing from talks to stall and intensify the war. Khalil al-Hayya, deputy head of Hamas's political bureau in Gaza, delivered the remarks in a video statement days after Israel pulled its negotiating team out of Doha for what it called 'further consultations', despite Hamas issuing what it described as a constructive response to the latest ceasefire framework. 'There is no point in continuing negotiations under the siege, genocide, and starvation of our children and women in the Gaza Strip,' al Hayya said. He added that 'the immediate and dignified entry of food and medicine to our people is a serious expression of the feasibility of continuing the negotiations.' Al Hayya said Hamas had shown 'all possible flexibility that did not conflict with the principles of our people' throughout the indirect talks. He said that 'clear progress' had been made during the last round of negotiations and that Hamas had accepted key elements proposed by mediators. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'In the last round of negotiations, we agreed with what the mediators offered us regarding the withdrawal, prisoners, and aid,' he said. But he expressed shock at Israel's sudden departure from the talks, 'we were surprised by the occupation's withdrawal from the negotiations and its alignment with US envoy Steve Witkoff,' he added. 'The occupation's withdrawal from the negotiations round is a transparent step aimed at wasting time and causing more genocide,' al-Hayya added. Over 100,000 children in Gaza at risk of death due to Israeli blockade Read More » He said Hamas had responded to the mediators at every stage and reiterated that the Palestinian resistance had 'used all its tools and relationships over the course of 22 months to stop the aggression against the people of Gaza.' His remarks come amid growing international outrage over the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza, where aid agencies say famine-like conditions have taken hold in several areas. More than 100 humanitarian organisations warned on Wednesday that "mass famine" has been spreading across the Gaza Strip since Israel blocked humanitarian aid from entering in early March and began providing inadequate aid through the controversial GHF at the end of May. The Israeli and US-backed initiative has allowed an insufficient amount of relief supplies, while carrying out attacks against civilians seeking aid at the GHF sites. At least 127 Palestinians, including more than 85 children, have died of starvation since Israel's blockade resumed in March, according to the Palestinian health ministry. More than 1,121 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid at distribution sites operated by the GHF, manned by Israeli soldiers and US security contractors.

Saudi forces arrest pilgrim for raising Palestinian flag in Mecca
Saudi forces arrest pilgrim for raising Palestinian flag in Mecca

Middle East Eye

time9 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Saudi forces arrest pilgrim for raising Palestinian flag in Mecca

Saudi security forces arrested an Egyptian pilgrim at the Grand Mosque in Mecca after he raised the Palestinian flag beside the Kaaba and called for an end to Gaza's siege and starvation. The actions by the Saudi authorities has triggered widespread condemnation. Footage shared online shows the man crying out 'Wa Islamah!', a phrase used historically to express anguish when Islam or Muslims are under threat, as he pleads for urgent intervention to help Gaza's starving population. The emotional scene, captured and circulated on social media, shows the pilgrim saying 'the children of Gaza are dying. O Muslims!'. Seconds later, Saudi officers appear and detain him inside the mosque. The incident has reignited debate over Saudi Arabia's strict bans on political expression at Islam's holiest sites. Authorities prohibit all slogans and symbols, including national flags, during Hajj and Umrah, arguing such measures protect the sanctity of worship. However, critics accuse the kingdom of using these restrictions to stifle support for Palestine and suppress expressions of Muslim solidarity. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In 2023, a British pilgrim was detained for wearing a white keffiyeh and a Palestinian-coloured prayer bead. Beyond Mecca, Saudi authorities have reportedly launched a broader crackdown on citizens who criticise Israel or voice solidarity with Gaza online. Since Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman rose to power in 2017, rights groups have documented a surge in arrests linked to peaceful speech, particularly posts viewed as critical of the kingdom's foreign policy or regional alliances. As Israel's war on Gaza continues, the arrest in Mecca has deepened concerns that public support for Palestine is being criminalised in Saudi Arabia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store