logo
Lawmakers consider requiring voted levies to be expressed in dollar amount, not mills

Lawmakers consider requiring voted levies to be expressed in dollar amount, not mills

Yahoo05-02-2025
Photo illustration by Getty Images.
Let's say voters in Great Falls approve a levy to pay for 10 new firefighters under legislation being considered by the Montana Legislature.
In just four years, the city probably would have to lay off two or more of those workers if House Bill 20 passes, said Danielle Bradley, representing the City of Great Falls.
That's because the bill would tie the levy to a dollar amount, worth less every year, as opposed to mills, a taxing rate with a value that rises and falls as property values rise and fall.
The bill partially accounts for inflation, which Bradley said she appreciates, but she said it still means the city would have to dig out of a hole sooner or later, given the cost of a firefighter will keep on going up.
Tuesday, the Senate Tax committee heard HB 20, which already has made its way through the House. Sponsored by Rep. Larry Brewster, R-Billings, the bill would require voted levies to be expressed in dollar amounts versus mills.
A mill is a unit that expresses property tax rates, and it's used to calculate tax bills. One mill generates $1 for every $1,000 of taxable value, and in Montana, taxable values have been going up.
That means tax bills generally have been going up too, and this session, legislators are interested in helping property taxpayers, some who have experienced steep increases in bills due to higher market values.
Several proposed bills address property tax formulas to help residential taxpayers, but HB 20 takes a different approach, and it gained some bipartisan support in the House.
Part of the rationale for the bill is that mills are not as accessible to the public as dollar amounts.
'Montana voters deserve to have the clearest possible picture about what they're voting on, especially if it means increasing their taxes,' Senate Tax committee Chair Greg Hertz, R-Polson, said in a statement. 'This bill will provide greater transparency on voted levies by putting the issue into terms that voters best understand.'
Some legislators also believe local governments spend money too freely, and proponents of the bill argue it would help provide accountability to voters.
Opponents, though, say local governments will end up having to play catchup when it comes to voted levies. That's because mills float, but dollars don't.
'Dollars don't equal dollars year over year,' said Jennifer Hensley, representing Missoula County.
Opponents also argue local governments don't have the authority to cut all the dollars in their budgets.
For example, Partnership Health Center in Missoula County is funded with significant federal dollars, 'flow through' money counted as an expenditure in the budget, but not under control of commissioners, Hensley said.
Sen. Dave Fern, D-Whitefish, asked bill sponsor Brewster if an 'unintended consequence' of the bill would be that local governments would lose dollar value on, say, an approved public safety levy, and then have to return to voters.
Brewster, though, said he believes that's one of the best parts of the bill.
'I don't know why engaging the taxpayers in the process seems to be an evil thing,' Brewster said. 'I think it's a good thing and requires a municipality to justify what they're spending.'
Hertz agreed, and he grilled local government representatives on the predicament. Hertz asked what a property taxpayer should do when an increase in value means their home is suddenly worth double — and, he said, their taxes are doubling too.
According to the Department of Revenue, property taxes generally go up when assessed value goes up, although typically the increase is not proportional.
Hertz, however, said taxpayers vote at the ballot box on a certain amount for a certain purpose, and then it escalates without their control.
'Is that really fair to the taxpayer?' Hertz said.
He requested solutions from local government representatives, but he said he believes the best form of local control is allowing the voters to decide.
Kelly Lynch, with the Montana League of Cities and Towns, agreed property taxpayers need help.
However, Lynch said the bill would mean that taxpayers might approve a project, say to build a fire station, but if a local government wanted to ask voters for ongoing operations too, it would be difficult to figure out the cost in dollars.
Nonetheless, Lynch said if full inflation was included, the League would support the bill. Lynch also said the issue is relatively new; property values didn't fluctuate as much in the past, and the legislature would mitigate changes by adjusting tax rates.
Lynch said voters already know what they want, even if expressed in mills, and the evidence is they've turned down many levies. At the same time, she said the League acknowledges the problem that property taxpayers are struggling.
'We know that taxpayers need relief, and we want to be part of the solution,' Lynch said.
An earlier amendment removed school district levies from the bill for simplicity, Brewster said.
To get the bill out of the House, he said the bill also was amended to say local governments can choose to ask voters to increase requested amounts at ¾ the rate of inflation averaged over the previous three years — instead of the current limit of half of the rate of inflation.
Bradley, with the city of Great Falls, asked legislators to oppose the bill unless it allowed for full inflation.
Sen. Mary Ann Dunwell, D-Helena, asked Brewster if he would support an amendment to fully fund inflation, but he said he would view it as an unfriendly amendment, especially because the bill allows voted levies to increase at a higher rate than general funds.
Brewster also said some cities can do a better job of managing their budgets. One city has a big budget for police, he said, but it can't fill all those jobs, and it has a reserve fund as a result.
'Maybe they need to reduce their spending a little bit,' Brewster said.
The committee did not take immediate action on the bill Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vice President JD Vance is on the road again to sell the Republicans' big new tax law
Vice President JD Vance is on the road again to sell the Republicans' big new tax law

Boston Globe

time9 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Vice President JD Vance is on the road again to sell the Republicans' big new tax law

In West Pittston, Pennsylvania, Vance told attendees at an industrial machine shop that they should be able to keep more of their pay in their pockets, highlighting the law's new tax deductions on overtime. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Vance also discussed a new children's savings program called Trump Accounts and how the new law promotes energy extraction, while decrying Democrats for opposing the bill that keeps the current tax rates, which would have otherwise expired later this year. Advertisement The legislation cleared the GOP-controlled Congress by the narrowest of margins, with Vance breaking a tie vote in the Senate for the package that also sets aside hundreds of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration agenda while slashing Medicaid and food stamps. The vice president is also stepping up his public relations blitz on the bill as the White House tries to deflect attention away from the growing controversy over Jeffrey Epstein. Advertisement The disgraced financier killed himself, authorities say, in a New York jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump and his top allies stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein's death before Trump returned to the White House and are now reckoning with the consequences of a Justice Department announcement earlier this month that Epstein did indeed die by suicide and that no further documents about the case would be released. Questions about the case continued to dog Trump in Scotland, where he on Sunday announced a framework trade deal with the European Union. Asked about the timing of the trade announcement and the Epstein case and whether it was correlated, Trump responded: 'You got to be kidding with that.' 'No, had nothing to do with it,' Trump told the reporter. 'Only you would think that.' The White House sees the new law as a clear political boon, sending Vance to promote it in swing congressional districts that will determine whether Republicans retain their House majority next year. The northeastern Pennsylvania stop is in the district represented by Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a first-term lawmaker who knocked off a six-time Democratic incumbent last fall. On Monday, Vance will be in the district of Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, who is a top target for the National Republican Congressional Committee this cycle. Polls before the bill's passage showed that it largely remained unpopular, although the public approves of some individual provisions such as increasing the child tax credit and allowing workers to deduct more of their tips on taxes.

The great Northeast exodus — how high taxes are driving away billions
The great Northeast exodus — how high taxes are driving away billions

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

The great Northeast exodus — how high taxes are driving away billions

New York and New Jersey lost $140 billion in income in just one decade. Call it moving van economics — and New York and New Jersey are the losers. A new analysis from my organization, Unleash Prosperity, of the latest census and income tax data finds these two states have lost more residents over the past decade than any other state not named California. Advertisement From 2015-2024, New York has lost 2 million residents. 3 Zohran Mamdani wants to raise taxes by 2 percent on wealthy New Yorkers. Getty Images These are giant population losses from two of America's leading industrial and financial centers throughout the 20th century. State tax havens These New York and New Jersey refugees have mostly relocated to the new powerhouse states like Florida, Texas and Tennessee. These moving vans explains why the Southeast is now, for the first time ever, the economically dominant region in the country. Advertisement Even more problematic for New York and New Jersey is that the movers are taking a lot of personal income and purchasing power with them. From 2012 to 2022, New York has lost $111 billion in income while Jersey is down by more than $31 billion. Because the income is lost forever — except for the rare cases when the exiles move back — these income losses accumulate year after year. 3 Unleash Prosperity Why are so many people leaving the Northeast? Advertisement A myriad of reasons — crime, cost of living, better job opportunities, warmer weather and, yes, to save money on taxes. New York, New Jersey and California are the three biggest losers in the interstate migration sweepstakes, and they just happen to be the states with the highest state-local income tax add-ons. The big winner states like Florida and Texas have no income tax at all. 3 Unleash Prosperity Coincidence? Doubtful. Advertisement There's a warning sign that should be flashing. The place in America with the highest income tax is New York City. Now one of the leading candidates for mayor, Zohran Mamdani, wants to raise the tax on the rich by another 2 percentage points. When will voters realize that you can't tax the New York millionaire after they move to Florida — and choose to pay no income tax at all? Stephen Moore is a co-founder of Unleash Prosperity and a former senior Trump economic adviser.

Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races
Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races

Republican strategists say they plan to make a major midterm talking point from the threat of a third impeachment against Donald Trump that could come if Democrats retake the House. 'We know what the stakes are in the midterm elections,' John McLaughlin, a Trump pollster, told NBC News. 'If we don't succeed, Democrats will begin persecuting President Trump again. They would go for impeachment.' Right now, Republicans hold an eight-seat advantage in the House, walling the president off from a third impeachment, but that could change if the Democrats surge in 2026, as the president's party typically suffers during midterm elections. Still, according to Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who led the party's second impeachment against Trump over the January 6 insurrection, the Democrats themselves plan to focus more on what they see as the president's 'terrible agenda.' 'We've already impeached him twice,' Raskin told NBC. 'So obviously that's not a complete solution, given that he is able to beat the two-thirds constitutional spread. So I don't think anybody thinks that's going to be the utopian solution to our problems.' Both House impeachments — first for an alleged offer of quid pro quo with Ukraine to go after Joe Biden, then for the Capitol riot — did not have enough votes to secure convictions in the Senate. During the second Trump administration, the president has continued to face attempts to initiate new impeachment trials, including from Michigan Democrat Shri Thanedar in the spring and a June effort over the administration's Iran strikes, though none of these have come to pass. Impeachments may not be coming any time soon, but Republicans face a variety of other risks to their three-party majority control of the federal government. The president's job approval rating has dipped to 37 percent, according to Gallup, the lowest of this term and just above Trump's lowest-ever approval rating, driven by hemorrhaging support from independent voters. A majority of Americans also oppose his signature One Big, Beautiful Bill, which contains a series of tax cuts and restrictions on social programs like Medicaid. The party also continues to face fallout and internal division over the White House's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files scandal, in which Trump and his allies campaigned on releasing materials related to the notorious financier's sexual misconduct, only to backtrack as more information concerning Epstein and Trump's long-time friendship came to light. The president has lashed out at his own base for seeking information about the scandal, which he calls a Democratic 'hoax,' while House Speaker Mike Johnson effectively ended business in the lower house until after its upcoming summer recess to avoid Democratic amendments calling for the release of the files. Meanwhile, former White House ally (and GOP mega-donor) Elon Musk has vowed to form his own political party, in the face of disagreements with the Trump administration over spending policy and the Epstein saga. There could also be blowback to economic conditions if the Trump administration's repeatedly delayed double-digit tariffs take full effect on major U.S. trading partners.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store