US Prepares South Korea To Face Nuclear Attack by North
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States has recently provided military training to South Korea, its treaty ally in Northeast Asia, for operating under a nuclear attack that might be launched by North Korea.
Newsweek has reached out to the North Korean Embassy in China for comment by email.
Why It Matters
North Korea is one of the nine countries armed with nuclear weapons. Its leader, Kim Jong Un, has pledged to keep the country's nuclear arsenal, which is estimated to have around 50 warheads, to strengthen deterrents against the U.S. and its South Korean and Japanese allies.
This photo provided by the North Korean government shows what it says is a test launch of new intercontinental ballistic missile Hwasong-19 on October 31, 2024, at an undisclosed site in North Korea.
This photo provided by the North Korean government shows what it says is a test launch of new intercontinental ballistic missile Hwasong-19 on October 31, 2024, at an undisclosed site in North Korea.
KCNA via AP
Facing North Korea's nuclear threats, the U.S. has been rotating its military assets, including aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, and nuclear-armed submarines, to the Korean Peninsula as a show of force while pursuing the goal of the "complete denuclearization of North Korea."
What To Know
From April 15 to 16, the U.S. Army Nuclear and Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Agency, which provides nuclear and countering weapons of mass destruction expertise and analysis, conducted the first training course in South Korea, the U.S. Forces Korea revealed.
The training, formally known as the Nuclear Weapon Effects Course-Korea, took place at a South Korean Strategic Command facility in Seoul. The command was launched in October 2024 to counter nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats posed by North Korea.
The course aimed at equipping participants with "knowledge and skills necessary to operate effectively in and through a nuclear environment," the U.S. Forces Korea said in the press release on Tuesday, which can strengthen deterrence against "nuclear-armed adversaries."
The Korean Service Corps 22nd Company conducts its annual Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) training at Camp Humphreys in South Korea on April 7, 2025.
The Korean Service Corps 22nd Company conducts its annual Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) training at Camp Humphreys in South Korea on April 7, 2025.
Spc. Caelum Astra/U.S. Army
A total of eight South Korean members, assigned to the Strategic Command and the Defense Ministry, took part in the training, as well as five people sent by the U.S.-South Korea joint warfighting headquarters, the Combined Forces Command, according to the press release.
South Korean admiral Kim Myung Soo, who serves as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as the country's top military officer, on Thursday visited a bunker buster missile unit, which operates the domestically developed Korean Tactical Surface to Surface Missile.
During the visit, the admiral urged for what he called "overwhelming capabilities" to deter potential provocations from North Korea, the South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff reported.
What People Are Saying
The U.S. Forces Korea said: "The training content is also directly applicable to Alliance tabletop exercises and wargames focused on conventional-nuclear integration, and enhancing the combined joint force's strategic understanding."
U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said: "North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is pursuing stronger, strategic, and conventional capabilities that can target U.S. forces and allies in the region, as well as the U.S. homeland, to bolster North Korea's leverage and stature, defend its regime, and achieve at least tacit recognition as a nuclear weapons power."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen when North Korea will carry out a new round of provocations, such as launching ballistic missiles, as the U.S. is enhancing its military presence in Northeast Asia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
36 minutes ago
- Newsweek
White House Reveals New Tariff Plan: What We Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing tariffs from 10 percent to 41 percent on U.S. imports from dozens of countries and foreign economies. The tariffs, which will take effect in seven days, include 25 percent on Indian goods entering the U.S., 20 percent on Taiwan's goods and 30 percent for South Africa's. Two of Asia's poorest counties, Myanmar and Laos, face 40 percent tariffs on their exports to the U.S., while Syria faces the highest rate of 41 percent. Canada faces tariffs of 35 percent on its exports to the U.S. In his order, Trump said that some trading partners had agreed or on the verge of agreeing to trade deals "to permanently remedy the trade barriers … and to align with the United States on economic and national security matters." "Other trading partners, despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters," he said. "There are also some trading partners that have failed to engage in negotiations with the United States or to take adequate steps to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national security matters," Trump said in the order. Trump set the August 1 deadline after his previous "Liberation Day" tariffs announced in April triggered global market panic fueled by fears of recession. He then imposed a 90-day period for negotiation and further extended the timeline while sending letters that listed rates to world leaders. That prompted a blizzard of hasty negotiations by numerous countries hoping to reach an agreement before the deadline. Shortly before the Friday deadline, Trump said he would enter a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of America's largest trading partners, with the current 25 percent tariff rates staying in place, down from the 30 percent he had threatened earlier.
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Rand Paul Sparks Fury for Floating Potential Third Trump Term: 'Chilling'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky brought up the potential for a third Trump term while speaking about the stock trading ban on Thursday. The comments sparked backlash on social media. Newsweek reached out to Paul's office via email for comment. Why It Matters The 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution limits presidents to two terms in the White House. Despite this, the notion of President Donald Trump running for a third term has periodically surfaced among Trump allies and the president himself. Trump fueled speculation in a March interview with NBC News, saying there were "methods [by] which you could do it" and adding that he was "not joking" about the prospect. However, he also said it was too early to seriously consider the idea, stating, "I'm focused on the current" presidential term. President Donald Trump speaks to the press at Glasgow Prestwick Airport on July 25, 2025, in Prestwick, Scotland. President Donald Trump speaks to the press at Glasgow Prestwick Airport on July 25, 2025, in Prestwick, To Know While speaking on Fox Business about the stock trading ban, Paul told host Stuart Varney, "I think we're going to discourage good people, successful people, from holding office. Part of the bill, I do believe, would forbid the president immediately from buying and selling stocks, and it would exempt him from the divestiture part." "Future presidents wouldn't be allowed to own things, so Donald Trump or the next president, which, you know, or some say he might run for a third term," Paul added. "But he would be forced to divest everything. He would have to sell all of his possessions." Paul continued: "I think Donald Trump's got a complicated, probably, financial empire, and a lot of people just wouldn't want to sell or get involved with all of that. You also don't want to sell it during a downturn. There's a lot of reasons, what would discourage successful people, and I frankly think that some of the success of Donald Trump being president is that he was used to the world of high finance, used to making deals with large amounts of money, and I don't think we want to discourage people like that from holding office." Dartmouth political scientist Brendan Nyhan reacted to Paul's comments on Bluesky, saying, "Chilling to see a senator floating the third term idea." Mark Copelovitch, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, wrote on Bluesky: "Signs you might be a far right authoritarian party (#3191): Casual normalization by a sitting Senator of a 'third term'" Former Republican Representative Joe Walsh posted on X, "The only reason Trump has succeeded is because he's gotten way too many Americans to normalize his corrupt, lawless, dishonest, and unconstitutional behavior.👇" What People Are Saying Robert Y. Shapiro, a professor of political science at Columbia University, told Newsweek: "I think Trump and his MAGA stalwart supporters like to have fun and to soak up media attention by talking about Trump serving a third term as president. The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution and the 12th Amendment make it sufficiently legally clear that he can serve no more than two terms. The harm here is any attempt to assert further authoritarian power of the sort we see in Russia, China, and Turkey and elsewhere, and to thereby undermine American constitutional democracy." Political analyst Craig Agranoff told Newsweek: "Paul's casual mention of a possible third term for Donald Trump, framed hypothetically in a discussion on stock trading bans, is noteworthy because it subtly tests the boundaries of the 22nd Amendment's two-term limit while portraying Trump as an indispensable figure deterred by divestment rules. This kind of offhand remark contributes to a pattern in Republican circles where constitutional constraints are treated as flexible, potentially to gauge public reaction." Agranoff added: "Among MAGA supporters, I believe most take this seriously rather than as humor; many see it as a legitimate aspiration, driven by frustration with perceived betrayals from establishment Republicans and a desire to extend Trump's influence indefinitely, viewing term limits as an obstacle to their agenda. "Yes, this rhetoric is dangerous, it normalizes authoritarian tendencies by eroding respect for democratic institutions, emboldening extremists and risking broader instability if such ideas gain traction without pushback." Republicans Against Trump, on X: "Rand Paul on voting against the stock trading ban: We discourage successful people from holding Trump were the next president, and some say he might run for a 3rd term, he would be forced to divest everything HE CAN'T RUN FOR A THIRD TERM." What Happens Next As debate over the legality and feasibility of a third Trump term floats around on social media and political circles, legislative efforts such as the proposed stock trading ban for public officials are expected to remain contentious.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Trump administration to expand price support for US rare earths projects, sources say
By Ernest Scheyder and Jarrett Renshaw (Reuters) -Top White House officials told a group of rare earths firms last week that they are pursuing a pandemic-era approach to boost U.S. critical minerals production and curb China's market dominance by guaranteeing a minimum price for their products, five sources familiar with the plan told Reuters. The previously unreported July 24 meeting was led by Peter Navarro, President Donald Trump's trade advisor, and David Copley, a National Security Council official tasked with supply chain strategy. It included ten rare earths companies plus tech giants Apple, Microsoft and Corning, which all rely on consistent supply of critical minerals to make electronics, the sources said. Navarro and Copley told the meeting that a floor price for rare earths extended to MP Materials earlier this month as part of a multibillion-dollar investment by the Pentagon was "not a one-off" and that similar deals were also in the works, the sources said. U.S. critical minerals firms, which complain that China's market dominance makes investing in mining projects risky, have long sought a federally backed price guarantee. Rare earths, a group of 17 metals used to make magnets that turn power into motion, and other critical minerals are used widely across the electronics sector, including the manufacture of cell phones and weapons. The officials detailed Trump's desire to quickly boost U.S. rare earths output - through mining, processing, recycling and magnet production - in a manner that would evoke the speed of 2020's Operation Warp Speed, which developed the COVID-19 vaccine in less than a year. Navarro confirmed the meeting to Reuters. He said the administration aims to "move in 'Trump Time,' which is to say as fast as possible while maintaining efficiency" to remedy perceived vulnerabilities in the U.S. critical minerals industry. Navarro did not comment on whether he mentioned the price floor at the meeting. "Our goal is to build out our supply chains from mines to end use products across the entire critical mineral spectrum, and the companies assembled at the meeting have the potential to play important roles in this effort," Navarro said. China - the world's largest producer of rare earths for more than 30 years - halted exports in March as part of a trade spat with Washington that showed some signs of easing late last month, even as the broader tensions remain. Beyond the price floor, Navarro and Copley advised attendees to avail themselves of existing government financial support, including billions of dollars worth of incentives in Trump's tax and spending bill approved on July 4, the sources said. Copley did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Apple signed a supply deal with MP after the Pentagon's investment this month. At the Washington meeting, Navarro and Copley said Trump would like to see more tech companies invest in the rare earths sector, either through seed investing or by making buyouts, all of the sources said. Apple and Corning did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Microsoft declined to comment. EXPORT BAN REQUEST While the attendees asked Navarro to support a ban on exports of equipment containing rare earth magnets to spur domestic recycling, Navarro told them he would push for that only after the U.S. rare earths industry is more developed so as not to prematurely give China leverage in the ongoing trade spat, according to the sources. When asked about a potential ban, Navarro told Reuters: "All policy options are on the table. As President Trump loves to say, 'Let's see what happens.'" Attendees included Phoenix Tailings, which is building a rare earths processing facility in New Hampshire, Momentum Technologies, which developed a modular battery and magnet recycling system, Vulcan Elements, which has built a pilot facility for rare earth magnets, and rare earths recyclers REEcycle and Cyclic Materials. "These guys are serious about fixing the problem," said Vulcan CEO John Maslin. "They want companies to partner." Redwood Materials and Cirba Solutions, two of North America's largest battery recyclers, also attended. TechMet, which invests in mining projects across the globe and in which the U.S. government holds a minority stake, also attended the meeting, as did Noveon, a Texas-based rare earths magnet company. Phoenix, Momentum, Cirba, TechMet, Noveon, Cyclic, ReElement and REEcycle, all of which are privately held, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Redwood declined to comment. The administration officials plan to meet again with the companies in roughly four to six weeks, a truncated timeline aimed at underscoring the administration's desire to quickly support a U.S. minerals industry, the sources said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
