
From 'jihadi gathering' to ‘no real brotherhood': BJP on Uddhav-Raj Thackeray reunion
Maharashtra minister Nitesh Rane had among the most caustic reactions, terming it a 'jihadi" gathering. "We are Hindus and also proud Marathi. The way jihadis attempt to divide our society, these people are doing the same," he alleged, as per an ANI report.
Mumbai BJP president Ashish Shelar termed the rally an "appeasement" campaign for elections 'rather than an event organised for language'.
In his X post, Shelar wrote: 'With the municipal elections approaching, the panicked Ubatha Sena (a mocking term for Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena) has suddenly remembered 'brotherhood'... and they've never truly cared for it anyway!"
Another BJP leader, former minister Sudhir Mungantiwar, however, had a rather conciliatory tone. "The two brothers should unite and stay united. If necessary, their parties should even consider merging… If they are coming together, it's a good thing. They have our best wishes." he said, according to the news agency.
At the central level, union minister Chirag Paswan that Uddhav and Raj were coming together 'not for language, but for their selfish motives and to recover their lost base'.
Paswan's LJP, an ally of the BJP, is from Bihar, one of the Hindi-speaking states that Raj Thackeray mentioned were 'lagging behind Maharashtra'.
'The Constitution of India permits us to live in any corner of the country and speak any language,' Pawan stressed, 'I support and respect every language... But how a few selfish political parties promote politics of discrimination – be it over caste, religion, region and now language – I do not support this at all."
(With inputs from agencies)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
Team Uddhav taunts Raj Thackeray day after reunion rally: Had tea with Amit Shah
A day after Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray shared the stage in a rare public appearance together, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut took a sharp dig at Raj Thackeray in his weekly column, questioning the political direction of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS). Raut accused Raj Thackeray of cosying up to the BJP and Eknath Shinde camp during a critical period for the Shiv the column 'Rokthok' published on Sunday, Raut wrote, 'Uddhav and Raj Thackeray's paths in politics went in opposite directions. After the split caused by [Amit] Shah, Shiv Sena joined the Maha Vikas Aghadi along with the Congress and NCP. Raj Thackeray kept having tea with the BJP, Shinde group, etc. He even went to Delhi once to meet Amit Shah, but it did not benefit Maharashtra and the political path of MNS did not move forward.'Raut went on to allege that the division between the Thackeray brothers was in the interest of "Delhi and the business politics here", adding that it served the strategy of dividing Marathi voters and weakening their political unity. He also accused the BJP and its allies of manipulating voter rolls, saying, 'The BJP and its allies are winning elections by inserting lakh of migrant names in the voter lists. MNS was also defeated in this.'Calling for greater unity among Marathi voters, Raut asserted, 'It is in the interest of Maharashtra to increase the Marathi percentage of votes, and from that to raise a united challenge in all municipal, district council and Assembly elections. Only if this happens, the Marathi people will be able to live with self-respect.'He concluded with a pointed remark aimed at what he described as empty theatrics, saying, 'Otherwise, drums and drums will beat, roars will be raised, and trumpets will be blown. This enthusiasm should remain the same!'Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray, the estranged cousins, shared a stage together on Saturday after 18 years of differences. The two reunited for a joint victory gathering titled 'Awaj Marathicha', to celebrate the Maharashtra government's rollback of Hindi as an optional third language in primary schools and the three-language policy.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
No political party satisfied with current electoral rolls: CEC Gyanesh Kumar
Amid growing political criticism and now court petitions challenging the Election Commission 's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Sunday sought to remind that none of the political parties were "satisfied" with the existing electoral rolls , as per recent rounds of ECI consultations with them across states. "During the past four months, all 4,123 EROs, all 775 DEOs and all 36 CEOs have held nearly 5,000 meetings with 28,000 political party representatives. ECI has also invited all recognised political parties for interaction. No one was satisfied with the current status of electoral rolls for one reason or the other," Gyanesh Kumar said. Poll panel sources, meanwhile, also cautioned the public on "misleading" statements being "orchestrated" to "confuse" them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Crossout Play Now Undo "People should beware of statements being made by a few persons who, without reading the SIR order dated June 24, 2025, and who are orchestrating and attempting to confuse the public with their incorrect and misleading statements," ECI sources said. Alongside, the Bihar Chief Electoral Officer on Sunday issued advertisements in leading Hindi newspapers of the state indicating some relief for those who don't have any of the 11 documents specified by the ECI. "If voters provide the required documents, it will be easier for the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) to process the application. If you are unable to provide the required documents, the ERO can decide based on local investigation or other documentary evidence", the advertisement said. Live Events


NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Our Fight Is Only Against Imposition Of Hindi In Primary Education": Sanjay Raut
Mumbai: Amid an ongoing political row over the alleged "imposition" of Hindi in Maharashtra's primary education, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut clarified that their party is not against the Hindi language, but opposes making it mandatory in primary schooling. Addressing a press conference on Sunday,Sanjay Raut said, "The Southern states have been fighting for this issue for years. Their stand against the imposition of Hindi means they will not speak Hindi and neither let anyone speak Hindi. But that is not our stand in Maharashtra. We speak Hindi... Our stand is that the strictness for Hindi in primary schools will not be tolerated. Our fight is limited to this..." "MK Stalin has congratulated us on this win of ours and said that he will learn from this. We wish him the best. But we haven't stopped anyone from speaking in Hindi because we have Hindi movies, Hindi theatre, and Hindi music here... Our fight is only against imposition of Hindi in primary education...," the UBT leader added. When asked about the reunion of Thackeray cousins (Uddhav and Raj Thackeray), Raut said, "Yes, the two brothers have come together for politics, but what have they come together for?..." On July 5, Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) held a joint rally called 'Awaaz Marathicha' at Worli Dome in Mumbai. The event marked the first time in nearly twenty years that Uddhav and Raj Thackeray shared the stage. The rally came after the Maharashtra government scrapped two Government Resolutions (GRs) that aimed to introduce Hindi as a third compulsory language. The now-withdrawn orders, related to the implementation of the three-language formula in state schools, had triggered widespread protests from Shiv Sena (UBT), MNS, and the Nationalist Congress Party (Sharad Pawar faction). Following the rally, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde criticised Uddhav Thackeray for allegedly using the occasion for political gain rather than addressing the concerns of the Marathi-speaking population. "There was a clear expectation that Uddhav Thackeray would apologise to the Marathi people for accepting the report mandating compulsory Hindi from Class 1 to 12. Instead, he turned the stage into a political battleground. He raised no relevant issue concerning the Marathi Manoos. Self-interest and the hunger for power were the only visible agendas," Shinde said.