Vietnam Ends Two-Child Policy to Tackle Falling Birth Rates
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Vietnam has abolished its long-standing two-child policy to tackle concerns about declining birth and fertility rates.
The National Assembly Standing Committee approved a new regulation lifting the restriction, permitting couples to freely choose the timing, number, and spacing of their children on Tuesday, state media reports.
Why It Matters
The fertility rate in Vietnam, Southeast Asia's third-most-populous nation, has fallen to 1.91 births per woman in 2024, according to the Vietnam General Statistics Office.
This is well below the replacement threshold of 2.1 needed to maintain the population size.
Vietnam's Two-Child Policy: Origins and Purpose
Vietnam introduced its two-child policy in 1988 to curb rapid population growth, when the average woman had more than four children.
The law restricted most families to one or two children, with exceptions in special cases.
Enforcement was stricter for Communist Party members, who faced penalties including warnings, reduced bonuses, or dismissal from positions for violations.
What To Know
Vietnam's decision to scrap its two-child policy followed a steady decrease in birth rates since 2022, when the fertility rate dropped to 2.01 and declined again to 1.93 in 2023.
Health officials have expressed concern that the nation's population of nearly 100 million may begin to contract by mid-century.
Authorities have also cited gender imbalances and the ongoing shift toward a "super-aged society," with projections that over 20 percent of Vietnamese will be age 65 or older by 2049.
Under the new regulation, all families—regardless of Party membership—can now choose freely how many children to have and when.
Vietnam's policy shift aligns with recent moves in other Asian countries also experiencing plunging fertility rates and rapid aging.
A billboard campaigning for each family to have two children in an effort to improve the birth rate stands along the street in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Jan. 14, 2024.
A billboard campaigning for each family to have two children in an effort to improve the birth rate stands along the street in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Jan. 14, 2024.
AP
China saw a slight uptick in its birth rate in 2024, attributed mainly to cultural factors such as the Year of the Dragon, despite wide-ranging pro-natal measures and the end of restrictive family policies.
Meanwhile, the country's overall population has continued to shrink for the third consecutive year.
Japan, facing a decades-long population decline and with nearly 30 percent of its population over age 65, is preparing to make childbirth free as early as April 2026.
The Japanese government proposes that public health insurance cover all delivery costs nationwide, attempting to alleviate financial burdens on families.
What People Are Saying
The United Nations Population Fund says: "Vietnam is in the period of population aging. The process of population aging is progressing rapidly, caused by mortality and fertility declines, and life expectancy at birth increase and that transition from an 'aging' to an 'aged' population will occur within just 20 years."
What Happens Next
The Vietnamese Ministry of Health is expected to submit a new population law to the National Assembly in 2025, aimed at sustaining fertility rates near replacement level while monitoring the ongoing demographic transition and the effects of the relaxed family planning rules.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Betting Market in Disarray Over Zelensky Suit That's Also Maybe Not a Suit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A major crypto-currency prediction market placed the odds of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wearing a suit before the end of June at just 3 percent on Sunday, with confusion reigning over the Ukrainian leader's attire days after he appeared to don a suit-style outfit for a series of meetings with world leaders. Polymarket, a platform that allows users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events using cryptocurrency, currently includes a market where users can place wagers on whether or not Zelensky will wear a suit before July. It was intended to resolve based on whether the Ukrainian leader was photographed or videotaped wearing a suit between May 22 and June 30, 2025. It attracted over $12 million in volume, but instead of resolving cleanly, it has ignited a furious debate online and among bettors, despite international news coverage and Polymarket's own descriptions seemingly confirming the appearance of a suit. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrives ahead of a formal dinner at the Paleis Huis ten Bosch ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Tuesday, June 24, 2025. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrives ahead of a formal dinner at the Paleis Huis ten Bosch ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Tuesday, June 24, 2025. AP Photo/Markus Schreiber Zelensky, attending the NATO summit in The Hague earlier this week, looked to choose a military-style yet formal blazer with a buttoned-up black shirt, including for his arrival to a formal dinner hosted by Dutch royalty on Tuesday. He also appeared alongside world leaders in the Netherlands in a black utility-style collared jacket, a noticeable departure from his wardrobe choices prior to his now-infamous and disastrous White House meeting in February. Zelensky chose a similar jacket for a meeting with British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in London just ahead of the NATO summit. The Polymarket chance of Zelensky wearing a suit by July jumped to 19 percent the day after the summit ended. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, left, welcomes Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Downing Street in London, Monday, June 23, 2025. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, left, welcomes Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Downing Street in London, Monday, June 23, 2025. AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth The Ukrainian president's outfit choices have drawn persistent attention and occasionally criticism, not least during his ill-fated trip to the Oval Office earlier this year. Zelensky's team was repeatedly told by President Donald Trump's advisers that Zelensky should opt to swap out his typical khaki or black military dress when visiting the White House, Axios reported in late February, citing two sources with direct knowledge of the topic. "He's all dressed up today," Trump told cameras as he greeted Zelensky at the White House. Zelensky arrived dressed all in black — but not in a suit. Gathered with Trump, Vice President JD Vance and other senior administration officials, Zelensky was prodded by a reporter on why he had not donned a suit. The Ukrainian leader shoots back that he will wear a suit "after this war finishes." From left, European Council President Antonio Costa, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen pose for photographers prior to a meeting on the sidelines of... From left, European Council President Antonio Costa, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen pose for photographers prior to a meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Tuesday, June 24, 2025. More AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert Zelensky typically wears military-style fatigues, or clothing boasting the Ukrainian trident, a nod to his role as a war-time leader showing solidarity with frontline troops, rather than a peace-time politician. There is a "political message" in Zelensky's choices, reminding the world he is a president representing a country actively at war, said Oleksandr Merezhko, the head of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee and a member of Zelensky's Servant of the People party. "Psychologically, the fact the President doesn't wear a suit might irritate only those who don't like Ukraine," Merezhko told Newsweek. "It's about them, not about what the President wears." Zelensky's dress should depend on the situation, Merezhko said. "While the war continues, the President should somehow in his attire to emphasize that he is commander in chief," he said. "In some rare cases he might wear a suit," but one adjusted to nod to the military, Merezhko added.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Iran Confirms Inmates Killed in Israel's Evin Prison Attack Last Week
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An Israeli strike on Tehran's Evin Prison on Monday killed 71 people, including inmates, staff and visiting family members, Iran's judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said on Sunday. Newsweek has reached out to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) via email for comment on Sunday. Why It Matters In mid-June, Israel initially struck Tehran and several other cities in "Operation Rising Lion," a campaign it said was meant to preempt a planned Iranian attack and disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities, which have long been a concern of Israel and the U.S. Iran, which has said its nuclear program is for energy purposes and not nuclear weapons, retaliated. Israeli defense systems—bolstered by U.S. military technology—intercepted nearly all incoming missile fire, according to Israeli officials, although Iran did strike a hospital southern Israel last week. More than 600 Iranians were reported killed by Israeli strikes, and 28 Israelis killed by Iranian strikes, with thousands wounded it both countries. Israel and Iran entered a fragile ceasefire on June 24, the day after Israel struck Evin Prison. Last weekend, the U.S. joined Israel in its war against Iran by bombing three nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz, in the largest B-2 bomber operation in U.S. history. What To Know On Sunday, Jahangir wrote in Mizan, the Iranian judiciary's outlet, that 71 people were killed in the Israeli strike on Iran's notorious Evin Prison. The update was republished on the official state news outlet, IRNA. The English version of the Mizan article states that, "Prison administrative staff, conscript soldiers, convicted prisoners, families of prisoners who had visited for meetings or judicial follow-ups, and neighbors living near the prison," were killed. It noted that people had come to the prison that day for various follow-ups on legal proceedings. The outlet confirmed that Judge Ali Ghanaatkar, who served as deputy prosecutor of Tehran and the detention center's top prosecutor, was killed in the strikes. It did not identify the others killed. Mizan also reported that foreign journalists from several outlets, including Associated Press and Reuters, participated in a tour of the area. On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of people filled the streets of Iran's capital for a state funeral honoring about 60 Iranians killed in Israeli strikes over the past few weeks, including top military commanders and nuclear scientists. The office building at the Evin prison sits damaged in Tehran, Iran, on June 29 after an Israeli strike on Monday. The office building at the Evin prison sits damaged in Tehran, Iran, on June 29 after an Israeli strike on Monday. AP Photo/Vahid Salemi What Is Evin Prison? Evin Prison holds many of the country's political detainees in Iran, housing dissidents, journalists, protesters, and foreign nationals accused of espionage. The prison is one of the apparatuses of the Iranian regime's domestic security apparatus. Human rights organizations have long documented abuse, torture and arbitrary detention inside Evin Prison. Notable former detainees include Narges Mohammadi, a human rights activist and a Nobel Peace Laureate, and Jason Rezaian, a Washington Post journalist who was held there for 544 days on espionage charges while serving as the paper's Tehran bureau chief a decade ago. What People Are Saying Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar posted alleged footage of the bombing after the attack, writing on X, formerly Twitter: "We warned Iran time and again: stop targeting civilians! They continued, including this morning. Our response: Viva la libertad, c*****!" Narges Mohammadi, a human rights activist and a Nobel Peace Laureate, said in a June 28 X post: "Israel's attack on Evin Prison, carried out in broad daylight in the presence of families and visitors, is undoubtedly a clear example of a war families of the detained are unaware of the status or whereabouts of their loved ones. Prisoners from the general wards of Evin Prison have been transferred to prisons around Tehran and are being held in harsh, inhumane, and grueling conditions. Furthermore, no official information has been released regarding the status of prisoners previously held in security wards or solitary confinement." Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote in a Persian in an X post on Saturday: "From the bottom of my heart, I thank you dear people; With love, you bid farewell to the martyrs of our homeland, and our voice of unity reached the ears of the world. We have learned from Husayn ibn Ali (peace be upon him) not to submit to humiliation and not to bow our heads before oppression. Serving such a noble nation is the honor of my life. Forever Iran" What Happens Next The ceasefire between Israel and Iran remains fragile. Trump said the U.S. and Iran are due to hold new talks about the country's nuclear capabilities. "We're going to talk to them next week, with Iran," Trump said at the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. "We may sign an agreement. I don't know." On Saturday, Araghchi posted on X, "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers."
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Higher Risk of Miscarriage in IVF When Father Is Elder Millennial
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Paternal age plays a critical role in IVF success—even when using eggs from young, healthy donors—a study has found. At the 41st ESHRE Annual Meeting, researchers reported that male partners over 45 have higher miscarriage risks and lower live birth chances during IVF with donor eggs. The research, spanning 1,712 donor egg IVF cycles conducted between 2019–2023 in Italy and Spain, aimed to isolate the impact of paternal age by controlling for maternal variables. Doctor providing compassionate healthcare consultation while young couple patient holding hand, comfort each other after infertile report. Doctor providing compassionate healthcare consultation while young couple patient holding hand, comfort each other after infertile report. Moment Makers Group All cycles involved fresh oocytes (immature eggs found in the ovaries) from young donors (average age 26.1), frozen sperm from male partners and a single blastocyst embryo transfer. The average age of female recipients was 43.3. When results were analyzed, stark differences emerged between the two paternal age groups: Miscarriage rates were 23.8 percent among couples with male partners over 45, compared to 16.3 percent in those with younger male partners. "It was genuinely surprising to see how strongly paternal age affects miscarriage and live birth rates, even in oocyte donation programs," lead author and embryologist Maria Cristina Guglielmo of Eugin Italy told Newsweek. Live birth rates dropped to 35.1 percent in the older paternal group, versus 41 percent for those aged 45 or younger. "This challenges the common perception that maternal factors are the primary drivers of reproductive success and highlights the need to pay more attention to paternal factors in fertility," said Guglielmo. She explained that biological changes in sperm linked to aging—such as increased DNA mutations, abnormal chromosome counts, DNA fragmentation and altered epigenetics—can compromise embryo development and raise miscarriage risk. "Together, these factors affect both the genetic integrity and the functional quality of sperm, which can impair embryo development and contribute to a higher risk of miscarriage," she added. Importantly, the study only included first embryo transfers and excluded repeat cycles, allowing for a clearer comparison. According to Guglielmo, this strengthens the evidence that paternal age is not just a minor variable, but a significant factor in reproductive outcomes. "Our hypothesis is that time does not change the ability of sperm to produce embryos however, some genetic defects in sperm only become apparent later in the process, potentially leading to adverse effects on embryo development and contributing to negative selection outcomes in the fetus," she said. For couples who are considering starting a family later on in life via IVF, Guglielmo advises to consult with a fertility specialist early to understand how paternal age might affect chances and explore all the available options. "All women know how the miscarriage is associated to mother age; however, it's time to inform the couple about how the father age is also important, especially during the pregnancy, in order to evaluate a prenatal screening," she said. "Being well-informed and proactive can help couples make the best decisions for their family-building journey and improve their chances of achieving a successful and healthy live birth." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about IVF? Let us know via health@ Reference Guglielmo, M.C., et al. (2025). Advanced paternal age affects miscarriage and live birth outcomes following the first transfer in oocyte donation cycles. Human Reproduction.
