logo
Accused child sex abuser had been flagged to authorities after alleged touching incident

Accused child sex abuser had been flagged to authorities after alleged touching incident

Accused paedophile David James was investigated and suspended in June 2024 after a colleague reported witnessing him inappropriately touching a child under 10 at a Primary OSHCare centre.
Despite the seriousness of the allegation and reports to police, Office of the Children's Guardian and the regulator, his working with children check was unaffected so he continued to work at other out of school hour centres with children.
While the 26-year-old was stood down from services operated by Junior Adventures Group (JAG), which owns Primary OSHCare and other brands including Helping Hands, he remained on the books and was still paid his part-time wages. Other providers, unaware of the incident, kept him employed on a casual basis.
Mr James was charged in October over the alleged abuse at Outside School Hours Care (OSHC) facilities between April 2021 and May 2024.
The case has thrust private equity firm Quadrant into the centre of another childcare scandal, this time involving the booming OSHC sector.
Over seven years, Mr James worked at nearly 60 different OSHC services across Sydney, including multiple centres operated by Quadrant-owned JAG, which also runs the brands OSHClub and Helping Hands.
Quadrant also owns Affinity Education, one of Australia's largest early learning providers, currently under intense scrutiny after a string of abuse allegations.
In October, a different man was arrested and charged in regional NSW with nine counts of intentionally sexually touching a child under 10. Another man, Joshua Dale Brown, who worked at 24 centres — including 13 run by Affinity — is facing more than 70 charges, including sexual penetration of children.
Affinity centres have also been at the centre of disturbing physical abuse incidents, including reports of toddlers yanked by the arms, children used to clean up vomit, broken bones, vomiting after contact with exposed metal hooks, and a baby slapped across the face repeatedly by an educator "for fun."
Mr James' case also highlights serious flaws in childcare regulation, with services in the dark when serious allegations are alleged.
7.30 can reveal internal documents from the NSW regulator show a number of other incidents including at centres owned by JAG.
At JAG's Helping Hands Lane Cove East, regulatory documents reveal a serious breach by two unnamed educators, who in March 2023 grabbed and pulled a child by the legs after trying to hide in the hall.
The centre failed to notify the regulator or parents of the incident within the prescribed time frame of 24 hours.
The regulatory letter resulted in a formal caution to the educators and mandated staff training on incident report compliance.
Mr James also worked at a number of Camp Australia centres, which is the country's largest provider with nearly 500 services and is owned by a consortium of corporate investors led by private equity firm Allegro.
A Camp Australia spokesman said "there is no evidence nor information indicating any offence has been committed at our services".
At Camp's Artarmon centre regulatory documents list a series of unrelated breaches in November 2023 including children left unsupervised while moving between two play areas, blind spots, stairs and an open gate leading to a busy road.
The spokesperson said the centre responded to the breaches with a detailed risk assessment and the matter was closed in February 20025 with no further action.
He said the company would work with the government and the regulator to strengthen the governance of the sector.
Contact Adele Ferguson on ferguson.adele@abc.net.au
OSHC is part of the $20 billion childcare sector, and like long day care is heavily subsidised by the federal Child Care Subsidy.
But unlike long day care, OSHC services operate under looser rules.
Staff aren't required to hold formal early childhood qualifications and supervision ratios are far more lenient, allowing one worker to oversee 15 children from ages five to 12.
In contrast, long day care services must meet stricter ratios — as low as 1:4 babies under one, 1:5 for toddlers, and 1:10 or 1:11 children over three.
Despite these reduced standards, the OSHC sector is still heavily underwritten by public money. Like early learning centres, most OSHC services are funded through the federal Child Care Subsidy.
Critics warn the minimal training, high child-to-staff ratios, and fragmented oversight creates fertile ground for serious harm, where red flags can be missed and vulnerable children left exposed.
NSW Greens politician Abigail Boyd, who has called a parliamentary inquiry into childcare and OSHC, said there has been a dramatic decline in quality in recent years.
"Out-of-school-hours care has traditionally been a service provided by and for school community groups and families to support busy working families navigate the demands of work and parenting," she said.
"But over time, and particularly in recent years, we have seen the increased incursion into this area by large corporate players, lured by the relaxed regulatory landscape designed for school community groups and the promises of a regular revenue stream from families forced to work longer hours just to pay the bills.
"This transition of this poorly regulated sector, from community service provision to corporate venture, has seen a dramatic decline in quality of care and safety as services are consolidated and responsible adult-to-child ratios have blown out.
"As we have seen time and again, when the profit motive becomes the primary factor, children's safety is put at unacceptable levels of risk.
"Meanwhile the regulator has been asleep at the wheel, while the Department of Education has encouraged the further privatisation of school services."
Polly Howard has worked in out-of-school-hours care for 20 years.
The director of community-run Eastwood Heights Out of School Hours Care Service in Sydney said the sector was in crisis.
"We are witnessing the real consequences of large commercial private equity owned childcare companies dominating the sector," she said.
"The combination of profit driven companies and badly treated, poorly paid, under-trained educators mean we are not attracting quality educators. This is not a respected profession.
"It's not surprising this is happening.
"Predators look for weak points. When the leadership culture is not child-safe, children are at greater risk."
She said staff are too often under-trained, under-supported and stretched too thin.
"If you treat your operation as if you were running a McDonald's, then children will be put at risk," she said.
Like early learning, OSHC is increasingly dominated by for-profit operators.
Professor Gabrielle Meagher, an expert in social services including childcare, says of the 5,094 out-of-school-hours services in Australia, around 53 per cent are for profit.
She says all the growth in the out-of-school-hours sector over the past decade has come from for profit providers.
"105 per cent of the net growth was for profits," she says.
Government and community-run services have declined by 308 over the same period.
In Victoria, 75 per cent of OSHC services are now run for profit. In Western Australia it's 87 per cent, and in New South Wales 49 per cent.
Since 2016, the number of private operators in NSW has surged 44 per cent — from 545 to 787 — while community-run, not-for-profit services have fallen by 12 per cent.
Professor Meagher says part of the shift in NSW was driven by a 2021 policy change, when the former government introduced competitive tendering for public school OSHC services previously managed by parent-run committees.
"This may have contributed to the decline in the share of these services," she said.
Ms Boyd said the NSW policy had been a disaster.
"The NSW policy has been to deliberately force out community-run organisations and we've been working with them to try and save them," she said.
A spokesperson for the NSW Department of Education said, "We want the best quality outside of school hours care for our students and families.
"Our tender process focuses on the quality of the provider, with this being the key assessment factor in our considerations."
Professor Meagher said nationally, the large for-profit providers operate 40 per cent of all OSHC services in Australia.
The result is a sector increasingly dominated by commercial interests — and one where concerns about quality are mounting.
She said across JAG's hundreds of centres, 10 per cent are not yet rated, 6 per cent exceed the standards, 79 per cent meet the standards and 4 per cent are working towards.
Of Camp Australia's 485 services, 88 per cent meet the national quality standards, 6 per cent are working towards and 5 per cent are not yet rated.
As the for-profit sector grows, experts say concerns are rising that oversight isn't keeping pace.
Polly Howard is sceptical of the quality ratings.
"Currently you can get an exceeding rating by telling good stories, having well written forms and paperwork," she said.
"Right now the system can be played and does not necessarily reward those that deliver the best outcomes for children.
"When the leadership culture is not child-safe, children are at greater risk.
"Child safety isn't just about policies on paper. It's about everyday practice, supervision, culture and trust, educators empowered to speak up, children believed and protected."
Junior Adventures Group said in a statement it has robust child safety policies in place, including a ban on personal mobile phones since 2024, mandatory child safety training, national police and WWCC checks, a dedicated safeguarding team, and risk management plans at every service — with ongoing reviews to ensure compliance with national standards.
"We fully understand how distressing this matter is – we share the immense upset and concern surrounding it," the statement said.
"We have been cooperating with police and doing all that we can to assist them in their investigation. We are now contacting all our parents at the centres the AFP has listed."
A spokesperson for the NSW Early Childhood Education Care Regulatory Authority said, "NSW is actively engaged in reforming the early childhood education and care sector, which includes outside of school hours care, to deliver a safer, more robust and transparent system."
"We know there is more to do. We are committed to a safe, high quality early childhood education and care sector."
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kmart denies sourcing any products from factories linked to forced labour in China
Kmart denies sourcing any products from factories linked to forced labour in China

ABC News

time24 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Kmart denies sourcing any products from factories linked to forced labour in China

An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed legal action in the Federal Court against Kmart, alleging the retail giant is sourcing some of its products from factories linked to forced labour camps in western China. Kmart has denied the allegations. Ramila Chanisheff, representing the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association (AUTWA), has sought documents from Kmart — requesting the retailer prove its public claims of operating a "sustainable" and "ethical" company, with products free from slavery or forced-labour. The court action is seeking preliminary disclosure of documents relating to Kmart's supply chains that could be linked to labour in the Uyghur homeland, now known as the Xinjiang. Australia, unlike the United States and some European nations, does not prohibit goods imported from China's Xinjiang region. The US has banned goods from that region since 2021, over credible evidence that many products are manufactured there using forced labour — particularly involving Uyghur Muslims and other minority groups. Jennifer Kanis, a solicitor from Maurice Blackburn representing AUTWA, said the legal case was designed to compel Kmart to, "prove their public position". By cross-referencing Kmart's supplier list with "numerous credible reports" connecting companies in the Xinjiang region to forced labour, the plaintiffs say they will allege they found a match for at least two factory suppliers. The application alleges at least two garment suppliers are linked to the use of Uyghur forced labour in the Uyghur region. In a statement, Kmart said it was disappointed AUTWA took this course of action and had invited the association to meet with them "several times" to understand their concerns. "Kmart has been in correspondence with the applicant's lawyers for over 12 months and has provided extensive details of our Ethical Sourcing Program," the spokesperson said. "For over 15 years, we have had in place an Ethical Sourcing Program, which helps us to identify and mitigate modern slavery risks, including the risk of forced labour, in our operations and supply chains. "Suppliers in the Kmart Ethical Sourcing Program are regularly monitored through activities including our site visits, audit programs and investigations if we receive any reports or complaints of concern." The spokesperson also said it was the first Australian retailer to publicly disclose its factory list on its website for transparency. Human rights groups and the United Nations have previously accused China of committing crimes against humanity and possible genocide against the Uyghur population and other mostly-Muslim ethnic groups in the north-western region of Xinjiang. The Chinese Government has repeatedly denied these claims. Freya Dinshaw from the Human Rights Law Centre, said alarm bells had been "ringing for a long time" regarding forced labour risks, especially in the Chinese garment industry, and pointed out that "85 per cent of the cotton in China comes from the Xinjiang region". Australian retailers, she said, "have been on notice for some time" regarding these risks. The allegations against Kmart also sheds light on the potential shortcomings of Australia's current Modern Slavery Act. Professor Justine Nolan of the Australian Human Rights Institute said while Australia was considered a leader when it introduced the Act in 2018, the law primarily imposed a mandatory reporting obligation for large companies (those with over $100 million in annual consolidated revenue) to identify modern slavery risks, but not an obligation to act on those findings. And a quarter of Australian companies were not complying with their basic reporting requirements, because there is "no significant enforcement framework," according to a Federal Government review led by John McMillan in 2023, "A non-compliance rate of 25 per cent just by false reporting or not reporting: that shows that the law that we currently have are not sufficient and that we really do need reforms," Professor Nolan said. She said other jurisdictions, such as the European Union and the United States, have moved further, adopting laws that mandated human rights due diligence and implementing forced labour import bans, which Australia lacks. A 2023 independent review of the Act confirmed deep inadequacies and found that "no meaningful change had been shown for people at the greatest risk of modern slavery." Last month the Australian Government released a consultation paper aiming to strengthen the Modern Slavery Act, focusing on streamlining existing mandatory reporting criteria (link here: "The reforms they are proposing are useful, not sufficient," Professor Nolan said. "We're still not tackling the root causes of the problem and we need to think about introducing an obligation to act, not just an obligation to report." Australia continues to import an estimated $27 billion worth of goods at risk of forced labour into the country every year with no laws that would prevent the importation of such goods, according to a 2023 report from human rights group Walk Free, an arm of Andrew Forrest's Minderoo Foundation. Ramila Chanisheff said if Kmart could prove beyond doubt that they were not linked to forced labour, the association would be satisfied. However, if links were found, AUTWA's call to action would be for Kmart to "divest" from those suppliers. "You can get your cotton from elsewhere," she said. Ms Kanis, said a successful outcome would be greater transparency and accountability in relation to being able to make claims about ethical sourcing, ensuring these were not "empty claims". Ms Chanisheff, who was born in East Turkestan/Xinjiang, but raised in Australia, still has family and friends in the province. She believes Australians do care about how their products and that "consumers can make a difference". Professor Nolan said without stronger laws, Australia risks becoming a "dumping ground" for goods made with forced labour if other countries implement effective import bans. She also noted a "willingness among Australian companies to go further" and align with global standards, but the current modern slavery law, introduced to federal parliament in 2018 is "not sufficient". "Seven years is a long time to wait for people who are working in modern slavery every day," she said. In a statement, the Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the federal government "is committed to combating modern slavery" and "its immediate priority is implementing its response to the statutory review of the Act to strengthen its operation." Minister Rowland also said the public consultation process "will inform the development of balanced measures to support and incentivise Australian businesses to take actions to eliminate modern slavery risks and practices, and combat them in their supply chains."

Melbourne man accused of sending death threats, anti-Semitic remarks to Australian politicians
Melbourne man accused of sending death threats, anti-Semitic remarks to Australian politicians

West Australian

time24 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Melbourne man accused of sending death threats, anti-Semitic remarks to Australian politicians

A Melbourne man accused of sending death threats to a federal lawmaker is working with authorities on a support plan to address his underlying issues, a court has been told. The 33-year-old from Reservoir, in the city's north, was arrested on February 6 as part of an investigation by the AFP-led Special Operation Avalite – set up in the wake of the Adass Israel Synagogue firebombing late last year to probe anti-Semitic threats and violence to Australia's Jewish community and parliamentarians. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was charged with four counts of using a carriage service to menace and one count of using a carriage service to threaten to kill. According to the AFP, it's alleged he used social media and email to make death threats and anti-Semitic comments towards a NSW-based federal MP between January 16 and 18 this year. The man is also alleged to have made threats to a Victorian state MP the same month over social media. He appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Tuesday for a short hearing after his case was referred to the Assessment and Referral Court (ARC). According to the Magistrates' Court of Victoria website, the ARC aims to assist people with complex mental health conditions receive support for up to 12 months before sentencing. 'ARC's therapeutic approach increases participants' engagement with the court process while providing treatment and support tailored to their needs and to address the underlying causes of their offending,' the website states. During the hearing, Magistrate Vincenzo Caltabiano left the bench to sit around a large oval-shaped desk with the accused man, his lawyer Jackson McLeod, a police prosecutor and court support services in a less formal setting. The court was told the man was engaging with support services to develop an individual support plan and access treatment needs. 'A lot of this stuff I've needed for years; its kind of irritating it's come this far,' he said. The accused man complained about his support worker, saying he'd avoided her recently because 'all she wants to do is drug me' and repeatedly mentioned an ex-boyfriend who, he said, had thrown his life into disarray. Mr Caltabiano said he was not going to pretend the ARC process would make things 'rosy' for the accused man, but the hope was his personal situation would improve. 'What I see in here is a number of things that hopefully if they can come together means some of these challenges become less significant,' the magistrate said after reviewing case notes. The accused man will return to court in a month for another case management check-in.

Man accused of threatening MPs
Man accused of threatening MPs

Perth Now

time24 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Man accused of threatening MPs

A Melbourne man accused of sending death threats to a federal lawmaker is working with authorities on a support plan to address his underlying issues, a court has been told. The 33-year-old from Reservoir, in the city's north, was arrested on February 6 as part of an investigation by the AFP-led Special Operation Avalite – set up in the wake of the Adass Israel Synagogue firebombing late last year to probe anti-Semitic threats and violence to Australia's Jewish community and parliamentarians. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was charged with four counts of using a carriage service to menace and one count of using a carriage service to threaten to kill. According to the AFP, it's alleged he used social media and email to make death threats and anti-Semitic comments towards a NSW-based federal MP between January 16 and 18 this year. He was charged in February by the AFP-led Special Operation Avalite. Supplied/ Australian Federal Police. Credit: Supplied The man is also alleged to have made threats to a Victorian state MP the same month over social media. He appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Tuesday for a short hearing after his case was referred to the Assessment and Referral Court (ARC). According to the Magistrates' Court of Victoria website, the ARC aims to assist people with complex mental health conditions receive support for up to 12 months before sentencing. 'ARC's therapeutic approach increases participants' engagement with the court process while providing treatment and support tailored to their needs and to address the underlying causes of their offending,' the website states. During the hearing, Magistrate Vincenzo Caltabiano left the bench to sit around a large oval-shaped desk with the accused man, his lawyer Jackson McLeod, a police prosecutor and court support services in a less formal setting. The court was told the man was engaging with support services to develop an individual support plan and access treatment needs. 'A lot of this stuff I've needed for years; its kind of irritating it's come this far,' he said. He will return to court in early September. NewsWire / Penny Stephens Credit: News Corp Australia The accused man complained about his support worker, saying he'd avoided her recently because 'all she wants to do is drug me' and repeatedly mentioned an ex-boyfriend who, he said, had thrown his life into disarray. Mr Caltabiano said he was not going to pretend the ARC process would make things 'rosy' for the accused man, but the hope was his personal situation would improve. 'What I see in here is a number of things that hopefully if they can come together means some of these challenges become less significant,' the magistrate said after reviewing case notes. The accused man will return to court in a month for another case management check-in.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store