Interpol seizes erectile dysfunction and anti-anxiety medication
Investigators retrieved £47 million worth of counterfeit or illegal medication as part of an operation codenamed Pangea XVII.
From December 2024 to May, police arrested 769 suspected drug traffickers and dismantled 123 criminal gangs.
Psychostimulants, anti-anxiety drugs and medications for Parkinson's disease topped the list as the most seized product type. Erectile dysfunction medicines were the second highest.
In Britain, drugs seized included painkillers, antidepressants and sleeping pills.
Australia recorded the largest seizures globally, with psychostimulants (drugs used to treat sleepiness) modafinil and armodafinil being the most common.
This was followed by anti-smoking nicotine pouches and erectile dysfunction medicines.
Ozempic -style weight loss drugs, such as semaglutide, and peptides used for bodybuilding and cosmetic enhancements were also seized in huge quantities.
The ease of purchasing these drugs either via social media or from online marketplaces are making them rapidly grow in popularity.
A single semaglutide pen may sell for several hundred US dollars on the black market, Interpol said.
About 13,000 criminal-linked websites, social media pages, channels and bots used to market and sell illegal or falsified medicines have been shut down
Criminal networks now view these drugs as 'lucrative and relatively low-risk opportunities' for selling poor quality or counterfeit products.
Law enforcement agencies launched 1,728 investigations and issued 847 search warrants targeting criminal networks.
Some 93 per cent of the illicit pharmaceuticals seized lacked regulatory approvals from national health authorities.
The remaining 7 per cent were confirmed as either counterfeit, diverted, or misbranded products.
Malaysia removed the greatest number of online listings (7,000), followed by Russia, Ireland, Singapore and Iran.
The five countries collectively accounted for 96 per cent of all listings taken down.
In Burkina Faso, 816,000 tablets including analgesics and anti-inflammatories were discovered hidden in vehicles.
Mexican authorities intercepted benzodiazepine drugs including 27,000 clonazepam tablets and 20,000 alprazolam tablets passing through a courier facility in Tijuana.
In Portugal, anabolic steroids were discovered in eight prisons across the country, unveiling evidence of a criminal network smuggling illicit substances into correctional facilities.
'Serious risk to public health'
David Caunter, director pro tempore of organised and emerging crime at Interpol, said: 'Fake and unapproved medications are a serious risk to public health. They can include dangerous or illegal ingredients potentially resulting in severe illness, or even death
'The rapid growth of online platforms has made it easier for these unsafe drugs to reach people as well as opening new opportunities for criminal networks to exploit.
'Working together through Operation Pangea, countries are taking action to protect people's health and keep healthcare systems safe.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that 'soak up' forever chemicals in the body
A family of healthy bacteria may help 'soak up' toxic forever chemicals in the body, warding off their cancerous effects. Forever chemicals, also known as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), are toxic chemicals that have been linked cancer, infertility and birth defects. They're named because they don't naturally break down in the environment or the body. Instead, they leech from plastic containers and nonstick cookware into food and build up in vital organs, increasing the risk of organ failure, infertility and some forms of cancer. Researchers at the University of Cambridge took samples of 38 strains of healthy bacteria living in the human gut and put them into lab mice. They found mice carrying human gut bacteria had up to 74 percent more 'forever' chemicals in their stool compared to mice without the bacteria within minutes of exposure. This suggests the toxins latched on to the bacteria as they moved through the digestive tract, leaving the body through the stool. While mountains of research have demonstrated deadly effects of forever chemicals, the new study is one of the first to show they can be taken out of the body instead of accumulating in there forever. And it builds on recent research showing a link between PFAS and the digestive tract. A study published last month, for example, found PFAS latches on to bile acids in the gut and eating fiber can help filter that excess bile out. Dr Kiran Patil, senior study author and toxicologist at the University of Cambridge, said: 'Given the scale of the problem of PFAS "forever chemicals," particularly their effects on human health, it's concerning that so little is being done about removing these from our bodies. 'We found that certain species of human gut bacteria have a remarkably high capacity to soak up PFAS from their environment at a range of concentrations, and store these in clumps inside their cells. 'Due to aggregation of PFAS in these clumps, the bacteria themselves seem protected from the toxic effects.' PFAS are thought to be endocrine-disrupting chemicals, meaning they imitate the body's hormones and interfere with the production of - and response to - natural hormones like estrogen and testosterone. This increases the risk of developing hormone-sensitive cancers like breast and ovarian cancer. The study, published Tuesday in the journal Nature Microbiology, looked at samples of 38 healthy bacteria in the gut. The researchers measured the effect of bacteria on levels of the forever chemicals perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorooctanoate acid (PFOA). PFOA is considered a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), meaning it causes cancer in animals. PFNA, meanwhile, is a Group 2 carcinogen, suggesting it may cause cancer in animals. Over the course of 24 hours, nine of the tested bacteria reduced exposure to PFNA by 25 to 74 percent and PFOA levels by 23 to 58 percent. For both types of PFAS, Odoribacter splanchnicus lead to the greatest reductions. It's thought to produce the short-chain fatty acid butyrate, which boosts metabolism and immune function. The team believes PFAS latch onto the bacteria and are excreted out of the body through the stool. The researchers are now working on developing probiotic supplements to increase levels of these healthy bacteria in the gut. Dr Indra Roux, study co-author and researcher at the University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit, said: 'The reality is that PFAS are already in the environment and in our bodies, and we need to try and mitigate their impact on our health now. 'We haven't found a way to destroy PFAS, but our findings open the possibility of developing ways to get them out of our bodies where they do the most harm.'
Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
Conor McGregor's legal team withdraws bid to introduce fresh evidence in appeal against civil case decision
The legal team for mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor has withdrawn a bid to introduce fresh evidence in his appeal against a decision in a civil case in which a woman accused him of raping her. Former hairdresser Nikita Hand, 35, sued the Irish sports star over an incident at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018. The 36-year-old was said to have "brutally raped and battered" Ms Hand in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel. During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, McGregor told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand. After six hours and 10 minutes of deliberating, the jury of eight women and four men found McGregor civilly liable for assault. Ms Hand was awarded €248,603.60 (about £206,000) in damages. McGregor was ordered by a judge to pay Ms Hand €100,000 (£85,000) of the damages and €200,000 (£170,000) of an expected €1.3m (£1.1m) in legal costs before the appeal, which the court heard had been done. Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, lost her case against another man, James Lawrence, who she accused of assaulting her by allegedly having sex without her consent at the same hotel. McGregor has since sought an appeal, which was initially expected to include new evidence. However, on Tuesday morning, the Court of Appeal in Dublin heard that McGregor would no longer be relying on additional evidence that had not been given to the initial trial for his appeal. That evidence was reported to relate to two neighbours of Ms Hand who had alleged they had seen her be assaulted by a former partner. However, his legal team said that after receiving new applications relating to the evidence to be given by pathologist Professor Jack Crane, they could no longer sustain that ground of appeal. John Gordon SC, for Ms Hand, said it was "frankly not appropriate" for the ground to be withdrawn on that basis, adding he had only been told of the development 10 minutes earlier. He objected to the withdrawal of the ground and argued he should still be allowed to cross-examine the neighbours. He said his client had been "put through the wringer yet again" and that the court should not permit the appellant to "waltz in here and then they can walk away from this". Mr Gordon said there could potentially be matters relating to perjury arising out of the developments. Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, alongside Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, said it cannot be the case that further submissions relating to Professor Crane could solely be the reason to withdraw the appeal matter of the neighbours' evidence. Mark Mulholland KC, for McGregor, said he was applying to withdraw the matter on a "holistic view" of the whole case and after taking instructions. Ms Justice Kennedy said it was "unsatisfactory" that it was being brought to the court at a late stage, but permitted the withdrawing of the ground. Following the withdrawal of that application, Remy Farrell, SC, also for McGregor, advanced the remaining four grounds of the appeal - largely relating to the right to silence and "no comment" answers to questions during garda interviews. He raised the issue of the cross-examination of McGregor during the original trial by Mr Gordon. He said an "enormous amount of no comment material" had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end. Mr Farrell said that Mr Gordon had raised more than 100 "no comment" answers given by McGregor while being interviewed by gardai on the basis that it related to a position put forward by the fighter that he had been fully co-operative with gardai. This was a good old-fashioned courtroom bombshell. Nikita Hand arrived at the Four Courts with her partner, walking past a rolling maul of TV cameras and photographers and a group of supporters with a large "We Stand With Nikita Hand" banner. The media – not expecting Conor McGregor himself to attend – were on high alert for the arrival of the two new witnesses, Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins. Former neighbours of Ms Hand, they were expected to tell the court that they may have witnessed her being assaulted by her partner after the hotel encounter with McGregor – explaining her subsequent bruising. But they did not arrive. Inside the small, packed court it immediately became apparent why. McGregor's legal team said they were withdrawing the fresh evidence – there were audible gasps and startled looks exchanged among the benches. The testimony of the neighbours had filled reams of Irish newsprint in the weeks ahead of this highly-anticipated appeal – now it was discarded immediately for various legal reasons. Ms Hand's counsel was furious – demanding an apology and muttering the word 'perjury'. He had only found out 10 minutes earlier, he declared – an unacceptable situation. Ms Hand had "been put through the wringer" by all of this, he said. The mixed martial arts fighter's appeal is now proceeding, but on reduced grounds. As so often with Conor McGregor, whether in an octagon or a courtroom, the unexpected is never far away. Mr Farrell said this was allowed to proceed by the trial judge, with Mr Justice Alexander Owens telling Mr Gordon multiple times to get to that specific purpose of that line of questioning. However, putting forward the appeal, McGregor's counsel said this did not occur - and was in itself based on an "entirely incorrect" paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said. Mr Farrell said his client had said that he had made a comment about wanting to "get everything correct" in seeking out the "best advice" from his solicitors - rather than saying he had been fully co-operative with gardai. He said the plaintiff had used this to construct a "hook" that McGregor had said he wanted to tell everything to gardai, adding: "With respect, that's not what it says." Mr Farrell said it was not the case that McGregor had said he had told gardai everything.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Philips Air Purifier 900 Series review: A small but powerful device for removing allergens and dust
What is the Philips PureProtect Mini 900 Series Air Purifier? The Philips Air Purifier 900 Series AC0920 is a compact model at approximately 36cm high by 22cm wide, suitable for spaces up to 65 square metres. This makes it an ideal air purifier for a bedroom or larger living space. At just £129.99 at the time of writing, it is excellent value, with filters costing only £34.99 annually. It's not the cheapest – some (like this Midea) retail for under £100 – but it's more affordable than premium brands like Dyson and Molekule. It is not a smart air purifier, so you can't connect it to your phone. But it is easy to operate and has a child lock, a colour changing light to indicate air quality and filter warning lights showing when it needs cleaning and replacing. It was extremely efficient at cleaning air in our real-world tests, earning the title of Best Value buy in our guide to the best air purifiers. JUMP TO: How we test air purifiers We independently test air purifiers in real homes, reflecting daily use. We set the device up from the box and run it for one hour on its medium or auto setting. We assess and score the following: Air quality testing: Using an air quality monitor, we measure the rate of small particulate matter (known as PM 2.5 and PM 10, referring to its size in microns), airborne chemicals called Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde in the room before and after testing and record changes in the overall air quality indicator (AQI) score. Noise levels: We use a decibel monitor app to check the noise of the air purifier against ambient sound in the room. We record the loudest and the quietest settings. Value for money: We judge the initial cost, the price of replacement filters and how frequently they need replacing, as well as its energy use per kWh, measured using a smart plug. The Philips Air Purifier 900 Series was tested in a bedroom following the use of common aerosols, including deodorant and hair spray, as well as during everyday use in a living area. For more on at home air care, read our guides to the best fan, best dehumidifier and best humidifier. Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended Our thorough, real-world tests will always help you find the best product. No manufacturer ever sees Telegraph Recommended reviews before publication and we don't accept payment in exchange for favourable reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles. All opinions are based on independent expert opinion and our hands-on testing. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more. Air quality Score: 9/10 In our tests, the Philips 900 Series performed better at improving air quality than some models more than twice the price. In just an hour, it reduced levels of PM 2.5 particles (small pollutants like dust and soot which can trigger allergies) in a large bedroom by 98 per cent. During the tests, the overall AQI score for the room improved by 96 per cent, dropping from an unhealthy 156 to just six (anything below 30 is good). It is also easy to tell what the current air quality is, since the air purifier has a coloured indicator light and a digital display on the top, showing PM 2.5 levels. But it doesn't tackle chemicals in the air like some others can, meaning it did not reduce levels of formaldehyde or VOCs. Ease of use The Philips 900 Series is easy to use with simple set-up instructions, although you must turn it upside down to remove the filter's protective cover before first use. After that it's self-explanatory, with straightforward controls to switch between its four modes: auto, fan speed one, fan speed two and night mode. A button dims the lights, which you can also hold to turn on the child lock. It beeps loudly so you know you've pressed the right button. We liked the warning light showing when the filter needs cleaning with a vacuum, as this could help extend its life. If cleaned regularly, the £34.99 filters last up to a year. Confusingly, although there is an on-box QR code for downloading the Philips app, this air purifier is not Wi-Fi-enabled and does not connect to it, so it can't be controlled remotely. Design As one of the best Philips air purifiers, this model is small but feels sturdy and durable. The HEPA filter, which can capture airborne particles like pollen and mould, is particularly robust and seems to be of a higher build quality than many other air purifiers with a HEPA filter for allergies. The display is clear to read, with the PM 2.5 levels shown as a number and as a light that changes colour to reflect their presence in the air (from a positive blue through to red for bad). This can be turned off for night time while a child-lock option is ideal for stopping tiny fingers from changing the settings. Controls are accessibly positioned, but frustratingly, you can't turn off the buttons' loud beeping noise. While helpful during the day, at night this is the one downside about the overall design. Operating noise Score: 7/10 The Philips 900 Series device was one of the quieter models we tested, running at just 30 dB on the quietest night mode setting (compared to an ambient sound in the home of 28 dB), making it a quiet air purifier for bedrooms. With the fan on top speed, noise was 62 dB, which is comparable with other air purifiers, including our Best Buy the Blueair Blue Max 3250i. We deducted a couple of points here because of the aforementioned loud beeps, which sound whenever you press any button on the device. This is intrusive if you are quietly trying to change the settings at night. Value Score: 9/10 At just £130, this air purifier performed significantly better than other budget options and pricier models. The filters are also reasonably priced, at £34.99 each, and this is made even more wallet-friendly by the fact they need replacing as infrequently as once a year. Many other air purifiers require a filter change at least every six months. In an hour, the Philips 900 Series used 0.007 kWh of energy, according to our tests, which works out as around 5p for every 24 hours of continuous use. Overall, this was a high-quality air purifier at a reasonable price, with low running costs too. Technical specifications We compared the Philips 900 Series with the premium Dyson Cool PC1 Air Purifier on performance, noise and value. Should you buy the Philips Air Purifier 900 Series? For clean air at a budget-friendly price, the Philips 900 Series performs even better than some larger, more expensive air purifiers. But this is a simple model, so you won't be able to track air quality or control the device remotely using an app. Yes, if: You want an efficient, compact air purifier You're looking for an air purifier with an air quality sensor You need a budget device with low running costs You want an air purifier with an auto mode No, if: You want Wi-Fi-connectivity or smart features You need a device that operates silently Philips Air Purifier 900 Series FAQs What size room is the Philips 900 Series suitable for? Up to 65 sq metres. Is it good for allergens and pollutants? Yes. It effectively removes PM 2.5 particles – those measuring 2.5 microns across – which can trigger allergies, and significantly improved air quality in our tests. How does the air quality sensor work? The sensor assesses the amount of PM 2.5 particles in the air passing through the device. It displays the level as a number, as well as showing a colour-coded light for air quality, from blue (good), through purple and pink to red (unhealthy). Is the Philips 900 Series noisy at night? No, the night mode is quiet at 30 dB – just over ambient noise (28 dB in our tests). But it beeps if you change any of the settings. Can I control the Philips 900 Series with my phone? No, there is no app control with this model. How often should I replace the filter in the Philips 900 Series? At least once a year. The device will let you know when it needs changing.
