LA media mogul Byron Allen hires investment bank to sell television stations
The Allen Media Group announced the news Monday morning. It owns nearly two dozen stations, including in Northern California near Redding, as well as Honolulu; Flint, Michigan; Madison, Wisconsin; and Tupelo, Mississippi.
The company needs to pay down debt, Allen said in a statement.
Allen's firm declined to provide details on its finances.
The Los Angeles firm has spent big bucks during the last six years buying stations with a goal of becoming the largest independent television operator in the U.S. Many of Allen's stations have standing in their markets with programming from one of the Big Four broadcast networks: ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox.
"We have received numerous inquiries and written offers for most of our television stations and now is the time to explore getting a return on this phenomenal investment," Allen, chairman and chief executive, said in a statement. "We are going to use this opportunity to take a serious look at the offers, and the sale proceeds will be used to significantly reduce our debt."
Allen Media Group, which was founded by Allen in 1993, also owns a dozen television channels, including the Weather Channel.
The Los Angeles entrepreneur and former stand-up comedian had been steadily expanding his empire for more than a decade.
However, the television advertising market has become increasingly challenged in recent years as media buyers shift their budgets to digital platforms where they are more likely to find younger consumers. The television advertising market has become more strained with the addition of streaming services, including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Paramount+ competing with legacy stations for dollars.
A decade ago, Allen brought a high-profile $20 billion lawsuit against two of the nation's largest pay-TV distributors, Comcast and Charter Communications, alleging that racism was the reason his small TV channels were not being carried on those services.
The case ultimately reached the U.S. Supreme Court and was legally significant because it relied on the historic Civil Rights Act of 1866, which was enacted a year after the Civil War ended and mandated that Black citizens "shall have the same right ... to make and enforce contracts ... as is enjoyed by white citizens."
But the Supreme Court struck down many of Allen's arguments. In a 9-0 decision in March 2020, the high court said it was not enough for a civil rights plaintiff to assert that his race was one of several factors that motivated a company to refuse to do business with him. Instead, the person must show race was the crucial and deciding factor.
Last month, CBS picked up his show "Comics Unleashed with Byron Allen" to run at 12:35 a.m.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump addresses pardon decision for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, but questions remain
President Donald Trump is breaking his silence on pardoning Sean "Diddy" Combs for the first time since he was acquitted of the most serious charges in a federal sex-crimes trial last month. In an interview that aired Friday, Aug. 1 on Newsmax with host Rob Finnerty, Trump discussed the possibility of presidential pardons for convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, Combs and former Rep. George Santos. After Finnerty asked, "Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Would you consider pardoning him?" Trump responded: "Well he was essentially, I guess sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do, he's still in jail or something. He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good of a victory." Trump 'should not pardon' Sean 'Diddy' 'Diddy' Combs, Megyn Kelly says On July 2, jurors found Combs not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking ex-girlfriends Casandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine and a woman known as "Jane" in his sweeping trial that nearly lasted two months. He was convicted July 2 on two of the five counts against him for transporting those same women for prostitution, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years per count. During the interview, Trump said "probably..." before pausing and revealing to Finnerty, "You know, I was very friendly with him, I got along with him great, seemed like a nice guy. I didn't know him well, but when I ran for office he was very hostile." The Newsmax host noted then that "he said some not so nice things about you, sir." "Yeah, and it's hard. You know, like you, we're human beings and we don't like to have things cloud our judgement, right?" the president continued. "But when you knew someone and you were fine and then you run for office and he made some terrible statements… so I don't know... it makes it more difficult to do." Then, Trump replied, "I'd say so," when Finnerty clarified by asking if it was "more likely a no for (pardoning) Combs?" In the interview, Trump was seemingly referencing Combs' expletive-filled 2017 comments in The Daily Beast, essentially saying that "(Black people) don't really" care about Trump. "The tomfoolery that's going on in D.C., that's just regular everyday business to Black folks," Combs told the left-leaning outlet in-part, adding later in the interview that he had to "keep it focused on that self-love that we need to give our race." Trump first weighed in on the possibility of pardoning Combs on May 30 in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." Despite last month's verdict, Combs' legal saga continues. On Wednesday, July 31, lawyers for Combs requested his acquittal, or a new trial altogether, in court documents reviewed by USA TODAY. A day earlier, conservative host Megyn Kelly urged Trump against potentially pardoning Combs. Kelly said in an X post on July 30 that "Trump should not pardon Diddy" because "he doesn't deserve it." "He's a Trump hater. He's a woman abuser. MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other. This would not help. GOP struggling w/young female voters, most of whom will HATE a Diddy pardon," Kelly wrote. Contributing: Taijuan Moorman
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Saturday Spread: How to Use Descriptive Math to Play the Hand, Not the Dealer
Suppose that you're the manager of an MLB team and it's the bottom of the ninth of the World Series. You're down to your last out. Do you go with the player who has a great career batting average but can't perform well under pressure or elect the guy who had a relatively average season but consistently comes through in the clutch? If you're into baseball or just sports in general, the answer is obvious: you go with the competitor that contextually gives you the best chance to win. Ultimately, your job is to take home championships, not dabble with math exercises. More News from Barchart How to Buy KO for a 2% Discount, or Achieve a 17% Annual Return Coinbase Shows Huge Unusual Options Volume After Lower Results Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! However, what seems so obvious isn't that way in the financial sector. Practically every western approach — from Black-Scholes-Merton-based models to the efficient market hypothesis — utilizes prescriptive financial modeling. Essentially, these methodologies dictate what should be, which theoretically sounds enticing. However, my contention is that this prescription is flawed. In contrast, I prefer a Markovian approach, which models behavior based on a descriptive framework. Such methodologies demonstrate what has been, not what should be. As such, we don't need complicated formulas rooted in stochastic calculus and other difficult concepts. A key reason why I'm not a fan of prescriptive models like Black-Scholes (aside from its inapplicability with American options) is that the underlying probabilities are based on the entire distribution of the dataset. That's like trying to predict hurricanes based on the last ten years' worth of weather reports. Instead, to accomplish this, you would focus on the immediate conditions that cause hurricanes to be more likely. With that said, below are three stocks that are potentially flashing buy signals based on a descriptive framework. Kroger (KR) Quantitatively, Kroger (KR) makes for an intriguing idea for bullish speculators. In the past 10 weeks, the market has essentially voted to buy KR stock four times and sell six times. Throughout this period, KR enjoyed an upward bias. For brevity, we can abbreviate the sequence as 4-6-U. At first glance, it may seem silly to compress the price magnitude of KR stock into a simple binary code. But what we have accomplished here is to define KR's price discovery process as a behavioral state. Through the study of past analogs, we can determine how the market responds to the 4-6-U sequence relative to the baseline. It's just like card counting in blackjack. If the deck favors us, we bet big. If it doesn't, we bet small (or in this case, not at all). On any given week, the chance that a long position in KR stock will rise is only 51.74%. It's an upward bias but a very modest one. However, this statistic stems from the derivative probability of upside across the entire distribution of the dataset. But our contention is that because the deck is flashing a 4-6-U sequence, the odds of upside are actually 72.73%. Barchart Premier members gain full access to the platform's options pricing tools, which can be incredibly powerful when integrated with a Markovian approach. Here, we can identify that the 72/73 bull call spread expiring Aug. 29 may be the least expensive multi-leg strategy that has a realistic chance of being fully profitable. Cinemark (CNK) For extreme contrarians, Cinemark (CNK) may be an intriguing name for its implied discount. On Friday, CNK stock dropped nearly 4%, while for the trailing week, it hemorrhaged almost 11%. On a year-to-date basis, the security — which is tied to the struggling movie theater business model — is down 16.49%. It's a mess but it has the potential to be meme-able. In the past 10 weeks, the market voted to buy CNK stock four times and sell six times. Throughout this period, CNK incurred a downward trajectory. For brevity, we can label this sequence as 4-6-D. Through past analogs, we can identify that this sequence has materialized 46 times on a rolling basis since January 2019. In 58.7% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 3.87%. As a baseline, the next-week upside probability is only 51.16%. Therefore, assuming that the implications of the 4-6-D hold up, there's a compelling incentive to place a wager. With CNK stock closing at $25.87, it could swing close to $27 in short order. It's a terribly risky idea but for hardened speculators, the 26/27 bull call spread expiring Aug. 15 could be attractive. Confluent (CFLT) It's no exaggeration to say that Confluent (CFLT) got obliterated this past week. On Friday, CFLT stock dropped 3%, which would be notable in and of itself. However, the real drama occurred the day before. Following a second-quarter earnings print that left investors severely disappointed, CFLT opened sharply lower against Wednesday's close. When the dust settled, the security had lost almost 38% in the trailing five sessions. Generally, it's best to avoid enterprises exhibiting such extreme volatility. However, the market has enticingly printed a relatively rare 6-4-D sequence. It's unusual because, despite the number of accumulative sessions outweighing distributive, the overall trajectory is negative. This quantitative signal has flashed 23 times since the company's public market debut in 2021. Notably, in 65.22% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 3.79%. As a baseline, the chance that a long position in CFLT stock will rise is only 53.49%. Subsequently, there appears to be a clear incentive to place a wager. With CFLT closing at $17.20 on Friday, it could jump to $17.85, perhaps close to $18, in short order. With that said, the most aggressive idea that you can arguably consider while still being rational is the 17/18 bull spread expiring Aug. 15. On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Siebert Williams Shank & Co Sticks to Its Buy Rating for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. Class A (INR)
In a report released today, Gabriele Sorbara from Siebert Williams Shank & Co maintained a Buy rating on Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. Class A, with a price target of $26.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at $15.07. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. According to TipRanks, Sorbara is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 23.2% and a 57.26% success rate. Sorbara covers the Energy sector, focusing on stocks such as EOG Resources, Comstock Resources, and Civitas Resources. Currently, the analyst consensus on Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. Class A is a Strong Buy with an average price target of $25.75, which is a 70.87% upside from current levels. In a report released on July 14, KeyBanc also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a $24.00 price target. Based on Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. Class A's latest earnings release for the quarter ending March 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $15.39 billion and a net profit of $4.37 billion. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $71.76 million and had a net profit of $60.23 million
