EU court adviser backs record €4.1 billion fine on Google for anti-competitive practices
The US tech giant has been trying to overturn on appeal a €4.3 billion fine imposed by the European Commission in 2018, which was later reduced to €4.1 billion.
But in its opinion, Juliane Kokott, advocate general at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), said 'the legal arguments put forward by Google are ineffective', the court later said in a statement.
Although not binding, such advice carries weight and is often followed by EU judges in their rulings.
The commission, the EU's antitrust regulator, had accused Google of abusing the popularity of its Android operating system to restrict competition.
It alleged Google pressured phone makers using Android to pre-install its search engine and Google Chrome browser – essentially shutting out rivals.
The findings were upheld in 2022 by the European Union's second-highest court, which slightly reduced the fine.
The levy remains the EU's biggest ever.
Arguing that the commission's case was unfounded and that the sanction penalised innovation, Google appealed to the EU's top court.
Advertisement
The company had also pushed the case that the EU was unfairly blind to Apple, which gives preference to its own services, such as Safari on iPhones.
Today's advice will guide the EUCJ in its decision. The court has the final say on the matter.
'Google held a dominant position in several markets of the Android-ecosystem and thus benefited from network effects that enabled it to ensure that users used Google Search,' the court said, detailing Kokott's opinion.
'As a result, Google obtained access to data that enabled it in turn to improve its service. No hypothetical as-efficient competitor could have found itself in such a situation,' the statement read.
As part of a major push to target big tech abuses, the EU slapped Google with fines worth a total of €8.2 billion between 2017 and 2019 over antitrust violations.
This set off a series of long-running legal battles.
Brussels has since armed itself with a more powerful legal weapon known as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), to rein in tech giants.
Rather than regulators discovering egregious antitrust violations after probes lasting many years, the DMA gives businesses a list of what they can and cannot do online.
In March, the commission informed Google parent Alphabet that preliminary reviews concluded its search engine and Google Play app store operated in ways that run afoul of the new rules.
-
© AFP 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
12 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Potential job losses in Leitrim if heavy tariffs imposed on alcohol says councillor
An escalation of tariffs on alcohol products produced in Ireland could severely impact producers in counties like Leitrim, Donegal, and Sligo where multiple distilleries are operating. The EU and the United States are currently in talks in relation to trade and tariffs. The talks are due to conclude before next Wednesday, July 9, at which point the US president Donald Trump, had threatened tariffs of 50pc will be imposed if agreement is not reached. Earlier this year, large rate tariffs were paused for 90 days but there is currently a 10pc tariff on EU goods going into the United States. Leitrim Councillor Enda McGloin said the potential tariffs on alcohol would not only impact the sale of the products but also affect the growth and expansion of businesses. He said distilleries such as Drumshanbo Gun Power Gin in Co Leitrim need their product to be exempt from the tariffs or there is a risk of job losses. 'At Drumshanbo Gun Power Gin, 35% to 40% of product produced is currently going to the United States. 'My concern is if the trade agreement was to fall away and the American government proceed to impose a very serious level of tariffs on whiskey or other spirits produced here. 'Another concern is that in order to have a negative impact against Donegal Trump and the Republican party, that the EU would target Bourbon. 'This would trigger further reprisals which could then impact the sale of Irish Whiskey, French wines and numerous other goods. ADVERTISEMENT 'That would trigger a trade war which could add tariffs of up to 25% to 30% or more and that would have a dramatic impact on the future growth of enterprises here. 'It would also have a negative impact on long term growth and it may even result in job layoffs as there is a significant amount of people employed in the sector. 'Any sort of a scenario where the drinks industry within the European Union is targeted, it transfers itself down to the ground here in Leitrim and the Northwest,' said Cllr McGloin. Cllr McGloin added that Tánaiste Simon Harris has been in negotiations with Europe and it is hoped there will be no reprisals against Bourbon. 'He is hopeful that a coercive trade agreement between the European Union and the United States could be reached and would negate the need for any major tariffs. "We have to see what the outcome will be on the talks. "The drinks industry has asked the Irish government to support non retaliatory tariffs against Bourbon and the government has agreed on that and have let their views known to the European Union. "We have support in countries like France, Holland and other major producers in the EU. "I am glad to see the Minister for Trade clearly supporting Irish Whiskey and drinks companies in this difficult time and I hope this will pay dividends during the negotiations,' said Cllr McGloin. Despite the uncertainty, the distillery in Drumshanbo is operating at full production and is planning a €1.6 million expansion. Cllr McGloin believes a successful agreement could unlock major opportunities for the Northwest. 'If we can get over this and successfully agree, we could be in a position of a positive outcome. 'We could see dramatic growth and locally, long term strategic growth in the Drumshanbo production facility which could mean more jobs and more opportunities for the county and also for the Northwest,' said Cllr McGloin.
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Government pushing for key sectors to be exempt from Donald Trump's planned 10pc tariffs
It is now exactly a week to the July 9 deadline set by US president Donald Trump, after which he has threatened to slap a 50pc tariff on imports from the EU. Mr Burke said the Government does want a trade deal to be in place by July 9, rather than the deadline being extended, because 'we don't want any uncertainty to continue'. He has also pointed out that there is another deadline – of July 14 – when the European Commission has threatened to hit back with tariffs on some US imports. It is now expected that a headline or framework deal will be agreed by the deadline, with talks continuing afterwards about the precise details. Mr Trump's administration seems to be insisting on a 10pc baseline tariff, and the focus for Ireland and other EU states is to get a zero-for-zero exemption for some sectors. 'We're very keen to get a carve-out in key sectors that are centrally important to the Irish economy and indeed the European economy,' Mr Burke told a press conference in Dublin. 'We have aircraft leasing here, which is a significant component of the global marketplace. About 65pc of all aircraft leased is through Ireland. 'We have a very important life sciences sector, which is again key to, and strategic, to the resilience of Europe. So we're looking at key sectors like that, to see if we can get a landing zone on those areas.' The minister said he is 'hopeful rather than confident' about a positive outcome, and pointed out that July 9 is the deadline set by Mr Trump for the conclusion of talks on trade deals with a number of countries. He said this posed a 'huge challenge' to the US administration itself, 'in terms of the bandwidth, to be dealing with so many moving parts'. Asked if a baseline 10pc tariff and carve-outs for key sectors would now represent a "win' for Ireland, given Mr Trump's threat to impose 50pc levies, Mr Burke said he didn't see any tariff as a win. 'What it would mean for our agri-food sector is 10pc on top of existing tariffs in many of those key areas. We need to see what a new 10pc would mean – if your margin is 6pc, 7pc, 8pc, where does a 10pc tariff leave you? It is a huge concern still. 'Tariffs are bad. They constrain supply, cause supply-chain shortages and, in essence, make goods more expensive for consumers in both countries. That's not a good position to be in.' The Enterprise Minister said the US negotiators seem to want a quota system, so that America is able to export a certain amount of their key products to Europe, such as cars and beef. He also indicated that final arrangements will not be put in place by July 9. 'There's a lot of concerns in relation to how much of an actual trade deal it is,' he said. 'It's more of a framework for the establishment of further negotiations.' Mr Burke said the agri-food and drinks sectors were very much on his mind as the trade talks continue. 'Distilleries are going through a huge amount of uncertainty. Right now they have a huge amount of premium product in the US, and margins are significantly under pressure. That's a big concern to the government and we're working through our partners in Europe in connection with them, particularly in relation to counter measures.' The EU is being represented at the talks by Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic, who is due to meet tomorrow with his US counterparts Howard Lutnick and Jamieson Greer. He will then brief EU governments on Friday.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
EU proposes a 90% cut in greenhouse gases by 2040
The European Commission has proposed a target of a 90% reduction in net greenhouse gases compared to 1990 levels by 2040. The target builds on the 2030 goals of a 55% reduction in carbon emissions, which the commission said the EU is "well on track" to meet. However, environmental organisations have criticised the new target because it assumes greater progress in carbon capture and storage, and introduces new flexibilities which would mean up to 3% of the target would be met by paying countries outside the EU - through so-called international carbon credits - to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. The European Commission said the new goal, and the methodology involved, will provide certainty for investors, boost the EU's competitiveness and increase its energy security. Under the EU Climate Law, the commission is required to update the carbon emissions target from 2030 to 2040 in order to meet the overall goal of net emissions neutrality by 2050. However, the existing drive towards net zero has been eroded in recent years by a political backlash, particularly where right-wing and far right parties have gained ground. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has been accused of watering down key pieces of legislation, such as the European Green Deal. Last week, the commission withdrew legislation banning so-called greenwashing - the practice of companies asserting spurious or unfounded environmental credentials. However, it insists the new target reflects growing public alarm at the effects of global warming. The 2025 Climate Eurobarometer, released on Monday, showed that 85% of EU citizens consider climate change a serious problem, with 81% supporting the net neutrality target for 2050. In a statement, Ms von der Leyen said: "As European citizens increasingly feel the impact of climate change, they expect Europe to act. "Industry and investors look to us to set a predictable direction of travel. "Today we show that we stand firmly by our commitment to decarbonise the European economy by 2050." The EU chief added the "goal is clear" and the "journey is pragmatic and realistic". Under the proposal, there will be a "limited role" for "high quality" international carbon credits in the second half of the 2030s in order to meet the 90% reduction target by the end of the decade. The amendment will also allow for the permanent removal of carbon within the EU's Emissions Trading System to be taken into account. The commission said these flexibilities will be done in "a cost-effective way and ensure a just and socially fair transition for all". The new target, it said, goes hand in hand with the Clean Industrial Deal - which updates the Green Deal - as well as the so-called Competitive Compass and the Affordable Energy Action Plan. Greenpeace has criticised the plan on the basis that it falls short of the European Scientific Advisory Board's own recommendation of a target reduction of 90% - 95%. It also said the decarbonisation involved in the plan should be measured only on the basis of internal EU efforts, rather than relying on carbon reduction done by countries outside the EU. The organisation's EU climate campaigner said the bloc's 2040 climate targets "should drive a shift away from fossil fuels, starting with an EU ban on new fossil fuel projects, towards renewables and energy saving to cut people's energy bills, make their homes easier to heat and cool, and clean the air they breathe". But Thomas Gelin said that instead the commission "relies on dodgy accounting and offshore carbon laundering to pretend to hit the lower bound of what its climate scientists advise". "The EU, as a historical polluter, has the responsibility to cut its own pollution and ironically will make the necessary changes harder for European households and businesses by delaying even further," he added. Ireland's 2030 emissions reduction target is 42%. According to a recent projection by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), however, the State will only manage to cut emissions relative to 1990 levels by 23% - even if every climate policy planned by the Government is implemented on time. That is actually down from a 29% prediction last year, meaning Ireland's progress towards the legally binding EU target is going backwards. The EPA said the deterioration is due to significantly slower progress on many fronts, including onshore wind, offshore wind, electric vehicles, district heating and the use of biomethane.
