
France and Poland's reconciliation is a sign of Europe's alarm over US disengagement
The treaty of Nancy will be signed on Europe Day, in the town hall on the 18th-century Place Stanislas, by the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and the Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk. It will cement a reconciliation between two countries that have been estranged within the EU for most of the last three decades.
France's lack of enthusiasm for EU enlargement and its pursuit of cooperation with Russia were the main reasons for the strained relationship. Poles still bitterly remember Jacques Chirac telling central European countries that endorsed the 2003 invasion of Iraq that they had behaved badly and 'missed a good opportunity to shut up'.
Warsaw has long relied exclusively on the US and Nato for its security and has resisted any EU role in defence. But with Donald Trump pursuing rapprochement with Russia, Poland's arch-foe, and his willingness to let Moscow prevail in Ukraine and reduce US military exposure to Europe, Tusk is rushing to build closer ties with Paris, Berlin and London in a quest for extra security insurance.
The Franco-Polish friendship treaty, closely resembling the Franco-German treaty signed in 2019, will be inked on the very day that Vladimir Putin stages a giant military parade in Moscow's Red Square, with the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, at his side, to mark the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany.
'Poland realises the depth of the security challenge and after years of benign neglect for Europe's defence integration, finally wants to discuss slipping under France's nuclear umbrella,' Shahin Vallée and Joseph de Weck wrote in an analysis for the Groupe d'Etudes Géopolitiques thinktank.
Tusk was quick to respond positively when Macron, after Trump's first shock disengagement signals, offered European partners a dialogue on nuclear deterrence. Without specifying how France might use its small atomic arsenal to shield Poland and other eastern EU members, the treaty of Nancy will pledge closer cooperation in a range of areas related to the ultra-sensitive nuclear field including air forces, air-to-air refuelling, air and missile defence and artillery. Negotiations are under way for Poland to buy military tanker aircraft and civilian planes from Airbus, as well as possibly submarines, though deals may not be signed until later in the year.
A Polish diplomat familiar with the document said the wording on mutual defence echoes the EU's Lisbon treaty, in which each country has 'an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power' if the other were attacked. Poland would have liked an explicit mention of nuclear capability, but the diplomat said the 'security guarantees are most important for Poland in the current geostrategic context and because of transatlantic turbulence'. Tusk was keen to seal the deal before Poland's 18 May presidential election rather than wait to secure more.
This does not mean that Warsaw is giving up on US nuclear protection. It is simultaneously pushing to join Nato's nuclear sharing programme, under which a handful of European allies with no nukes of their own store US weapons on their soil and fly aircraft adapted to deliver them if the alliance so decides. Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy and Turkey each hold at least 20 US nuclear bombs for this purpose. Poland has wanted to join that club for more than a decade but has made no progress. US and western European diplomats have long worried that such a move would be escalatory towards Russia and could put nuclear storage sites too close to the eastern European border, potentially raising pressure for early use in the event of an invasion.
France has historically maintained a policy of total independence for its force de frappe (strike force). It does not participate in Nato's nuclear planning group, in which the US, the UK and other allies consult on policy, training and deployment of these ultimate weapons. Yet Trump's erratic course and ambiguity about whether he would be prepared to defend Nato allies against Russian aggression has forced European governments to rethink their security assumptions and reach for backup plans should the US and Nato be no longer available.
Germany's new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, who took office this week, is also keen to talk to Macron about extended nuclear protection as well as conventional arms cooperation. The stars are aligning for the Franco-German-Polish grouping known as the Weimar Triangle to take the lead on these issues, reaching out to the UK as a vital defence partner despite its withdrawal from the EU.
An EU-UK security and defence agreement is likely to be concluded at a summit on 19 May. France and Britain are negotiating an update of their Lancaster House defence treaty, and Berlin is working on bilateral defence pacts with Warsaw and London.
France will never share control of its 290 nuclear warheads, most of which are based on submarines on permanent patrol beneath the oceans. Only Monsieur le Président can have his finger on the button, not some European committee. However, Paris keeps dropping hints that it is open to extending its umbrella to European allies. To do so credibly, it would need more costly warheads and launchers than it owns now. That might require European co-financing or some trade-off to help France raise defence spending.
Its small force of nuclear bombers has never been deployed abroad. Without mid-air refuelling and air-to-air interceptors, it could not reach far into Russia and return home. In French doctrine, the planes would deliver a final warning shot if France's vital interests were in danger, prior to the ultimate Armageddon strike. In the kind of small gestures that count in the language of nuclear deterrence, an Italian refuelling plane recently joined a French nuclear air patrol for the first time. And France did not deny a British newspaper report in February that it was considering deploying air-launched nuclear weapons to Germany.
The last Polish government, led by Jarosław Kaczyński's conservative nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) party, did its best to obstruct French efforts for closer EU integration. But Poland has now repositioned itself at the heart of the EU under Tusk's centre-right coalition, and France has lost its illusions about Russia since Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The treaty of Nancy is a consequence of Putin's aggression and Trump's global wrecking ball.
Paul Taylor is a senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
We need substance, not gestures in pursuit of the two-state solution
The suffering we are witnessing in the Gaza Strip demands a response. All parties must do what they can to ensure every civilian has safe access to adequate food and medicine, along with the immediate return of the remaining hostages. This moment of crisis requires practical solutions, not gesture politics. The push for the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state by some politicians in this country, and by President Macron of France, cannot improve the situation. The UK Jewish community and its major communal organisations have long supported a two-state solution, leading to a secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state. But recognising Palestine now will not help achieve that goal. Hamas, having started this war with the brutal terrorism of October 7, are desperate for a propaganda victory to justify the immense suffering they have created. They will claim recognition of Palestine as a vindication of their murderous rampages and hostage-taking. Further, unilateral recognition cannot substitute for the difficult negotiations and concessions needed to realise an enduring peace. Palestinian leaders have been offered two-state proposals in 1947, 2000, 2008, 2014 and 2020, rejecting them each time. This intransigence, and the incitement and corruption of the Palestinian Authority, must be abandoned. Israelis cannot be expected to sacrifice their security for a Palestinian state which could be the base for another October 7. After decades of statements and declarations, it should be clear to all parties that declaring something does not make it the case. Any Palestinian state will need to be created to thrive in reality, not only in the minds of policy-makers. As UK ministers have rightly argued, recognition should be used when it can contribute materially to the endgame of a diplomatic process. In our meetings with the Israeli government, and partners across the Jewish Diaspora, we have been clear that the need for consensual diplomacy, rather than unilateralism, also applies to Israel. The alarming rhetoric of some within the Israeli government, extremist settler violence in the West Bank, and the lack of a clear vision to end the conflict, has left many of Israel's friends unsure of how a sustainable 'day after' can be achieved. In this complex and challenging moment, steps to advance a two-state solution should still be focussed on substance, not gestures. The immediate priority must be to ensure a massive expansion of aid to Gaza, the return of hostages and a lasting ceasefire. This aid must be delivered, whether by the GHF or other humanitarian agencies, in a way which ensures that the beleaguered population receives it but does not allow Hamas to continue to weaponise the aid to fund this war. Beyond this immediate crisis, the ongoing need for peace building has never been more important. This includes both international diplomacy, such as the expansion of the Abraham Accords through normalisation with Saudi Arabia, and bottom-up initiatives both in the Middle East and at home. We need to export peace, not import this conflict. We have told the UK Government that we stand ready to engage with them, the British Muslim community, Israelis, Palestinians, and other key actors, in support of a comprehensive plan that will make a Palestinian state beside a secure Israel a reality. After the horrors of the last 21 months, lasting peace and security for Israelis, Palestinians and the wider Middle East must now be our urgent mission.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Macrons v Candace Owens: lawsuit marks new phase in battle against conspiracy theories
When the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and his wife, Brigitte, took the rare step this week of filing a US defamation lawsuit against the rightwing podcaster Candace Owens, it marked a new phase in a legal battle on both sides of the Atlantic against the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux. The Macrons' US lawsuit attacked what it called the 'verifiably false and devastating lies' being repeated online by Owens that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born a man. The lawsuit said evidence clearly disproved this 'grotesque narrative', which had become 'a campaign of global humiliation' and 'relentless bullying on a worldwide scale'. The case prompted broader questions this week about how conspiracy theories spread worldwide, whether they can be stopped in the courts and what this false narrative, which began in France after the Covid pandemic, says about French society's distrust in politicians. 'This is now one of the biggest fake news stories worldwide in terms of popularity – a billion people have seen it,' said Emmanuelle Anizon, a senior journalist for the French weekly Nouvel Obs, who last year published a book, L'Affaire Madame, investigating the origins of the rumour in France. 'What's new is that for the first time, Emmanuel Macron has joined his wife in taking legal action.' The Macrons' US lawsuit states the accusation that Brigitte Macron was born a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux is completely false and Trogneux is in fact is her older brother. Trogneux, 80, lives in the northern French town of Amiens, where he grew up with Brigitte and four other siblings in a family famous for its local chocolate business. He was present in public alongside his Brigitte at Emmanuel Macron's two presidential inaugurations in 2017 and 2022. Owens, whose podcast and social media channels have an audience of millions, said this week she stood by her narrative. The false claim that Brigitte was a man first went viral in France in 2021, at a moment when distrust of politicians in was at a high, after the gilets jaunes (yellow vests) anti-government protest movement and the Covid pandemic that killed more than 130,000 people in France. In December 2021, a woman who used the name Amandine Roy and called herself a 'spiritual medium', broadcast a four-hour YouTube interview with Natacha Rey, 51, who had worked previously for a small essential oils business and described herself as 'an independent investigative journalist, self-taught, and not from the inner circle of mainstream media'. Rey said she had spent three years investigating Brigitte Macron, after questioning the first lady's body-shape in photos. Rey said she believed Brigitte Macron was actually a man called Jean-Michel Trogneux. Within hours, the interview had 500,000 views and the hashtag #Jean-MichelTrogneux was trending on social media in France, promoted by, among others, some far-right and anti-vaccine accounts. A small far-right newsletter had already published Rey's theories but it was the video interview that sent the claim viral. 'There was a deeper societal problem at that time in France: the mistrust of political, media and economic institutions,' Anizon said. 'There had been years of political health scandals worldwide and in France – from a contaminated blood scandal to the Mediator weight-loss drug. Many people had gradually reached a point of distrust, switching off traditional mainstream media and turning instead to online accounts – Covid and vaccine mistrust increased that.' The rumour spread in part because the Macrons' relationship had long been a topic of comment online. Brigitte Macron, who is 24 years older, first met Emmanuel Macron when she was a French teacher at his Jesuit secondary school in Amiens, directing him in a school play. The Macrons' US lawsuit this week stated: 'Through the school's theatre programme, president Macron and Mrs Macron formed a deeper intellectual connection.' It added: 'At all times the teacher-student relationship between Mrs Macron and President Macron remained within the bounds of the law.' Brigitte Macron, who has three children from her first marriage, divorced in 2006 and she and Emmanuel Macron married the following year when he was 30. In early 2022, after the first viral video allegations, Brigitte Macron and her brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux, filed a defamation case in France against Roy and Rey, who both denied wrongdoing. In September 2024, a Paris court found the two women guilty and ordered them to pay €8,000 in damages to Brigitte Macron and €5,000 in damages to Jean-Michel Trogneux. The women appealed against the verdict and, this month, they were acquitted by a Paris appeals court. The appeal court verdict did not imply that the claims that Brigitte Macron was a man were true, but instead judges ruled that the case against the women did not fit the definition of defamation. Brigitte Macron and Jean-Michel Trogneux have taken the case to France's highest appeals court, the cour de cassation. Brigitte Macron has filed a separate case for online harassment and 10 people will go on trial in Paris in October. Each time the Macrons' relationship is in the spotlight, the false allegations about gender spread again online. This was the case in May, when video images appeared to show Brigitte pushing her husband away with both hands on his face before they disembarked from a plane on a tour of Southeast Asia. Macron dismissed the incident as play-fighting, telling reporters that 'we are squabbling and, rather, joking with my wife', and that it had been overblown into 'a sort of geo-planetary catastrophe'. Brigitte Macron has not spoken publicly on the false gender claims since 2022 when she told French radio, RTL, that allegations that 'I am my brother' were an 'impossible' attack on her parents' family tree. She told TF1 TV at the time she wanted to set an example so other people would not suffer in the same way. She said fighting online bullying 'is my battle'.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Migrant dies after suffering cardiac arrest on small boat crossing the Channel to UK
A man has died after suffering a cardiac arrest on board a migrant boat attempting to reach the UK. A boat heading for English shores turned back towards Equihen beach in northern France on Saturday morning following the medical emergency. When the boat arrived at the beach, a man was found on board in cardiac arrest, French authorities confirmed. Despite emergency services intervening at the scene, the man died soon after, the Pas-de-Calais department's sub-prefecture said. According to UK Home Office provisional statistics, almost 24,000 people have arrived on small boats in the UK in 2025. An investigation is under way under the authority of the prosecutor to determine the circumstances of the man's death. It comes after US President Donald Trump told Europe it 'better get your act together' on immigration as he landed in Scotland last night. Mr Trump landed in the country on Friday evening for a four-day visit to both of his golf clubs in Aberdeen and Ayrshire. Asked about illegal immigration - which successive UK governments have sought to curb - Mr Trump said: 'On immigration, you better get your act together. You're not going to have Europe anymore, you've got to get your act together. 'As you know, last month we had nobody entering our country - nobody, (we) shut it down.' He added: 'You've got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe' add that immigration was 'killing Europe'. Trump's comments come after hundreds of protestors concerned about a controversial migrant hotel marched through Epping as police launched a huge operation to stop the event spilling over into violence.] Some European leaders, Trump continued, 'have not let it happen' and are 'not getting the proper credit they should', though the president did not say who he was talking about.