logo
Court rules in favor of Korean American that suspicion does not constitute draft dodging

Court rules in favor of Korean American that suspicion does not constitute draft dodging

Korea Herald07-04-2025
A South Korean court recently ruled in favor of a Korean American man, who challenged the state for dismissing his request to reinstate his South Korean nationality based on the suspicion he had illegally refused to do his mandatory military service here, according to court officials on Monday.
Seoul Administrative Court said a simple suspicion is not enough to reject the plaintiff's request to restore his nationality, pointing out that there is no specific evidence to prove the accusation made by the Ministry of Justice.
The plaintiff, born in 1986, had been living primarily outside of Korea since the age of 16 and acquired US citizenship in July 2022 at the age of 35. He filed for the restoration of his South Korean citizenship in December of that year, which the ministry rejected on grounds that his acquiring of US citizenship is believed to have been designed to avoid mandatary military conscription in South Korea.
All able-bodied South Korean men are mandated to serve in the military for at least 18 months, but the Military Service Act in the past had exempted those over 35 of such duties. Those who evaded conscription without justifiable clause, those whose enlistment for noncombat duties had been cancelled, and those who violated the state permit to stay overseas -- such as returning to the country after the permitted period -- are subject to enlistment until age 37.
South Korean men have the freedom of travel, but those who are at least 25 years old and have not yet served their mandatory military duty have to receive government permission to travel overseas. This is to prevent draft-dodging via emigration.
The Military Service Act allows male citizens to postpone enlistment under justifiable causes, which include educational commitment at tertiary educational institutes or higher and residence outside of the country. The plaintiff in question was permitted by the government to stay outside the country until Dec. 31, 2023.
The court pointed out that the plaintiff had been permitted by the state to stay outside the country until Dec. 31, 2023, and that he had been effectively exempted from conscription as of Jan. 1, 2022. This was the year when he turned 36, and Article 2-2 of the Military Service Act states that one is regarded to have become a certain age in Jan. 1 of a given year.
By this logic, the court said the plaintiff had already been exempted from the military duties when he became a US citizen. "It would have been possible for the plaintiff to expect that he would not have to shoulder the military duties even without losing his South Korean citizenship. Thus it cannot be considered that applying for US citizenship was a reasonable or unavoidable means for him to avoid the duties," the court said in its ruling.
"A vague suspicion itself is not sufficient in such case, and there must be probable cause to strongly suspect draft dodging, such as the purpose of stay in another country, reasons for acquiring the foreign nationality and the situation and time of losing the Korean nationality," the court stated.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Baby born alive, then frozen: YouTuber, doctors indicted for murder in 36-week abortion case
Baby born alive, then frozen: YouTuber, doctors indicted for murder in 36-week abortion case

Korea Herald

time2 minutes ago

  • Korea Herald

Baby born alive, then frozen: YouTuber, doctors indicted for murder in 36-week abortion case

A South Korean YouTuber who posted a video detailing what she said was an abortion at 36 weeks of pregnancy, and the doctors who performed it, have been indicted for murder. The Supreme Prosecutors' Office said Thursday that they have indicted three on murder charges in connection with the death of the baby: A hospital director surnamed Yoon, a surgeon surnamed Shim and the YouTuber surnamed Kwon. Two brokers who introduced patients to the hospital were charged with violating the Medical Service Act. According to the prosecutors, the baby was allegedly born alive through a C-section and later placed in a freezer. "We will do our utmost to ensure that all profits obtained through this crime are fully confiscated, to send a strong message against such inhumane acts driven by financial gain and a disregard for life," the prosecutors said in a statement. The case came to public attention in June last year when Kwon uploaded the video saying she had received an abortion at 36 weeks, considered full-term under medical guidelines. Police found that the still alive when it was removed, and the hospital director and surgeon then allegedly placed the newborn under a surgical drape and put it into a freezer, where it died. Prosecutors said hospital staff attempted to conceal the incident by falsifying Kwon's medical records. They recorded symptoms such as abdominal pain and bleeding to make it look like a stillbirth. A false diagnosis was also issued. The investigation also uncovered a wider illegal abortion scheme. From August 2022 to July 2023, the hospital allegedly performed over 500 illegal abortions arranged through brokers, earning nearly 1.5 billion won ($1.09 million) in total. Abortion remains in a legal gray area in South Korea. In April 2019, the Constitutional Court ruled the country's criminalization of all abortions unconstitutional. However, the National Assembly has yet to enact a new law governing abortions to legalize it.

Police forming team to prevent abuse against families of tragedy victims: report
Police forming team to prevent abuse against families of tragedy victims: report

Korea Herald

timean hour ago

  • Korea Herald

Police forming team to prevent abuse against families of tragedy victims: report

The South Korean police are forming a task force to prevent secondary victimization of people whose family members have died in disasters, in response to President Lee Jae Myung's directive. According to the Yonhap News Agency on Thursday, the National Police Agency has started recruitment of officers for the unit, tentatively named "investigative team against secondary victimization." The team will be headed by two superintendent-level officers — mid-level management position usually in charge of department at police stations. The National Office of Investigation will evaluate the applicants and, if none is deemed fit to carry out the role, will commandeer officers with sufficient experience in investigation and planning. Last Wednesday, Lee invited 200 family members of victims of tragedies with mass casualties, including the Jeju Air crash last year, an underground tunnel flooding in 2023, the deadly crowd crush in Itaewon, Seoul in 2022, and the sinking of ferry Sewol in 2014. He issued an official apology as the president, and pledged to form an investigative team to prevent secondary damage for bereaved families and survivors. The presidential office said last Thursday that Lee has ordered officials to compose a joint team of police and prosecutors to closely probe the Itaewon tragedy, while instructing a permanent team to prevent abuse of the victims' families.

Woman suspected of neglecting disabled brother, leading to death
Woman suspected of neglecting disabled brother, leading to death

Korea Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Woman suspected of neglecting disabled brother, leading to death

A South Korean woman accused of letting her intellectually disabled and injured brother die through years of neglect is facing punishment, as the prosecution sought a seven-year prison term. Prosecutors in Daegu requested the Daegu District Court to convict the 47-year-old defendant on charges including death caused by neglect. It is alleged that she and her husband, who lived with the victim since 2011, willfully let her older brother die in 2015. The victim had suffered serious injuries from at least seven accidents between 2013 and 2014 that all occurred inside their home. Despite the hospital warning his conditions were severe, the couple repeatedly brought him home, rather than pursuing further medical care. It was found that the husband had multiple life insurance policies under the victim's name, with the couple named as the beneficiaries. The prosecution argues that the victim's conditions and the defendants' repeated failure to seek proper care, plus financial motive from the insurance, support their conclusion that they deliberately neglected the victim. The couple was indicted together in 2015, but the trial is ongoing only for the female defendant as the husband fled while out on bail in 2017. The court is expected to deliver its verdict in October, separately for the female defendant, while the trial for the husband remains stalled. The female defendant has denied the charges, claiming that she knew nothing of what happened between her husband and her brother.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store