The Sunday Independent's View: Donald Trump only knows how to make threats, not deals
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu also flew home to the Middle East last week without agreeing to the ceasefire in Gaza that negotiators in the US and Israeli camps had promised was imminent. Casualties among Palestinians queuing for aid continue to mount.
The president's most conspicuous failure to strike a deal, however, has undoubtedly been on the thorny issue of US-EU trade, and those negotiations have now taken a further, and alarming, backwards step with his announcement yesterday afternoon of new 30pc tariffs on all goods from the European Union.
So much for the White House press secretary's assurance just days ago that any changes to the 10pc tariffs introduced in April would be put back to a new deadline of August 1.
It could be that a deal is still on the cards. Even as he declared himself 'hopeful' that an outline agreement could be reached last week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin was under no illusions that more detailed negotiations would continue behind the scenes. The real concern is whether Donald Trump actually wants a deal, or what the EU can do to press him into making concessions.
It remains to be seen how markets will respond when they open again
The president has indicated that any tariffs imposed in retaliation to this move will simply be added to that baseline 30pc, and that even this will not be sufficient to eliminate the deficit in trade that the US runs with Europe, raising the threat of more punishment to come.
It remains to be seen how markets will respond when they open again tomorrow, but the omens cannot be good.
Traders have, to some extent, learnt to factor in Trump's volatility, but this represents a serious ramping up of the stakes.
For Ireland, the world's third largest exporter of pharmaceutical products, the nightmare scenario is that Trump goes ahead with his repeated warning of 200pc tariffs on the pharma industry in an effort to strong-arm US giants into bringing manufacturing home.
Many of those who are resentful of Ireland's economic success actively seem to be willing the worst to happen. One headline in the Tory press last week asked, almost wistfully: 'Will Trump's pharma tariffs destroy the Irish economy?'
ADVERTISEMENT
Even if Trump presses that nuclear button, tariffs would not come into place for another 18 months, allowing time for further haggling.
The Irish economy should remain reassuringly robust overall, with growth expected to exceed 4pc annually through 2027 — well ahead of the eurozone. Panic would be premature.
All the same, it is hard to deny that Ireland seems to worm under Trump's thin skin, and our EU partners may well be inclined to prioritise their own interests if he comes gunning for us.
Ultimately, it could be that a deal is simply impossible because the US president's demands are so mercurial that they cannot reasonably be satisfied. The one thing the world needs is certainty, and his personality ensures this is the one thing that it cannot expect to enjoy any time soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: The 'lived experience expertise' of survivors is invaluable
As a survivor of Willow Park and four other boarding schools, I applaud the establishment of the commission of investigation into the handling of historical child sexual abuse in schools. My gratitude to Mark and David Ryan is in equal measure to my deep respect for what they have achieved. Over the past 30 years, numerous similar inquiries have been carried out. Academic, clinical, and legal expertise has been an important part of the development and progress of these inquiries. What has had less space is 'lived experience expertise' — the expertise of survivors, the ones who lived through what was done to them by others. In June 2025, researchers at Trinity College published a substantive report, Transforming Justice Responses to Non-recent Institutional Abuses, prepared by Anne-Marie McAlinden, Marie Keenan, and James Gallen. Their report assessed past inquiries — in Ireland, the UK, and beyond — with this in mind. Their research has shown clearly that the inclusion of lived experience expertise at all stages of such inquiries, as active agents, improves outcomes for everyone concerned. Survivors were excluded from setting the terms of reference of the commission of investigation, in spite of our requests to be participants in that process. Nothing about us, nothing without us. I urge the Irish Government, and everyone in our elected assemblies, to take on board the wisdom and expertise of the academics, legal experts, and clinicians. Survivors deserve nothing less. Corneilius Crowley, Address with the editor Happy campers As a campervan owner, I have often used the facility at Cobh, I find it great. My partner and I have travelled all over Europe in the last 10 years or so and have a lot of experience of how good the facilities are on the continent. Ireland is still lagging behind Europe in this area, county councils around Ireland are missing a great opportunity to raise revenue and encourage camper tourism. Campsites in Ireland are too expensive, the owners won't let you service your van (empty grey/ black waste, refill fresh water) for a small fee (€5/€10) unless you want to stay overnight. In lots of towns in Europe, they provide this facility free or for a €2/€5 charge. It's great to see that Cork County Council is thinking outside the box. Well done! We're looking forward to visiting new sites when they open. Eddie Tierney, Rathgar, Dublin Tourism no-brainer Campervan parks are badly needed. Youghal is a prime tourist destination, and campervans are the vehicle of choice for many tourists. Similar seaside towns on the continent have them, and they are great assets to these places. Campervanners are a community in their own right, they bring business to the town and are in nobody's way, provided they're given proper facilities. It's an absolute no-brainer, in my opinion. Utta Hogan, Youghal, Cork Government all at sea over cables It seems very deceitful of the Government to invite us to take part in a survey on maritime security to protect undersea cables, the property of private industries, from little or no threat, when, at the same time, it has failed to enact the long-promised and essential Marine Protected Areas Bill. Surely, it would be easier, more urgent, and more appropriate to establish areas of marine protection for the health and biodiversity of our waters, within our own territory, than to spend our money trying to protect cables that run thousands of miles outside of our territory and area of responsibility. This Government seems to have the will and the money for the protection of undersea cables, but not the will or the money to protect the very life of the seas around our island home. Marian Naughton Naas, Co Kildare Aiding corruption Between €500m and €1bn has been spent by Ireland on development aid to Mozambique over the past 30 years — despite it being one of the most corrupt governments in Africa. Yet Irish media expends far more energy scrutinising the Dáil bicycle shed than this long-running misuse of taxpayer funds. Mozambique became a priority for Irish Aid in 1996. Some of the funding may have achieved limited success in niche areas, but it has also propped up a rapacious elite. Frelimo, the ruling party, has clung to power for nearly 50 years, overseeing increasingly fraudulent elections. In the most recent vote, more than 50 protesters were reportedly shot by police. Irish Aid to Mozambique was over €40m annually until 2016, when a $2bn corruption scandal involving the Frelimo government — exposed largely by the US — came to light. Since then, the aid has been halved, but €20m a year still flows in. I spent 14 years working in education in Mozambique and met many of the Irish embassy staff. Most were aware of the rampant corruption, but felt bound by the system: 'The money has been allocated — we have to spend it.' They are career diplomats, not policymakers, and no doubt their private reports paint a clearer picture. While Irish Aid's brochures highlight contributions to health, education, and governance, the reality is less reassuring. Transparency International reports increasing corruption. Mozambique's ranking on the UN Human Development Index is falling. Meanwhile, the ruling elite grows richer and ever more detached from the needs of ordinary citizens. I'm not against development aid — far from it. But we owe it to taxpayers and to the poor themselves to be more discerning. Why is the Irish media silent on this long-running farce? It's time we stop turning a blind eye and recognise our complicity in enabling corrupt regimes. Donal Conlon, Paris, France Our waters matter It's disappointing to read that our Government has failed to legislate to exclude large trawlers from Irish coastal waters. We live on a beautiful island, surrounded by rich, diverse, and abundant seas; at a minimum you would expect our politicians to do all in their power to protect what we have — not just for those of us alive now, but for future generations. I don't really get a sense that our island and its environment matter a whole lot to TDs. We are constantly being told how rich a country we are, we paint the world green every St Patrick's Day, there's no end to the 'hard sell' of our little nation. So why not put our money where our mouth is, and endeavour to make our land, air, sea, and water 'best in class', a place that will nurture all of us now and for generations to come. Anne Quinlan, Clondalkin, Dublin 22 Explaining sea snot With the good weather on us, a lot of concern is being raised by the smothering of our coastal areas with what is called sea lettuce or sea snot. This is great, because it calls for an explanation. Fifty years ago, the vast majority of our river tributaries and streams were fully open to the sunlight and hosted a vibrant growth of green ranunculus crowsfoot weed, on which the whole riparian ecosystem was based, be it fish or bird. This weed would have sequestered any passing molecule or nitrogen or phosphorus, and all the fine silts and muds. These streams, of which nationally we have over 30,000km, are now just shaded out, eutrophied drains. Nicholas Grubb, Dromana, Cappoquin Nitrates indulgence Drought conditions have been declared in 12 counties and 31 catchment areas, yet our Government — so happy to give lip service to environmental protection — is in negotiations with the EU to extend the nitrates derogation for dairy farms. Should that wrong-headed objective be achieved, Ireland would be the only EU country where that indulgence endures. If it is achieved, it would inevitably exacerbate the negative impact modern farming has on water quality — no matter what the agri-food lobby argues. Sometimes the self-destructive insanity plays out in plain view. Jack Power, Inniscarra, Cork Burden on owners John Tierney's idea of dog-walking loops on farms is well-meaning, but risks placing a burden on farmers rather than where it belongs — on irresponsible dog owners. Livestock-worrying, fouling, and trespass aren't caused by farmers, but by a minority of dog owners who refuse to control their animals. Farmers shouldn't have to adapt their land to fix this. Responsible dog ownership, not more obligations for farmers, is the real solution. Until that's addressed, conflict will continue, through no fault of those who work the land. Richard Vickery, Midleton, Cork
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
UK is ‘number 1 target for Russian cyberattacks' as Vlad wreaks revenge for Ukraine backing and avoids offending Trump
THE UK has become the "number 1 target for Russian cyberattacks" as Vladimir Putin seeks revenge on Ukraine-backing enemies. Millions of Brits could be plunged into darkness as the mad zealot concentrates his sabotage on British infrastructure in a bid to avoid offending Trump. 5 Russian cyberattack threats have surged since the start of the year Credit: Getty 5 Mad Vlad is thought to be focusing his sabotage efforts on the UK Credit: EPA 5 UK leaders have been urged to ramp up protections against Russian threats Credit: Getty It's believed Trump's friendlier stance towards the raging despot has pivoted his attention away from American targets, concentrating his efforts on the UK instead. The UK has seen a significant hike in the number of Russian An official told 'If only the British state was as powerful as they claim.' Read more on World UK spy chiefs confirmed that Vlad's objective is to create "mayhem on British" and European streets – targeting key infrastructure and attempting to cause havoc with the economy. Last year, minister Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, warned Britain and its allies "not underestimate" the threat posed by He warned an attack of this kind could turn the lights off for millions of people by shutting down power grids. Most read in The Sun The cyber attack plans would be an attempt to dilute He slammed the Kremlin as "exceptionally" aggressive and "reckless" in this area, adding that a number of attacks had already been foiled both publicly and behind the scenes. According to Richard Horne, the head of GCHQ's national Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) the UK is dangerously unprepared for this surge in cyber attacks. Speaking at the launch of the NCSC annual review last year, which lay bare the alarming rise in cyber threats facing the UK, he urged UK leaders to increase the pace they're working at to "keep ahead" of Putin. Putin warns Trump he 'will have to respond' to Ukraine's daring drone attack in hour-long phone call with president He said that the NCSC received 1,957 reports of cyber attacks in 2024, 430 of which needed support from the centre's incident management team - up from 371 the previous year. Of these incidents, 89 were nationally significant. PREPARING FOR WAR Just a couple of months ago, reports emerged of g overnment officials racing to update decades-old contingency plans to protect the country and prepare for any potential combat. The classified "home defence plan" would lay out how Downing Street will respond if Vladimir Putin declares war on the UK, including moving the Royal Family into bunkers. Ministers worry Britain could be outfought by Russia on the battlefield, but also poorly defended at home as things stand. Experts have warned that the country's national infrastructure is vulnerable ahead of the release of Labour's Strategic Defence Review - an examination of the Armed Forces. As military warfare has evolved in the past two decades, fears are that Putin could launch a combination of attacks, including conventional ballistic missile strikes, sabotage and the latest tactic in the Russian playbook - cyber warfare. But Britain - which is just beginning to review and revise its security and contingency plans for the first time in more than 20 years - is feared to not be fully prepared to go to war against the Russians. Former Nato commander Colonel Hamish De Bretton-Gordon told The Sun: "Britain is very much in the sights of Putin's derision, and we are the ones likely to be attacked first. "Britain really has got to dust off its contingency plans. Over 20 years of neglect, and we understand that's exactly what this report is about at the moment." 5 Britain is just starting to review and revise its security and contingency plans for the first time in more than 20 years Credit: Getty 5 Fears are that Putin could launch a combination of attacks Credit: Reuters Retired military officer Colonel Richard Kemp, who was working in the Cabinet Office when the contingency plans were last updated, told The Sun: "Contingency plans like this should be updated frequently. Twenty years is far too long, especially given the radically changed threat picture. "Putin has said Britain is in his crosshairs since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "Even before then, he proved he was willing to attack this country, including with a nerve agent attack in Salisbury in 2018. We should take him seriously." The classified plan by the Cabinet Office's Resilience Directorate - which was last updated in 2005 - would set out war strategies in the event of a catastrophic attack by the Russians, which could well involve tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. The plan is based on the War Book, a Cold War dossier of instructions for government response to nuclear attacks. Under such plans, Britain could be divided into 12 zones, each governed by Cabinet ministers, and food rationed. The plans will include scenarios like widespread sabotage and crippling cyber warfare, which were seen as a limited threat back when the document was last updated. It will also direct the PM on how to run a wartime government, as well as strategies for travel networks, courts and the postal system, reports the Daily Telegraph. Although the highly-classified document is expected to never be revealed in the public domain, military experts suggest what could be changed to prepare us for a potential war against the Russians. Colonel Bretton-Gordon said that cyber attacks will be given a major chunk of attention in the latest round of updates. He believes the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) would be given additional funding to improve the existing measures against cyber attackers.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Dorcha Lee: Israel lets Trump take charge in Gaza talks
Last Monday night, at a dinner in the White House, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu handed Donald Trump a copy of Israel's formal nomination of the US president for the Nobel Peace Prize. The Israeli nomination was not the first. Pakistan has also nominated Trump, for the contribution of his good offices to averting a war between Pakistan and India. The day after receiving the Pakistani nomination, Trump went ahead and bombed Iran, a Muslim country. Embarrassing moment for Islamabad. But this gesture from Netanyahu is all about Trump's declaration, last week, that he wants agreement this week on a 60 day ceasefire in Gaza. It means that, this time, Netanyahu may not jeopardise the ceasefire agreement by introducing last minute additional pre-conditions to stall the US plan. It is also an Israeli acknowledgement that 'Daddy' Trump is in charge of the process. During the recent Nato Summit, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte's sycophantic reference to Trump as 'Daddy', was a bit weird, but, in a strange way, appropriate. The reality is that the former real estate man in the White House, is not just 'primus inter pares', in Washington DC, he is also first among equals everywhere, as the Americans say, period. Things are moving fast. As before, the US cleared the latest revised text of the ceasefire agreement proposals with the Israelis, which was passed on to Hamas. Hamas basically accepted the proposals with three reservations. First, they want a guarantee that Israel would not delay the negotiations as an excuse to resume the war. Secondly, they want the UN back in the role of humanitarian aid without the flow of aid being controlled by Israel. Thirdly, they want the IDF to withdraw to the positions they held before the ceasefire ended in March. Fresh from receiving the 2024 Tipperary Peace Award, in Ballykisteen, Co Tipperary, Sheik Mohammed Al Thani, prime minister of Qatar, is now back in Doha, in charge of the Israel-Hamas peace process. The Qataris signalled last Tuesday that they will need more time to bridge the gaps between both sides on the US proposals. On Friday, they proposed this Sunday as the deadline to conclude the agreement. The objective is to get the framework for the agreement agreed this week, so that proximity talks on the truce can begin next week. Proximity talks are where the belligerents do not meet face-to-face but where a third party passes messages between them. One technical point that remains unclear is whether US special envoy Steve Witkoff's proposals are considered to be a fresh start in the talks, or the continuation of the ceasefire suspended in March. These 13-point proposals were outlined in the Examiner's previous analysis, on June 19. Before going further on the ceasefire agreement, an update on the military situation will help to understand the context. The IDF has an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 personnel committed to the Gaza operation. The IDF main formations are three to five mixed armour/mechanised infantry divisions, reinforced with specialist units, including combat engineering companies able to fight underground. They are mostly regulars and comprise the main fighting units of the regular army. This commitment would limit any additional extended operation by Israel, in Lebanon or Syria, at least for the time being. The IDF ground offensive, which began with the objective of reoccupying 75% of Gaza, has reached the 65% target. Unlike previous ground operations, they are systematically neutralising selected sections of the tunnels' system. Probably for the first time in the war, the IDF is manoeuvring underground in synchronisation with the above ground offensive. However, the tunnels are turning out to be far more extensive and deeper than previously estimated. To destroy them all is now estimated to take many years. Air support is being directed at Hamas fighters who appear on the surface, but also at suspect concentrations of civilians close to the IDF advance. The IDF action is mainly in Central and South Gaza, up to about the week before last, when they advanced into the North at Jabalia. On Monday, the ultraorthodox Yehuda Battalion lost 5 KIA (killed in action)+ 14 WIA (wounded inaction) by a roadside bomb in Northern Gaza. Last week, a Hamas fighter managed to open the back door of an IDF armoured personnel carrier, throw in an explosive device, and close the door. Seven IDF soldiers were killed. The door was secured only by a rope, which seriously questions the issue of the maintenance of Israeli fighting vehicles. In late January, before he left the Middle East, yesterday's man, former US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, made a seemingly casual observation, which contradicted IDF claims that Hamas was effectively degraded. Blinken said that Hamas had already replaced almost all their casualties. During the subsequent ceasefire (Phase 1), Hamas had ample opportunity to restore their losses. This means that they are probably back up to a strength estimated at 25,000. US president Donald Trump with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in April. Picture: Mark Schiefelbein/AP Hamas fighters are unable to move about as easily in the tunnels systems as heretofore. They must be short of ammunition although they can decant explosive material from the numerous unexploded shells lying about. The simplest roadside bomb consists of an unexploded shell and a detonator. The Israeli objective in breaking the ceasefire in March was to degrade Hamas's military capabilities and disrupt their ability to govern the enclave. The combination of the disruption of communications ,and the reoccupying of urban areas of Gaza by the IDF, will effectively remove Hamas's ability to govern Gaza, but they can still fight on in small but uncoordinated units. However, while Israeli officials are negotiating in Doha, the hawks back in Jerusalem are talking about Israel governing Gaza for the immediate future. This means that the IDF's presence in Gaza will be prolonged indefinitely. By yesterday morning, the two main issues unresolved are: who will organise the humanitarian aid distribution, and, to what extent will the IDF withdraw from Gaza? The gap between both sides on these issues is wide and may stall the talks for some more days. US Envoy Witkoff's return to Doha has been delayed. When the gap has narrowed, the plan is for Witkoff to return and bring the agreement across the line. American diplomacy takes a leaf from those Western movies, where, just when the cowboys are about to be massacred by the Indians, the US Cavalry (Witkoff, Trump's representative on Earth) comes to the rescue. But who will supervise the ceasefire and the 60-day truce? Governance of Gaza by Israel will lead to martial law implemented by the IDF. With over 57,800 dead, of which 85% to 90% are innocent civilians, are we now to witness another Srebrenica as the 25,000 Hamas fighters emerge from the catacombs into the daylight? Up to now the Israelis have never agreed to a peacekeeping mission for Gaza, but Trump could persuade them, especially if US troops participate. Watch this space. Dorcha Lee is a retired army colonel and defence analyst, with extensive experience of UN peacekeeping in the Middle East.
