logo
Maserati to open new car showroom in Glasgow this month

Maserati to open new car showroom in Glasgow this month

Glasgow Times05-06-2025
Maserati is opening a dealership in the city's Southside as part of its new partnership with Arnold Clark.
The Italian luxury brand, renowned for its racing heritage, will be based at a showroom in Mossland Drive in Hillington Park.
Maserati's Glasgow location will offer both sales and after-sales.
READ NEXT: Clyde Metro possible routes and cost known by 2027
Callum Rankin, group brand director at Arnold Clark, said: 'We're proud to have Maserati joining the Arnold Clark franchise.
'This iconic brand represents the pinnacle of Italian luxury and performance, and its arrival allows us to offer our customers an even more exciting and first-class driving experience.
'Maserati's legacy of innovation and growth aligns perfectly with our aims, and we look forward to working with them closely for years to come.'
The Maserati range will be on display at the new showroom and forecourt.
This includes the mid-size SUV Grecale, available in both petrol and electric form.
Glaswegians will also be able to test drive the brand's new GranCabrio as well as the marque's flagship road car range, the MC20 (which has a top speed of 200mph), and the company's iconic model, the four-seater GranTurismo coupe.
READ NEXT: 'Exceptional' Glasgow flat with 'stunning' views up for sale
Mariangela Del Vecchio, Head of Maserati North Europe, commented: 'I'm delighted to welcome Arnold Clark to the Maserati family.
'They have a hard-earned reputation for high-quality customer service, and we look forward to serving Glasgow and Manchester and their surrounding areas with our beautifully crafted and designed cars, Made in Italy, in the coming months and years.'
The brand is popular with celebrities including David Beckham, Sir Elton John, Lionel Messi, and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

E.U. tariffs set to raise pasta and wine prices, threatening jobs on both sides of the Atlantic
E.U. tariffs set to raise pasta and wine prices, threatening jobs on both sides of the Atlantic

NBC News

time3 hours ago

  • NBC News

E.U. tariffs set to raise pasta and wine prices, threatening jobs on both sides of the Atlantic

Europe is sounding the alarm: Tariffs could soon be hitting wallets of people in the United States. The 30% tariffs on European Union imports, announced by President Donald Trump on Saturday, could be a 'death blow' to the European food industry and lead to price hikes for American consumers, the Italian winemakers association UIV said. 'The 30% tariff on wine … would be virtually an embargo on 80% of Italian wine,' the group added, according to a translated statement. Coldiretti, an association that represents European agricultural companies, said American consumers would likely face shortages or see price hikes for imported wine, cheese and pastas. And German industry association BDI called the escalation 'incomprehensible,' warning that it threatened jobs and investment worldwide. Germany is the top E.U. exporter to the U.S. Cars and other vehicles produced in the E.U. could also face increased prices. "The costs for our companies have already reached the billions—and with each passing day, the total continues to grow," the German auto trade group VDA told NBC News in a statement Monday. Those statements come after Trump sent a letter to the E.U. (and a separate one to Mexico) on Saturday threatening a blanket 30% tariff on goods shipped to the U.S. starting Aug. 1, an indication that ongoing trade negotiations have failed. After initially backing down from his 'Liberation Day' tariffs and promising trade deals with dozens of countries, Trump has steadily returned to his trade war posture, sending letters to countries around the world with ultimatums and tariff rates from 20% to 40%. President Emmanuel Macron of France, a key source of U.S. food and wine exports, said Saturday he strongly disapproved of the 30% tariff and urged the E.U. to speed up 'the preparation of credible countermeasures.' He said trading partners such as the U.S. and Europe 'owe each other' respect. In 2024, the U.S. was the top destination for E.U. exports. The top exported products from the E.U. to the U.S. last year were medical and pharmaceutical products, medicines, motor vehicles and machinery, according to Eurostat. Trump has threatened sector-specific tariffs on pharmaceutical products, although it's not clear when those might be unveiled. Ireland's deputy prime minister and foreign minister Simon Harris, one of the first E.U. leaders to react to Trump's Saturday letter, said 'there is no necessity to escalate the situation.' Harris said he planned to meet with the U.S. ambassador to Ireland on Monday to discuss the situation. Ireland is the top source of U.S. pharma imports from the E.U., and serves as the European headquarters of Apple, Google, Microsoft and Meta. Speaking in Brussels on Monday after a meeting of E.U. trade ministers, the European Commission's top trade negotiator, Maros Šefčovič, said the 30% tariff 'is absolutely unacceptable. That is the level which is absolutely prohibitive to any trade.' Last year, the total value of E.U.-U.S. trade amounted to nearly $2 trillion. Some are still expressing hope for a deal. 'The clear impression was that we were very, very close in agreement in principle,' Denmark's foreign minister said Monday after the trade ministers meeting. 'Unfortunately, it wasn't possible due to this presidential letter, but it is still our major vision that we should reach an agreement, but we also want to send signal that it must be a fair deal for everybody.' For its part, the E.U. has delayed any countermeasures — or retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. — but it currently has more than $100 billion of retaliatory tariffs on standby. Some of that retaliation targets goods and produce from politically sensitive U.S. states, such as soybeans from House Speaker Mike Johnson's home state of Louisiana or bourbon from Kentucky. Other retaliatory tariffs could target Boeing planes and U.S.-built vehicles. The American Chamber of Commerce in the E.U. said it was 'concerned' about the tariffs that it said would 'generate damaging ripple effects across all sectors of the EU and US economies.' The group added that 'tariffs disrupt supply chains and add costs and complexity for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' Despite the major escalation, Šefčovič said that he planned to speak with his American counterparts, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, on Monday to keep negotiations going.

Milan court orders judicial administration for Loro Piana
Milan court orders judicial administration for Loro Piana

Fashion United

time6 hours ago

  • Fashion United

Milan court orders judicial administration for Loro Piana

Another case of labour exploitation involving a luxury brand has emerged. This time it concerns LVMH-owned brand, Loro Piana. A Milan Court has ordered judicial administration for one year for Loro Piana. Frédéric Arnault has been the CEO of the company since June 10. According to Italian news agency Ansa, the measure taken by the judges of the prevention measures section concerns an investigation by prosecutor Paolo Storari. He ascertained that Loro Piana had outsourced the production of garments, including jackets, which were allegedly manufactured under "labour exploitation". FashionUnited contacted Loro Piana for comment, but no statement has been released at this time. The company recently obtained a legal victory in the fight against counterfeiting. Returning to the labour exploitation case, Loro Piana is another high fashion brand on which Storari has shone a light. He obtained the judicial administration regime from the judges. According to investigations by the Milan Labour Protection Group, the company allegedly failed to prevent and contain labour exploitation within the production cycle, as well as implement appropriate measures to verify the actual working conditions. It is believed to have further failed to monitor the technical capabilities of the contracting companies. In this way, Ansa reports, it culpably facilitated labour exploitation. According to the investigation, the fashion house entrusted the production of garments to an external company, Evergreen. The latter, not having been able to produce the requested garments, allegedly subcontracted the work to Sor-Man snc of Nova Milanese. This company also lacked adequate production capacity. According to the Prosecutor's Office's reconstruction, the company turned, also to reduce costs, to Chinese factories. These were closed by the military and one of the owners was arrested in May. The ruling states they used "irregular and clandestine labour, in unhealthy and dangerous working environments". Workers were housed "in abusive dormitories in order to draw mere manpower at any time of day or night and subjecting them to work shifts (...) far exceeding those contractually foreseen". This system allegedly allowed for profit maximisation. It induced the Chinese factory that actually produced the goods to cut labour costs (contributions, insurance and direct taxes). It did this by resorting to "undeclared" and clandestine labour. It also failed to comply with health and safety regulations in the workplace and did not respect the National Collective Labour Agreements for the sector regarding workers' wages, working hours, breaks and holidays. According to Ansa, the court found this "mechanism was culpably fuelled by Loro Piana spa. It did not verify the real entrepreneurial capacity of the contracting and subcontracting companies (Sor-Man), to whom it entrusted production. Over the years, it did not carry out effective inspections or audits to ascertain in practice the operation of the production chain and the actual working conditions and work environments." This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

Judge dismisses 25 million dollar NFT lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana's US arm
Judge dismisses 25 million dollar NFT lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana's US arm

Fashion United

time6 hours ago

  • Fashion United

Judge dismisses 25 million dollar NFT lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana's US arm

A New York federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana USA Inc. that had accused the retailer of abandoning a non-fungible token (NFT) project and failing to deliver on promised benefits. The case was originally filed in May 2024 by Luke Brown and later amended in September. The plaintiff had claimed that both Dolce & Gabbana USA and its Italian parent company Dolce & Gabbana SRL operated as 'effectively the same company'. The brand's Dubai-based partner UNXD and Italian firm Bluebear Italia, the creator of the NFT collection, were also named as defendants. In the latest court documents, the 25 million dollar lawsuit was found to be insufficient on the grounds that Dolce & Gabbana USA was the only US-based defendant cited, and was therefore not liable for the allegations against its parent firm. In the suit, Brown claimed that Dolce & Gabbana did not follow through on certain perks that were promised upon the purchase of an NFT from its 'DGFamily' collection. Among the benefits initially offered were that of physical clothing, access to events and digital outfits, all of which were supposed to be delivered each quarter. According to Brown, however, the brand had 'failed to provide the complete set of benefits' promised. Brown also accused Dolce & Gabbana of delaying the delivery of the NFTs by a week, causing their value to decrease by 5,800 dollars. The suit says the delays occurred when the brand failed to secure approval for certain assets from UNXD. Dolce & Gabbana USA filed to dismiss the suit in January 2025, stating that as it was a separate subsidiary to its Italian parent, which had allegedly established the NFT project, it could not be held accountable. Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald had determined that the suit lacked specific facts to prove the US entity was directly involved in the project, meaning that it was 'plainly insufficient to withstand D&G USA's motion to dismiss'. Buchwald added: 'The court finds that plaintiff has not adequately alleged that D&G SRL completely dominated D&G USA even if D&G SRL allegedly shared some employees and office space with D&G USA.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store