How To Prevent Walking Into Trap Set By Pak? Ex Navy Chief Arun Prakash Says...
Admiral Arun Prakash (retired) has cautioned people against going on a path that Pakistan's ISI wants Indians to take amid the rising tension between the two neighbours, days after Pakistan-linked terrorists killed 26 tourists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam.
An aviator by specialisation, Admiral Prakash was awarded the Vir Chakra while flying with an Indian Air Force (IAF) IAF fighter squadron in the Punjab during the 1971 war.
"... One of the results desired by the ISI and by the Pakistani actors is to cause a huge split in India on religious lines. Hence this business of Hindu-Muslim is going on. They have targeted Hindus, etc. And that has triggered off responses all over the country against Kashmiri students," Admiral Prakash told NDTV, referring to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence.
"Now, that is exactly what our Pakistani adversaries want us to do. So, through your medium, may I request the media to hold facts. Yes, and I am a Kashmiri myself. I want to tell you I was born 40 miles away from where you are standing now in Anantnag. So it hurts when I hear Kashmiri students are being beaten up for something that Pakistani terrorists did in India. The media has a big role to play in this by cutting out this nonsense," said the former Chief of the Naval Staff.
He said the Pahalgam terror attack was "just a part of a continuum that has been going on for the last 35-odd years."
"From 1989, the Pakistanis have felt free to cross our border and attack military, civilian targets and so on. Now, the problem here is that if we go back in time, I think our first misstep was to coin the term cross-border terrorism. This possibly was a convenient and soft term, but it gave an escape clause to Pakistan because anything that came across the border, across the International Border or the Line of Control should have been treated as aggression or war," Admiral Prakash said.
In hindsight, he said, India should have started off by saying anything that comes across the LoC or the International Border would be treated as an act of war and we would respond accordingly.
"And thereafter, there should have been a doctrine. We launched surgical strikes and we hoped at that time that they would have beneficial results, act as deterrents, but they should have been accompanied by a clear articulation of our national policy that we will not tolerate any such acts in future and there will be an instant and effective response," Admiral Prakash said.
"We failed to do that. We haven't articulated a doctrine. So I don't know how effective the 2016 and 2019 strikes were and whether they conveyed a message of deterrence to Pakistan or not. Obviously, they haven't. We have failed to deter Pakistan and they've continued with this policy of so-called cross-border terrorism. The policy of bleeding us by a thousand cuts and so on," he said.
He suggested going for deterrence using various means, as the "kinetic option" is always available.
"... We have got armed forces. That's what they are meant for, to fight wars. But that's a political decision that has to be carefully considered and taken. If we go kinetic right away as a knee-jerk reaction or in the sense of taking revenge, then it will be stepping on an escalatory ladder for which we must be prepared," Admiral Prakash told NDTV.
Sanctions against Pakistan, a country that is already reeling from harsh economic realities, will cripple the country, he said, adding the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), for example, can take strong action against Pakistan and choke all aid.
During his 40-year career, Admiral Prakash commanded a carrier-borne fighter-squadron, a naval air station and four warships, including the aircraft carrier INS Viraat.
India has taken seven steps against Pakistan following the terror attack in Pahalgam. The biggest yet was India keeping the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 in abeyance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Canada hikes proof of funds for foreign students
Toronto: Prospective international students seeking higher education in Canada will have to furnish proof of funds beginning September this year that is over 10 per cent higher than the amount specified at this time. A new Canadian citizen takes a flag during a citizenship ceremony at Canada Place on Canada Day in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on Tuesday. (Bloomberg) In an update to its proof of financial support norms for those applying for a study permits on or after September 1 this year, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) noted that the minimum amount required, not including tuition, will be CA$ 22,895 for the applicant alone. If the applicant is accompanied by family members, the amount increases. The current amount required for the applicant is CA$ 20,635, making the forthcoming hike nearly 11 per cent higher. Proof of being able to pay living expenses and other costs in Canada can be in the form of a bank account in the country with the balance available, a guaranteed investment certificate (equivalent of an Indian fixed deposit) for the amount, proof of a student or education loan from a bank, among other methods. Canada started taking measures with regard to international students since late 2023. On December 7 that year, IRCC announced for new study permit applications received on or after January 1, 2024, a single applicant will 'need to show they have CA$ 20,635 as against CA$ 10,000 earlier. The measure comes as the number of study permits issued to international students from India continues to plummet, down nearly a third in the first quarter of this year as against the corresponding period in 2024. IRCC data showed that the number of permits issued to students from India in the first quarter of 2025 was 30640, versus 44295 last year, a drop of nearly 31 per cent. Overall figures have also declined, falling from 121070 in 2024 to 96015 in the first quarter of 2025. This follows the trend of decreasing intake of international students after the Canadian Government started applying brakes on the influx in the last quarter of 2023. In 2023, Canada issued a total of 681155 study permits, with Indians comprising 278045 of them. Last year, that total slid to 516275 with the Indian component decreasing to 188465. Policy changes were instituted because record immigration was blamed, partly, for housing unaffordability, and pressure on health and transport infrastructure. After he led his party back to form the Government following the April 28 Federal election, Prime Minister Mark Carney made it clear that position will not change in the near future as he said temporary residents, including students and foreign workers, will not account for more than five per cent of the country's population by 2027. On September 18, 2024, IRCC stated the cap for issuing study permits for 2025 will be at 437,000, down from the target of 485,000 for this year. The 'stabilizing' 2025 figure will also apply for 2026.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who has the hand on Pakistan's nuclear button?
Amid reports of India hitting Pakistan 's nuclear-related military infrastructure during Operation Sindoor and US President Donald Trump repeatedly making claims about his intervention averting a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan, John Kiriakou , a controversial former CIA officer and whistleblower, has claimed in a viral video that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is under the control of an American general. "The command and control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been placed under an American general by the Pakistani government,' Kiriakou said. Kiriakou is known for publicly confirming the US government's use of waterboarding and other forms of torture during the post-9/11 "War on Terror". He was stationed in Pakistan in the early 2000s as part of the CIA's counterterrorism operations and managed CIA–ISI joint operations. During his time there, he played a key role in the capture of Abu Zubaydah, a senior member of al-Qaeda, in 2002. Zubaydah was one of the first high-value detainees captured after the 9/11 attacks. In 2012, he was charged under the Espionage Act for leaking the identity of a covert CIA officer to a journalist and was imprisoned. Kiriakou has since become an outspoken advocate for whistleblower protections and a critic of US intelligence practices. Last month, a Pakistani security expert, Imtiaz Gul, ignited a controversy by claiming that Pakistan's strategically important Nur Khan airbase is under American control and even senior Pakistan Army officers are not allowed there. The airbase is also close to the Strategic Plans Division, which is said to be in charge of Pakistan's nuclear weapons. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Fungo nas unhas: um truque simples reduz facilmente Acabe com os Fungo Undo India called Pakistan's nuclear bluff during Operation Sindoor, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar repeatedly saying that India will not submit to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail. The control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been a subject of a lot of debate ever since 1998 when it joined the ranks of nuclear powers after conducting atomic tests. Besides Kiriakou's claim, various theories have been doing the rounds. There is speculation that the US has an emergency plan ready for Pakistan's nuclear weapons while many think close military cooperation between the two countries suggests a degree of American control over Pakistan's nukes. Live Events You Might Also Like: Does America have a plan to capture Pakistan's nuclear weapons? America's plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons America's concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal go decades back. It was reported by NBC News in 2011 that the US has a contingency plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons, if and when the US President believes they are a threat to either America or its interests. Plans had been drawn up for dealing with worst-case scenarios in Pakistan, NBC news reported quoting several US officials, who said that ensuring security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons had long been a high US security priority even before 9/11 terrorist attacks. Among the scenarios drawn by the report were Pakistan plunging into internal chaos, terrorists mounting a serious attack against a nuclear facility, hostilities breaking out with India, or Islamic extremist taking charge of the government or the Pakistan army. NBC said in its 2011 report that the greatest success of the US war on terrorism, the military operation that killed Osama bin Laden in his safe house in Pakistan, had fuelled concerns about Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. The report said there were increasing suspicions among US officials that Osama had support within the ISI and the Abbottabad operation had emboldened those in Washington who believed an orchestrated campaign of lightning raids to secure Pakistan's nuclear weapons could succeed. In the aftermath of the bin Laden raid, US military officials testified before Congress about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and the threat posed by "loose nukes" - nuclear weapons or materials outside the government's control. Earlier Pentagon reports also outlined scenarios in which US forces would intervene to secure nuclear weapons that were in danger of falling into the wrong hands. In an interview with NBC News in 2011, former Pakistan military ruler Pervez Musharraf had warned that a snatch-and-grab operation would lead to all-out war between the countries, calling it "total confrontation by the whole nation against whoever comes in". Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan's best known nuclear physicist and a human rights advocate, too, said a US attempt to take control of Pakistan's nukes would be foolhardy. "They are said to be hidden in tunnels under mountains, in cities, as well as regular air force and army bases," he said. "A US snatch operation could trigger war; it should never be attempted." Despite such comments, interviews with US officials, military reports and even congressional testimony indicated that Pakistan's weaponry had been the subject of continuing discussions, scenarios, war games and possibly even military exercises by US intelligence and special forces regarding so-called "snatch-and-grab" operations, the 2011 NBC News report said. "It's safe to assume that planning for the worst-case scenario regarding Pakistan nukes has already taken place inside the US government," Roger Cressey, former deputy director of counter-terrorism in the Clinton and Bush White House, had told NBC News. "This issue remains one of the highest priorities of the US intelligence community ... and the White House." Pakistan's "emerging threat" to the US American concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal narrated in the NBC News report in 2011 must have only grown over time as Pakistan stockpiled more nukes and also achieved greater military power. A decade later, in 2021, a Brookings article mentioned the American plan to capture Pakistan's nukes: "Indeed, since the shock of 9/11, Pakistan has come to represent such an exasperating problem that the U.S. has reportedly developed a secret plan to arbitrarily seize control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal if a terrorist group in Pakistan seemed on the edge of capturing some or all of its nuclear warheads," wrote Marvin Kalb. "When repeatedly questioned about the plan, U.S. officials have strung together an artful, if unpersuasive, collection of 'no comments.' Last year, the US was alarmed by a new development in Pakistan. A senior White House official said in December that nuclear-armed Pakistan was developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that eventually could allow it to strike targets well beyond South Asia, making it an "emerging threat" to the US, Reuters reported. Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer's surprise revelation underscored how far the once-close ties between Washington and Islamabad had deteriorated since the 2021 US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Speaking to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Finer said the number of nuclear-armed states with missiles that could reach the US homeland "is very small and they tend to be adversarial," naming Russia, North Korea and China. "So, candidly, it's hard for us to see Pakistan's actions as anything other than an emerging threat to the United States," he said. An official told Reuters that the threat posed to the US is up to a decade away. Finer's speech came a day after Washington announced a new round of sanctions related to Pakistan's ballistic missile development program, including for the first time against the state-run defense agency that oversees the program.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘I am sure there will be no hurdle': Bilawal Bhutto claims Pakistan open to handing over Hafiz, Azhar to India; says New Delhi must cooperate
File photo: Pakistan's former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto (Picture credit: ANI) Pakistan's former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has said that Islamabad would be open to extraditing individuals of concern, including terror accused, as a goodwill gesture to India, provided New Delhi is willing to cooperate in the process. Speaking to Al Jazeera, Bilawal, who also heads the Pakistan People's Party, said that such a move could be part of a 'comprehensive dialogue' between the two countries, where terrorism is discussed as a key issue. "As part of a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where terrorism is one of the issues that we discuss, I am sure Pakistan would not be opposed to any of these things," he said, when asked whether figures like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) chief Hafiz Saeed and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) founder Masood Azhar could be handed over as a sign of good faith. Bilawal clarified that cases currently prosecuted against these individuals were related to domestic offences, such as terror financing. He, however, blamed India's "noncompliance" for the lack of progress on cross-border terrorism charges. "India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements that require that conviction to take place," Bilawal said, pointing to the need for Indian witnesses to testify in Pakistani courts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More "If India is willing to be cooperative in that process, I am sure there will be no hurdle in extraditing any individual of concern", he added. According to Pakistan's National Counter Terrorism Authority (Nacta), both LeT and JeM are proscribed outfits. Hafiz Saeed, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks mastermind, is currently serving a 33-year sentence in Pakistan for terror financing. Masood Azhar, a UN-designated global terrorist, has also been banned by Nacta. Addressing concerns about Azhar's whereabouts, Bilawal claimed, "It is our belief that he is in Afghanistan," adding that Pakistan had so far failed to locate or arrest him. 'If and when the Indian government shares information that he is on Pakistani soil, we will be more than happy to arrest him,' he further said. Dismissing allegations that Hafiz Saeed was free, he said, 'It is factually not correct that Hafiz Saeed is a free man; he is in the custody of the Pakistani state.' Responding to India's assertive posture on terror, Bilawal called it a 'new abnormal,' warning it could harm both nations. 'This does not serve the interests of Pakistan, and it does not serve the interests of India,' he said. A 2025 Global Terrorism Index ranked Pakistan as the second-most terrorism-affected country, with a 45% rise in terror-related deaths, especially near the Afghanistan border. Bhutto has previously insisted that Pakistan met the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) standards, citing convictions and seizures of over 90 extremist-linked institutions.
