Lovestruck Mark Latham proposed marriage to ex-lover
Despite Mr Latham describing the relationship as 'a situationship', friends of the former couple have revealed the relationship was serious.
In fact, they insist that the former Labor leader proposed to the businesswoman and Liberal Party supporter on May 23, 2024 at the acclaimed Italian restaurant Otto in Sydney.
But Ms Matthews has now alleged that Mr Latham asked her to call him 'master' and engaged in degrading sexual acts, allegations detailed in a shocking apprehended violence application.
She has alleged that he defecated on her before sex, took intimate images and threw a plate at her – allegations Mr Latham strongly denies.
News.com.au does not suggest the claims are true, only that they have been made in an application to the NSW Local Court in pursuit of an AVO.
Mr Latham separated from his second wife Janine Lacy, a local magistrate, and the mother of his children, in September, 2022 after over twenty years of marriage.
He divorced his first wife Gabrielle Gwyther in 1999.
Mark Latham denies 'degrading' sex acts'
Mr Latham, 64, who is a New South Wales Legislative Council member, has issued an emphatic denial about the claims, telling The Australian newspaper – that first broke the story – that the allegations were untrue.
'The claims you've listed there are absolute rubbish,' Mr Latham said.
'Comical in fact.
'Nothing has been served on me nor has anyone contacted me.
'I haven't had anything to do with her (Ms Matthews) since 27 May, so nearly seven weeks ago. I ended the 'situationship' that night for very good reason.'
In late 2023, it was a different story with Mr Latham gushing over his new girlfriend on social media.
'So much looking forward to The Everest this Saturday at Royal Randwick,' Mr Latham's post read.
'A beautiful trophy designed by the great Nic Cerrone, made even more spectacular by being photographed with @nathaliemaymatthews.'
In another post, the loved-up couple cuddled at the Rosehill Gardens Racecourse, in Sydney's west.
'Great day of racing at Rosehill with the Town Crier and the very beautiful Nathalie Matthews,' the caption on the post read, followed by an emoji with heart eyes.
NSW police contact
NSW police sources say officers who initially interviewed Ms Matthews did not believe there was sufficient evidence to proceed with charges or an apprehended violence order on the information they were given.
They remain open to taking a further, more comprehensive statement.
They again spoke to her as recently as Monday and will continue to seek a comprehensive statement.
'Degrading' sexual acts alleged
Ms Matthews, 37, is seeking an order preventing Mr Latham from going within 100m of her, alleging an 'ongoing, reasonable fear of harassment, intimidation, and potential harm'.
'Throughout our relationship, the defendant engaged in a sustained pattern of emotional, physical, sexual, psychological, and financial abuse, including defecating on me before sex and refusing to let me wash,'' the application states.
'Forcing degrading sexual acts, pressuring me to engage in sexual acts with others, demanding I call him 'master,' telling me I was his property, and repeatedly telling me that my only value to him was for sex to demean and control me.'
News.com.au does not suggest the claims are true, only that they have been made in an application to the NSW Local Court in pursuit of an AVO.
In the application, she stated that on May 27, 2025, Mr Latham arrived at her home at some time in the evening after sending her 'abusive and coercive text messages, pressuring and insulting me for not being home with him'.
After she returned home later that evening, she alleged he was verbally aggressive and intimidating before leaving.
'Monster' texts revealed
Shortly after, she alleged he sent further threatening and coercive messages, falsely accusing her of aggression, calling her a 'monster,' and stating he had gone to his GP to create a record claiming distress and that he had approached Parliamentary Security – given he is currently a member of the New South Wales Legislative Council.
In June, she stated she was in the Middle East for several weeks. Ms Matthews owns an e-commerce global logistics firm based in Dubai, Perth and Sydney.
But upon her return, the application stated she had been in 'a constant state of fear and hypervigilance due to the defendant's pattern of harassment and intimidation following previous separations'.
She also alleged instances of physical violence in the application including 'pushing me against walls, forcing me out the door, throwing a plate at me during an argument, and driving at me with his vehicle, hitting me with the side mirror and causing a bruise'.
The application also cites allegations of psychological abuse, including 'constant put-downs comparing me unfavourably to other women, acting as if he would harm himself to manipulate me, monitoring my devices without consent, and systematically undermining my confidence to control and isolate me'.
There are also claims of financial abuse, including borrowing $20,000 on four occasions without prompt repayment, forcing her to pay for international holidays under duress, coercing her into expensive purchases, and pressuring her regarding her father's will.
'Intimate videos'
'The defendant has held intimate photos and videos of me, and I have been afraid he would expose them to shame and control me if I attempted to leave or resist his demands,'' the application stated.
'The defendant has repeatedly manipulated and intimidated me into resuming the relationship following separations, creating a cycle of fear and control. Previous breakups in May 2024, June 2024, September 2024, January 2025, and June 2025 were followed by similar intimidation and re-engagement.
'(Mr Latham engaged in) physical violence, including pushing me against walls, forcing me out the door, throwing a plate at me during an argument, and driving at me with his vehicle, hitting me with the side mirror and causing a bruise,' the court document claims.
The matter will be mentioned at Downing Centre Local Court on July 30.
'Vile' homophobic tweets
Last year the Federal Court found Mr Latham defamed independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich after claiming in a homophobic social media post that Mr Greenwich was not a fit and proper person to be a member of the NSW parliament because he engaged in 'disgusting' sexual activities.
He was ordered to pay $140,000 to Mr Greenwich.
During the trial, Mr Greenwich's barrister Matt Collins KC said Mr Latham's statements were 'pregnant with innuendo'.
'It is plainly not a tweet about homosexual sex. It's a tweet about a particular and unhygienic sex act,' Dr Collins said.
'People understood Mr Latham to be saying exactly what he said in the tweet: that Mr Greenwich engages in a particularly disgusting and hygienic sexual act.'
Last month Mr Latham used parliamentary privilege to reveal confidential information from a psychologist's report prepared for the tribunal as to the case brought by Mr Greenwich.
In response, Mr Greenwich told parliament that Mr Latham 'thinks and talks far too much about my sex life'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Brady Hubbard may have been thrown from the back of ute and fatally injured, inquest hears
A "fishtail" burnout may have caused a young man to be thrown from the back of a ute and fatally injured outside a north-west Tasmanian football club, a court has heard. Brady James Hubbard was 21 when he died on June 28, 2023, about four days after he was injured. He played football for the West Ulverstone Lions football club on June 24, but an inquest into his death in the Devonport Magistrates Court has heard several stories about how he was injured. Several witnesses have told the court three club members — Andrew Hilfenhaus, his son Cameron Hilfenhaus, and club trainer Anthony Sharman — lied to others at the club and "covered up" how Mr Hubbard was injured. Those three men have now given evidence in the inquest into Mr Hubbard's death which is being held at the Devonport Magistrates Court before Coroner Leigh Mackey. The court has heard from multiple witnesses that Mr Hubbard and many other club members were drinking and socialising during the afternoon and evening of June 24, after a football game against Wesley Vale. The court heard Mr Hubbard had joined the two Hilfenhaus men when they left the football club in the evening to collect a pool cue from Andrew's nearby home. Multiple witnesses have said Mr Hubbard was "not himself" when he returned to the club, and that he was not sociable, and sat down at a table while cradling his head. None of the witnesses knew what caused the change in his demeanour, though some said they were told he had slipped and hit his head, while others heard he hit his head while wrestling with a clubmate. The court heard suggestions he may have been injured during the day's football game, or that he might have got into a fight at Burnie's Greens Hotel. But on Thursday, Cameron Hilfenhaus told the court Mr Hubbard fell off the back of Andrew Hilfenhaus's ute while they were driving back toward the clubhouse. The Hilfenhaus men told the court Mr Hubbard and Cameron were standing on the back step of the ute, on either side of the tow ball, and that Andrew was driving. However, they gave differing stories about when and how Mr Hubbard came off the back of the ute. Andrew told the court his son and Mr Hubbard stepped off the back of the ute, and that he then did a burnout to "spray them with mud" from the oval. Cameron said he was still on the ute when his father did the burnout, but that Mr Hubbard no longer was. He said Mr Hubbard may have fallen off the ute, but if he did, it was before the burnout. Counsel assisting the coroner, Anna Hogan, suggested to both men Mr Hubbard was injured after being thrown from the ute during the "fishtail", which they both denied. Cameron agreed with Ms Hogan that as he was on the back of the ute with Mr Hubbard, he was best placed to know what happened, but denied her version of events. Both men agreed that whatever happened, Mr Hubbard was then on the ground and in need of medical assistance, so Cameron alerted trainer Anthony Sharman, who had first aid training. Mr Sharman told the court he believed Mr Hubbard needed an ambulance, but that the young player denied needing to be hospitalised, so triple-0 was not called. He said he blamed himself for Mr Brady's death. He also told the court Andrew had changed his version of the story in the two years since Mr Hubbard's death. Cameron agreed he had told different stories about what happened to other people at the club, but could not explain why. Andrew said he was also concerned about being charged by police in relation to the incident, but that he would admit it, if he was to blame. He denied attempting to shift blame by lying about how Mr Hubbard may have been injured, or starting rumours about his mental health. "If I'd done the wrong thing … I'd be happy to go to jail," he said. The inquest is expected to end today, with findings to be delivered at a later date.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Islamist preacher unable to 'bury' anti-Semitism ruling
An Islamist preacher who used harmful racial stereotypes about Jewish people in sermons will be forced to tell the world of his anti-Semitism through prominent online posts. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was ordered by the Federal Court earlier in July not to repeat the perverse and racist tropes used in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023. In the speeches, Mr Haddad - who is also known as William Haddad or Abu Ousayd - variously referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "mischievous". Justice Angus Stewart found the sermons contained "perverse generalisations" against Jewish people and included racist, anti-Semitic tropes. The judge on Thursday ordered the preacher "pin" or "feature" corrective notices describing the court's findings to the centre's website and social media pages on Facebook, Rumble, Instagram and Soundcloud. He has been given 21 days to comply with the order and the posts had not been made as of Thursday afternoon. Mr Haddad objected to prominently displaying the notices, saying this would go beyond what was ordinarily ordered by the courts. Pinning the posts would be tantamount to promoting or advertising the findings, he said. Justice Stewart ordered the notices to be pinned for 30 days, saying the requirement was not unduly burdensome and would stop them disappearing from view. "It will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts," the judge wrote. Promoting the notices was part of their objective, he said. "The respondents promoted the unlawful lectures and it is not disproportionate to require them to promote the corrective notice in the relatively constrained manner described above as an appropriate form of redress," he wrote in his judgment. The notice itself highlights the "unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred" of Mr Haddad and the centre. The three lectures - titled "The Jews of Al Medina" and published on video hosting site Rumble - were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish members of the Australian community, the notice says. The lawsuit was brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who claimed the lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jewish people. The pair said they were vindicated by Justice Stewart's findings, saying no community in Australia should be dehumanised. "Freedom of expression should not be abused by the promotion of hateful anti-Semitism and those who wish to do so should know that conduct shouldn't be tolerated by us," Mr Goot told reporters after the judgment. The cleric has been ordered to remove the lectures and not to repeat similar racist statements about Jewish people in public. He will also have to pay the legal bill for Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot, which is estimated to be in the six figures. Mr Haddad's speeches were delivered after Hamas, designated by Australia as a terrorist group, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023. The attack sparked Israeli retaliation that has left Gaza in turmoil and tens of thousands of civilians dead.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Islamist preacher unable to 'bury' anti-Semitism ruling
An Islamist preacher who used harmful racial stereotypes about Jewish people in sermons will be forced to tell the world of his anti-Semitism through prominent online posts. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was ordered by the Federal Court earlier in July not to repeat the perverse and racist tropes used in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023. In the speeches, Mr Haddad - who is also known as William Haddad or Abu Ousayd - variously referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "mischievous". Justice Angus Stewart found the sermons contained "perverse generalisations" against Jewish people and included racist, anti-Semitic tropes. The judge on Thursday ordered the preacher "pin" or "feature" corrective notices describing the court's findings to the centre's website and social media pages on Facebook, Rumble, Instagram and Soundcloud. He has been given 21 days to comply with the order and the posts had not been made as of Thursday afternoon. Mr Haddad objected to prominently displaying the notices, saying this would go beyond what was ordinarily ordered by the courts. Pinning the posts would be tantamount to promoting or advertising the findings, he said. Justice Stewart ordered the notices to be pinned for 30 days, saying the requirement was not unduly burdensome and would stop them disappearing from view. "It will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts," the judge wrote. Promoting the notices was part of their objective, he said. "The respondents promoted the unlawful lectures and it is not disproportionate to require them to promote the corrective notice in the relatively constrained manner described above as an appropriate form of redress," he wrote in his judgment. The notice itself highlights the "unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred" of Mr Haddad and the centre. The three lectures - titled "The Jews of Al Medina" and published on video hosting site Rumble - were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish members of the Australian community, the notice says. The lawsuit was brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who claimed the lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jewish people. The pair said they were vindicated by Justice Stewart's findings, saying no community in Australia should be dehumanised. "Freedom of expression should not be abused by the promotion of hateful anti-Semitism and those who wish to do so should know that conduct shouldn't be tolerated by us," Mr Goot told reporters after the judgment. The cleric has been ordered to remove the lectures and not to repeat similar racist statements about Jewish people in public. He will also have to pay the legal bill for Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot, which is estimated to be in the six figures. Mr Haddad's speeches were delivered after Hamas, designated by Australia as a terrorist group, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023. The attack sparked Israeli retaliation that has left Gaza in turmoil and tens of thousands of civilians dead.
