13175 S. River Bend Road in Photos
The World's First Zero-Emission Sailing Yacht Is Expected to Launch This Year
Saks Is Losing Luxury Shoppers in the Wake of Its Neiman Marcus Takeover
This $6.7 Million Ultra-Modern U.K. Home Appeared in the Robert Pattinson Sci-Fi Film 'Mickey 17'
Best of Robb Report
The 10 Priciest Neighborhoods in America (And How They Got to Be That Way)
In Pictures: Most Expensive Properties
Click here to read the full article.
The modern residence spans almost 3,700 square feet.
The entrance to the home.
A slatted wood screen accents the foyer.
The dining room is open to the kitchen.
Custom walnut cabinetry is featured throughout the kitchen.
Huge windows provide unobstructed views of Wolf Mountain.
The butler's pantry includes a full-height wine refrigerator.
A three-sided fireplace encased in a metal column separates the living and dining areas.
The living room has a walnut-paneled ceiling and open views from picture windows.
The primary bedroom.
The primary bath includes a steam shower and its own washer and dryer.
The covered patio with alfresco dining space for 10.
Open spaces give way to dramatic mountains.
Lounge seating surrounds a fire pit, next to the hot tub.
The toy barn offers space for three car.
The property spans 35 acres above the Snake River.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How to build a B2B payments behemoth
This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. Bottomline Technologies sells business payments and digital banking services to banks, which in turn use them to offer corporate customers non-branded technology for online banking and cash-management services. Bottomline says about one million companies use its platforms to make $16 trillion in annual payments, with customers including 90% of the Fortune 100 businesses. It also contends it's the world's third-largest Swift service bureau owing to a large cross-border payments business in Europe. In May, Bottomline introduced embedded access for banks to offer a proprietary payment network, Paymode, as part of their digital banking platforms. This network for large companies contains about 600,000 vendors for which Bottomline has verified the identity and bank account details of each. That information allows for any company to pay these vendors, regardless of the bank they use, and prevents fraud, CEO Craig Saks said, calling the 'closed loop environment' Bottomline's 'most interesting business.' Bottomline has 2,500 employees and dual headquarters in Portsmouth, New Hampshire and Theale, England, with its operations focused on North America, the United Kingdom and Europe. Saks, a former ACI Worldwide senior executive, joined Bottomline as chief executive officer in May 2022, when private equity firm Thoma Bravo closed on its $2.6 billion cash purchase of the company and took it private. Saks spoke with Payments Dive on July 23. Editor's note: This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity. There is a massive opportunity. The U.S. business payments volume in aggregate, is tens and tens and tens of trillions of dollars. No one has got a material share of that. We're pretty big and we still think we've got so much headroom to go. We are still growing incredibly fast, because there's this huge white space in the addressable market. The U.S. does need at least one or two large-scale business payment networks to emerge. It doesn't have a large scale, de facto standard for a business payment network like it has in the card brands or in the big merchant acquirers. There just isn't anyone who's got to that breakthrough scale. And I think that is necessary in the U.S., and it's inevitable. There are a lot of reasons why payment networks emerge at different speeds around the world. One is the level of regulatory push. The U.S. doesn't have a history or culture of decree: This is the new business-payment standard, and thou shalt all do it. Europe and the rest of the world tends to do that. The other thing that slows these things down a little bit in the U.S. is just the pure scale and complexity. Building payment networks takes a lot longer when there are thousands of banks than if there are dozens of banks. It takes a lot longer with millions of businesses. It obviously takes a lot longer when there are lots of states with different state regulations and so on. And so I think the scale and complexity of the U.S. just makes it take a little bit longer to gel together. I'd say it's inevitable for a few reasons. First of all, the efficiency that a scaled payment network brings to an economy is undeniable. When I look at where we play best, it's in the upper part of the mid-market enterprise and above, and typically in the larger bank ecosystem. And it's also not dependent on cards. It's dependent on any type of electronic payment. In that realm, relatively few (companies) play, and there are relatively few that have advanced as far as we have, but absolutely some of the names you threw out there. Fiserv and FIS, or the big card associations or some of the big ERP (enterprise resource planning) players, they all expressed interest at serving that community with different strategies...I think the U.S. is big enough for a small handful. I get asked this question a lot, and it's obviously speculative in terms of who would find us attractive and who wouldn't. Our company is fairly sizable and very rapidly growing and a very profitable company. And so it would absolutely need to be bought by a larger player. This is going to be a fairly significant acquisition for someone. I think the ideal player would be someone who is interested in an industrywide network and in network dynamics. They could be anyone who's got a payment network or a network of customers within the banking or commercial corporate space. I think it's unlikely that any one of the big (bank) participants in the network would want to buy it, because that would then turn you from being a 'member of the club' to a competitor in the club. And I think that that would actually probably not work for the other banks. It's not to say that it's impossible, and it's not to say that some wouldn't think about it, but I do think that it's more likely that it will be a third party that serves the banking industry and has the opportunity to bring more scale and more amplification to the industry level value proposition, because of the network dynamic that we have. Do I think that stablecoin could make inroads into Swift volumes or other cross border volumes? Absolutely, it's a better widget. And the reason I say it's a better widget is it's still just dollars at the end of the day, if it's backed by dollars, right? So it's got certain technological and security advantages and all the other good things about a modern technology. What people often forget is that payment types and methods are not just about the rail. It's about 10 million other things that happen in the institutions on each side and in all of their customers, and around security rules and protocols and around trust. Nothing's going to just walk in and say, 'I'm going to replace the trust for the Swift correspondent banking network.' And 'I'm going to just replace all the understanding of the 10,000 ways people have tried to steal money from Swift in the last five decades,' instantly. I've always seen that the evolution of payment types is actually a very long and drawn out journey. So do I think that it could end up being a dominant payment type? Absolutely. Do I think it'll take as long to get rid of everything else as it's taken us to get rid of checks? Most likely. Correction: This story has been updated to correct the current number of vendors within Bottomline's payment network. Recommended Reading Same-day ACH payments soar Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Saks Clashes With Onetime Financing Partner Pathlight in Court Over HBC Deal That Cleared the Way for Neiman's Acquisition
Since Saks Global completed its acquisition of Neiman Marcus Group in December, it's had to wrestle with vendors unhappy over new payment terms and sooth the nerves of bondholders who didn't have as much collateral as they thought. Even without that, bringing the two companies together is a big project that involves cutting some $600 million in costs over time, setting up shop on Amazon, resetting the luxury department store model and more. More from WWD Saks Global Posts Q1 Top- and Bottom-line Declines, but Underscores Progress 'Transforming' the Business EXCLUSIVE: Saks Global Names Brandy Richardson CFO S&P Cuts Saks Global's Credit Rating to CC But as much as Saks wants to move forward, it is also — literally — litigating one thorny piece of its $2.7 billion deal for Neiman's. It's a legal dispute that could, if it goes to trial, shed some light on exactly how the long-suffering Hudson's Bay went under. The dispute started with the complicated negotiations that cleared the way for the Neiman's acquisition. Saks needed to restructure some debt from its partner Pathlight Capital in order to separate from its former parent company, Hudson's Bay Co., as Neiman's was brought on board. Pathlight agreed to amend a credit facility and give Hudson's Bay a $65.6 million term loan in return for a $5 million payment, which Saks made in January. But Saks also agreed to two further payments totaling $8.8 million to Pathlight if the term loan to Hudson's Bay was not repaid. Saks did not make the two additional payments, claiming that Pathlight did not support its effort to refinance the loan to Hudson's Bay, precipitating the Canadian retailer's slide into the equivalent of bankruptcy and then into liquidation. Pathlight sued Saks in New York State Court in May, claiming that it 'fully performed its obligations,' and was due its $8.8 million. In its reply to that suit on Tuesday, Saks denied Pathlight's allegations. The retailer said in connection with the acquisition it paid back $370 million in loans to Pathlight, rolled over its remaining debt into the term loan and agreed to pay more than $6 million in fees. 'Pathlight's claims are barred by its breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing,' Saks said in its response filed with the court. 'Pathlight agreed that Saks Global would not be required to pay the second and final installments to the extent that HBC had repaid the term loans. 'Pathlight, however, refused to cooperate or otherwise take any actions that would have allowed HBC to address its liquidity needs and repay the term loans,' Saks said. 'In fact, when asked for basic cooperation, Matt Williams, a Pathlight principal, at one point stated bluntly: 'I don't care. I'm not interested in being helpful.' 'Accordingly, through its actions and inactions, Pathlight has violated the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, including its implied duty to act in good faith to facilitate and/or not inhibit HBC's efforts to repay the term loans and thereby discharge any obligation to pay the second and final installments.' Saks also claimed that Pathlight 'fraudulently induced' Saks to enter the side agreement, knowing that 'it would never cooperate with HBC as necessary to satisfy the term loans such that the Saks Global's obligation to pay the second installment and final installment would be relieved.' While the case does not seem central to the bigger picture at Saks and its efforts to remake luxury retailing, it is something of a coda for Hudson's Bay — which had years of ups and downs and ranks as North America's oldest company, founded in 1670 as a fur trader. Hudson's Bay liquidated, but the name is due to live on. The Canadian Tire Corp. agreed to buy the intellectual property of Hudson's Bay for 30 million Canadian dollars in May. Best of WWD The Biggest Legal Battles Shaping the Fashion Industry Today PETA Asks Lululemon About Slaughterhouse Practices China's Livestreaming Star Viya Fined $210 Million for Tax Evasion Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Ellen DeGeneres U.K. Farm in Photos
More from Robb Report 'The A-Team' Producer's Former SoCal Estate Lists for $20 Million This $65 Million Florida Mansion Has Both Indoor and Outdoor Pools Mark Zuckerberg Quietly Added Another 1,000 Acres to His $300 Million Compound in Hawaii Best of Robb Report The 10 Priciest Neighborhoods in America (And How They Got to Be That Way) In Pictures: Most Expensive Properties Click here to read the full article. The stone-clad exterior. The great room's lounge. The dining area. The kitchen. The kitchen is fitted with premium appliances. A casual dining spot alongside the kitchen. A sunroom. The primary bedroom The primary bath. There are two ample dressing rooms. The gym. The minimalistic indoor swimming pool. Many rooms spill out to a central courtyard. An alfresco dining terrace. The naturalistic gardens. Atop the carriage house is a massive entertainment space with a bar. A seating area inside the barn.
