President Donald Trump threatens to arrest Zohran Mamdani
Trump also said "a lot of people are saying he's here illegally," which is false. Mamdani is a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Uganda, who immigrated to the United States with his parents - film director Mira Nair and Columbia University professor Mahmood Mamdani - at the age of seven.
Mamdani, a state Assembly member who won the nomination for mayor on a progressive platform, responded on social media that Trump is threatening him despite the fact that not cooperating with ICE doesn't violate any law. (The Immigrant Legal Resource Center notes "There is no federal legal obligation for state and local jurisdictions to use their resources to help with immigration enforcement.")
"His statements don't just represent an attack on our democracy but an attempt to send a message to every New Yorker who refuses to hide in the shadows: if you speak up, they will come for you," Mamdani said. "We will not accept this intimidation."
The clash represents an escalation of tensions over immigration enforcement, as well as an outpouring of xenophobic reactions to Mamdani's victory from Republicans and conservatives. Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tennessee, called for Mamdani to be stripped of his citizenship and deported and offensively referred to Mamdani as "little muhammad" in reference to his Muslim religion.
Trump made border security a priority in his administration. He deployed the National Guard to help ICE conduct raids in Los Angeles after sometimes violent protests there. The Justice Department sued Los Angeles to halt its "sanctuary" policies refusing to help federal agents.
But California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Karen Bass said the raids and National Guard troops exacerbated tensions that led to the protests where rocks were thrown at federal authorities and cars were burned.
The arrest threat is just the latest clash between Trump and Mamdani.
Trump wrongly called Mamdani a communist and a "radical left lunatic" on Maria Bartiromo's "Sunday Morning Futures" on Fox News.
Mamdani, 33, beat former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, is not a communist. He is a democratic socialist. A communist believes in collective ownership of all property and the end of capitalism. A democratic socialist aims to reform capitalism through democracy.
Mamdani faces New York Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent on the November ballot.
Trump's comments drew swift pushback from some New York elected officials, including those that distanced themselves from Mamdani after his June 24 upset against Cuomo, the three-term governor who resigned amid a sexual harassment scandal.
"I don't care if you're the President of the United States," Gov. Kathy Hochul tweeted, "if you threaten to unlawfully go after one of our neighbors, you're picking a fight with 20 million New Yorkers -- starting with me."
Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine, who recently won the nomination for city comptroller, said, "This is not normal. This is not acceptable. These are the words of an unhinged would-be dictator."
In attacking Mamdani, Trump backs Mayor Eric Adams
Trump also gave support to Adams, the embattled mayor who opted not to run in the Democratic primary amid a corruption scandal. Adams is now running in the Nov. 4 general election as an independent.
"I helped him out a little bit," Trump said. "He had a problem."
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan indicted Adams on corruption charges before Trump's Justice Department intervened to drop the charges. Officials said the case interfered with Adams' ability to conduct the administration's priorities on immigration enforcement, and that he was running for reelection. Several prosecutors resigned in protest of senior officials' actions to drop the case.
Adams has denied wrongdoing or that he negotiated with the administration.
Trump falsely said prosecutors indicted Adams "the following day" he made comments about the influx of migrants to New York City.
Adams' office didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
"That was a Biden indictment," Trump said. "I said, 'Don't feel bad, I got indicted five times.'"
Adams, a centrist Democrat, is one of a number of candidates in the November election for mayor. Curtis Sliwa, the GOP nominee, has said he won't drop out of the race and Cuomo is mulling an independent bid as well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
18 minutes ago
- NBC News
Republicans scramble to corral support for Trump megabill ahead of House vote
WASHINGTON — House Republican leaders are moving rapidly on Wednesday to try to pass the party's massive domestic policy package after the Senate approved it, launching a full-court press and enlisting the help of President Donald Trump to sway a broad group of holdouts. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., can only afford three defections to pass the legislation through his narrow majority, presuming all members attend and Democrats vote against it. Johnson privately huddled just off Capitol Hill with members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, who are demanding deeper spending cuts. At the White House, Trump was holding multiple meetings with holdouts and on-the-fence members, one GOP lawmaker said, including with the moderate members of the Republican Main Street Caucus. Within hours of it narrowly passing the Senate Tuesday, House Republicans advanced the bill through the Rules Committee by a margin of 7-6, with Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Ralph Norman, R-S.C., voting "no" due to concerns that it would add to the debt. Several House conservatives complained that the spending cuts were insufficient after shrinking in the Senate package. They raged against the fact that various provisions were stripped out due to budget rules in the chamber, including immigration-related restrictions they strongly support. But nearly all of those lawmakers have developed a track record of folding and voting in alignment with Trump when the pressure is on them. GOP leaders are counting on them to do so again. One House Republican lawmaker said conservatives in the Freedom Caucus used to get political cover from groups like Club for Growth, but Trump has scrambled the calculus on the right. The Club for Growth is backing the bill, and conservative figures like Russell Vought and Stephen Miller are in Trump's inner circle and some of the loudest cheerleaders for the package. Freedom Caucus members 'have no cover' if they vote no, the lawmaker said Wednesday. 'Who's going to protect them from Trump? Thomas Massie?' Trump has been in a bitter feud with conservative Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., threatening to recruit a primary challenger against him after he was one of just two Republicans who voted against the House bill in May. Massie, who walks around Capitol Hill wearing a live debt clock, has said the legislation would make the deficit situation worse and has continued to rail against it. And politically vulnerable Republicans were unhappy with the more aggressive Medicaid cuts in the Senate bill, along with a series of clean energy funding rollbacks that they warned against. The Senate-passed bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which found that the loss of revenue from tax cuts would outstrip the spending cuts in the legislation. The legislation would extend the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017 while boosting funding for immigration enforcement and the military. It would also makes significant cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and clean energy funding, while raising the debt limit by $5 trillion. On the Capitol steps Wednesday morning, Democrats blasted the legislation as a massive tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, paid for by slashing programs that help the working class. "It is the cruelest bill that I've ever seen in my tenure in the House of Representatives," said Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who has served in the House since 1988.
Spectator
23 minutes ago
- Spectator
The new right is splintering
When Elon Musk tweeted his vision for an 'America Party', he ignited a firestorm of hope and scepticism. The idea was inspired by his anger for Donald Trump's $5 trillion spending bill. In the UK, Ben Habib and Rupert Lowe, formerly figures in Reform, have splintered away from Britain's populist party over splits with Nigel Farage. Musk, Habib and Lowe are all disruptors united by disdain for broken systems, and all face harsh electoral realities. In the US, a hypothetical Musk-led party could split the Republican vote, potentially handing Democrats victories. Habib and Lowe could dilute the populist vote in the UK, most of which is currently with Reform. Musk's flirtation with a new political movement stems from his clash with Trump over fiscal policy. Musk's platform – slashing deficits, deregulating business and boosting high-skilled immigration – appeals to tech-savvy moderates and disillusioned independents. On X, Musk has framed himself as a voice for the pragmatic middle, critiquing both parties' extremes. But his vision lacks the cultural red meat – 'America First' border control or anti-woke rhetoric – that fuels Trump's MAGA base. Musk's $250 million investment in America PAC for Trump's 2024 campaign shows his financial clout, but he would struggle to go it alone. The US electoral landscape is unforgiving to new parties. In 1992, Ross Perot's Reform party won 19 per cent of the vote but zero electoral votes, a cautionary tale for any Musk-led venture. State-by-state ballot access laws, such as California's requirement of roughly 131,000 signatures, would also pose logistical hurdles. Musk's wealth – estimated at $400 billion in 2025 – could fund signature drives and ad campaigns, but building a national infrastructure by 2026 is daunting. Republican strategists have suggested that Musk could reshape the party from within, using his America PAC influence and X's narrative-shaping power, rather than risk starting a third party and failing. Others have warned that his centrist pitch – pro-immigration, pro-tech – alienates voters demanding border security and cultural conservatism. Polls, while unconfirmed for 2025, suggest Republicans view third-party efforts sceptically. Across the Atlantic, Habib and Lowe embody a parallel populist surge. Habib has launched a new political party, Advance UK, which he says stands for a 'proud' and 'independent' United Kingdom, where 'the political views you hold won't land you in jail'. It is billed as an alternative to Reform. Lowe, meanwhile, has just launched Restore Britain, a 'movement' that will pressure political parties to 'slash immigration, protect British culture, restore Christian principles, carpet-bomb the cancer of wokery'. The UK's first-past-the-post system is brutal – Reform's 14 per cent in 2024 yielded just five MPs – and so a fragmented populist vote could split the right and gift Labour seats. Populism in the US and UK shares politics but fights different battles. Musk decries bureaucratic bloat and unfulfilled 2016 promises, while Habib and Lowe target Labour's cultural shifts and attack Farage personally. Musk's X is the transatlantic wildcard, shaping narratives but fuelling polarisation. Reports earlier this year suggested Musk was thinking about making a significant investment in UK politics. In the US, his $250 million America PAC war chest (and X's reach) give him leverage, but Republican loyalties and the Electoral College limit third-party impact. Disruption without cohesion breeds division. The US and the UK need fresh ideas, but splitting conservative votes could empower the elites they oppose. The lesson is clear: conservatives must channel their zeal to reform existing parties from within. To do otherwise risks electoral failure.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
House members in mad scramble back to DC to vote on Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' after heading home for July 4
Members of the House of Representatives from both parties were forced to return to Washington, D.C. to vote on President Donald Trump's ' One Big, Beautiful Bill ' after the Senate passed it, Politico reported. With Trump exerting great pressure on Speaker Mike Johnson to get the bill to his desk for a signing before the July 4 holiday, the House plans to vote on the bill as soon as possible. That triggered a mad dash back to the nation's capital and comes amid a Republican rift over the amended bill — which would force cuts to Medicaid and makes states shoulder more of the cost for food assistance while extending the 2017 tax cuts Trump signed. Republican Rep. Nancy Mace posted that she and her team would travel back from South Carolina by van. 'We have secured a van for a DC road trip tonight to make it in time for votes on BBB tomorrow,' Mace posted. Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who is running for Illinois' open Senate seat, hosted a Zoom town hall as he drove 14 hours to Washington after his flight was canceled. 'We made it,' he said. 'Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law.' By coincidence, Rep. Derek Tran of California wound up stranded in the Pittsburgh airport, so he and fellow Democratic Rep. Chris DeLuzio of Pennsylvania drove to Washington and hosted a virtual town hall as well. Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin posted how his flight was canceled because of thunderstorms, so he would drive to Chicago to make an early flight to Washington. The bill passed the House of Representatives narrowly last month, partially due to the fact that three Democratic members of Congress had died. House Speaker Mike Johnson has scheduled a vote for the morning. The vote comes after the Senate conducted a marathon 27-hour vote-a-rama before passing the bill by a 51-50 margin with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie in the Senate. Three Republicans--Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina--opposed the bill. But many House members have criticized the bill. During a House Rules Committee hearing, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who criticized the bill last month but nonetheless voted for it, said the Senate 'failed' with the bill. Plenty of Republican members also fear the cuts to Medicaid could disproportionately hurt their constituents.
