Trump's Tariff On India To Do Little To Upset IPhone Manufacturing Plans
President Donald Trump's 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods will do little to slow the role of the Asian country as a key hub for manufacturing iPhones, even when it means more expensive smartphones for US consumers, analysts and industry executives said.
Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the US market, with nearly all the $3.2 billion-worth of iPhones exported by Foxconn from India going to the United States between March and May.
It's "too early to say" if recent events or future changes in Trump's stance will alter Apple's manufacturing plans in India, an industry executive familiar with Apple's strategy said. "These plans are made with a longer window."
Trump on Wednesday imposed a 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from the country, effective Friday, a move that sent jitters across India Inc., though some view it as a negotiation tactic.
For Apple, India is now central to its strategy of diversifying manufacturing beyond China, where geopolitical pressures have pushed it to consider alternative bases.
India supplied 71 per cent of all iPhones sold in the US market between April and June, up from 31 per cent a year earlier, driven by a corresponding decline in shipments from China, according to Counterpoint Research.
Despite the newly announced tariffs, manufacturing iPhones in India would continue to remain cost-competitive, with expenses lower than when Apple began production there eight years ago, narrowing the cost gap with China, analysts said.
Factors like growing local component availability, federal government incentives, and wages nearly half those in China have positioned India as one of the top two iPhone-producing countries, alongside China.
"Making supply chain adjustments, particularly with new iPhone models nearing release, is unlikely due to the complex factors involved. It is expected to be business as usual, especially with a resilient supply chain like Apple," said Tarun Pathak, a research director at Counterpoint.
Trump's Ire
Trump has repeatedly targeted Apple for making US-sold iPhones outside the country by threats, including company-specific tariffs, but hurdles like high costs, technological shortcomings, and legal issues have stood in the way.
In May, he recalled telling Apple CEO Tim Cook: "we put up with all the plants you built in China for years ... we are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves".
Apple would rather absorb the higher costs for iPhones sold in the United States than slam the brakes on its India expansion, said Faisal Kawoosa, chief analyst at Indian research firm Techarc.
"Given that sales in the US are largely operator-driven and sold as part of plans, it might mean adding a few more dollars to monthly plans rather than giving an upfront blow to consumers".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
H-1B visa tension rises amid US lawmaker's call to curb Indian tech hiring
NYT News Service A social media post by US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has intensified political scrutiny over the H-1B visa programme, widely used by Indian professionals. On August 4, Greene wrote on X, 'End Indian H-1B visas replacing American jobs instead,' while reposting former President Donald Trump's call for higher tariffs on Indian exports over its oil trade with statement, though not tied to any legislative move, has drawn strong reactions from Indian students, legal professionals, and tech workers in the United States. It also coincides with remarks from Trump's aide Stephen Miller, who in a Fox News interview accused India of undermining US interests on trade and immigration.'India portrays itself as being one of our closest friends in the world. But they don't accept our products, they impose massive tariffs on us. We also know they engage in a lot of cheating on immigration policy,' Miller said. India continues to be the top source of H-1B visa recipients. According to US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), nearly 70% of all H-1B visas approved in FY 2024 were granted to Indian nationals. The programme is often a key step for international students transitioning from academic training to full-time employment in the US. Greene's statement emerged in the context of rising US-India trade tensions, with Trump demanding tariff retaliation for India's energy imports from Russia. While Greene tied her comment to American job losses, Miller's interview offered further criticism of India's economic and immigration practices. Though no new visa restriction has been introduced, the political messaging has prompted concern. US lawmakers have recently debated reforms such as more transparency in the H-1B lottery, better wage protection for domestic workers, and broader access for STEM graduates trained in US institutions. No policy change yet, but messaging matters As of August 2025, the F-1 visa and the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programmes remain operational. Indian students and professionals applying for H-1B visas continue to follow the existing process. However, experts advise staying informed through USCIS updates and seeking legal or academic guidance for long-term Greene and Miller's remarks do not carry immediate policy consequences, they reflect growing scrutiny around skilled migration programmes and outsourcing. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Can Coforge's ambition to lead the IT Industry become a reality? BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? Amazon is making stealthy moves in healthcare, here's why! The trader who blew the whistle on Jane Street Stock Radar: Globus Spirits breaks out from 9-month consolidation; check target & stop loss for long positions Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus These large-caps have 'strong buy' & 'buy' recos and an upside potential of more than 25% Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 36% in 1 year
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Gurgaon has slum-like infra: Suhel Seth slams Millennium City's urban planning a ‘shame on the country'
Author Suhel Seth has criticised urban planning in India. He focused on Gurgaon's infrastructure. Seth called it slumlike despite housing big companies. He compared India's planning to a '1947 mindset'. Seth also criticised the quality of civil engineers. He highlighted the lack of technology use. Seth urged for reform and better leadership. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India still builds with a '1947 mindset' Gurugram has big companies, but lacks basic planning Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 'Worst civil engineers' and no use of technology Delhi-NCR's flooding compared to 'two Venices' Seth calls for reform and better leadership Author and entrepreneur Suhel Seth has criticised India's urban planning and infrastructure, especially in Gurugram , calling it an example of failed governance. Speaking on an ANI podcast, Seth questioned the quality of civil engineering in the country and said that despite housing some of India's wealthiest firms, Gurugram's infrastructure is 'slumlike'.Drawing a comparison with China, Seth recalled a visit with the British Airways advisory board to Beijing, before the Olympics. 'When we reached the airport, we saw 60 per cent of it shuttered. I asked why. They said it was planned for 2040. In India, we still build using 1947 thinking,' he pointed out that Gurugram is home to major companies such as Coca-Cola, EY, Hero MotoCorp , Apollo, Max, and Fortis . However, he said the city has 'slumlike' infrastructure and lacks basic civic facilities.'It's bizarre. The richest people live in slumlike environments,' he also criticised how Gurugram developed, saying it did not come from a vision or planning framework. 'It didn't grow because of Hindustan Lever. It grew because GE and Genpact came in first for back-office operations. The city boomed around that, not planning.'On the state of engineering in India, Seth said, 'We have the worst civil engineers in India. Absolutely. We've obliterated the use of technology in civil planning and infrastructure. We have no care.'He blamed poor civic outcomes on a lack of accountability and planning, saying the approach to building cities in India is outdated and another remark aimed at Delhi-NCR, Seth posted on X that the region is the 'only place on the planet that can boast of two Venices side by side. Gurugram and Delhi.' He pointed to regular waterlogging, garbage, and lack of traffic infrastructure, adding that 'liquor vends outnumber working traffic lights in the city.''Every year, without government help, we create a Venice for people to enjoy,' he said during a panel hosted by The Indian Express, where he called Gurugram 'a shame on this country'.Seth urged for a 'non-hostile takeover' to restore basic governance in Indian cities. He ended his remarks by saying, 'We've become a country of suffering and sufferers,' calling for forward-thinking leadership and a complete change in how cities are built and managed.
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
America's tariff avalanche catches Switzerland unawares
THE FIREWORKS in celebration of the Rütlischwur, the foundational oath of Switzerland on August 1st 1291, had just subsided when Donald Trump announced that Swiss exports to America would soon face tariffs of 39%. It came as a shock to Europe's most stubbornly independent country. After consulting with businesses and holding a crisis meeting on August 4th, the government announced it will make America a more attractive offer. Switzerland had negotiated early and swiftly. The deal it offered 'was not so different from that of the European Union', says a senior Swiss official. It contained similar pledges to invest in America, an overall tariff rate that was lower than the EU's, a few concessions on agriculture and various other offers, such as collaboration in training American manufacturing workers. Switzerland could hardly open the Swiss market any further: the country had already cut tariffs on nearly all industrial goods to zero, and its currency is overvalued by about 50%, according to The Economist's Big Mac index. What sealed Switzerland's fate was its outsize trade surplus with America. The Eidgenossenschaft (oath confederation), as the Swiss call their country, exported goods worth about $48bn more to America in 2024 than it imported. That comes to about 5% of Swiss GDP—too much for the deficit-obsessed American president, who bizarrely thinks this amounts to 'stealing money' from Americans. The country was lucky that he did not take as his baseline early 2025, when Switzerland's trade surplus with America ballooned to a whopping $54bn in the first quarter alone. What sealed Switzerland's fate was its outsize trade surplus with America. The culprit behind that surge was Mr Trump. Upon his inauguration, uncertainty over America's economic policy rose sharply, leading investors to seek safety in one of Switzerland's main exports: gold (see chart). The country is responsible for about a third of global gold refining, and typically exports around $4.5bn-worth of the precious metal to America each year. But in 2024 America imported $12.5bn-worth of gold from the country. Switzerland's role as a refiner can make trade flows look deceptively big. Although its gold exports amounted to $116bn last year, it also imported $100bn-worth of the metal. With some 1,000 workers in total, the industry is not exactly a jobs-booster. America charges no tariffs on gold imports, and Mr Trump is not likely to impose any on his favourite metal. Switzerland's gold exports, along with the watches and jewellery it sells to America (worth $7bn in 2024), may simply have convinced the president the country is rich enough to bear more. Pharmaceuticals are the other Swiss export that aroused the president's ire. The Swiss shipped $35.5bn of these to America last year. 'We want to be making pharmaceuticals in our country,' Jamieson Greer, the US trade representative, said after the tariff announcement. America is also keen to bring down the prices of medicines. Mr Trump sent letters to 17 pharma CEOs, including those of Novartis and Roche, two Swiss companies, to demand prices in line with the lowest in comparable economies. 'I don't think it was a coincidence that we had a tough call with the president 20 minutes after he had sent out his letters to the pharma industry,' says the Swiss official. Luckily for Switzerland, tariffs on drugs will remain at zero until America makes decisions about its global pharma policy. Because of the exemptions for gold and (temporarily) pharma, Switzerland faces an overall effective tariff rate of just 12% for now. But businesses other than gold and pharma must pay the 39% rate, much to their dismay. They might end up as the main victim of Mr Trump's economically misguided focus on bilateral trade balances. Half of Switzerland's overall trade surplus with the world is with America, because its specialties—pharma, gold, luxury items and high-end machinery—fit American demand. Thermoplan, the sole supplier of coffee machines to Starbucks, a coffee chain, is reluctantly considering a partnership with an American firm to lower the tariff burden. 'There is a wide range of responses among businesses. Some say they will just increase prices, others have already lost half of their orders from America,' says Daniel Kalt of UBS, a bank. Switzerland is likely to face a mild recession, should the tariffs stick. Many hope negotiations will bring down the rate. And Switzerland's flexible economy will be able to adjust. The Swiss will also look more eagerly to co-operate with others. The EU's better deal is helpful because Swiss firms are integrated into European supply chains, and the country trades far more with Europe than America. Yet politically, being slighted by America hurts. The country is moving towards a referendum on a permanent package of agreements with the EU, in place of its long-standing patchwork of temporary deals. Eurosceptics who want to reject that proposal will find their case harder to make. 'Their narrative is breaking down now, being alone out there has not paid off,' says Mr Kalt. That was also the central insight of the Rütlischwur more than 700 years ago.
