Trump needs to act fast as Houthis launch killing spree, attacking and sinking ships in the Red Sea
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Houthis Resume Attacks in the Red Sea After Months of Lull
EU Naval Mission Blames Houthis for Attack on Cargo Vessel
US Embassy Says 'Most Violent Attack to Date'
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
March Bombing Campaign Led to Temporary Ceasefire
Ceasefire Only Covered US Ships, Leaving Others Exposed
US Forces May Be Pulled Back Into Red Sea Conflict
FAQs
Tensions in the Red Sea have started again, as Iran-backed Houthi rebels attacked a commercial cargo ship this week and killed several crew members on another ship, which was the Houthis' first deadly assault on shipping this year, as per a report.The European Union's defensive counter-Houthi mission called Operation Aspides accused the Houthis of an attack on Monday against the Eternity C, a Liberian-flagged, Greek-owned cargo vessel, as reported by Business Insider. An Aspides official shared that four speedboats that were carrying armed personnel approached the vessel and fired on it with rocket-propelled grenades, and the Houthis also used uncrewed aerial vehicles, or drones, against the Eternity, according to the report.ALSO READ: Billionaires ditch Nvidia for this AI stock that's soared 2,000% since 2023 The official revealed that the attack killed three crew members and injured about two others and left the Eternity adrift in the Red Sea, as reported by Business Insider.While the Houthis have not yet taken responsibility for the latest attack, but the US Embassy in Yemen, which operates out of Saudi Arabia because of security reasons, said that it was the rebels' "most violent attack to date" and added that they are "once again showing blatant disregard for human life," as quoted in the report.ALSO READ: Trump's silent economic war on China: How he's cornering Xi Jinping one nation at a time The rebels attack comes after the Houthis were relatively quiet during the first half of the year, according to Business Insider. The US military had started a weeks-long bombing campaign against the Iran-backed rebels in Yemen, and American forces struck more than 1,000 targets in a matter of weeks in March, as per the report. The Then the Trump administration reached a ceasefire with the Houthis in May and brought an end to what was called Operation Rough Rider, as reported by Business Insider.ALSO READ: Craving McDonald's snack wraps? They are back — with bold new flavors you need to try But the agreement with US president Donald Trump's administration only prevented the Houthis from attacking US ships, according to the report. So, in recent weeks, the rebels have continued to fire long-range drones and missiles at Israel, as per Business Insider. While Israel's military retaliated on Sunday with airstrikes against Houthi infrastructure across Yemen, as reported by Business Insider.The Houthis' ability to continue attacks against Israel and the latest Red Sea operations indicated that the rebel group still retains some military capabilities, even after the intense US bombing campaign, according to the report. The renewed tensions in the Red Sea could risk drawing US naval forces, which have expended hundreds of missiles and bombs fighting the rebels, back into the Red Sea conflict, as reported by Business Insider.ALSO READ: The Magnificent Seven just lost Tesla and Apple - these 2 surging tech stocks are taking over fast They're an Iran-backed rebel group from Yemen involved in a long-running regional conflict, now targeting international shipping, as per the report.Not officially yet, but the US and EU strongly believe they are responsible, as per the Business Insider report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fibre2Fashion
22 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Trump imposes 30% tariff on imports from Mexico, EU starting Aug 1
US President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping 30 per cent tariff on all imports from Mexico and the European Union, set to take effect on August 1, 2025. The move follows unsuccessful negotiations with both trading partners over broader trade reforms. In separate letters posted on Truth Social, President Trump cited persistent trade deficits and unfair practices as justification for the tariffs. Trump has announced a 30 per cent tariff on all imports from Mexico and the EU, effective August 1, citing trade imbalances and unfair practices. The tariffs exclude goods manufactured within the US. Trump warned against retaliation and pledged streamlined investment approvals to encourage domestic production. The move adds to existing sectoral duties and targets transhipped goods. Addressing Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump stated the tariffs would apply to all Mexican goods entering the US, excluding items manufactured domestically in the US. He also warned that any retaliatory tariff from Mexico would result in a proportional increase above the 30 per cent base rate. In a parallel letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump criticised the EU's tariff and non-tariff barriers, calling the trade relationship 'far from reciprocal'. He justified the 30 per cent rate as being 'far less than what is needed' to correct the trade imbalance with the EU. President Trump indicated that the new tariffs would not apply to goods produced within the US by Mexican and EU firms. He emphasised that his administration would streamline the approval process for such investments, promising quick, professional, and routine clearances—potentially within just a few weeks—to encourage domestic manufacturing. The new tariffs are in addition to existing sector-specific duties and will also apply to goods transhipped through third countries to avoid the higher levy. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran signals shift in cooperation with IAEA after war with Israel
Iran's 12-day war with Israel last month, sparked by an Israeli bombing campaign that hit military and nuclear sites as well as residential areas, rattled its already shaky relationship with the UN nuclear watchdog read more A satellite overview shows the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, near Qom, Iran, June 29, 2025. Maxar Technologies/Handout via Reuters Iran said Saturday its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency 'will take on a new form', expressing a desire for a diplomatic solution to resolve concerns over its nuclear programme. Iran's 12-day war with Israel last month, sparked by an Israeli bombing campaign that hit military and nuclear sites as well as residential areas, rattled its already shaky relationship with the UN nuclear watchdog. The attacks began days before a planned meeting between Tehran and Washington aimed at reviving nuclear negotiations, which have since stalled. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday that Iran's cooperation with the IAEA 'has not stopped, but will take on a new form', after the Islamic republic formally ended cooperation with the UN watchdog in early July. Iran has blamed the IAEA in part for the June attacks on its nuclear facilities, which Israel says it launched to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon – an ambition Tehran has repeatedly denied. The United States, which had been in talks with Iran since April 12, joined Israel in carrying out its own strikes on June 22, targeting Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. Araghchi said requests to monitor nuclear sites 'will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis… taking into account safety and security issues', and be managed by Iran's Supreme National Security Council. 'Assurances' In early July, a team of IAEA inspectors left Iran to return to the organisation's headquarters in Vienna after Tehran suspended cooperation. The talks were aimed at regulating Iran's nuclear activites in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Before agreeing to any new meeting, 'we are examining its timing, its location, its form, its ingredients, the assurances it requires', said Araghchi, who also serves as Iran's lead negotiator. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He said that any talks would focus only on Iran's nuclear activities, not its military capabilities. 'If negotiations are held… the subject of the negotiations will be only nuclear and creating confidence in Iran's nuclear programme in return for the lifting of sanctions,' he told diplomats in Tehran. 'No other issues will be subject to negotiation.' Araghchi also warned that reimposing UN sanctions could eliminate Europe's role in the process. Enrichment 'Such measures would signify the end of Europe's role in the Iranian nuclear dossier,' Araghchi said. A clause in the 2015 nuclear agreement, which US President Donald Trump withdrew from during his first term, allows for UN sanctions to be reimposed if Iran is found to be in breach of the deal. Araghchi stressed that any new nuclear deal must uphold Iran's right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. 'I would like to emphasise that in any negotiated solution, the rights of the Iranian people on the nuclear issue, including the right to enrichment, must be respected,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We will not have any agreement in which enrichment is not included.' Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at the BRICS summit in Rio on Monday that Moscow would remain a committed ally of Iran and support its nuclear programme. 'Russia has technological solutions for uranium depletion and is ready to work with Iran in this field,' Lavrov said, as reported by Russian state news outlet TASS.
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Columbia and Trump near a deal, with school possibly paying millions
Columbia University and the Trump administration on Friday were nearing a deal in the contentious fight over allegations that the school had failed to protect Jewish students from harassment, with Columbia potentially agreeing to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to settle the matter, according to two people familiar with the discussions. The deal, which remains in draft form, would restore at least some of the $400 million in federal research funding the administration canceled. In exchange, Columbia would provide compensation to settle allegations of civil rights violations and increase transparency about admissions and foreign gifts, among other concessions. The existence of a potential deal was confirmed by a third person, who, like the others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive negotiations. The deal could include $200 million or more in compensation paid by Columbia for alleged civil rights violations. Columbia officials are expected to meet with Trump aides next week at the White House to finalize the deal, said one of the people familiar with the discussions. A university spokesperson on Friday night did not confirm details of the deal or the potential White House meeting. 'The university is focused on advancing the discussions with the federal government. There is no resolution at this time,' the spokesperson, Virginia Lam Abrams, said. The current draft of the deal, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal and The Free Beacon, does not go as far in exerting federal authority over the university as an earlier version that was circulated in April. That deal would have included a judge-approved consent decree, which is a kind of legally binding performance-improvement plan, according to a copy of that agreement obtained by The New York Times. A consent decree, which would have given the Trump administration significant control over the university for years to come, is not part of the current discussions, the people said. In March, after the $400 million in funding was cut, Columbia agreed to an initial set of demands from the Trump administration, including empowering campus police to arrest students, exerting more control over its Middle Eastern Studies department and restricting the use of masks at protests. Once those preconditions were met, Columbia continued negotiating over the return of the federal funding. Columbia's decision to negotiate with the Trump administration rather than sue was widely criticized within academia as a form of capitulation. Harvard University took a different approach, choosing to sue. Claire Shipman, Columbia's acting president, has defended her strategy, writing in a letter to the university community in June: 'Following the law and attempting to resolve a complaint is not capitulation.' And Harvard, despite its litigation, has also restarted talks with the Trump administration regarding the return of billions of dollars in federal research funding that have been cut. While the exact terms of Columbia's agreement are still being negotiated, it could be the first university to come to a resolution with the Trump administration for the return of research funding pulled as a result of antisemitism concerns. The Trump administration announced March 7 that it was canceling millions of dollars in grants and contracts to Columbia, an extraordinary step that made the university the first to be punished by the administration for what it called unacceptable harassment of Jewish students on campus after the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Punishment for other universities, including Harvard, Cornell and Northwestern, soon followed. As weeks passed, it became evident that the damage to Columbia's research enterprise went further than the original cut. The National Institutes of Health, the government's premier medical research funder, froze nearly all research funding flowing to Columbia, including for reimbursement of grants that were still active. Grant Watch, a project run by research scientists who compiled information on the grants pulled by the Trump administration, estimated this week that about $1.18 billion in unspent funding to Columbia from the NIH had been terminated or frozen. Other federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation, also pulled grants. Columbia was reaching a 'tipping point' of preserving its research excellence, Shipman said in June. Columbia's board met last Sunday to discuss potential terms of a deal, one of the people familiar with the matter said. The negotiations with Columbia have been directed out of the White House by a team led by a Trump adviser, Stephen Miller, with additional involvement of an interagency task force on antisemitism.
