
‘Incorrect' that India lost Rafale ‘jets' during Operation Sindoor, says defence secretary
Singh refused to answer a question regarding the losses the Air Force suffered during the initial phase of the four-day conflict, the news channel reported.
'You have used the term Rafales in the plural, I can assure you that is absolutely not correct,' Singh told CNBC-TV18. 'Pakistan suffered losses many times over India in both human and material terms and more than 100 terrorists.'
The defence secretary also reiterated that the government had given the Indian military operational freedom during the conflict. 'No political constraints on our armed forces and they have full operational freedom in conflict,' he said.
This came following a remark by Captain Shiv Kumar, India's defence attaché to Indonesia, on June 10 that the Indian Air Force had lost fighter jets to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor on May 7 because of the ' constraint given by the political leadership'.
'Suppression of enemy air defences and destruction of enemy air defences is very very important…' Kumar said. 'I may not agree…that India lost so many aircraft, but I do agree we did lose some aircraft.'
He added: 'And that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or [Pakistani] air defences'.
Kumar had said that the tactics were changed after the loss and 'we went for their military installations'.
The defence attaché had made the comments during a seminar analysing the India-Pakistan conflict at a university in Jakarta. He made the statement in response to Pakistan's claim of having downed six aircraft, including three Rafales. The claims made by Islamabad have not been independently verified.
On Sunday, the Associated Press quoted French Air Force chief General Jérôme Bellanger as saying that he had seen evidence pointing to the Indian Air Force having lost just three fighter jets: a Rafale, a Su-30MKI and a Mirage 2000.
A controversy had erupted after the video of Kumar's remarks surfaced online on June 28.
Following this, the Indian embassy in Jakarta had said that the Navy officer had only pointed out that India's armed forces serve under ' civilian political leadership ', unlike some neighbouring countries.
'It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory,' it added.
The Indian embassy also said that Kumar's remarks were 'quoted out of context' and 'the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker'.
Kumar's statement had come more than a month after Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan's May 31 comments that were seen by some as an acknowledgement of the Indian Air Force having lost aircraft during the operation.
Chauhan had told Bloomberg that what was important was 'not the jet being down, but why they were being down'.
'Why they were down, what mistakes were made – that are important,' Chauhan told Bloomberg. ' Numbers are not important.'
He had also said that Pakistan's claims of having shot down six Indian Air Force fighter jets was 'absolutely incorrect'.
Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22.
The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling.
India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Maharashtra language war: Is the showdown aimed at Mumbai civic poll? Experts debate
On 'To The Point', the focus is on Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's announcement of 35% reservation for women in government jobs, aimed at empowering women and reshaping Bihar's workforce. This policy applies to all government positions at every level and department, but only for original residents of the state. The decision comes months before the Bihar Assembly elections, with women constituting nearly half of Bihar's 7.64 crore voters. In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, women outvoted men with a 59.4% turnout compared to 53% among men. The government has also approved the formation of a Bihar Youth Commission to address unemployment concerns. The announcement has sparked debate on whether it's a genuine push for empowerment or a well-timed political strategy, especially given that a similar 35% reservation policy has been in place since 2015. Additionally, the transcript covers a controversy between the Indian government and social media platform X (formerly Twitter) over the blocking of Reuters and over 2000 handles. X claims the government ordered blocking without justification, while the government denies issuing any fresh blocking orders, raising concerns about press freedom and censorship. The upcoming Kaavad Yatra is also discussed, with reports of shops and dhabas along the route being made to display 'I am Hindu' posters, sparking a debate on religious profiling and discrimination. The discussion touches on broader issues of religious identity, caste census, and economic discrimination, with opposing views from BJP and Samajwadi Party spokespersons.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
India must create a graded Munir response plan. He could rear his head before long
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says peacetime is an illusion and India must remain prepared — another reminder that Asim Munir could be back with his compulsive idea of an 'unfinished war' he sees as a god-given opportunity. India must create a graded Munir response plan. He could rear his head soon. Govt focusing on acquisition, military leaders on operation—it's a calibrated division of responsibility Government is being smart by letting military leaders speak on operational aspects of Operation Sindoor while Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh focuses on budgets and future acquisitions. It's a calibrated division of responsibility — strategic and political. Singh is on a mission and has an opportunity to leave a meaningful legacy.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Aviation body understaffed at top level, can hire retired officials: Ex-minister
Former Civil Aviation Minister and Public Accounts Committee (PAC) member Praful Patel on Tuesday flagged a shortage of senior skilled personnel in the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), suggesting that retired officials be brought back on short tenures to strengthen oversight and maintain safety standards in Indian after the PAC meeting, Patel said, "Safety is paramount. Anyone who flies wants to be safe and assured that they will reach their destination. Many events took place in the wake of the Air India crash. Obviously, when a crash happens, everything is taken with sensitivity."advertisementHe, however, emphasised that Indian aviation remains safe and there is no need for panic. "Indian aviation is safe, and we don't need to panic. All airlines, including Air India, follow all safety protocols. DGCA is well equipped and does a very good job," Patel said. He added, "DGCA needs to have more people. It is facing a shortage of staff at the top level, of skilled people. Retired officials can be brought back to deal with this understaffing and ensure safety standards are fully compliant at the earliest. Maybe an audit of the entire sector or all the aircraft should be done at the earliest so that passenger confidence is restored."Patel made these remarks after a PAC meeting that was originally convened to discuss "levy charges at airports" but saw an intense focus on the June 12 Air India crash in Ahmedabad. The London-bound flight AI 171 crashed into the BJ Medical College hostel building just seconds after take-off, killing 260 people, including 241 passengers and crew on board, and 19 people on the meeting was attended by senior officials from the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA), DGCA, Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA), Airports Authority of India (AAI), and the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS). Air India CEO Wilson Campbell and top officials from IndiGo and Akasa Air were also said MPs asked aviation authorities pointed questions about safety and demanded an immediate audit by BCAS. They sought details on the timeline for black box analysis and raised concerns about the probe committee's selection criteria, including whether foreign aviation experts had been India, in its submission to the PAC, defended the Boeing 787 Dreamliner involved in the crash, calling it one of the safest aircraft in operation and noting that more than 1,000 Dreamliners are flying worldwide. The airline said it was "deeply concerned" about the crash and was awaiting the official inquiry also flagged several safety incidents reported in May and June, along with what they described as the "high-handed behaviour" of private airlines. They pointed to a spike in flight fares following the Pahalgam terror attack and questioned regulatory oversight.- EndsMust Watch