Zeda records lower revenue as corporate customers delay investment
Small to medium enterprises (SMEs) also came under similar strain, particularly in the mining and transport sectors.
Revenue was down 1.6% to R5.2bn. The leasing business segment delivered a solid performance, with revenue increasing by 5.6% to R1.4bn, underpinned by increased penetration within the corporate, heavy commercial fleet and the rest of Africa businesses.
The leasing business maintained its growth trajectory, despite the overall delayed fleet investments, Zeda said.
It said the upward trajectory of additional revenue was affected by corporate customers delaying replacement cycles and some constraints from SMEs with contracts in the mining and transport sectors in South Africa.
Heavy commercial remains a steady growth pillar for Zeda, with a healthy order book. The car rental segment's revenue decreased by 4% to R3.8bn due to a drop in used car volumes.
However, excluding the car sales business, rental revenue remained flat.
'We were able to defend the revenue levels despite a decline in the replacement and inbound business. Rental days increased by 2.5%, primarily driven by a 49% rise in the short-term subscription business, following an improvement in technology that made transactions easier for customers,' said Zeda.
Zeda has on average more than 20,000 vehicles in its fleet in Southern Africa. Its customer segment base is diversified and consists of the private sector, public sector, insurance business (replacement), inbound market, domestic leisure market and short-term subscription.
This business provides a range of self-drive and driven products and services, including car and van rental, chauffeur services and luxury vehicle services.
'In a period where traditional car rental and vehicle sales faced mounting pressure, our leasing, subscription and greater Africa strategies delivered, helping grow earnings, improve margins and continue investing for the long term.
'We achieved this through a stringent implementation of the operating model of financing right, buying right, using right and disposing right,' said Zeda CEO Ramasela Ganda.
Zeda anticipates improved performance in the second half of its 2025 financial year, driven by stronger car sales, contract renewals and subscription momentum.
Ganda said the bedrock of Zeda's growth pillars consists of the subscription business, the corporate leasing book, greater Africa, and the used car business. 'These pillars provide us with access to vehicles, markets and a disposal channel, which are core to our fundamentals, which remain strong despite the challenging trading environment.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
12 hours ago
- The Citizen
Should you be mad at your lawyer for using AI?
While the legal fraternity has used AI to make it more efficient, it is also prone to making up fictitious case law. There's a reason lawyers get paid as much as they do, and why good lawyers get paid even more. Knowing decades of precedent, the intricacies of each case and creatively patching ones which support your case together — that takes years of graft. As in all industries, even though there are thousands of lawyers out there, there's that special handful who really have mastered the craft. Then you get the rest of us who aspire to be at that level. Some work toward it through personal development. Others have discovered artificial intelligence. As with any tool, it's important that you understand how it works in order for it to deliver the results you want. How to read a book is pretty understandable. How to search through an index, equally so, but it's not the grandest of ideas to give a lawyer a child's picture book titled 'How Birds Fly' and expect them to be able to land a 747. You'd be within your rights to have an expectation that they'd have some sort of pilot training first. Similarly, you don't just throw tech at a lawyer and say hey, your job, which you get paid above minimum wage to do, just got so easy that you can sit back and relax while Jarvis takes a break from building the next Iron Man to help your client settle their messy divorce. ALSO READ: Lawyers who steal: R1.4bn trust fund theft ignored It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to realise that typing 'write me an argument to win my case' and 'I have a client who caught their partner cheating with the pool guy and wants to divorce and take the three kids. What are similar cases in my favour?' will yield different results. It's not that much of a leap to understand that the quality of your AI 'research' is only as good as the information you give it. And if you don't understand how AI works or, worse, understand that each AI is different and based on differently prioritised datasets, you're not going to know how to ask it for what you want. To its credit, the legal fraternity is very welcoming of AI as a tool and globally, it's been adopted to create much more efficiency, especially in the mundane parts of the job. Is it prone to making up fictitious case law? Absolutely. And we've seen this in jurisdictions around the world. ALSO READ: Will AI replace your psychologist? You've got to admire the ballsiness of a lawyer who would approach a judge with a made-up case, but if we're honest, it's unlikely that they even knew what they were doing. Sounds right, looks right, everybody is claiming how awesome this tech is… let's just submit what it gives me. And yet, it is not right when it comes to case law. That's not entirely surprising. It's one thing to teach a bot to string a couple of emotional sentences together using a global database. It's quite another to have it formulate a cohesive legal argument using jurisdiction-dependent and often elusive legal sources. So if your lawyer gets busted for using AI to build your case and gets called out by a judge on it, then of course you should be upset about it. If your lawyer uses AI to get a bunch of cases together before they check them and put them together for argument themselves, that's just good sense. Nobody expects a lawyer to build a time machine, go back to every case that they reference and witness the full proceedings first-hand. We have a tool to avoid doing that: the written record. Similarly, it's not expected that you restudy an LLB every time you do legal research, and if AI is going to get you the result faster, it may even save you some fees. All you need to demand of your AI-using lawyer is that they compile and check the final product, because it would be pretty upsetting if you're sitting in court and the judge asks why you pleaded, 'click here for more information'. NOW READ: AI-powered online lawyer now available in SA


The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Thousands denied pensions as employers fail to pay
R5.2bn in pension debt owed by employers, mainly municipalities and security firms, leaves thousands of workers in limbo. A large number of municipalities and private employers who did not pay employees' contributions over to pension funds may face investigations. Their non-payments have tipped the new two-pot retirement system into turmoil. The employers are facing imminent investigation by the department of employment and labour, which is planning to flood them with labour inspectors to check their compliance status. Long list of companies, municipalities that violated pension fund They will also be sanctioned by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) which has a long list of private companies and municipalities that violated the pension fund rules and the law. An FSCA report showed municipalities and firms, mainly in the security and cleaning sectors, owe their employees approximately R5.2 billion in outstanding pension fund contributions impacting 31 000 people, with some cases dating back to the 2000s. Of the outstanding contributions, some R1.4 billion is owed by municipalities, affecting pension fund members' savings. ALSO READ: Industry leaders launch market surveillance code as Steinhoff fallout lingers The FSCA identified around 7 770 noncompliant employers, with 2 330 of them being publicly listed for violating Section 13A of the Pension Funds Act. Many employees, who were hoping to claim from their pension funds under the two-pot scheme, are crying foul after hitting a brick wall when they attempted to claim the 30% due to them under the two-pot system, which came into effect last year. The system has two pots – one is for savings and constitutes one third which goes into a savings pot and is accessible for withdrawal since September last year. The other two-thirds goes into the retirement pot to be kept in the fund until the pensioner's retirement age. Employees found their monies had been withheld The distraught employees found that their monies had been withheld by employers, particularly municipalities and the security and cleaning sector, that were all blacklisted by the FSCA. This means the contributors cannot claim the saving portion of their contributions. The Congress of SA Trade Unions (Cosatu) has taken up the matter on behalf of the affected workers, who inundated their various unions with complaints about how their employers had inconvenienced and prejudiced them due to nonpayment of their pension fund contributions. ALSO READ: Missing broker, missing money Cosatu parliamentary coordinator Matthew Parks said Cosatu has established a task force with the FSCA, National Treasury and the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (Asisa) at the National Economic Development and Labour Council to deal with this crisis. Asisa represents the collective interests of asset managers, collective investment scheme management companies, linked investment service providers, multi-managers and life insurance companies. Parks said: 'It has the potential to get out of control. We're engaging the different sectors. Engagements have taken place with the SA Local Government Association and more are planned.' Potential to get out of control The department agreed to issue a ministerial directive to labour inspectors to check pension fund compliance by employers. The department also increased the number of labour inspectors from 2 000 by 10 000 this year and 10 000 to be hired next year. The FSCA is working with the National Prosecuting Authority to pursue criminal sanctions against offenders. NOW READ: FSCA juggling high-profile cases with limited resources

TimesLIVE
29-06-2025
- TimesLIVE
Gauteng to pay second instalment of R3.377bn towards historical e-toll debt
The Gauteng government will on Monday make a payment of R5.476bn towards the e-toll debt and the contribution towards the SANRAL Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project, Gauteng finance MEC Lebogang Maile said. Maile said the government will be paying the second instalment towards the historical e-toll debt which, based on the memorandum of agreement, amounts to R3.377bn. 'This is the amount that we will be paying to the National Treasury tomorrow as a second instalment as part of our 30% contribution,' he said. The provincial government made the first instalment of R3.8bn in September 2024, consisting of R3.2bn historical debt and the maintenance portion of R546m. In addition to the e-toll payment, Maile said the provincial government will also transfer an amount of R2.099bn as part of the contribution towards the backlog of rehabilitation to restore the GFIP 1 freeways to an acceptable condition before SANRAL resumes its obligations for all future maintenance funded by the national fiscus. He said the amount outstanding for SANRAL's Gauteng freeway projects was R3.559bn. 'We must emphasise that in terms of the agreement, SANRAL cannot use these funds for any purpose other than the nine projects that are financed by the province. SANRAL is also required to report to the Gauteng provincial government on progress being made with the implementation of these projects. This will include providing credible information on developmental objectives such as how these projects contribute to economic growth in the province, the number of jobs being created through these projects and related social and economic benefits,' he said. Maile said the implications of the e-toll debt and contributions to SANRAL's Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project require the Gauteng government to manage finances prudently, while carefully balancing the service delivery needs of residents. He said the provincial Treasury has a five-year budget approach that will facilitate provincial delivery based on the Medium-Term Development Plan for the seventh administration. 'The five-year budget approach will focus on introducing and implementing immediate, short-term, and medium-term budget reforms over the 2025 MTEF. This includes maintaining fiscal discipline and credibility, and impactful service delivery. Over the next few years, the Gauteng provincial government will have to allocate a substantial amount of funds each year to service the repayment obligations for e-tolls. This will be happening in a constrained fiscal environment, details of which we expressed in the initial budget speech and reiterated when we re-tabled the budget for the 2025/2026 financial year,' Maile said. Maile noted that the funding envelope was stretched by existing allocations, particularly in keeping critical social programmes in health and education funded. 'Nevertheless, we reaffirm our commitment to the residents of Gauteng that the servicing of the e-toll debt will not compromise our priorities, particularly with social services such as health and education,' he said. Maile said the provincial government was implementing various measures and reforms to ensure the sustainability of the fiscal environment, including active debt management strategies, spending restraint, improving compliance with rules and regulations in supply chain management, as well as revenue enhancement.