Adelita Grijalva wins Democratic primary to replace her father in US House, CNN projects
Grijalva, a former county supervisor, is the daughter of the late Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva, who represented the district for two decades before his death in March.
She'll be favored to win the Sept. 23 general election in this heavily Democratic district.
Grijalva defeated state Rep. Daniel Hernandez and 25-year-old activist Deja Foxx.
Arizona's 7th Congressional District, which includes parts of Tucson and most of the state's southern border with Mexico, has been without representation since March, when Raul Grijalva died due to complications from cancer treatments. The late congressman and former Congressional Progressive Caucus chairman was first elected to the House in 2002.
Adelita Grijalva entered the race as the front-runner and garnered the lion's share of endorsements in the contest, including support from both of Arizona's US senators as well as Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She also benefited from her family's longstanding recognition in the district, saying she would continue her father's legacy.
Like her father, Grijalva served on the Tucson Unified School District governing board and the Pima County Board of Supervisors before running for Congress.
She pushed back on her opponents' efforts to frame her as the establishment candidate, saying that she applied for and earned her endorsements from various groups and has her own record of advocacy work, including running diversion programs while working at Pima County's Teen Court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's border miracle: From Biden's chaotic immigration crisis to 'all quiet' in record time
"All Quiet on the Western Front" is the title of Erich Maria Remarque's moving World War I novel. As of July 2025, it's all quiet on the U.S. southern border. How quiet? In June, the Border Patrol encountered just over 6,000 inadmissible aliens at ports of entry. Under President Joe Biden, they sometimes saw twice that many in a single day. The total number of inadmissible aliens encountered in June, at both our northern and southern borders, at or between ports of entry, was 25,243 – the lowest monthly total in U.S. history. And of all those encountered in June, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released zero - for the second month in a row. In May, DHS also released not a single alien they stopped trying to enter the United States illegally. In May 2024, in contrast, they released at least 62,000 – not counting more than 30,000 inadmissible aliens they let in every month using immigration parole, and thousands more "gotaways" who snuck in without being stopped or identified. Other than abusing parole, the Biden administration disguised the entry of millions of inadmissible aliens into our country through catch-and-release: detain them for a few hours, do cursory data entry, then move them inside where they are hard to find and deport later. Former Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas testified in December 2023 that DHS was releasing upwards of 85% of aliens caught entering illegally. That was the worst month for encounters of inadmissible aliens on the southern border in U.S. history – 251,178. That means around 213,500 were likely released – about 10 times the TOTAL number of aliens encountered last month on all our borders combined. More inadmissible, unidentified aliens were released, in one month, than the current population of Tallahassee, Florida. Making it hard for a future president to restore the rule of law was part of the plan – and now, the legacy media is doing its part by painting routine law enforcement as authoritarian excess. Under President Donald Trump, aliens entering without permission are mostly being detained pending the completion of their due immigration process – as the law explicitly requires. In some cases, that will mean an expedited removal process under the Immigration and Nationality Act. But many more will exploit our overly generous and backed-up asylum process to slow things down. Reportedly, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will no longer allow routine bond hearings for aliens to ask an immigration judge to release them pending their process. Why? Because, when detained, aliens always show up for each hearing. They want it done quickly, especially if they know they have no credible asylum case. When let loose in the country, free to work, aliens want to drag it out. Many don't show up for their immigration court dates. In Biden's term, more than half a million aliens didn't show up for their removal hearings. Detaining illegal aliens throughout their entire process means that if the result is an order for their removal (that is, deportation to their home country or another that will take them), the judge's decision can be carried out quickly and safely. If they're released into the U.S. interior, it takes time and staff to find and re-arrest them later. Speed and efficiency are in everyone's interest, and in normal times, an expedited removal case should take only a few weeks from start to finish. Asylum cases can take longer, especially with appeals, but that should still mean only months, not years. The pace has slowed in recent years due to the massive backlog caused by unchecked illegal entry and meritless asylum claims. But the Big Beautiful Bill has $170 billion to hire 300 more immigration judges and more DHS staff, increase detention capacity to 100,000, and more. Increased detention will remove incentives for aliens to make baseless claims. Trump ended catch-and-release as the default policy for inadmissible aliens. He closed the supposed "lawful pathways" of parole and government encouragement of asylum claims. He reinstated 'Remain in Mexico' and agreements with safe third countries to take deported aliens. He resumed building a wall to impede easy crossing of the border with Mexico. And Trump stopped funding the web of activist NGOs that got fat from facilitating mass illegal migration. Making it hard for a future president to restore the rule of law was part of the plan – and now, the legacy media is doing its part by painting routine law enforcement as authoritarian excess. Equally important, Trump had the fortitude to back federal agents in doing their duty. Under Biden, ICE was told to ignore most illegal immigrants – just like police are obliged by politicians to look the other way in our big cities when it comes to myriad crimes that undermine the quality of life for everyone. Now, agents are out doing their jobs, enforcing federal law. The media and some politicians are apoplectic to see that it's working. While Biden complained of invisible forces beyond his control, or asked for more money or new laws from Congress, Trump acted. He withdrew the red carpet for the world's inadmissible economic migrants, and they stopped coming. Even if most media outlets pretend to be perplexed at the relationship between policy and result, Americans can link cause and effect, and let's hope they get used to it. Then they will never allow a future president – of either party – to abandon his duties and throw open the border again.
Indianapolis Star
29 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional
After Northeast Indiana mom recorded a meeting with her daughter's principal last year and then posted it online, she was banned from school grounds and limited in her communications with school employees. Nicole Graves was disciplined after twice violating a Whitley County district policy not to record meetings without the building administrator's permission, according to a district letter sent to her. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, is pushing to rescind the policy, arguing that it violates the right to free expression protected under the First Amendment. It's a policy found in other schools around the state and the country. "We're very hopeful that the school district will simply just change the recording policy," attorney Adam Shelton said. "However, we are still open to litigation depending on how the conversation with the school district continues to go." If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different. "This is just a measure the school's adopted to prevent the most accurate record of conversation from being taken," he said. The school has since lifted its punishments as part of a typical end-of-school-year review, said Laura McDermott, superintendent of Whitley County Consolidated Schools, in a statement. The statement did not mention the recording policy, and McDermott has not responded to additional IndyStar questions. In a prior statement to Fort Wayne TV station WPTA, she said Graves violated the recording policy meant to protect student privacy. "The parent was not restricted from school property for expressing concerns, but rather due to a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," the statement to IndyStar reads. "As a school district, we have an obligation to protect the privacy and well-being of all students and to maintain a safe, respectful environment for staff and families." Nicole Graves asked to meet with Indian Springs Middle School principal, Wesley Mullett, after her daughter reported an incident on the school bus. In a video produced by Goldwater, Graves said her daughter's school bus driver was smacking his belt against his hand and had his underwear visible. Graves asked to meet with Mullett to ask about the incident and why she wasn't notified when her daughter reported the driver's behavior. She also previously had issues with other bus drivers in the district, Shelton said. Graves said she lost confidence in the school after hearing Mullett's explanations about the situation and later posted the meeting recording on social media. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater. Graves received a letter detailing punishments for violating the district's recording policy. She was asked to take down the audio clip, according to the letter. Goldwater argues Graves' Fourteenth Amendment rights to control her child's education were violated. Shelton said Graves should have been notified about her child's report of the bus driver, and there are concerns about her subsequent punishment limiting access to her daughter's education. In a letter sent to school officials in May, Shelton and Goldwater argue that the school's policy violates her rights to free expression. Though Graves is no longer banned from school grounds, Shelton said the think tank wants to see this policy rolled back. McDermott did not respond to an IndyStar question about the details of the policy and whether it is under review. The First Amendment extends to conduct that is inherently expressive, which courts have decided does include video and audio recordings in some cases. Goldwater's argument lands in a legal gray area. Shelton believes the right to record government officials is protected and argues that freedom should not be limited to a public setting if there are no other privacy concerns at play. "There's no meaningful constitutional difference between speaking about what happened at a meeting and recording what happened at a meeting," Shelton said. Still, there isn't clear case law on this issue. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mamdani, NYC mayoral front-runner, meets with Bernie Sanders and AOC in DC visit
WASHINGTON − New York City's mayoral front-runner and Democratic disruptor Zohran Mamdani hopped south July 16 to the nation's capital, as he looks to shore up the support of some wary party bigwigs. Mamdani, a 33-year-old state lawmaker, declared victory in the New York Democratic primary in June, beating out well-known former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (who has since announced plans to run as an independent candidate). His win was a stunning upset that reverberated beyond New York's five boroughs, with many openly questioning whether the success of a self-described democratic socialist spelled a left-leaning movement in the national party. More: Trump says Cuomo has a 'good shot' for NYC mayor; Mamdani camp calls it an 'endorsement' Nowhere are people more obsessed with the political eight ball than in Washington, where Mamdani was enjoying breakfast and kudos from congressional Democrats. Mamdani "got an energetic and welcoming reception in DC this morning," Rep. Robert Garcia, D-California, wrote in a post July 16. "Proud of our Democratic nominee for NYC Mayor. Let's win!" Lawmakers spent the roughly two-hour meeting at a Washington restaurant talking campaign strategy and takeaways from Mamdani's success, Politico reported. The meal was organized by fellow New Yorker and democratic socialist, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Mamdani was later seen laughing with progressive icon Sen. Bernie Sanders after a meeting with Democratic lawmakers. Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders, emblematic of the party's left flank, each gave Mamdani their endorsement in the primary race. "It's a wake-up call for the Democratic Party establishment, should they choose to listen," Stephanie Taylor, cofounder of Progressive Change Campaign Committee, told USA TODAY in June. "It's voters saying very clearly what they want and offering a direction for how the Democratic Party can start to win again." Not everyone is cheering for the left-wing Cinderella story, though. "Socialist Zohran Mamdani is too extreme to lead New York City," Rep. Laura Gillen, D-New York, said in a statement at the time of his win. Democratic leaders Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries − both New Yorkers − have also yet to endorse Mamdani. Politico reported Jeffries, who other outlets reported was not in attendance Wednesday, is waiting to meet with the nominee before extending official support. Ocasio-Cortez called the intraparty division "disappointing," in speaking to reporters July 15. "Democrats support the Democratic nominee," she said. "For me, my principles are consistent. I supported Sen. Bernie Sanders in 2020," she added. After Joe Biden won the Democratic presidential primary that year, "I got behind our presidential nominee because I'm a Democrat and I believe that our party is stronger when we are united." Contributing: Phillip M. Bailey and Deborah Berry, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Mamdani meets with Bernie Sanders, AOC
