
Rallies over alleged human and civil rights violations to be held across North Texas on "Good Trouble Day of Action"
Titled "Good Trouble Lives On," organizers said the rallies will take place all over the country on National John Lewis Day of Action. According to organizers, the rallies are also in honor of the legacy of the late Congressman, who often called on his supporters to make "good trouble, necessary trouble."
According to the news release, rallies will be held in Garland, Dallas, Fort Worth, Southlake and Rockwall.
"Participants will gather to demand an end to racist gerrymandering and the authoritarian attacks on our freedom to vote, protest, and organize — and to stand united against efforts to criminalize our communities, roll back our rights, and slash vital public programs," the news release states.
Organizers said the events will be peaceful and include a candlelight vigil to honor Lewis.
Lewis died July 17, 2020, at the age of 80. He was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer in December.
His death sent shock waves across the country and
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. called Lewis the "boy from Troy" when the two first met in 1958, according to the Associated Press, and their meeting kicked off Lewis' lifetime of activism. In 1961, Lewis was just 21 years old when he joined the Freedom Riders who rode public transportation to Alabama in an effort to integrate bus travel.
Lewis was beaten and arrested multiple times due to his activism. He was elected as chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and was the youngest speaker at the 1963 March on Washington.
He was also a leader of the march in Selma, Alabama, across the Edmund Pettus Bridge on March 7, 1965, that became known as "Bloody Sunday" as police beat the marchers. Lewis' skull was fractured. The events of "Bloody Sunday" helped lead Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act, and President Johnson signed it into law on August 6, 1965.
He served Georgia's Fifth Congressional District in Congress from 1987 until his death.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Slovenia to ban Smotrich, Ben-Gvir for 'genocidal statements' against Palestinians
Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon announced Slovenia will become the first European Union member state to ban the two ministers from entering the country. Slovenia will ban Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon announced after a cabinet session on Thursday. Fajon stated that the two will be declared personae non grata following accusations against them inciting "extreme violence and serious violations of the human rights of Palestinians" with "their genocidal statements." Slovenia will become the first member of the European Union to ban the two ministers. Recent sanctions against Ben-Gvir, Smotrich In June, Britain joined Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and others in sanctioning the two ministers over comments regarding Gaza and Palestinians that British Foreign Secretary David Lammy described as 'monstrous.' US Ambassador to the UK Warren Stephens wrote in response: "The United States stands firmly in support of Israel. The United States is deeply concerned by the recent decision to impose sanctions on democratically elected officials of the State of Israel. "These measures impede constructive dialogue and do not advance our shared goals of supporting peace and security. The United States will continue to focus our collective efforts on defeating Hamas, securing the release of all hostages, helping to create an enduring peace, and promoting Israel's security and regional prosperity." This is a developing story. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Flippant ‘Alligator Alcatraz' name obscures the unjust, dehumanizing truth
Flippant 'Alligator Alcatraz' name obscures the unjust, dehumanizing truth | Opinion An open letter to the editors and producers of our nation's newsrooms: I am writing today out of deep concern over the language being used by many media outlets to describe the immigrant detention center in Florida currently known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' As an English teacher of nearly 20 years, I understand that language matters. While it may seem like a harmless nickname or a clever turn of phrase, referring to this facility by such a flippant term has dangerous consequences for public understanding and moral clarity. Let's call this place what it is: a government-run detention camp, where human beings — including children — are being held in conditions that have been widely criticized by humanitarian organizations. Hundreds held there are facing no criminal charges. A catchy nickname, especially one coined by the administration responsible for its operation, serves to sanitize and trivialize the very real suffering taking place there. It diminishes public outrage and makes it easier for these facilities to continue existing in the shadows of normalized cruelty. The words we choose shape public perception and, ultimately, public policy. Both history and current events offer chilling reminders of how euphemisms can be weaponized to obscure injustice. During World War II, The United States referred to the unconstitutional incarceration of Japanese Americans as 'relocation,' and the German Nazi government used the term 'Sonderbehandlung' (which translates to 'special treatment') in the context of the Holocaust. More recently the first Trump administration's Zero Tolerance Policy on immigration, led to the creation of detention centers for migrant children who were taken from their parents. They were branded 'tender-age shelters.' Right now, as our government publicly condemns China for rounding up Uyghur people and sending them to 'reeducation camps,' it is sending people snatched from their jobs and immigration hearings to a camp that sounds like a Disney attraction. The mass media has no control over what an administration that has no shame will do. However, it does have a responsibility, not to repeat the government's talking points, but to speak truth to power. Going along with that name minimizes the gravity of a human rights crisis. The fact that this nickname has been circulated by officials, or gained social media traction, does not mean it should be perpetuated by responsible journalists. I urge you, as people with power to shape public conversation, to reconsider how your organization refers to this facility. Call it what it is: a detention center, an immigrant holding facility, or — if you have the courage to name the moral reality — a modern-day concentration camp. The stakes are too high for us to play along with euphemisms. People's lives and dignity hang in the balance. Sincerely, Nikki Kincaid Nikki Kincaid is a proud lifelong Missourian, a veteran teacher and a believer in plainspoken truth. Solve the daily Crossword


Washington Post
17 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump's bullying of Brazil is backfiring
About five decades ago, a U.S. president provoked a shift in his country's relationship with Brazil. President Jimmy Carter decided to end what had amounted to unconditional American support for a string of anti-leftist Latin American dictatorships, including the military-backed regime entrenched in Brasília. Carter's emphasis on human rights is credited by some Brazilian politicians for helping to create the space for Brazil's transition to democracy by the mid-1980s — even as Carter's treatment of autocratic U.S. allies was used as a cudgel against him during Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 election campaign.