Australia cricketer Usman Khawaja boycotts radio station that sacked pro-Gaza journalist
Khawaja refused an interview with SEN after the first day of Australia's first test match against the West Indies in Barbados.
He was seen approaching two SEN broadcasters off the field of play, before spotting the SEN branding on their microphone, raising a hand at them and walking away.
Khawaja, who has been an Australian international cricketer since 2011, has regularly criticised Israel's war on Gaza in public.
In February, Lalor's freelance job with SEN's cricket commentary team was cancelled after station chief Craig Hutchison claimed his pro-Palestinian social media posts were distressing to Jewish Australians.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
After he was sacked, Lalor said: "I have friends who are frightened and have heard the fear in their voices during conversations.
"It is an awful situation. But so is Gaza."
Khawaja criticised the decision at the time, saying: "Standing up for the people of Gaza is not antisemitic, nor does it have anything to do with my Jewish brothers and sisters in Australia, but everything to do with the Israeli government and their deplorable actions.
Cricket journalist axed over Gaza views on social media, sparking backlash Read More »
"It has everything to do with justice and human rights."
Khawaja has not commented on why he declined an interview with SEN. Lalor said: "Usman is a man of principle whose support I valued greatly when I was dismissed and whose ongoing support I appreciate."
In December 2023, during a training session, Khawaja was seen with the phrases "Freedom is a human right" and "All lives are equal" written on his boots in the colours of the Palestinian flag.
"The ICC [International Cricket Council] have told me I can't wear my shoes on the field because they believe it's a political statement under their guidelines," Khawaja said at the time.
"I don't believe in this though. It's a humanitarian appeal. I will respect their view and decision, but I will fight it and seek to get an approval.
"Freedom is a human right."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why western visions for a 'new Middle East' are irrelevant
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, political scientist Francis Fukuyama announced, with unprecedented bravado, 'the end of history' - declaring the victory of not only the United States over the USSR, but also of liberal democracy and capitalist economics. The US reshaped the international order. It took Russia two decades to rebuild its strength, declare wars on Georgia and Ukraine, and witness the rise of an emboldened China. Today, the international system has demonstrated that history did not end at all - and that liberal democracy is in retreat, grappling for its identity and for the global order born out of the Second World War. With the end of the recent war between Israel and Iran, claims have reemerged that this could give rise to a 'new Middle East' - one where Iran's axis of resistance has been weakened, with its influence rolled back in Syria, Lebanon and Gaza. This echoes claims that have been repeated every decade for the past century. Ever since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the partitioning of the Middle East by western interests, the refrain has been the same: after every war, a new era will dawn, and the Middle East will flourish. But every military campaign has only planted the seeds for the next conflict. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Consider the Six-Day War of 1967. Israel defeated three Arab armies and conquered the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, and the rest of historic Palestine. Yet from this victory emerged its biggest long-term challenge: the rise and entrenchment of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). Until then, the PLO had been largely shaped and dominated by Arab regimes, but after the defeat of those regimes, Palestinians asserted their independence within the organisation, aligning it with their own interests rather than those of Arab states that treated Palestine as a political tool. Undermining democracy Similarly, after Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982, it achieved a remarkable military feat, swiftly reaching Beirut and occupying the country's south. But from that victory emerged Hezbollah, a force that has posed a direct and constant threat to Israel for four decades now. Unlike Arab regimes that often fail to recognise or utilise the strength within their own borders, Israel understands the latent potential of Arab states. The recurring Israeli fantasy of a 'new Middle East' is not only unrealistic; it rests upon demands that no Arab regime can accept At the outset of the Arab Spring, after the fall of Tunisian leader Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and amid the beginnings of a democratic process in Egypt, Israel acted quickly to undermine that democratic wave, focusing especially on Egypt. The reason was plain: Egyptian public opinion is largely hostile towards the Camp David Accords and normalisation with Israel. So it came as no surprise when Israel leveraged its influence in Washington to legitimise President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi's regime following the 2013 military coup. The recurring Israeli fantasy of a 'new Middle East' is not only unrealistic; it rests upon demands that no Arab regime can accept. Even when states consider making far-reaching compromises, Israel always demands more. Just weeks before 7 October 2023, Saudi Arabia was reportedly ready to join the Abraham Accords - a move that would effectively empty the Palestinian cause of its meaning - without receiving anything substantial in return, other than increased lobbying power in Washington. Constant reinvention After two years of Israeli attacks on Gaza and Lebanon came the unexpected Israeli attack on Iran. The West found itself once again supporting a blatantly illegal campaign that violated international law, risking the lives of millions. The Israeli and US strikes on nuclear installations risked causing a radiological disaster across multiple nations, and flew in the face of intelligence assessments - showing once again that international law applies only when it serves western interests. Western leaders have embraced the mantra of a 'new Middle East' as if it were gospel. In reality, this term is fiction; the Middle East is perhaps the only place in the world that reinvents itself every decade. Vital lessons can be drawn from the recent war between Israel and Iran. There was no decisive victory, but both sides exposed their advanced military and intelligence capabilities, while also revealing vulnerabilities. As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu grows stronger domestically and the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei endures, tensions and future confrontations will likely continue. Israel-US attack on Iran: The price of Netanyahu's forever wars Read More » Secondly, Arab states proved how exposed and militarily irrelevant they remain. When drones crashed in Jordan and Iran threatened to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, Gulf states could only defend themselves by aligning with Israel and relying on American bases, apparently unable to assert their own role. This confrontation has exposed Arab nations to two profound threats. Iran will likely try to rebuild its 'soft power' across Iraq, Lebanon and Syria, presenting itself as the only force capable of standing up to Israel and the US. Meanwhile, Israel, emboldened by messianic forces within its government, will pursue policies that could forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza and the occupied West Bank at the expense of Arab states. As Israel and Iran jostle for position in the Middle East, much rests upon neighbouring Arab nations. Two years into the Gaza genocide, in a world that has failed to halt the slaughter and starvation of Palestinians, Arab nations must ask deeper questions about the two prevailing approaches that have shaped their politics for decades: pro-western secularism and Islamism. As proponents of each have clashed, Arab peoples have been left exposed and vulnerable. Perhaps the time has come for Arab nations to pursue a vision for a truly new Middle East: one that serves Arab interests first, and is shaped by Arabs themselves - not by external powers from the West or East. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
RSF advance on Libyan border marks new phase in spread of Sudan's war
The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and allied troops have placed Sudan's northern border region near Egypt on high alert, as the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) make significant advances after seizing control of the strategic border triangle with Libya and Egypt. The development signals a new phase in the regionalisation of Sudan's ongoing conflict. It has heightened tensions not only with Egypt (one of SAF's key allies) but also with Libyan forces loyal to General Khalifa Haftar, who has been accused of supporting the RSF's advance. Although the RSF has lost vast territories in the centre of the country following SAF's recapture of Khartoum, al-Jazira and Sennar states, this recent gain is considered crucial. Sources indicate the RSF is now preparing to announce a parallel government in western Sudan. The contested triangle area is also believed to be the site of unreported clashes between SAF and RSF over control of gold mines, critical supply routes and smuggling corridors that serve both logistics and trade. Eyewitnesses and miners who fled the area following the RSF's advance, allegedly supported by Libyan forces, say they were looted and attacked by RSF fighters, prompting them to abandon their belongings and escape to save their lives. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters One miner, who requested anonymity for security reasons, told Middle East Eye that he and several fellow miners walked over 30km to reach Egypt's border crossing points. There, he said, the Egyptian army transported them to the Sudanese side of the Argeen border crossing. 'After the RSF's attacks, the looting, and the widespread violations in the triangle area, we realised we had to leave immediately,' he said. 'But we also heard that Sudanese people were being mistreated by Libyan militias in al-Kufra.' The miner said that making the journey to Egypt on foot was the only choice they had. 'At its core, this is a fight over wealth and power, and the gold-rich triangle border region is a perfect example of that' - Sudan researcher 'Going back towards Sudan meant falling straight into RSF hands. We had no option but to walk towards Egypt, even though we knew the border was officially closed.' He added that the Egyptian authorities allowed them to pass and escorted them safely back into Sudanese territory. Another miner said the RSF had raided al-Katma market, one of the four main markets in the region, where he worked in gold extraction. He reported that RSF fighters looted all possessions, including money, cars, gold, mobile phones and other valuables. 'We walked for two days without rest until we reached the Egyptian border,' he told MEE. 'The Egyptian army then transported us to the Sudanese border, where we crossed back into Sudan. However, we lost everything. Now we rely entirely on the assistance provided by Sudanese authorities and local initiatives in Halfa and Dongola.' The RSF has rejected the looting and abuse accusations, posting videos on its Telegram channel purporting to show miners and civilians in the triangle area welcoming RSF troops. In one video, an RSF commander is seen addressing a large crowd in a marketplace, promising to protect the population and ensure the security of local businesses. Another video shows an RSF commander speaking to groups of migrants, pledging to help them continue their desert journeys. However, Wasfy Osman Gadeed, secretary general of the Halfa Popular Council, told MEE that thousands of people have fled the fighting in the triangle area and have been received in Halfa after entering Sudan via the Argeen crossing. 'We have received large numbers of those fleeing the conflict,' Gadeed said. 'Thanks to local community initiatives, we've managed to provide them with assistance, and we are working to transport many of them to Dongola.' Meanwhile, the International Organization for Migration said that more than 4,000 people, many of them minors and including non-Sudanese nationals, have fled the RSF attack. Fears of RSF control RSF fighters being sighted in parts of Sudan's Northern State have fuelled widespread fears, with the militia repeatedly threatening to seize control of the area. Following its capture of the triangle border region, the RSF has advanced towards Karab Altoum, an oasis near the Owainat mountains. The paramilitary group now controls most of North Darfur, where it has laid siege to the state capital, el-Fasher, for more than a year. In another escalation, the RSF has also attempted to attack villages around Aldaba city on the western bank of the River Nile in Northern State. Strategic locations such as Wadi Alatroon (Alatroon Valley) and al-Malha in North Darfur have seen a back-and-forth struggle between former Darfur rebels and RSF forces. The prospect of RSF attacks has terrified local populations. Some civilians have fled their villages, seeking refuge in safer areas, while others have armed themselves, vowing to defend their land. 'We've partnered with the popular resistance committees to train young people, stockpile weapons and store them under military supervision' - A member of the Halfa Youth Committee In response, the local authorities in Northern State have called for widespread mobilisation of the SAF to defend the region. The SAF, along with its allied militias, including joint forces of former Darfur rebels, has deployed reinforcements to key locations such as Aldaba, Alkhanag, Dongola and other cities. One resident from Dongola city told MEE that many people from villages on the western bank of the Nile, including Alkhanag and Gobat Salim, have fled across to the eastern bank. 'Joint forces, including former Darfur rebels, have been deployed in Alkhanag, particularly inside the gold market. This has sent worrying signals to miners and civilians that an RSF attack may be imminent, which prompted many to flee,' he said. Khalaf Allah Mohamed Abdo, a resident of Halfa city, told MEE by phone that markets in Alkhanag, Abdry, Dal and other nearby areas had initially closed when rumours spread that the RSF was planning an assault. 'Things are gradually returning to normal now,' he said. 'But most people are prepared to take up arms to defend the state. Military training has already begun, and thousands of volunteers have stepped forward.' A member of the Halfa Youth Committee told MEE that local communities have set aside their internal disputes and united against the common threat posed by the RSF. 'We are preparing for all possible scenarios,' he said. 'We've partnered with the popular resistance committees to train young people, stockpile weapons, and store them under military supervision.' The source requested anonymity as he was not authorised to speak to the media. 'Military manoeuvre' A military expert, who also asked not to be named for security reasons, told MEE that RSF fighters are advancing along multiple fronts across the desert regions of North Darfur and Northern State. He argued that the RSF's primary objective is to secure control over vast desert areas and border crossings with neighbouring countries to re-establish critical supply lines after suffering significant territorial losses elsewhere. 'I think the RSF's threats to attack Northern State may be part of a larger military manoeuvre,' he said. 'By signalling an imminent assault, the RSF is forcing SAF and its allies into a defensive posture, allowing the paramilitary group to focus on securing the strategic desert and border routes.' The contested triangle border region, stretching over approximately 1,500km, includes the Owainat mountains, an essential crossing point between Sudan and Libya. The route has long served as a key corridor for Sudanese people travelling to Libya, particularly after the war began. Even prior to the conflict, it was frequently used by irregular migrants and human traffickers. While Libya's border remains open, Egypt has closed its borders and is closely monitoring the situation. However, Egyptian authorities permitted most of the miners who fled following the RSF attack to pass through Egypt and return to Sudan. The RSF's control of the triangle border has granted the group additional strategic leverage. With plans to announce a parallel government in Darfur, the RSF now controls border access to five countries: South Sudan, the Central African Republic (CAR), Chad, Libya and Egypt. 'The Sudan-Libya border has long been a major entry point for weapons and mercenaries supporting the RSF, financed by the UAE and coordinated through Haftar's forces' - Sudanese Military Capabilities Platform report This geographic advantage offers the RSF potential flexibility in future cross-border trade, arms supply and logistics networks. Despite these territorial gains, the military expert told MEE that the RSF's current movements may carry limited military weight and instead serve as political compensation for the group's substantial battlefield losses elsewhere in the country. Meanwhile, tensions have escalated along the Sudan-Libya border following mutual accusations between the SAF and the Libyan National Army (LNA), led by General Khalifa Haftar. The SAF, which has since announced its withdrawal from the area, accused Haftar's Salafist-aligned militia - specifically the Subul al-Salam Brigade (also known as the Salafi Brigade) - of participating in the RSF attack. Sudanese officials also accused the United Arab Emirates (UAE) of backing the assault, while Haftar's forces claimed that Sudan was trying to externalise its internal crisis by dragging Libya into the conflict. The Sudanese Military Capabilities Platform, a think tank aligned with the SAF, identified the leader of the brigade responsible for the attacks as Abdul Rahman Hashim al-Kilani, who reportedly controls much of southern Libya from his base in al-Kufra. According to the think tank, Kilani has consistently provided weapons and logistical support to the RSF since the outbreak of the war. 'The Sudan-Libya border has long been a major entry point for weapons and mercenaries supporting the RSF militia, financed by the UAE and coordinated through Haftar's forces and affiliated armed groups,' the think tank said in a recent report. 'These forces, following the RSF's repeated battlefield defeats, have now resorted to direct military intervention to support the militia's remaining operations.' The think tank also published photos and videos purportedly showing Libyan and RSF fighters together in the triangle border area. Competing interests over gold Moumen Abdul Rahman, a mining engineer based in Northern State, believes the RSF has an additional motive for advancing into the region: to retake control of gold mines it previously held before the war erupted. According to Abdul Rahman, the RSF previously owned at least three gold mines in the Akasha area on the eastern bank of the Nile, near Wadi Halfa. The militia reportedly held shares in these mines through a joint venture with the Turkish-Qatari company DELGO, as well as in sites located on the western bank of the Nile near Dongola. He noted that the RSF withdrew from these areas just days before the outbreak of the war in Khartoum, particularly after seizing the Merowe military airport three days before the fighting began. The smugglers and miners running gold on the Egypt-Sudan border Read More » MEE contacted Sudan's ministry of mineral resources to verify these claims but received no response. A researcher familiar with the matter told MEE that the RSF previously owned full or partial stakes in several mines in Northern State through its commercial arm, Al Junaid Company. These assets were later confiscated by Sudanese authorities before the company was added to the United States' sanctions list for allegedly fuelling the war. The researcher, who requested anonymity for security reasons, explained that both warring sides have aggressively targeted each other's financial networks as part of a broader strategy to cut off funding sources. 'The confiscation of RSF-linked companies, gold mines, assets, bank accounts and other commercial interests is a significant dimension of this conflict,' the researcher said. Further insights from the Sudanese think tank Demands-Based Groups TAM, shared with MEE, suggest that the RSF had previously seized a number of mining areas in Northern State that were formerly controlled by associates of the ousted Bashir regime, including family members, security officials and corrupt business networks. In its study titled 'DELGO Company: The Real Face of the Sudanese War', the think tank found that the RSF inherited control over gold mines in al-Qaoub, Halfa, Delgo and other regions after the 2019 revolution. Public pressure had been growing at the time for these mines to be shut down amid widespread concerns over resource exploitation and environmental degradation. However, the SAF regained control of these mining areas following the outbreak of the war in 2023, after the RSF fighters previously stationed to guard the sites fled. Gold mining triangle The gold-rich triangle border area has long been a crucial supply hub for the RSF, as well as for the joint Darfur forces, former rebel groups now allied with the SAF in the ongoing war. These joint forces have been actively fighting the RSF in Darfur, particularly around el-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur State. 'You made a mistake trying to leave': Crossing enemy lines in the heart of Sudan Read More » The region encompasses four major mining zones, including Algilayaa and Alkatma, where thousands of miners from various countries are engaged in gold extraction. Beyond its economic importance, the RSF has maintained a longstanding military presence in the triangle border area. Its Chevrelet military base has been used since 2014 to combat human trafficking, irregular migration and cross-border crime as part of the Khartoum Process, an EU-backed initiative to manage migration flows through Sudan. The same researcher who spoke to MEE on condition of anonymity and has visited the area multiple times said the two warring factions (the SAF and RSF) have been in a protracted conflict of interest over control of the region's lucrative gold mines, even before the war officially began. The RSF's commercial arm, Al Junaid Company, was granted a mining concession in the area in 2018 and 2019. However, Ariab Mining Company, which is aligned with the SAF, was also awarded a concession for the same territory, reflecting competition between Sudan's military and paramilitary forces that predates the current conflict. 'Looking at these underlying disputes and competing interests helps us understand some of the deeper reasons behind this war,' the researcher said. 'At its core, this is a fight over wealth and power, and the gold-rich triangle border region is a perfect example of that.'
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Hamas gives Israel-backed gang leader in Gaza 10 days to surrender
Hamas has given the leader of an Israel-backed armed gang in Gaza 10 days to surrender, citing his involvement in looting aid deliveries. The Revolutionary Court of the Military Judiciary Authority said Yasser Abu Shabab, the 35-year-old leader of the Popular Forces, would stand trial over charges of treason, collaborating with hostile entities, forming an armed gang and armed rebellion. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has admitted to arming the Popular Forces, which aid groups have accused of stealing humanitarian aid, in a bid to counter Hamas. In a statement on its Facebook page, the Popular Forces described the court order as a 'sitcom that doesn't frighten us, nor does it frighten any free man who loves his homeland and its dignity'. Abu Shabab, who was imprisoned by Hamas on drug trafficking charges, managed to flee prison with the outbreak of Israel's war on Gaza in October 2023. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Since his escape, Abu Shabab has assembled a few hundred men and exerted control over an area near the Karem Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom) crossing, which connects Gaza, Israel and Egypt. Israeli news reports have described Israeli soldiers intervening in clashes between Hamas fighters and members of the militia group in order to protect Abu Shabab. Why I support the UK taking a more nuanced position on Hamas Read More » A leaked UN memo described their base as a 'military-like compound' in a zone 'restricted, controlled and patrolled' by Israeli forces. In its assessment in mid-May, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global initiative aimed at enhancing food security and nutrition analysis to inform decisions, wrote that over the next six months, the entirety of Gaza is expected to face what is referred to by experts as 'crisis, or worse acute food insecurity'. Furthering the shortage of food has been the recently operating US-Israeli aid initiative, which has come under scrutiny for its use of militarised methods to distribute aid, and the lack of essentials entering the Gaza Strip. In a joint statement on Tuesday, more than 130 NGOs have called for immediate action to end the 'deadly' US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid scheme, and revert back to United Nations-led aid coordination mechanisms. The GHF began operating in late May, following a three-month total blockade on the Gaza Strip by Israeli forces. Since then, more than 500 Palestinians have been killed and around 4,000 wounded by Israeli troops while attempting to access food and aid supplies.
