Why western visions for a 'new Middle East' are irrelevant
The US reshaped the international order. It took Russia two decades to rebuild its strength, declare wars on Georgia and Ukraine, and witness the rise of an emboldened China.
Today, the international system has demonstrated that history did not end at all - and that liberal democracy is in retreat, grappling for its identity and for the global order born out of the Second World War.
With the end of the recent war between Israel and Iran, claims have reemerged that this could give rise to a 'new Middle East' - one where Iran's axis of resistance has been weakened, with its influence rolled back in Syria, Lebanon and Gaza. This echoes claims that have been repeated every decade for the past century.
Ever since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the partitioning of the Middle East by western interests, the refrain has been the same: after every war, a new era will dawn, and the Middle East will flourish. But every military campaign has only planted the seeds for the next conflict.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Consider the Six-Day War of 1967. Israel defeated three Arab armies and conquered the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, and the rest of historic Palestine. Yet from this victory emerged its biggest long-term challenge: the rise and entrenchment of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO).
Until then, the PLO had been largely shaped and dominated by Arab regimes, but after the defeat of those regimes, Palestinians asserted their independence within the organisation, aligning it with their own interests rather than those of Arab states that treated Palestine as a political tool.
Undermining democracy
Similarly, after Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982, it achieved a remarkable military feat, swiftly reaching Beirut and occupying the country's south. But from that victory emerged Hezbollah, a force that has posed a direct and constant threat to Israel for four decades now.
Unlike Arab regimes that often fail to recognise or utilise the strength within their own borders, Israel understands the latent potential of Arab states.
The recurring Israeli fantasy of a 'new Middle East' is not only unrealistic; it rests upon demands that no Arab regime can accept
At the outset of the Arab Spring, after the fall of Tunisian leader Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and amid the beginnings of a democratic process in Egypt, Israel acted quickly to undermine that democratic wave, focusing especially on Egypt.
The reason was plain: Egyptian public opinion is largely hostile towards the Camp David Accords and normalisation with Israel. So it came as no surprise when Israel leveraged its influence in Washington to legitimise President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi's regime following the 2013 military coup.
The recurring Israeli fantasy of a 'new Middle East' is not only unrealistic; it rests upon demands that no Arab regime can accept. Even when states consider making far-reaching compromises, Israel always demands more.
Just weeks before 7 October 2023, Saudi Arabia was reportedly ready to join the Abraham Accords - a move that would effectively empty the Palestinian cause of its meaning - without receiving anything substantial in return, other than increased lobbying power in Washington.
Constant reinvention
After two years of Israeli attacks on Gaza and Lebanon came the unexpected Israeli attack on Iran. The West found itself once again supporting a blatantly illegal campaign that violated international law, risking the lives of millions.
The Israeli and US strikes on nuclear installations risked causing a radiological disaster across multiple nations, and flew in the face of intelligence assessments - showing once again that international law applies only when it serves western interests.
Western leaders have embraced the mantra of a 'new Middle East' as if it were gospel. In reality, this term is fiction; the Middle East is perhaps the only place in the world that reinvents itself every decade.
Vital lessons can be drawn from the recent war between Israel and Iran. There was no decisive victory, but both sides exposed their advanced military and intelligence capabilities, while also revealing vulnerabilities. As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu grows stronger domestically and the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei endures, tensions and future confrontations will likely continue.
Israel-US attack on Iran: The price of Netanyahu's forever wars Read More »
Secondly, Arab states proved how exposed and militarily irrelevant they remain. When drones crashed in Jordan and Iran threatened to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, Gulf states could only defend themselves by aligning with Israel and relying on American bases, apparently unable to assert their own role.
This confrontation has exposed Arab nations to two profound threats. Iran will likely try to rebuild its 'soft power' across Iraq, Lebanon and Syria, presenting itself as the only force capable of standing up to Israel and the US.
Meanwhile, Israel, emboldened by messianic forces within its government, will pursue policies that could forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza and the occupied West Bank at the expense of Arab states.
As Israel and Iran jostle for position in the Middle East, much rests upon neighbouring Arab nations. Two years into the Gaza genocide, in a world that has failed to halt the slaughter and starvation of Palestinians, Arab nations must ask deeper questions about the two prevailing approaches that have shaped their politics for decades: pro-western secularism and Islamism. As proponents of each have clashed, Arab peoples have been left exposed and vulnerable.
Perhaps the time has come for Arab nations to pursue a vision for a truly new Middle East: one that serves Arab interests first, and is shaped by Arabs themselves - not by external powers from the West or East.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Iran reopens airspace including Tehran after conflict
Iran announced on Thursday that it has reopened its airspace, including over Tehran, after closing it on June 13 due to the conflict with Israel, according to state media. "Tehran's Mehrabad and Imam Khomeini international airports, as well as those in the north, east, west and south of the country, have been reopened and are ready to operate flights," the official IRNA news agency reported. Domestic and international flights from all airports across the country — except those in Isfahan and Tabriz — will operate between 5am and 6pm, authorities said. Flights from those cities will resume as soon as the necessary infrastructure is in place, according to IRNA. Iran closed its skies entirely last month after Israel launched a wave of air strikes, prompting Iranian retaliatory missile fire. The country had already reopened airspace in eastern Iran and expanded access for international overflights following the truce. Dubai's flagship carrier Emirates said its flights to and from Tehran, Iran, will remain suspended till July 5, 2025.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
The rise of paramilitary settler groups in Israel's West Bank strategy
Last week, just days after Israeli forces killed three men while intervening to protect settlers violently storming the Palestinian village of Kafr Malik in the occupied West Bank, an unusual wave of condemnation swept through Israeli politics and media. But the outrage was not directed at the killing of Palestinians. It came only after settlers turned on Israeli soldiers. On Friday night, settlers, commonly referred to in Israel as the 'Hilltop Youth', attacked soldiers stationed at an outpost near Kafr Malik, northeast of Ramallah. The following day, the same group stormed a nearby military base. For a military long accustomed to escorting settlers during raids on Palestinian communities, the aggression from their usual allies was both unexpected and unsettling. The term 'Hilltop Youth' may no longer accurately describe this group. Their structure, tactics, and growing confidence suggest they now function more as a paramilitary organisation than as an informal collection of radicalised young settlers. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz, and politicians from across Israel's political spectrum, including members of both the coalition and the opposition, swiftly condemned the attacks on soldiers. Yet the violent activities of these settler groups against Palestinians have continued for years with little political or legal consequence. State-sanctioned violence The rise of settler militias is not a new phenomenon. During the May 2021 clashes between Jews and Palestinians, coordinated settler militias carried out simultaneous assaults on Palestinian villages across the West Bank. These militias do not operate spontaneously but rather operate within the framework of an organization that includes several hundred-armed men. Israeli army detains Palestinian family members after settlers attack village Read More » What has changed is the apparent formalisation of their operations under the current Israeli government. Since Bezalel Smotrich, who also serves as Israel's finance minister, assumed control of the Civil Administration in the West Bank, these militias appear to be operating in closer alignment with a broader strategic objective: expanding Israeli control over Area C, which makes up about 60 per cent of the West Bank, effectively obstructing the possibility of establishing a future Palestinian state. A central feature of this strategy is the proliferation of so-called 'shepherds' farms', a settlement model that allows settlers to seize large tracts of land without formal government approval and with little, if any, military resistance. These farms typically begin with just a few settlers, sometimes as few as two or three, but they quickly spread across wide areas. Through these outposts, small groups of settlers, often linked to the Hilltop Youth, manage to assert control over vast stretches of land. The settlers who run these farms routinely intimidate and forcibly expel Palestinian herders and residents, creating de facto zones of exclusion without official annexation. For Palestinians living in the West Bank, the violence and dispossession inflicted by these militias are neither new nor isolated. But the recent attacks on Israeli soldiers have briefly drawn attention to these groups, exposing a reality Palestinians have long endured: that parts of the settler movement are evolving into organised, militarised forces pursuing a territorial agenda with increasing impunity. Post-Smotrich strategy Under Smotrich's leadership, many of these farms are now being legalised. At the same time, attacks (seemingly deliberate and coordinated) are increasing against Palestinian shepherds and Bedouin communities east of the Alon Road, particularly in the Jordan Valley. The purpose of these attacks appears to be clear: to drive Palestinians from the area. Recently, the settler militias have begun pushing westward from the Alon Road, moving closer to the Nablus and Ramallah regions. It remains uncertain whether the militias are receiving direct orders from Smotrich himself, but their objectives are evidently aligned. Both are working towards a shared goal: to consolidate Israeli control over Area C and to clear it of its Palestinian inhabitants. Smotrich's apparent aim is to ensure that these annexed areas are as devoid of Palestinians as possible, reducing the number who would have any claim to citizenship An example of this tacit cooperation emerged in the aftermath of last Friday's events. Smotrich declared that shooting at Jews constituted 'a red line' that must not be crossed, stating unequivocally that it was forbidden to shoot at Jews. Settlers had initially claimed that a 14-year-old boy had been shot by Israeli soldiers, though it later emerged that the boy had been injured while throwing stones at soldiers in an entirely different location. Nevertheless, Smotrich chose to side with the Hilltop Youth's version of events. The attack on the military base the following day forced the finance minister to publicly condemn the settlers' actions, but the shared strategic interests between the two sides remain intact. The increased pace of attacks against Palestinians in recent times may stem from the Israeli finance minister's concern that the government will collapse or that he will not be a member of the next government. In most polls, Smotrich's Religious Zionist Party does not pass the electoral threshold. UK and allies sanction Israeli ministers Ben Gvir and Smotrich over Gaza comments Read More » Smotrich is one of the most sophisticated and sharp politicians in Israel and has a developed historical consciousness. The aggressive expansion by armed settler militias across the West Bank is not simply a series of isolated attacks; it is part of Smotrich's broader effort to establish irreversible 'facts on the ground' in the event of a change in government. He may well be correct in his calculation. It is highly unlikely that any future Israeli government will move to dismantle shepherds' farms or outposts in the West Bank, and even less likely that it would act to restore displaced Palestinians to the lands from which they were expelled. Smotrich may also have in mind the contours of the Trump administration's Middle East plan, which he has publicly criticised. According to that plan, much of Area C would be annexed to Israel, while a fragmented Palestinian state would exist as disconnected enclaves throughout the West Bank. Smotrich's apparent aim is to ensure that these annexed areas are as devoid of Palestinians as possible, reducing the number of Palestinians who would have any claim to citizenship or full rights within the Israeli state. The ongoing war in Gaza is also shaping the thinking of settler militias, as well as bolstering Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. The war has created a permissive environment that seems to embolden these actors to accelerate their agenda in the West Bank. Settler fantasy Settlers have long harboured the ambition of emptying the West Bank of its Palestinian population. For years, this aspiration was broadly understood, even among settlers themselves, as an unattainable fantasy. However, the near-total destruction of Gaza and the growing perception that the ethnic cleansing of the Gaza Strip has, at least semi-explicitly, become one of the war aims of Prime Minister Netanyahu, have emboldened settler groups to believe that such a scenario might also be possible in the West Bank. Israeli forces kill three Palestinians in violent West Bank settler assault Read More » Ethnic cleansing in the West Bank would, however, present far greater logistical and political challenges than in Gaza. Unlike Gaza, the West Bank features a more intertwined population of Palestinians and settlers. Additionally, Jordan (positioned just across the border) would almost certainly respond with far less tolerance than Egypt in the event of any Israeli attempt to forcibly expel hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into its territory. Nevertheless, some of the methods currently employed by the Israeli military in Gaza appear to be gradually making their way to the West Bank, albeit on a smaller scale. In recent months, large sections of the Tulkarm and Jenin refugee camps, along with other areas, have been bulldozed, and hundreds of homes have been demolished by Israeli forces. The images emerging from these sites increasingly resemble those coming out of Gaza. Even if the West Bank is not yet experiencing a full replication of the Gaza campaign, what is unfolding may well be seen as preparation for a more extensive effort by Smotrich and the settler militias to 'clear' key areas of Palestinians. A race between thugs Last Friday's attack on the Israeli army by settler militias marked a rare deviation from the unwritten rules that have long governed the relationship between settlers and the military in the West Bank. This breach prompted some criticism within Israel. However, such criticism is unlikely to have any meaningful impact on the militias' operations or on the broader trajectory of settlement expansion and Palestinian displacement. Defence Minister Israel Katz, who recently revoked the use of administrative detention orders against Jewish settlers (thereby weakening the enforcement powers of the Shin Bet's Jewish Division) has now announced the formation of a new police unit tasked with addressing settler violence. Israel's Ben Gvir calls for aid to be bombed amid siege on Gaza Read More » According to Katz, the Israeli army and the Shin Bet will be involved in some capacity, but the unit will be led primarily by police officers. In practice, however, there is little doubt that the appointment of the unit's commander will require the approval of Ben Gvir, who oversees the police and is widely seen as an ally of the settler movement. As such, the creation of this unit appears less a genuine effort to curb settler violence and more a political manoeuvre to manage public perception. It is likely aimed at deflecting criticism rather than seriously addressing the ongoing attacks. Public assaults on Israeli soldiers are broadly unpopular within Israel, and even Israelis from the centre and centre right oppose settler violence against Palestinians. These factors pose a potential threat to the political project advanced by Smotrich and the settler militias. Yet despite these internal tensions, the project is unlikely to be fundamentally derailed. Smotrich and Ben Gvir, who serve as the settler movement's most prominent representatives within the Knesset, are now deeply embedded within the core of the Israeli government, making it difficult to envisage any scenario in which this agenda is meaningfully challenged from within. Still, as is often the case within violent movements of this nature, there may be more extreme elements who perceive Smotrich and Ben Gvir as too moderate or insufficiently committed to the cause. But this is ultimately a competition among factions driven by escalating radicalism. It is a race between thugs.
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Gaza ceasefire: Trump expects Hamas decision in 24 hours on 'final' peace proposal
US President Donald Trump said on Friday it would probably be known in 24 hours whether the Palestinian group Hamas has agreed to accept what he has called a " final proposal" for an Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza. The president also said he had spoken to Saudi Arabia about expanding the Abraham Accords, the deal on normalisation of ties that his administration negotiated between Israel and some Gulf countries during his first term. Trump said on Tuesday Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, during which the parties will work to end the war. He was asked on Friday if Hamas had agreed to the latest ceasefire deal framework, and said: "We'll see what happens, we are going to know over the next 24 hours." A source close to Hamas said on Thursday the Islamist group sought guarantees that the new US-backed ceasefire proposal would lead to the end of Israel's war in Gaza. Two Israeli officials said those details were still being worked out. Dozens of Palestinians were killed on Thursday in Israeli strikes, according to Gaza authorities. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, Israeli tallies show. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's subsequent military assault has killed over 56,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations. A previous two month ceasefire ended when Israeli strikes killed more than 400 Palestinians on March 18. Trump earlier this year proposed a U.S. takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights experts, the U.N. and Palestinians as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." Trump made the comments on the Abraham Accords when asked about U.S. media reporting late on Thursday that he had met Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman at the White House. "It's one of the things we talked about," Trump said. "I think a lot of people are going to be joining the Abraham accords," he added, citing the predicted expansion to the damage faced by Iran from recent U.S. and Israeli strikes. Axios reported that after the meeting with Trump, the Saudi official spoke on the phone with Abdolrahim Mousavi, chief of Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces. Trump's meeting with the Saudi official came ahead of a visit to Washington next week by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
